• 제목/요약/키워드: Review committee

검색결과 411건 처리시간 0.023초

Prevalence of obesity and overweight in Iranian children aged less than 5 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Mansori, Kamyar;Khateri, Sorour;Moradi, Yousef;Khazaei, Zaher;Mirzaei, Hossein;Hanis, Shiva Mansouri;Aliabadi, Mehran Asadi;Ranjbaran, Mehdi;Varse, Fatemeh;Parang, Serveh
    • Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
    • /
    • 제62권6호
    • /
    • pp.206-212
    • /
    • 2019
  • Purpose: The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of childhood obesity and overweight in Iranian children under 5 years of age using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, CINHAL, and the Iranian databases, including Scientific Information Database (www.sid.ir), Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (Irandoc.ac.ir), Iranmedex (www.iranmedex.com), and Magiran (www.magiran.com), for all articles published between January 1989 and August 2017. Sources of heterogeneity were determined using subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Results: Six articles were ultimately included in the meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence, based on which the prevalence of obesity and overweight were estimated to be 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-10%) and 9% (95% CI, 7%-11%), respectively. The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the prevalence of obesity in boys and girls was 9% (95% CI, 6%-13%) and 7% (95% CI, 4-10%), respectively, and the prevalence of overweight in boys and girls was 10% (95% CI, 5%-15%) and 9% (95% CI, 5%-13%), respectively. Conclusion: Despite high heterogeneity among the results of the articles included in the meta-analysis, the prevalence of obesity and overweight is higher in Iranian children under 5 years of age. Therefore, parents and the health system must pay more attention to the lifestyle, nutritional habits, and physical activity of these children.

의료인문학 교육과정 개편에 대한 Kern의 교육과정개발 모델에 근거한 비판적 성찰 (A Critical Review of Medical Humanities Education Curriculum Development Based on Kern's Curriculum Development Model)

  • 이이레;안신기
    • 의학교육논단
    • /
    • 제22권3호
    • /
    • pp.173-188
    • /
    • 2020
  • Medical humanities education (MHE) is as essential as basic medical sciences and clinical medicine education. Despite the importance of MHE, MHE curriculum development (CD) has proven to be challenging. This critical review examines the MHE CD at one medical school. The critical review methodology was developed based on Kern's six step CD model to systematically examine the CD of "Doctoring and Medical Humanities (DMH)" at the Yonsei University College of Medicine. Five review questions were developed related to (1) necessity, (2) direction and purpose, (3) design, (4) operation, and (5) evaluation of CD based on Kern's model. The review showed that the process of DMH CD mapped to components of Kern's model. The DMH curriculum content selected was closely related to medical practice and aimed to combine the acquisition of understanding and skills by designing a student-participatory curriculum based on clinical cases. Assessment methods that emphasized students' reflections were actively introduced in the evaluation section. Since the regular committee for DMH continued the work of the special ad hoc committees for DMH CD, the CD was effectively completed. However, the planning and evaluation functions and responsibilities of the DMH committee need to be strengthened. Despite the apparent limitations, the fact that students showed a high satisfaction rate and preferred small group discussions based on clinical cases has significant implications in the instructional design of MHE, where changes in self-awareness and attitude are more important than the acquisition of information. It is necessary to systematically review and study students' reflection results produced by the changed assessment methods and to develop assessment indicators for MHE that reflect the achievements of the MHE competencies of students.

ADR을 활용한 스포츠사건의 해결에 관한 고찰 - 중재제도를 중심으로 - (A Study of Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sports Dispute - Focus on Arbitration System -)

  • 김용길
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제21권1호
    • /
    • pp.109-129
    • /
    • 2011
  • In the approaching 21th century, the outstanding development in international sports has established arbitration as the preferred form of dispute resolution. Because the form of sports dispute becomes more complicated and varied with the quantitative increase of them, the reasonable and rapid settlement of them must be the important problem. The Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR) as the settlement of sports dispute is regarded as the one of effective dispute resolution method and merits notice. The Korean Sports Arbitration Committee has been established for dispute resolution between athletes and the clubs or alike. Now, We must review and complements the rules of the Korean Sports Arbitration Committee in order to be a representative system of domestic sports dispute arbitration that settle the sports dispute practically and efficiently.

