• 제목/요약/키워드: Personal protective equipment

검색결과 226건 처리시간 0.03초

위드 코로나 시대 일부지역 치과위생사의 개인보호장구에 대한 지식, 태도 및 착용 (Knowledge, attitude, and wearing of personal protective equipment among dental hygienists in regions during the COVID-19 era)

  • 박미정;이정화;장경애;윤현서
    • 한국치위생학회지
    • /
    • 제24권2호
    • /
    • pp.163-174
    • /
    • 2024
  • Objectives: This study aimed to understand the knowledge, attitude, and wearing of four types of personal protective equipment among dental hygienists based on to the COVID-19 infection control guidelines and to provide basic data on the need to wear these equipment by dental hygienists in dental medical institutions. Methods: Between March 31 and April 26, 2022, 285 dental hygienists working at dental institutions in Busan and Gyeongsang Provinces participated in the study. Results: The higher the knowledge on personal protective equipment, the higher the glove-wearing rate; and the higher the attitude toward personal protective equipment, the higher the KF94 mask-wearing rate. Furthermore, the higher the rate of wearing face shields, the higher the rate of wearing gloves and full-body protective suits; and the higher the rate of wearing gloves, the higher the rate of wearing a full-body protective suit. Conclusions: To prevent cross-infection by dental hygienists in dental medical institutions, it is necessary to have the four types of personal protective equipment at all times and to strengthen comprehensive education on these equipment

개인보호구 착용문화 정착을 위한 제도개선 (Improved System for Establishing a Culture to Wear Personal Protective Gear)

  • 정성효;이용수;김창은
    • 한국건설안전학회 논문집
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.16-20
    • /
    • 2019
  • 국내 건설 현장에서 발생한 재해 중 약 50%가 개인보호구 미착용 상태에서의 사고가 재해로 이어진 것이다. 현행법령상 사업주는 개인 보호구를 지급하고 근로자는 개인보호구를 착용해야 하지만 일선 현장에서는 개인 보호구 착용 준수가 미흡한 실정이다. 본 연구는 개인 보호구를 근로자 개인이 구매하여 착용, 관리하는 형태로 제도를 개선하고 개인보호구 구매비용을 근로자에게 환급해 주는 방안에 대한 것이다. 본 논문을 통해 개인 보호구 제도가 효용성있게 개선되고, 개인보호구 착용문화를 정착시켜 재해 예방에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

119구급대원의 개인보호장비 착용이 혈압·맥박·호흡에 미치는 영향 (Effects of 119 Paramedics Wearing Personal Protective Equipment on Blood Pressure, Pulse, and Breathing)

  • 이승규;공하성
    • 대한안전경영과학회지
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.89-96
    • /
    • 2021
  • This study analyzed the physical changes in 119 paramedics transporting equipment at the emergency site and performing post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation through experiments. First, the average heart rate increased by about 25 times comparing CPR was performed without physical load and with personal protective equipment after moving equipment. In the third quartile, it increased to about 27 times. Second, when CPR was performed without physical load, and CPR was performed after moving the equipment with personal protective equipment, both the body temperature was raised and the rising body temperature was measured within normal body temperature. Third, the change in respiration rate increased by 7 times on average comparing CPR was performed without physical load and CPR was performed after moving the equipment while wearing personal protective equipment. In the third quartile, it increased to about 11 times. Finally, the change in blood pressure increased by 26.6 mmHg on average comparing CPR was performed without physical load and with wearing personal protective equipment after moving the equipment, and increased by 31.2 mmHg on average in the third quartile.

