• 제목/요약/키워드: Quantitative Criteria

검색결과 781건 처리시간 0.033초

Decision-Making on Incoterms 2020 of Automotive Parts Manufacturers in Thailand

  • SURARAKSA, Juthathip;AMCHANG, Chompoonut;SAWATWONG, Nutcharin
    • The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
    • /
    • 제7권10호
    • /
    • pp.461-470
    • /
    • 2020
  • The objective of this research is to examine the factors affecting the decision-making of International Commercial Terms (Incoterms) of automotive parts manufacturers in Thailand. This mixed method study applied qualitative and quantitative research methods and utilized the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to prioritize the significance of the factors. By an in-depth literature review and expert interview, four main criteria were identified. These criteria include Operating costs, Cooperation and bargaining power, Knowledge and understanding and Operation duration then main criteria divided into fifteen sub-criteria. The common Incoterms, Ex Works (EXW), Free On Board (FOB), Free Carrier (FCA), and Cost, Insurance and Freight (CIF), were determined as alternatives to the incoterms through a preliminary survey. The results revealed that the operating costs were the most important factor for the company. Moreover, it was discovered that this was consistent with the priority of the secondary factors, which included the annual budget for the transportation expenses and product value at one time. The respondents' perspective suggested that FCA was the most appropriate Incoterms for international trade for a company. The findings of this research suggest a hierarchy model for organizations to prioritize the significant factors in order to make a decision on the most appropriate Incoterms.

연근해 수소추진선박의 벙커링 안전구역 설정에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Establishment of Bunkering Safety Zone for Hydrogen Propulsion Ships in Coastal Area)

  • 전성하;정석영;남동
    • 대한조선학회논문집
    • /
    • 제60권6호
    • /
    • pp.433-440
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study aims to establish safety zones for bunkering operations of hydrogen propulsion ships in coastal areas through risk assessment and evaluate their validity. Using a 350 kW-class ferry operating in Busan Port as the subject of analysis, with quantitative risk assessment based on accident consequence and frequency analysis, along with a social risk assessment considering population density. The results of the risk assessment indicate that all scenarios were within acceptable risk criteria and ALARP region. The most critical accident scenarios involve complete hose rupture during bunkering, resulting in jet flames (Frequency: 2.76E-06, Fatalities: 9.81) and vapor cloud explosions (Frequency: 1.33E-08, Fatalities: 14.24). For the recommended safety zone criteria in the 6% hose cross-sectional area leakage scenario, It could be appropriate criteria considering overall risk level and safety zones criteria for hydrogen vehicle refueling stations. This research contributes to establishing safety zone for bunkering operations of hydrogen propulsion ships through risk assessment and provides valuable technical guidelines.

국방품질경영체제(DQMS) 정량평가모델 개발 및 제도화 방안 연구 (A Study on the Development and Institutionalization Plan of a Quantitative Evaluation Model of Defense Quality Management System)

  • 김영현;하진식
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제50권2호
    • /
    • pp.183-197
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a quantitative evaluation model for the defense quality management system and suggest institutionalization plans. To this end, another existing evaluation model was reviewed and analyzed to develop a quantitative evaluation model applicable to military institutions. Methods: In this study, in order to establish a DQMS quantitative evaluation model, a military product quality level survey model and a defense quality model operated in the defense field were analyzed. In addition, evaluation models and indicators were analyzed by investigating evaluation models operated by other institutions and private sectors. Results: As a result of the study, the total score of the DQMS model was 1,000 points, 600 points for maturity level indicators and 400 points for operation performance indicators, and the evaluation items consisted of 7 major categories and 25 middle categories. The maturity level index 600 points are 70 points for organizational situation, 60 points for leadership, 40 points for planning, 100 points for support, 180 points for operation, 90 points for performance evaluation, and 60 points for improvement. Conclusion: It will be easy to quantify and evaluate the operating level of DQMS certified companies through the application of the DQMS quantitative evaluation model and evaluation criteria presented in this study. As a result, it will be possible to grasp the level of quality management system and the areas of improvement, and the overall level of improvement can be expected by inducing voluntary improvement activities through sharing of best practices and identifying improvement cases.

