Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.2.183

A Study on the Development and Institutionalization Plan of a Quantitative Evaluation Model of Defense Quality Management System  

Kim, Young Hyun (Development Quality Research Bureau, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
Ha, Jin Shik (Korea Standards Management Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management / v.50, no.2, 2022 , pp. 183-197 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a quantitative evaluation model for the defense quality management system and suggest institutionalization plans. To this end, another existing evaluation model was reviewed and analyzed to develop a quantitative evaluation model applicable to military institutions. Methods: In this study, in order to establish a DQMS quantitative evaluation model, a military product quality level survey model and a defense quality model operated in the defense field were analyzed. In addition, evaluation models and indicators were analyzed by investigating evaluation models operated by other institutions and private sectors. Results: As a result of the study, the total score of the DQMS model was 1,000 points, 600 points for maturity level indicators and 400 points for operation performance indicators, and the evaluation items consisted of 7 major categories and 25 middle categories. The maturity level index 600 points are 70 points for organizational situation, 60 points for leadership, 40 points for planning, 100 points for support, 180 points for operation, 90 points for performance evaluation, and 60 points for improvement. Conclusion: It will be easy to quantify and evaluate the operating level of DQMS certified companies through the application of the DQMS quantitative evaluation model and evaluation criteria presented in this study. As a result, it will be possible to grasp the level of quality management system and the areas of improvement, and the overall level of improvement can be expected by inducing voluntary improvement activities through sharing of best practices and identifying improvement cases.
Keywords
DQMS Performance; Quantitative Evaluation Model; The Standard of Maturity; AHP;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cha Myeongseon, Jang Joongsoon. 2009. Maturity Evaluation of Quality Management System in Semiconductor Companies. Journal of the Korea Institute of Plant Engineering 14(4):35-44.
2 Ha Jinsik. 2014. Research Report on the Operation of Domestic and Overseas Quality Certification System Technical Report of DTaQ.
3 International Organization for Standardization(ISO). 2018. ISO 9004:2018-Quality management-Quality of an organization-Guidance to achieve sustained success. ISO.
4 International Organization for Standardization(ISO). 2021. ISO 10014:2021-Quality management systems-Managing an organization for quality result-Guidance for realizing financial and economic benefits. ISO.
5 Jeon Changkwon. 1999. A Study on the Evaluation of Quality Management Activities of Domestic Military Companies using AHP Techniques. Graduate School of Korea University.
6 Kim Pankyu, Lee Donguk. 2008. A Study on the Status and Development Direction of Defense Quality Management System. Korean Industrial Economic Association 31(1):151-173.
7 Park Donghoon. 2007. An Empirical Study on the Performance of Defense Quality Management System and Certification Outcomes for Military Contractors. MS Thesis, Department of Information and Industrial Engineering, Graduate School, Seoul National University of Science and Technology.
8 Park Jongman, Yang Junmo, Kim Younggil. 2020. An Empirical Study on the Importance of Standard for DQMS Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Applied Reliability 20(3):271-276.   DOI
9 Park Junhyun, Kim Minwoo. 2019. A Study on the Development in Evaluation Indices and Model of the Quality level for Manufacturers of Military Suppliers. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 20(10):107-116.   DOI
10 Saaty TL. 1991. How to Make Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 24.
11 Gal Jieun. 2011. Study on prioritizing methods for quality improvement of global strategic product. Graduate School of Industrial Sungkyunkwan University.
12 Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ). 2020. Defense Quality System Certification Service Regulation. Revised on October 15. http://www.dtaq.re.kr.
13 Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ). 2021. Military Supplies Quality Management Basic Regulation. Revised on September 28. http://www.dtaq.re.kr.
14 Kang Jinwoo, Kim Youngsoo. 2013. A Study on the AHP-Based Company Rating System. Technical Report of DTaQ.