• 정보처리학회논문지:컴퓨터 및 통신 시스템
• /
• 제7권7호
• /
• pp.165-174
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 R&D 프로세스 성숙도가 제품개발 성과에 미치는 영향을 확인하고, 그 과정에서 R&D 프로젝트 성과가 R&D 프로세스 성숙도와 제품개발 성과의 관계에서 매개역할을 하는지 검증하는데 목적이 있다. 본 연구목적의 실증분석을 위해 설정된 연구가설을 검증하기 위하여 R&D 업무를 수행하는 55개의 기업과 공공기관을 대상으로 R&D 업무와 관련된 131명의 인원에게 설문을 수집 분석하였다. 실증분석 방법으로 변수들과 요인들에 대한 신뢰성 및 타당성 검증, 상관관계분석을 진행하였고 R&D 프로세스 성숙도가 제품개발 성과에 미치는 영향에 대해서는 단순 다중회귀분석, R&D 프로젝트 성과의 매개효과에 대해서는 매개회귀분석을 SPSS 통계프로그램으로 분석하였다. 분석결과 R&D 프로세스 성숙도가 높을수록 제품개발 성과와 R&D 프로젝트 성과가 높아지는 것으로 나타났고, R&D 프로젝트 성과는 부분매개효과가 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 연구결과를 기반으로 기업에서는 제품개발 성과를 향상시키기 위해서는 체계적인 R&D 프로세스의 수립과 운영이 필요하고, 기업 특성에 적합한 프로젝트관리 방법론의 개발이 중요하다는 결론을 제시하였다. 본 연구결과에서 정리된 R&D 프로세스 성숙도 및 R&D 프로젝트 성과, 제품개발 성과에 대한 실증분석 결과를 기업 경영에 실질적인 R&D 관리 방법론으로 활용한다면 기업의 연구개발 성과 향상에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제43권2호
• /
• pp.90-99
• /
• 2017

As the importance of R&D has increased, there have been various efforts to apply the quality management principles and tools to R&D activities in order to manage them effectively. The R&D sector differs from other value chains, so it may be difficult to apply quality management without proper considerations of R&D characteristics. This study describes the characteristics of R&D as high uncertainty and risk, diversity of R&D types, project-based activities, importance of strategic goals and business models, and importance of intangible assets. Three well accepted R&D quality management models are reviewed and implications for quality management and R&D characteristics are summarized. Based on these findings, the management targets of R&D quality management are classified into management level (organization, project) and management focus (process, output), and the contexts of R&D quality management are classified into R&D type (research, development) and market/customer requirement clarity (fluid, specific), and appropriate R&D quality management activities in each situations have been suggested.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.123-144
• /
• 1994

This Study has empirically examined the relationship between the role of R & D project leaders and their team performance using data from 87 project teams in 6 R & d organizations. The results reveal that : 1) R & D project leaders play five different roles for performing their jobs-strategic plannar, team builder, gatekeeper, expert and champion : 2) all but the champion role of leaders are positively associated with project team performance unless they have too short team tenure to materialize their role efforts : 3) However, the relationship between the role of leaders and project team performance varies according to characteristics of their team and project tasks. More specifically, it becomes more important for leaders to focus on gatekeeping and championing roles as their team gats older. Team building role of leaders is more important for higher performance of relatively certain R & D projects, while for uncertain R & D projects gatekeeping role appears to be more important.

• 시스템엔지니어링학술지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.61-68
• /
• 2010

Generally EPC management system was simply management concept through the normal S/W. Our LNG Plant R&D Center wanted to the excellent management system from the S/W. So We developed the R&D management S/W and EPC management S/W Built in the Microsoft Project Server. Our system made to the customer Requirements. It was just User Interface protocol. But User Interface has more Weak position, because it makes from the MS Project Servers. Ms Projector server make easy to treat the project on the WBS. EPC parts mixed WBS and normally Ms SQL Database. It has very complicated Structures. Now We planed to make the general Database and Ms Project Server, It' means to the S/W Developer and Schedule Manager ability. We will successfully integrate R&D management system and EPC system and other softwares.