학문 목적 한국어교육의 연구 유형 분류와 연구 방법의 동향 분석 (A Classification of Research Types and Trend Analysis of Research Methods in Korean for Academic Purposes)

  • 나원주;주현하;김영규
    • 한국어교육
    • /
    • 제28권1호
    • /
    • pp.79-111
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study is a trend analysis study that discusses the current status and directions of research methods of KAP research. The existing trend ana lysis studies dealing with research methods have problems in that the classification criteria of the studies used are rough and different from each other, rendering comparison between studies being difficult, and do not comprehensively cover research methods of diversified KAP research. Therefore, this study examined the research methods of KAP research from a critical point of view and suggested a set of classification criteria and an analysis framework that can be used consistently in classification and analysis of future KAP research methods. Based on the theoretical background of second language studies and applied linguistics, this study revised and supplemented Brown (2015)'s research method types and selected 289 journals and theses/dissertations from 2012 to 2016 and classified them into a new analysis framework. The primary and secondary studies, which are the major categories, were 219 and 70, respectively, so it was confirmed that there were much more primary studies. The primary studies then were subdivided into 128 qualitative research studies, 142 survey research studies, and 23 quantitative research studies, pointing to the trend that survey and qualitative research methods were preferred. In the qualitative research approaches, there were 21 action research studies, which were used the most. In addition, such qualitative research approaches as case studies and narrative inquiries which were difficult to find in the past, have gradually increased, confirming that the diversification of research methods is becoming common. However, there were still many studies that did not explicitly put forward research questions and there were many studies that did not report reliability and effect sizes in quantitative research. Of the 23 quantitative studies, only 50% reported reliability, and only three reported effect sizes. In order to enable systematic reviews (meta-analysis) of quantitative research and expect quality improvement of research in future KAP research, reporting of quantitative research should be done more systematically. This study is meaningful in that a systematic and detailed analysis framework was proposed to classify various research methods in the future and that the problems and directions for improvement of the KAP research methods were discussed through the analysis of the research trend of the KAP studies for the last 5 years.

델파이 기법을 적용한 항만 계류시설 유지보수 투자우선순위 결정 기준 개발 (The Development of Investment Prioritization Criteria for the Mooring Facilities's Maintenance by the Delphi Study)

  • 김용희;이영호;송재준;이상윤
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.515-524
    • /
    • 2014
  • 본 논문은 국내 노후 항만 계류시설에 대한 유지보수수요가 급격히 증가함에 따라 한정된 예산을 적기에 투입함으로써 시설물의 상태를 관리수준 이상으로 유지하기 위한 기준을 수립하기 위한 연구이다. 한정된 예산을 적재적소에 투입하기 위하여 현장조사 상태평가 점수와 정량적 평가지표 및 관리주체의 의견을 수렴하는 전국단위의 네트워크 레벨 투자우선순위 결정 기준을 개발하였다. 또한, 개발된 기준의 타당성 및 적정성을 검증하기 위하여 항만 계류시설 유지보수 및 관련 전문가를 대상으로 2차에 걸친 델파이 기법(Delphi Method) 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문결과를 분석하여 각 항목에 대한 합리적인 기준을 도출하였다. 평가기준의 객관성을 높이기 위하여 항만 계류시설의 물동량 데이터를 분석한 결과를 바탕으로 제안한 '연간물동량/연장'을 활용하여 항만 계류시설의 활용도를 평가하는 기준을 제시하였다. 본 논문에서 제시한 항만 계류시설 유지보수 투자우선순위 결정 기준은 향후 전국단위의 항만 계류시설 유지보수 예산계획에 적용하여 보다 효율적이고 합리적인 유지보수 예산분배에 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

환경영향평가중 삼림생태계 평가기법개발(II) : 녹지의 자연성평가 (Development of Forest Ecosystem Assessment Technique of Environmental Impact Assessment(II) : Nature Evaluation of Vegetation)

  • 최송현;이경재
    • 환경영향평가
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.33-47
    • /
    • 1996
  • To select the criteria, literature review was made in the quantitative case of conservation biology, foreign country's EIA and domestic ecology. Among them, a few factors was extracted. To applicate the criteria to domestic forest ecosystem, expert opinion survey was executed to the ecologist. The results were summarized as follows; 1. Classification of sites was made of land use system which is related to forest ecosystem or forest conservation. Sites are divided into 3 categories which are nature preservation area, seminature preservation area and urbanized area. Evaluation criteria is consisted of rarity and naturalness. 2. Each area had different criteria composition according to the site characteristics. Criteria of nature preservation area is rarity in the broad sense (distribution pattern of vegetation), vegetation size, successional stage and depth of organic matters. Those of seminature preservation area are rarity in the broad sense (distribution area of vegetation), vegetation size, successional stage, diameter at breath height and depth of organic matters. And those of urbanized area are vegetation distribution in area, successional stage, age of forest and diameter of breath height. The basic data of criterion was gathered by field survey. 3. Evaluation index and total naturalness index was obtained by adding the each criterion. It is made up of two categories-rarity and naturalness. TNi is divided into 3 grades. Grade I is more than 70% for TNi, grade IT is 50~70%, and grade III is below 50%. According to the each grade, permitted action and facilities were suggested.. This research just focuses on the evaluation of vegetation quality and the assessment results do not directly judge conservation or development. To make better evaluation criteria, various fields of forest ecosystem-geological or physical nature environment and fauna ecosystem etc. -will be added wholly to this research.

