• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.79-83
• /
• 1999

• 대한두경부종양학회지
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2021

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using X-rays is a standard technique implemented for treating head and neck cancer (HN C). Compared to 3D conformal RT, IMRT can significantly reduce the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues by using a highly conformal dose to the tumor. Proton therapy is a type of RT that uses positively charged particles named protons. Proton therapy has a unique energy deposit (i.e., Bragg peak) and greater biological effectiveness than that of therapy using X-rays. These inherent properties of proton therapy make the technique advantageous for HNC treatment. Recently, advanced techniques such as intensity-modulated proton therapy have further decreased the dose to normal organs with a higher conformal dose to the tumor. The usage of proton therapy for HNC is becoming widespread as the number of operational proton therapy centers has increased worldwide. This paper aims to present the current clinical evidence of proton therapy utility to HNC clinicians through a literature review. It also discusses the challenges associated with proton therapy and prospective development of the technique.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.305-313
• /
• 1997

목적 : 비인두강종양의 방사선치료의 결과를 후향적으로 분석하여 방사선치료의 효과와 예후인자를 분석하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 1989년부터 1996년까지 서울중앙병원에서 비인두강종양으로 진단받고 근치적 방사선치료를 시행한 56명을 대상으로 하였다 병기별로 보면 T1, T2, T3, T4가 각각 17, 10, 11,18명이었고 NO, Nl, N2, N3가 각각 11명, 27명, 4명, 14명이었다. 근치적 방사선치료만 시행한 환자는 28명, 유로항암요법을 병용한 환자는 7명, 매주 CDDP 항암요법을 병용한 환자는 21명이었다. 조사량은 6940-8620cGy였고 중앙값은 7440cGy였다. 외부방사선조사 60Gy이후 원발병소에 대한 부가적치료는 1명은 외부방사선조사, 46명은 강내조사, 9명은 삼차원 입체조형치료를 받았다. 추적관찰기간은 5-92개월이었고 중앙값은 34개월이었다. 결과 : 전치료후 47명은 완전관해, 8명은 부분관해, 1명은 무반응을 보여줬다. 5년 생존율은 $67.2\%$, 5년 무병생존율은 $53.6\%$이였다. 국소재발이 생긴 시기는 6-45개월(중앙값: 14개월)이었으며 전신적 전이가 생긴 시기는 3-49개월(중앙값: 16개월)이었다. 8명의 환자$(14.3\%)$에서 국소재발이 발생하였고 18명의 환자$(32.1\%)$에서 전신적 전이가 발생하였다. T3나 T4 환자 중 강내조사를 받은 20명중 4명$(20\%)$예서 원발병소에 재발이 있었고 삼차원 입체조형치료를 받은 9명중 1명$(11\%)$에서 원발병소에 재발이 발생하였다. 전신적 전이는 골전이가 가장 많았다. 생존율에 영향을 주는 예후인자로는 생존율에는 KPS(P=0.005), 방사선치료에 대한 반응(P=0.0001)이 통계학적으로 유의하였고 무병생존율에는 KPS(P=0.02), 방사선치료에 대한 반응(P=0.005)이 통계학적으로 유의하였다. 국소재발과 관련있는 예후인자는 없었으며 원격전이와 관련있는 예후인자는 Nstage(P=0.06), 병기(P=0.06)가 다소 의미있는 경향을 보였고, 방사선치료에 대한 반응(P=0.009)이 통계학적으로 유의하였다. 결론 : 비인두강종양에서 방사선치료로 5년생존율 $67.2\%$이었고 5년 무병생존율은 $53.6\%$이였다. 재발양상을 보면 국소재발보다는 전신적 전이율이 높음을 알 수 있었고 항암치료와의 병용은 관련이 없었다. T3 혹은 T4 병기에서 삼차원 입체조형치료를 받은 환자에 대해서는 앞으로 추적 관찰이 좀 더 필요할 것으로 생각된다. 앞으로 국소관해를 높이기 위한 방사선치료방법과 전신적 전이율의 감소를 위한 항암요법에 관한 연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 1995