  • PDF

정부조직 개편의 메커니즘에 관한 시론 (Structural Mechanism of Governmental Reformulation)

  • 김동환
    • 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
    • /
    • 제14권3호
    • /
    • pp.5-23
    • /
    • 2013
  • This paper explores a structural mechanism underlying governmental reformulation. Studying cases of governmental reorganizations occurred during past 60 years, this paper constructs a causal map containing a principle of small government, an integrative organization of the government, and a committee organization. A positive feedback loop linking these factors produces an increase in the number of the committee organization in the government. Also, this paper points out that there might be a hidden self fullfilling prophecy that reinforces the principle of small government. Open experiment toward a big government is proposed to overcome the vicious circle of small government curse.

  • PDF

부산대학교 의과대학 코호트 구축과 운영 사례 (Cohort Establishment and Operation at Pusan National University School of Medicine)

  • 윤소정;이상엽;임선주
    • 의학교육논단
    • /
    • 제25권2호
    • /
    • pp.119-125
    • /
    • 2023
  • Pusan National University School of Medicine (PNUSOM) began analyzing the cohort of pre-medical students admitted in 2015 and has been conducting purposeful analyses for the past 3 years. The aim of this paper is to introduce the process of cohort establishment, cohort composition, and the utilization of cohort analysis results. PNUSOM did not initially form a cohort with a purpose or through a systematic process, but was able to collect longitudinal data on students through the establishment of a Medical Education Information System and an organization that supports medical education. Cohort construction at our university is different in terms of a clear orientation toward research questions, flexibility in cohort composition, and subsequent guideline supplementation. We investigated the relevance of admission factors, performance improvements, satisfaction with the educational environment, and promotion and failure rate in undergraduate students, as well as performance levels and career paths in graduates. The results were presented to the Admissions Committee, Curriculum Committee, Learning Outcomes Committee, and Student Guidance Committee to be used as a basis for innovations and improvements in education. Since cohort studies require long-term efforts, it is necessary to ensure the efficiency of data collection for graduate cohorts, as well as the validity and ethics of the study.

전라남도 지명업무의 개선방안 연구 (A Study on Improvement of JeollaNamdo Geographic Name Task)

  • 오창석
    • 지적과 국토정보
    • /
    • 제47권2호
    • /
    • pp.201-212
    • /
    • 2017
  • 본 연구는 전라남도 지명업무의 현황을 분석 문제점을 파악하고 이에 대한 개선방안을 제시하기위한 것이다. 이를 위해 연구 대상인 지명의 정의 등 이론적 고찰을 시행하고 현행 지명업무의 조직 현황, 지명위원회 조례 제정 및 정비 현황, 지명위원회 운영 현황 등을 분석하여 지명업무에 대한 문제점을 도출하고 개선방안을 제시하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 지명업무 담당조직 및 담당 공무원의 전문성 개선방안으로 지명업무 담당부서의 일원화, 담당공무원의 전문화, 지명업무 관련 교육 및 교재 개발 등을 제시하고, 둘째, 지명위원회 조례 및 운영에 대한 개선방안으로 지명위원회 조례 제정 및 정비 적극 추진, 지명위원회 구성 및 운영 지도 감독, 지명의 제정 및 변경 절차의 간소화, 지명법 제정 등을 제시 하였다.

한국 내 인터넷 거버넌스 형성과 인터넷주소에 관한 법률 (Suggestion on Korean Internet governance system by multi stakeholder approach and Introduction of Korean Internet address law)

  • 윤복남
    • 인터넷정보학회지
    • /
    • 제14권3호
    • /
    • pp.68-77
    • /
    • 2013
  • This article consists of 3 parts. Part I is multi stakeholder approach on Internet governance system. Part II is analysis of the Korean Internet governance system. In this part, I explain relevant laws in Korea, including Korean Internet Address Resources Act. Part III is my suggestion on Korean Internet governance system using a multi stakeholder approach. First of all, the keyword of the Internet governance system is decision making process: that is, consensus based versus top-down approach. Then who are major players in Internet governance in national level? Government, or Private sectors such as business and civil society. Korean legal system for Internet governance shows a top-down decision making process. Major players are the government (that is, Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning) and KISA affiliated with the government. Other players include Internet Address Policy Committee, Korea Internet Governance Alliance, and NGOs. The key statute for Internet governance in Korea is Internet Address Resources Act of 2004. Articles 3 and 5 require the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning to take a proactive role in Internet governance. The government shall consult with the Internet Address Policy Deliberation Committee for Internet governance. Yet this Committee is established under the control of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. All members of this Committee are also commissioned or nominated by the Chairman of the Ministry. Meanwhile, there are also non-official organizations, including Sub-committee on Address & Infrastructure of Korea Internet Governance Alliance. I suggest to reform decision making process of Korean Internet governance system based on BOTTOM-UP process for CONSENSUS BASED DECISION. My suggested system includes the following: (1) The government hands over a major role in Internet governance to INDEPENDENT Internet policy organization. And the government participates in such organization as ONE of the players. (2) Nomination of this committee member must be bottom-up process for a genuine multi-stakeholder model including civil society, commercial organization, end-users and experts. (3) The government should establish plan for supporting the private sector's international activity on the long-term basis.

