• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.129-142
• /
• 2007

The main purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the local agenda 21 of Daegu City based on the evaluation model and propose important measures to solve its problems and improve the limitations. As a whole, the evaluation result of the local agenda 21 of Daegu City showed very low score, only 151 points out of 500 points and revealed it was below the level in all three domains of making process, designed content, and evaluation of implementation. The making process got only score below the half in all large indicators of under-standing, driving, and rationality. This unsystematic and irrational process inevitably resulted in ambiguous and proclamatory content mainly expressing willingness to do. This fact means that the local agenda 21 of Daegu City has not served as the comprehensive local environmental plan containing visions, policies, ends and means. It did not suggest evaluation system and institutionalization of evaluation. These results of evaluation suggested that the existing local agenda 21 of Daegu City was neither useful nor effective and thus the totally new local agenda 21 should be prepared. Finally, important measures in making process, designed content and evaluation of implementation were proposed for the remaking.

• 한국소성가공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국소성가공학회 1998년도 춘계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.113-116
• /
• 1998

A derivative based approach to process optimal design in powder forging is presented. The process model, the formulation for process optimal design, and the schemes for the evaluation of the design sensitivity, and an iterative procedure for the optimization are described in detail. The validity of the schemes for the evaluation of the design sensitivity is examined by performing numerical tests. The capability of the proposed approach to deal with diverse process parameters and objective functions is demonstrated through applications to some selected process design problems.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.109-132
• /
• 2007

In the paper, we builds an advanced new credit evaluation system for Micro-small sized individual firms through appropriate evaluation factors derived by logistic regression analysis for credit evaluation model using in Korean Federation of Credit Guarantee Foundations, and the weights of factors computed by analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Industry characteristics are more applied to previous credit model with the additional the financial fact-information and non-financial judgement-information. Our results show that the financial factors have become more important than three years ago. Moreover, in the non-financial factors, the fact-information factors consider more important then the judgement-information factors. A new credit evaluation system is developed based on this credit evaluation model.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.97-115
• /
• 1998

This study aims to develop the methodology based on the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) of evaluation for commercial paper. commercial paper is the ma product of merchant banks. commercial paper evaluation is annually performed by the credit-evaluation agency. Credit evaluation is performed by the informal judgemental system, which has potential to induce serious inconsistencies in decision-making. We present an objective scoring model which does not suffer from the weakness of the subjective judgement system. The model used is illustrated by analyzing the commercial paper evaluation for the 3 motor-companies(H, K and S motors).

• 한국신뢰성학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국신뢰성학회 2000년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.375-384
• /
• 2000

The main objective of this paper to purpose a evaluating methods of process capability measures for exponential distributed quality characteristics. For correctly evaluating process capability , the first thing , exponential data is applied the Lilliefors test statistic to the null hypothesis of nornality. The next, exponential parameters is estimated in terms of MLE , ME , MME and then evaluated , respectively , process capability index based on exponential curved (Ιe) proposed by in this study and process capability indices based on Pearson system and Johnson system.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.79-85
• /
• 2005

In this paper, we dealt with substantial asset analysis methodology applied to two-dimensional asset classification and qualitative evaluation method according to the business process. Most of the existent risk analysis methodology and tools presented classification by asset type and physical evaluation by a quantitative method. We focused our research on qualitative evaluation with 2-dimensional asset classification. It converts from quantitative asset value with purchase cost, recovery and exchange cost, etc. to qualitative evaluation considering specific factors related to the business process. In the first phase, we classified the IT assets into tangible and intangible assets, including human and information data asset, and evaluated their value. Then, we converted the quantitative asset value to the qualitative asset value using a conversion standard table. In the second phase, we reclassified the assets using 2-dimensional classification factors reflecting the business process, and applied weight to the first evaluation results. This method is to consider the organization characteristics, IT asset structure scheme and business process. Therefore, we can evaluate the concrete and substantial asset value corresponding to the organization business process, even if they are the same asset type.