  • PDF

이용자측면의 고속도로 휴게소 서비스 평가지표 개발 (A Development of the Service Evaluation Criteria for the Expressway Service Areas on the Side of Users)

  • 원제무;진원영
    • 대한토목학회논문집
    • /
    • 제32권5D호
    • /
    • pp.421-427
    • /
    • 2012
  • 본 연구는 고속도로 휴게시설 이용자측면을 평가할 수 있는 평가지표를 개발하여 고속도로 노선별 휴게소의 서비스를 평가하고 향후 모니터링 시 활용하고자 하였다. 평가지표 개발방향은 휴게소 이용자들의 필요성, 시대여건 반영, 종합 평가지표 구축, 관련연구 검토와 같이 크게 4가지 측면에서 고속도로 휴게소 평가지표 개발방향을 정립한 후 기존문헌 검토 및 전문가 심층면접 토론(FGI)을 통해 1차 평가항목을 선정하고, 평가지표의 적합성 검증을 통해 최종평가지표를 도출하였다. 이용자 설문인 AHP분석을 통하여 도출된 평가항목 중요도 분석결과는 환경시설 측면(0.35), 위치 측면(0.33), 위생적 측면(0.32) 순으로 가중치가 도출되었다. 본 연구결과에서도 알 수 있듯이 정량적, 정성적인 인자가 함께 고려되어 실질적인 고속도로 휴게소 평가가 가능하고, 스파이더맵을 통한 고속도로 휴게소별 맞춤형 휴게소 향상 방향 제시 및 향후 모니터링을 위한 기초연구가 될 수 있을 것이다.

랜덤하중하의 피로균열진전 데이터를 이용한 ${\Delta}K_{eff}$ 평가법의 정량적 평가 (A Quantitative Evaluation of ${\Delta}K_{eff}$ Estimation Methods Based on Random Loading Crack Growth Data.)

  • 구자석;송지호;강재윤
    • 대한기계학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 대한기계학회 2004년도 추계학술대회
    • /
    • pp.208-213
    • /
    • 2004
  • Methods for estimation of the effective stress intensity factor range (${\Delta}K_{eff}$) are evaluated for narrow and wide band random loading crack growth test data of 2024-T351 aluminum alloy. Three methods of determining $K_{op}$, visual measurement, ASTM offset compliance method, and the neural network method proposed by Kang and Song, and three methods of estimating ${\Delta}K_{eff}$, conventional, the 2/PI0 and 2/PI methods proposed by Donald and Paris, are compared in a quantitative manner by using the results of fatigue crack growth life prediction under random loading. For all $K_{op}$ determination methods discussed, the 2/PI0 and 2/PI methods of estimating ${\Delta}K_{eff}$ provide better results than conventional method for narrow and wide band random loading data.

  • PDF

부식을 고려한 콘크리트 교량의 최대 균열폭 제어 (Maximum Crack Width Control in Concrete Bridges Affected By Corrosion)

  • 조태준
    • 한국안전학회지
    • /
    • 제21권3호
    • /
    • pp.114-121
    • /
    • 2006
  • As one of the serviceability limit states, the prediction and control of crack width in reinforced concrete bridges or PSC bridges are very important for the design of durable structures. However, the current bridge design specifications do not provide quantitative information for the prediction and control of crack width affected by the initiation and propagation of corrosion. Considering life span of concrete bridges, an improved control equation about the crack width affected by time-dependent general corrosion is proposed. The developed corrosion and crack width control models can be used for the design and the maintenance of prestressed and non-prestressed reinforcements by varying time, w/c, cover depth, and geometries of the sections. It can also help the rational criteria for the quantitative management and the prediction of remaining life of concrete structures.

Quantitative Definitions of Collaborative Research Fields in Science and Engineering

  • Schwartz, Mathew;Park, Kwisun;Lee, Sung-Jong
    • Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
    • /
    • 제5권3호
    • /
    • pp.251-274
    • /
    • 2016
  • Practical methodology for categorizing collaborative disciplines or research in a quantitative manner is presented by developing a Correlation Matrix of Major Disciplines (CMMD) using bibliometric data collected between 2009 and 2014. First, 21 major disciplines in science and engineering are defined based on journal publication frequency. Second, major disciplines using a comparing discipline correlation matrix is created and correlation score using CMMD is calculated based on an analyzer function that is given to the matrix elements. Third, a correlation between the major disciplines and 14 research fields using CMMD is calculated for validation. Collaborative researches are classified into three groups by partially accepting the definition of pluri-discipline from peer review manual, European Science Foundation, inner-discipline, inter-discipline and cross-discipline. Applying simple categorization criteria identifies three groups of collaborative research and also those results can be visualized. Overall, the proposed methodology supports the categorization for each research field.