• 대한기계학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한기계학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회논문집C
• /
• pp.357-360
• /
• 2001

Design Engineering Group, LG Production engineering Research Center has been developing The Integrated Design Environment enabling engineering design task with ease, speedy and accurate for several years targeting the design departments in LG Electronics. $ezDesign^{(R)}$ System is consisted by Engineering Database Management, Engineering Knowledge Management, 3D Design Application, Design Evaluation Method and Project Management. Engineering Database Management manage the design information effectively. Engineering Knowledge Management takes control of design knowledge from design engineering activity systematically. It is possible for the engineering designer to utilized 3D CAD easily by 3D Design Application. Design Evaluation Method can evaluate several design alternatives synthetically. In Project management System, Designer can simulate the project schedule and cost. In this report, We will introduce how design process can be innovated by way of $ezDesign^{(R)}$ System.

• 시스템엔지니어링학술지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.26-33
• /
• 2017

Pyro project, one of complex project, is now under research and development. To manage this kind project successfully, it is essential to apply the processes of technical management (TM) based on systems engineering (SE) and project management (PM). In this paper, the project management processes from ISO-21500 standard, PMBOK guide, and PRINCE2 guide were reviewed, and then some common PM for the large national R&D project were selected. An integrated technical management and project management frame work was finally established and suggested for Pyro project.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 2010

In R&D project evaluation, we consider the technical couple. And we set technology modular alternatives, after evaluating technical group based on technical couple. So we solve the problem extracted from existing research of R&D project evaluation. We use Conjoint Analysis(CA) for this research. CA is usually used for confirming customers' preference. However we use it for researchers' preference in the side of technology. This research is followed by the next 4 steps. (1) Hierarchical model of goal technology (2) Composition model of modular alternatives (3) Evaluation model of modular alternatives (4) Setting model of technology modular alternatives.

• 시스템엔지니어링학술지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.79-90
• /
• 2023

In principle, R&D of general weapons systems are led by companies or government-funded organizations. In terms of project execution, the defense R&D planning system was reorganized to conduct SE-based project management by integrating the naval ship project execution procedure into the general weapon system R&D procedure. The development progress was confirmed according to the guide for SE application of DAPA, and a technical review meeting was proposed to enter into the each next phase in the R&D process. This paper focuses on improvement for technical review in terms of technical management based on system engineering for R&D mounted weapon systems and the naval surface ship project in preliminary design and detailed design. So, the improvement direction for reviewing the entry criteria for the R&D weapons systems of the naval ship and mounted weapons is proposed.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제13권8호
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 2015

최근에 소프트웨어(SW) 융복합 시대를 맞아 SW품질관리의 중요성에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 품질관리전담기관의 SW품질활동관리 적정성을 객관적으로 평가 할 수 있는 방안에 대하여 기존의 품질 활동관리 적정성 사례를 기반으로 새로운 적정성 평가 방안을 제안하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 다음과 같이 연구 목적을 세 가지로 설정한다. 첫째, 기존의 국가 SW R&D 프로젝트의 SW품질활동관리 적정성 평가의 문제점을 도출하고 분석한다. 둘째, 기존의 SW품질활동관리 적정성 평가에 대한 문제점을 극복할 수 있는 새로운 적정성 평가 방법을 제안한다. 셋째, 새로운 적정성 평가 방법을 WBS(World Best Software) 프로젝트를 대상으로 적용해서 그 가능성과 효과성에 대하여 살펴본다. 본 연구에서 새롭게 제시한 국가 SW R&D 품질활동관리 적정성 평가 프레임워크를 대형 SW R&D 프로젝트인 WBS 프로젝트의 2개 과제에 실질적으로 적용해봄으로써 새로운 품질활동관리 적정성 평가 프레임워크의 효과성과 실무 적용 가능성을 입증하였다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.69-88
• /
• 2010

This paper explores the determinants of the innovation impact of publicly funded R&D projects along three broad dimensions, namely project, firm and market-related factors. In addition to these factors we examine the attributes of the research result per se and aspects of the commercialization process. The observations from empirical and qualitative analyses are based on R&D projects funded by the Fifth and Sixth Research Framework Programmes of the European Union. Firm size, prior experience, innovation culture, the nature of the project itself, explicit intension to commercialize, consortium management and strategy are the factors with the strongest effect on project success, defined in terms of product/process innovation and/or technical knowledge creation. The paper provides important implications for the organization, objectives, and management of public programmes that fund R&D and for project and participant selection.