• 실천공학교육논문지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.513-522
• /
• 2022

강의평가는 대학교육의 질을 향상시키고 수업을 개선하는데 유용한 정보로 활용된다. 본 연구는 강의평가를 구성하는 요인을 탐색하고자 선행연구와 FGI를 통해 구성요인을 도출하고 계층분석법(AHP: Analytic Hierarchy Process)을 통해 요인간 상대적 중요도 및 우선순위를 파악하였다. 이를 위해 5개의 구성요인과 15개의 평가항목을 도출하였다. 강의평가 요인개발의 전문성과 공정성을 확보하기 위해 학생과 교원을 대상으로 설문을 실시하여 총 20부의 유효한 자료를 수집하였고, 일치도 검증을 완료한 자료를 토대로 각 평가항목의 가중치를 산출하였다. 분석 결과 강의평가 요인구성에 있어서 학생은 수업 내용, 수업 방법, 수업 운영, 수업 평가, 수업 계획 순으로, 교원은 수업 내용, 수업 운영, 수업 방법, 수업 평가, 수업 계획 순으로 중요하다고 평가하였다. 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 대학교육의 질 관리 차원에서 강의평가의 효율성과 신뢰성 향상을 위해 다양한 분석과 연구가 있기를 기대한다.

• 한국지능시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국퍼지및지능시스템학회 1993년도 Fifth International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress 93
• /
• pp.1082-1085
• /
• 1993

In this paper, we notice the fact that a human learning process is characterized by a process under a natural language environment, and discuss an approach of learning based on indirect linguistic instructions. An instruction is interpreted through some meaning elements and each trend. Fuzzy evaluation rule are constructed for the searched meaning elements of the given instruction, and the performance of a system to be learned is improved by the evaluation rules. In this paper, we propose a framework of learning based on indirect linguistic instruction based learning using fuzzy theory: FULLINS(FUzzy-Learning based on Linguistic IN-Struction). The validity of FULLINS is shown by applying it to helicopter flight control.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.369-393
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 과정 중심 평가가 학교현장에서 자연스럽게 도입되기 위해 과정 중심 평가와 기존 수행평가와의 공통점을 찾아보고 과정 중심 평가가 수학교과 인성 함양에 효과가 있음을 알아보고자 함이 목적이다. 선행연구를 분석하여 본 연구에서는 과정 중심 평가의 의미를 다양한 수행과제 및 평가방법을 도입하여 수업 중 실시하며 즉각적인 피드백을 통해 학생들의 성장 및 수업의 질을 향상시킬 수 있는 평가로 정의하였으며, 수학교과인성이란 수학수업시간에 쉽게 발현되고 함양되기 쉬운 인성요인을 뜻한다. 이에, 기하와 벡터 과목을 중심으로 과정 중심 평가의 실현 가능성에 대해 사례를 제시하고, 과정 중심 평가를 통한 수학교과 인성 함양에 효과가 있는지 알아보고자 하였다. 수학교과인성함양을 꾀하는 4가지의 과정 중심 평가(수학실험, 논리, 증명, 의사소통)을 인문계 고등학교 3학년 101명을 대상으로 2019년 3월부터 6월까지 수행한 후 수학교과 인성검사지를 활용하여 지수를 측정하였다. 대응변인 t-검정을 사용하여 결과를 분석한 결과 본 연구에서 실시한 과정 중심 평가는 수학교과 인성함양에 유의미한 효과가 있음이 나타났다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.41-53
• /
• 2017

Recently, due to the economic recession and increase of ITO (IT Outsourcing), bidding in software industry has been recognized as more competitive and the importance of software bid evaluation for corporate selection is being increased. This study aims to analyze and prioritize influential factors in the software bid evaluation criteria which is adopted as the main evaluation model of national software businesses by Ministry of Science. The priority was developed by AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) through pair-wise comparison. For the analysis, this study developed analysis model for AHP and conducted survey of experts who have work experience for more than 10 years in the IT industry. As the result of analysis, weighted factors in the evaluation criteria were deduced and differences of priority factors between purchaser and bidder were investigated. The analysis showed differences of view point in the bidding process. With these results, this study suggests how to write a proposal strategically and effectively in perspective of the purchaser. It is expected that priority factors will be adopted in strategic proposals in both bidder and purchaser. For purchaser, the priority will be adopted to select reliable bidder. So, we expect that the priority factors will be used to get more values for both bidder and purchaser in their business atmosphere.