Purpose : Surgery is the treatment of choice for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. For patients who are medically unable to tolerate a surgical resection or who refuse surgery, radiation therapy is an acceptable alternative. A retrospective analysis of Patients with stage I non-samll cell lung cancer treated with curative radiation therapy was performed to determine the results of curative radiation therapy and patterns of failure, and to identify factors that may influence survival. Materials and Methods : From 1986 through 1993, 39 Patients with T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer were treated with curative radiation therapy at department of radiation oncology, Kyungpook national university hospital. All Patients were not candidates for surgical resection because of either Patient refusal (16 patients), poor pulmonary function (12 patients), old age (7 patients), Poor Performance (2 patients) or coexisting medical disease (2 patients). Median age of patients was 67 years. Histologic cell type was squamous cell carcinoma in 36, adenocarcinoma in 1, large cell carcinoma in 1 and mucoepidermoid carcinoma in 1. All patients were treated with megavoltage irradiation and radiation dose ranged from 5000cgy to 6150cGy with a median dose of 6000cGy. The median follow-up was 17 months with a range of 4 to 82 months, Survival was measured from the date therapy initiated. Results : The overall survival rate for entire Patients was $40.6\%$ at 2 years and $27.7\%$ at 3 years, with a median survival time of 21 months. The disease-free survival at 2 and 3 years was $51.7\%$ and $25.8\%$, respectively. Of evaluable 20 patients with complete response, 15 patients were considered to have failed. Of these, 13 patients showed local failure and 2 patients failed distantly. Response to treatment (p=0.0001), tumor size (p=0.0019) and age (p=0.0247) were favorably associated with overall survival. Only age was predictive for disease-free survival (p = 0.0452). Conclusion : Radiation therapy is an effective treatment for small (less than 3cm) tumors, and should be offered as an alternative to surgery in elderly or infirm patients. Since local failure is the prominent Patterns of relapse, potential methods to improve local control with radiation therapy are discussed.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.113-119
• /
• 1999

목적 :국소적으로 진행된 자궁경부암 환자에서 저용량의 Cisplatin을 방사선민감제로 사용하여 방사선치료와 동시 치료하였을 때의 급성독성 평가와 초기 반응을 평가하기 위하여 연구를 시행하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 본 연구는 1996년 12월부터 1999년 1월까지 FIGO Stage IIB-IIIB의 진행된 자궁경부암 환자 38명을 대상으로 하였다. 16명은 자궁경부암의 크기가 4cm이상인 환자들로 방사선 치료와 저용량의 cisplatin을 매일 동시에 치료 하였으며, 나머지 환자에선 방사선 치료 단독으로 치료하였다. 방사선치료는 골반강에 외부 방사선치료로 4500 cGy(3060cGy시행이후 midline block 추가), 자궁옅조직으로 침범이 있는 경우에는 자궁옅조직으로 방사선치료 부위를 줄여 900-1000cGy 추가치료를 시행하였고, 내부치료는 Ir$^{192}$고선량 근접 치료기(micro-Selectron HDR)로 6극회의 강 내조사(point "A"에 3000 to 3500cGy, 500cGy/fx, 2회/week)를 시행하였다. 방사선치료와 저용량의 cisplatin을 동시에 사용한 군에서는 방사선치료 첫날부터 방사선치료 20일째 되는 날까지 저용량의 cisplatin 10mg을 방사선치료 30분 전에 투여하였다. 급성독성의 평가는 expanded common toxicity criteria of the NCI Clinical Trial을 이용하였다. 초기반응의 평가는 방사선치료 종료이후 최소 4주이상의 추적조사가 가능한 사람들을 대상으로 시행되었다. 결과 : 급성독성 평가는 전체 38명에서 평가 가능하였으며, 방사선치료와 저용량의 cisplatin을 병용한 군에서 16명 중 6명(37.5$\%$)에서, 방사선 단독으로 치료한 군에서는 22명중 1명(6.2$\%$)에서 3등급 이상의 백혈구감소를 보였으며, 통계학적으로 의미있는 차이를 보였다 (P=0.030). 3등급 이상의 급성 위장간 독성은 저용량의 cisplatin을 병용한 군에서만 4명이 있었으나, 2-3일의 치료 중단이후 증상이 완화되어서 치료를 계속할 수 있었으며, 치료중 5kg이상의 체중감소는 방사선치료와 저용량의 cisplatin을 병용한 군에서는 16명중 3명(18.7$\%$), 방사선 단독으로 치료한 군에서는 22명중 2명(9.1$\%$)으로 통계학적으로 의미 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다(P=0.63). 초기반응은 추적조사가 4주 이상 가능하였던 34명을 대상으로 하였으며, 저용량의 cisplatin을 병용한 군에서 14명중 11명 (78$\%$), 방사선 단독으로 치료 군에서 20명중 16명(80$\%$)으로 통계학적으로는 의미있는 차이를 보이지 않았다(P=0.126). 결론 :국소 진행된 자궁경부암에 대한 방사선치료와 저용량의 cisplatin 병용요법 치료시 3등급 이상의 백혈구감소가 방사선치료 단독으로 치료시보다 많았으나, 1주 이하의 치료중단 이후 치료를 계속 할 수 있었으며, 4등급 이상의 백혈구감소와 치료에 의한 사망은 없었다. 초기반응에 대한 평가는 저용량의 cisplatin병용 군에서 4cm 이상의 자궁경부암을 가진 환자가 많음에도 불구하고 양 군에서 비슷한 정도의 반응을 보였으므로 진행된 자궁경부암의 치료에서 저용량의 cisplatin을 방사선민감제로 사용하여 치료결과의 향상을 기대할 수 있게 되었다. 따라서 저용량의 clsplatin과 방사선치료를 병용요법하였을 때의 치료효과를 판정하기 위해서는 phase III study가 필요하다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.361-367
• /
• 1991