개인보호구(안전모, 안전벨트) 성능 유지를 위한 관리방안에 관한 연구 (A Study on Management Measures to Maintain the Performance of Personal Protective Equipment(Hard Hat, Safety Belt))

  • 김자연
    • 대한안전경영과학회지
    • /
    • 제24권1호
    • /
    • pp.11-19
    • /
    • 2022
  • In order to find out the management and sanitation status of protective gear provided at the construction site, a case study and survey were conducted by visiting the site. As a result of the case study, inspection and management, disinfection, and storage of protective equipment were insufficient in both workplaces with less than 50 employees and workplaces with more than 100 employees. As a result of the survey, workers(66.2%), said they did not know how to identify hard hats(67.6.%), how to identify bad hard hats(60.8%), and how to identify bad safety belts (73.0%), even though workers(66.2%) were educated on protective gear, and those in charge of protective gear Non-specified(56.8%), regular inspection of the provided protective equipment was not performed(82.4%), and disinfection was not performed(90.5%). Therefore, as a management plan to maintain the performance of personal protective equipment, educational aspects, regular training on protective equipment, training on how to identify defective protective equipment, management of recording papers, technical aspects, strengthening of standards for placement of dedicated safety managers in small workplaces, participation of workers' representatives when selecting protective equipment, and selection of protective equipment for workers Providing opportunities, administrative aspects of protective equipment regulation and management, introduction of sanitary and cleanliness system, and selection of personnel in charge of protective equipment management were suggested.

양계 농업인의 작업장 환경 및 개인보호구 착용 실태조사 (A Survey on the Workplace Environment and Personal Protective Equipment of Poultry Farmers)

  • 김인수;김경란;이경숙;채혜선;김성우
    • 한국환경보건학회지
    • /
    • 제40권6호
    • /
    • pp.454-468
    • /
    • 2014
  • Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate the actual condition of the farm work environment and personal protective equipment as part of the effort to improve livestock work for the safety and health of poultry farmers and provide basic data for establishing plans to improve and develop personal protective equipment. Methods: For this purpose, a questionnaire survey on general information about stables, the poultry work environment, accidents, the wearing of work clothes and personal protective equipment, and the level of awareness related to personal protective equipment was conducted among 148 poultry farmers. Results: As a result, it was found that poultry workplace environment was exposed to such risks as fine dusts; organic dusts; poisonous gases; odorous substances; chicken excrement; contact with chickens, bacteria or viruses; and accidents related to machine operation. Thirteen percent of respondents suffered severe respiratory diseases, and the most frequently injured sites due to accidents were the hands (25.7%), knees (23.8%), arms (17.3%), and head (10.9%). The most frequent type of accident was collisions between the body and obstacles or machinery during movement (36.4%), followed by erroneous machine operation such as feeders and electric shocks (8.5%). Regarding the wearing of work clothes and personal protective equipment, 51.7% of the respondents wore worn-out clothing or everyday clothes, whereas only 32.0% wore work clothes. The percentage of farmers who wore proper protective equipment for the work environment during poultry work was 48.4%. The most frequently used type of protective equipment was boots (38.9%), followed by mask (36.7%), gloves (36.3%), appropriate work clothes (22.6%), quarantine clothes (17.6%), helmets (13.4%), and goggles (12.6%). The rate of wearing goggles was low because they were considered inconvenient and lowered work efficiency. Furthermore, they purchased everyday products available on the market for their personal protective equipment which were not appropriate for maintaining safety in an actual harmful environment and its consequent risks. As a result of the survey of the awareness level related to personal protective equipment, their levels of awareness of accidents and attitude proved to be average or higher, but the practice of wearing protective equipment and the level of knowledge and management of personal protective equipment were lower. Conclusion: This survey found that the wearing status of personal protective equipment among poultry farmers was insufficient even though they were exposed to risks. Most respondents were aware of the necessity of wearing personal protective equipment and of the potential for accidents, but they did not wear proper protective equipment. Their wearing rate was low due to a lack of knowledge about protective equipment, as well as the inconvenience of wearing it. Therefore there is a need to improve and develop specialized personal protective equipment for respiration, hands, and eyes, as well as work clothes that can protect farmers from major harmful matter that is generated in the poultry workplace. Based on the results of this investigation, we will conduct further studies on the required performance and design directions of personal protective equipment while collecting more objective data through field-oriented assessments.

