• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.41-59
• /
• 2007

This paper analyzes interactive activities of foreign R&D centers operating in Korea. Interactive activities refer to collaborative R&D activities, R&D outsourcing, and formation of communities between foreign R&D centers and Korean firms and institutions. Active interactions between foreign R&D centers and their Korean partners (Korean firms and universities, research institutes etc.) are essential in promoting spillover effects from foreign R&D centers. Using the survey of 76 foreign R&D centers operating in Korea, this paper found the intensity of interplay between foreign R&D centers and the Korean firms and institutions was not so high. And the partners of foreign R&D centers with the mission of finding new technologies in Korea are mainly customers rather than universities and research institutes. This result is markedly different from previous studies focused on the cases of western countries, where the partners of foreign R&D centers that have the mission of finding new technologies were mainly local universities and research institutes.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권12호
• /
• pp.3797-3803
• /
• 2009

우리나라 IT산업성장에서 혁신잠재력과 혁신수행능력이 중요한 역할을 했다. 글로벌 R&D센터는 IT산업의 혁신의 중요한 요소이다. IT산업에서 혁신환경에 대한 글로벌 R&D센터구조를 파악하기 위하여 R&D센터구성원과 정책입안자 각 50명씩 현장설문을 실시하였다. 본 실증분석결과를 보면 단기적으로 R&D정책은 연구영역과 시장역역의 인식차이를 해소하는 촉진자로서 역할이 중요하며, 중기적으로 R&D정책은 개발과 시장의 영격의 인식차이를 좁히는 조정자로 그리고 장기적으로는 기술능력과 시장의 확산 자로서 역할이 중요함을 보여준다. IT 정책입안자는 R&D정책에서 글로벌 R&D센터를 혁신체계의 요소로 활용하는 것이 요구된다.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.111-121
• /
• 2011

Multinational Corporations (MNCs) are establishing globally-distributed R&D centers around the world. Firms can overcome resource constraints and achieve superior innovative performance not only by using internal resources but also acquiring knowledge from oversea R&D centers. This paper explores the key factors that have been cited as significant influences on the ability to transfer knowledge, an important area of knowledge management of MNCs. Also, we identify the emerging outcomes in terms of R&D transfer and for the education, employment, and retention of knowledge works in MNCs. The result will be helpful for both MNC's managers and governments' decision makers with respect to R&D centers.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.55-83
• /
• 1995

This paper addresses three central decision-making problems frequently encountered in developing evaluation checklists for ex-post evaluation of R&D projects at private R&D centers: 1) what kind of evaluation elements and factors should be included in the evaluation forms\ulcorner 2) how much weight should be assigned to each evaluation factor and element\ulcorner and 3) could the same evaluation elements and factors with weights be applied all the project type(research, development, and engineering)\ulcorner To answer these questions, we identified the evaluation elements/factors based on the review of relevant literature and measured the perceptions of researchers, R&D managers, and top managements of the three private R&D centers to get the information about the importance levels of the elements and the weights of the factors for each of the three project types. The findings include that 1) all the evaluation elements derived from the literature exhibited high importance levels, and 2) the importance levels of the elements and the weights of the factors were quite varied along the project types. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings for ex-post evaluation of R&D projects are discussed.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.255-283
• /
• 2007

우리나라는 u-IT839 전략을 추진하는 과정에서 막대한 자본 및 인력의 투입에 따른 높은 위험과 불확실한 성공가능성을 극복하기 위한 방안으로 국제 전략적 제휴를 적극 추진하였고 2006년 말까지 다국적 IT기업의 R&D센터 15개를 유치하는데 성공하였다. 그러나 아직 유치성과를 논의하기에는 이른 시점이지만, 비판적 시각과 우려의 소리가 들리고 있다. 즉 유치기관의 활용에 대한 전략적인 고려 없이 양 중심으로 유치하여 R&D 성과가 초기의 기대에 못 미친다는 것이다. 이러한 현실적인 문제에 당면하여 본 연구에서는 해외 R&D 센터를 유치하는 국가의 입장에서 유치효과를 극대화하기 위한 분석 모형을 개발하고, 이를 정보통신기술분야에 적용하여 주요 기술분야별 및 세부기술별 적합한 유치 전략을 제안하고자 한다. 기존의 많은 연구들이 다국적기업의 입장에서 수행된 점을 고려한다면 본 연구가 갖는 의의가 크다고 할 것이다. 본 연구의 결과는 세계 각국의 R&D 센터 유치경쟁이 격화되고 있는 상황에서 선택과 집중을 가능하게 하고 유치한 R&D센터 간 시너지를 추구함으로써 유치성과를 향상시키는데 활용될 것으로 기대한다. 끝으로 본 연구의 의의와 한계점, 그리고 향후 연구방향을 논의한다.