This paper on the status of radiotherapy machine and related facilities, clinical activities and radiation safety management is based on the statistical data which collected through the questionaire sent to a total number of 37 hospitals holding the Department of Therapeutic Radiology in Korea. It is true that the quality of instruments installed in the hospitals equal to that of the instrument in the industrialized conuntries' hospitals. But the clinical specialists and physicists who can utilize such instruments fall short of the required number, which might be a main factor in hindering the development of therapeutic radiology of Korea. According to the nation-wide cancer statistics, we can estimate the number of annual cancer patients as 45,000 to 50,000. As a result, probably around 25,000 should receive radiation therapy. It is expected that in the future the number of cancer patients to whom radiation therapy should be applied will become twice as much as that of the cancer patients in 1990. Given such a condition, the problem facing the Korean Society of Therapeutic Radiology now is to increase the number of medical doctors and physicists.

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2003년도 Proceedings of the Convention of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea Vol.2-1
• /
• pp.54-55
• /
• 2003

Radiation therapy has been used for the cancer treatment externally or internally. The external radiation therapy has been widely used, but for the lack of its selectivity it requires strong radiation dose causing the dermal irritation and radiation effect of the normal tissues or organs. So we investigate non-clinical and clinical studies of “Milican inj.”, in which chitosan is chelated with 166-Holmium, as an anticancer agent for internal radiation therapy. (omitted)

• 대한두경부종양학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.30-35
• /
• 2002

Objective: To determine the effectiveness and toxicity of chemoradiation therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparing with radiation therapy alone. Materials and Methods: Between October 1989 and July 2000, One hundred eleven patients with newly diagnosed and histologically proven nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-five patients were treated with radiation therapy alone (Group I) and 66 patients were treated with radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin (Group II). Cisplatin was administered once a week, on the first day of each successive week of treatment, starting on day 1 of radiation therapy and given as a intravenous bolus at a dose of $20mg/m^2$ of body-surface area. Radiation therapy was given in doses of 1.8Gy, once a day, 5 days per week with 4MV or 6 MV photons. Initial field was received a total of 60Gy and a primary tumor and enlarged lymph nodes were boosted with an high dose intracavitory brachytherapy and 3D conformal therapy. Results: The complete response rate was 86.7% in Group I, and was 90.9% in Group II. The 5 year overall survival rate for Group I was 60% and for Group II was 45% (p=0.2520). The 5 year disease free survival rate was 52% versus 45%, respectively (p=0.7507). The median follow up was 44 months versus 34 months, respectively. Conclusion: Analysis of the III patients showed no significant difference in disease free survival and overall survival in two treatment group. This retrospective analysis did not demonstrate benefit with concurrent chemoradiation using cisplatin at a dose of $20mg/m^2$ of body-surface area in treatment result than radiation alone.

• International Journal of Contents
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.74-77
• /
• 2012

Radiation has been an effective tool for treating cancer for a long time. Radiation therapy induces DNA damage within cancer cells and destroys their ability to reproduce. Radiation therapy is often combined with other treatments, like surgery and chemotherapy. Here, we describe the effects of radiation and histone deacetylase inhibitor, Trichostain A, on cell cycle regulation in hepatoma cells. The combinatorial treatment of radiation and Trichostain A induced cell cycle arrest and thereby increasing the hepatoma cell death. Furthermore, the regulatory effects of radiation and Trichostatin A on cell cycle applied in cell type specifically. These results suggest that the treatment of radiation and Trichostatin A may play a central role in hepatoma cell death and might be a good remedy to improve the efficiency of radiation therapy.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.156-159
• /
• 2016

Although carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 is a useful tumor marker for pancreatic cancer, it can also become elevated from a variety of benign and malignant conditions. Herein we describe an unusual presentation of elevated CA 19-9 in an asymptomatic patient who had previously undergone adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for resected early stage pancreatic cancer. The rise in CA 19-9 might be due to delayed radiation-induced inflammation related to previous intra-abdominal radiation therapy with or without radiation recall induced by gemcitabine. After treatment with corticosteroids the CA 19-9 level decreased to normal, and the patient has not developed any evidence of recurrent cancer to date.