Browse > Article

Development and Application of Technology Modular Alternatives Setting Model for Evaluating R&D Project Effectively  

Kwon, Cheol-Shin (R&D Engineering, Department of System Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kim, Ki-Chan (R&D Engineering, Department of System Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Ahn, Ki-Hyun (Korea Semiconductor Industry Association R&D management Team)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers / v.36, no.1, 2010 , pp. 22-31 More about this Journal
Abstract
In R&D project evaluation, we consider the technical couple. And we set technology modular alternatives, after evaluating technical group based on technical couple. So we solve the problem extracted from existing research of R&D project evaluation. We use Conjoint Analysis(CA) for this research. CA is usually used for confirming customers' preference. However we use it for researchers' preference in the side of technology. This research is followed by the next 4 steps. (1) Hierarchical model of goal technology (2) Composition model of modular alternatives (3) Evaluation model of modular alternatives (4) Setting model of technology modular alternatives.
Keywords
Technology Modular Alternaruves; Alternatives Setting Model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mok, Hak Soo and Yang, Tae Il (2002), Systemization of module design of a product, Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers/Korea Management Engineers Society Spring Joint Scholarship Conference, 625-628.
2 Yoo, Pil Hwa (1994), Modern Marketing Research, Bubmoonsa, 123- 134.
3 Kwon, Cheol Shin and Jung, Kil Hwan (1994), Design of the modified AHP model for strategic evaluation of technology alternatives, Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers Fall Joint Scholarship Conference.
4 Kalish, Shlomo and Paul Nelson (1991), A comparison of ranking, rating and reservation price measurement in conjoint analysis, Marketing Letters, 2(4), 327-335.   DOI
5 Cho and Kwon (2004), Hierarchies with dependence of technological alternatives: A cross-impact hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 420-432.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New-York.
7 Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New-York.
8 Saaty, T. L. (1986), Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 32(7).
9 Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G. (1980), Hierarchical Analysis of Behaviour in Competition: Prediction in Chess, Behavior Science, 25.