• 한국소음진동공학회논문집
• /
• 제22권10호
• /
• pp.932-939
• /
• 2012

Recently, data centers are being established because IT and telecommunication industries are growing. The data centers have to install emergency generators to prevent unexpected shutdown of the electrical power supply. When the data centers are located in the densely populated urban area, the operating noise of the emergency generators can be a cause of people's complaints. In this case, it is necessary to establish effective countermeasure by noise & vibration specialists. To achieve this, noise reduction measure using noise measurement data and 3D noise analysis method have been employed in this study.

• 국제지역연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.309-340
• /
• 2009

다국적기업은 새로운 제조 및 기술을 협업에 의해 개발하기 위하여 점차로 전 세계에 걸쳐 연구개발(R&D)센터를 설치하고 있다. 이러한 범세계적인 현상은 기업의 글로벌 전략과 맞물려 신흥 공업국을 포함하는 추세다. 이는 다국적기업의 전략과 신흥공업국의 개발전략 양자에 있어 더욱 더 그 중요성이 커지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 다국적기업의 R&D이전에 따른 운영활동의 구체적인 요인들을 살펴보고 다국적기업들이 다른 국가에 비해 R&D센터 설립을 선호하는 중국과 한국에서의 R&D센터 운영을 둘러싼 각 요인을 비교 분석한다. 본 연구에서는 다국적기업의 R&D이전과 관련된 8가지 차원을 통하여 특히 입지결정 요인, 시장특성, 정부의 지원정책, R&D네트워킹에 있어 중국과 한국이 큰 차이를 보이고 있음을 밝혀냈다. 또한 다국적기업의 R&D센터 운영과 관련하여 한국보다는 중국이 긍정적인 요인이 많은 것도 비교연구로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 다국적기업의 R&D센터 운영자들과 한국의 다국적기업의 유치와 관련된 정책결정자들에게 많은 시사점을 제공 할 수 있을 것이다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 1993

• 한국지역사회생활과학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.39-49
• /
• 2014

This study identifies the necessity and importance of innovation in rural communities and highlights the role of rural revitalization support centers in facilitating the diffusion of community innovation. The study provides a literature review and employs the survey method to verify the arguments. There is an urgent need for rural communities to be distinct, attractive, and competitive in the wake of globalization. It is clear that they must recognize the need to facilitate innovation under growing trends toward trade liberalization, environment-oriented life styles, diversified consumer needs, and a knowledge-based society. The results provide support for the legitimacy of establishing rural revitalization support centers to help community leaders and local stakeholders develop their communities. More specifically, rural communities should employ R&D outcomes from diverse fields and capacity building by community members, leaders, and local governments to foster sustainable growth by overcoming limitations in spatial access and resources. The results suggest that rural revitalization support centers can be established as intermediary organizations that can be operated to facilitate community innovation in rural development. In addition, these centers should play key roles such as empowering communities, facilitating region-specific rural development policies, motivating R&D applications for rural development, encouraging rural development networks. Further, close attention should be paid to facilitate mutual learning by expanding networks and interactions between these centers.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.96-108
• /
• 2013

Egypt has been known as the light house of science and innovation not only in the Middle East but to the world across ages. Recently, there have been many ups and downs that positioned Egypt in a lower rank that it actually deserves according to its long history. This review entitles the current condition of science, technology and innovation in Egypt and the consequent setting up of best practices of science and technology parks (STPs) experiences. Egypt's science, technology and innovation (STI) system is highly centralized and dominated by the public sector, with R&D happening mostly in state-run universities and research centers supervised by the Ministry of Higher Education and Ministry of Scientific Research. R&D indicators state that Egypt ranking is 40th worldwide for the published articles (around 10,000 papers in 2011), while the numbers of issued patents (350 local and 50 international in 2011) is still far beyond expected. STPs in Egypt are addressed in this review by three examples; smart village in Cairo, Investment zone in Borg El-Arab City and Technology Valley in Ismailia. The three models are discussed in details and a suggested road map for developing more STPs is estimated.