  • PDF

턴키.대안입찰 설계심의 및 평가제도의 개선방안 (Improvement of Procedures on Design Deliberation System for Turnkey and Alternative-Design Contracts)

  • 박홍태;이양규
    • 한국철도학회논문집
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.31-38
    • /
    • 2011
  • 2004년 1월부터 2009년 12월까지 국내 턴키 대안입찰의 적격자 선정방식은 통합설계심의방식에서 기술위원회와 평가위원회를 이원화한 공개토론방식을 도입 운영하여 왔으나, 제도 운영상에서 나타난 문제점을 개선하기 위하여 정부는 2010년 현재 설계심의분과위원회를 크게 중앙, 지방, 특별 설계자문위원회의 분과위원으로 구성하여 운영하고 있다. 그러나 평가과정의 객관성 및 적정성 확보, 대형건설업체의 수주편중현상 그리고 과다경쟁 등이 여전히 문제점으로 제시되고 있다. 이에 이 연구는 일괄 대안입찰공사 설계심의 및 평가에 대한 투명성과 공정성을 제고하고 업무담당자의 심의 평가업무를 효율적으로 운영할 수 있도록 하였다. 또한 기존 공개토론방식의 턴키 대안입찰제도가 건설산업에 미치는 영향, 심의 운영제도, 설계심의 개선사항 및 운영상의 문제점을 분석하여 개선 보완하여 제시하였다.

한국의 병원 구조에서 QA 팀을 어떻게 구성하고 운영 할 것인가? (How to organize and manage hospital QA according to specific structures of a general hospital in Korea?)

  • 양웅석
    • 한국의료질향상학회지
    • /
    • 제4권2호
    • /
    • pp.280-284
    • /
    • 1997
  • 한국의 병원 구조에서는 우리 실정에 맞게 QA를 조직하고 운영하여야 한다. QA 실은 원장 직속 기구로 두고, QA 위원회의 자문을 받는다. 의료 보험과 QA의 근원지 국가들에서는 보험 심사실이 없고, 심사 업무를 QA실에서 하고 있다. 심사실과 QA 실이 이미 따로 설치된 병원에서는 이들을 통합하고, QA 실을 신설하고자 하는 병원은 심사실을 QA 실로 전환시킨다. 심사 간호사회가 이를 적극적으로 찬성하고, 이를 수용 할 준비를 하고 있다.

  • PDF

중소규모 공동주택의 건축심의 한계점 분석 (Analysis on Limitations of Municipal Architectural Review Procedure for Small and Medium-sized Apartments)

  • 안지호;구본길;류종우;허영기
    • 한국건설관리학회논문집
    • /
    • 제23권6호
    • /
    • pp.15-20
    • /
    • 2022
  • 국내 1인 가구 수가 2000년대 이후로 증가함에 따라, 건축심의 대상인 중소규모 신축 공동주택 사업도 함께 증가세를 보이고 있다. 더불어, 건축심의제도 도입이후 최근까지도 건축심의제도의 한계점에 대한 많은 의견이 연구를 통해 지속적으로 제기되어 왔다. 이에 본 연구는 두 집단의 전문가를 대상으로 종합적 설문조사 및 인터뷰를 진행하였고, 해당 결과를 통해 B도시의 건축심의의 한계점에 대한 AHP 분석을 진행하였다. 총 27개 응답으로 구성된 설문결과는 '건축심의 제도의 한계', '심의위원의 한계' 및 '건축심의 행정절차의 불합리함' 의 순서로 심각성이 크다고 분석되었다. 또한, 건축직 공무원과 건축사의 그룹별 응답결과 항목별 중요도에 대한 인식에 차이가 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 연구결과는 건축행정 절차 중 심의제도 개선에 대한 초기연구자료로서 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.