소방공무원의 보호장비 착용실태에 관한 연구 -경남지역을 중심으로- (A Study on Wearing Practice of Personal Protective Equipment for Firefighter : Focusing on Gyeongnam Province)

  • 방창훈
    • 한국방재학회 논문집
    • /
    • 제10권6호
    • /
    • pp.65-71
    • /
    • 2010
  • 본 연구에서는 경남지역에 근무하는 소방공무원의 보호장비 착용실태를 연구하여 소방공무원의 안전보건에 대한 기초자료를 제공하고자 시도되었으며, 연구에서 얻어진 결과를 제시하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 소방용 보호장비에 대한 전체 신뢰도는 3.19로 조사되었으며 신뢰도 향상을 위한 개선이 필요할 것으로 판단된다. 둘째, 소방공무원은 보호장비 중 가죽제 안전화(2.68), 장갑(2.67) 그리고 고무제 안전화(2.59)등에 낮은 만족도를 나타내었으며, 고무제 안전화(2.75), 다음으로 장갑(2.77), 가죽제 안전화(2.97)의 상태가 좋지 않은 것으로 조사되었다. 셋째, 소방용 보호장비에 대하여 소방공무원은 전체적으로 착용감과 무게에 많은 애로를 겪고 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 이를 개선하기 위하여 인체공학적 디자인과 고성능 경량의 소재 개발 등이 필요하다.

한우 사육자 작업환경 및 작업복과 보호구 착용 실태 분석 (Research on the Working Environment and Personal Protective Equipment of Korean Native Cattle Raising Farmers)

  • 김인수;이경숙;채혜선;김경수;최동필;김효철
    • 한국지역사회생활과학회지
    • /
    • 제27권4호
    • /
    • pp.891-906
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study examined the working site environment of Korean native cattle raising farmers and their actual condition of wearing personal protective equipment as part of preventing disasters during agricultural work. To this end, 160 Korean cattle raising farmers were surveyed and a site visit was performed on 10 farms. According to an examination of the cattle breeding environment, the major harmful factors were in the following order: fine dust (12.8%), organic feed dust (10.3%), contact with cattle (9.7%), manure (8.2%), germs and viruses (8.1%), harmful gases (7.4), contact with obstacles (6.7), and temperature (6.6%). The current status of the rate of wearing protection was in the order of gloves (20.9%), working hats (19.7%), boots (19.6%), masks (10.9%), protective clothing (8.9%), and specialized working clothing (6.6%). Nevertheless, most Korean cattle raising farmers recognized the risks when they did not wear protective equipment and the need for wearing protectors, but they mostly did not wear personal protective equipment due to a lack of knowledge on the selection of appropriate personal protective equipment and the discomfort they experience when they put on protectors. Even when they put on protective equipment, 38% was inappropriate for the farming work environment. Given the research results, improvements on and the development of specialized working clothing and personal protective equipment to protect farmers from harmful and dangerous materials from the cattle nurturing environment is necessary. Overall, based on the study data, objectified data collection, a determination of the necessary performance elements of personal protective equipment, and R&D will be needed through an on-site current status investigation.

Awareness of occupational hazards and personal protective equipment use among dental hygienists

  • Choi, Hyun-Ju;Hwang, Tae-Yoon;Jeon, Man-Joong
    • Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
    • /
    • 제36권1호
    • /
    • pp.20-25
    • /
    • 2019
  • Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness of occupational hazards and personal protective equipment use among dental hygienists (DHs). Methods: A total of 271 self-administered questionnaires were obtained from 280 DHs working at dental hospitals or clinics in Daegu and Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea. Results: The occupational hazards included work involving dust (94.1%), volatile substances (86.0%), noise (97.0%), and light-curing units (96.7%). The proportion of dental hygiene tasks that participants perceived as harmful were 42.4%, 51.7%, 9.2%, and 31.4% in the same order as above. The proportion of participants who used dust-proof masks during work involving dust was 1.1%. Those who wore gas-proof masks and gloves for work using volatile substances were 0.7% and 31.2%, respectively. Participants who used goggles for work involving light-curing units were 31.0%. None of the participants used ear plugs for work involving noise. A total of 22.9% of the participants recognized the Material Safety Data Sheet, while 79.7% had never been educated about harmful work environments. Conclusion: When compared to exposure status and perception of occupational hazards, the level of protective equipment use was very low. Extra measures to increase DHs' use of personal protective equipment are necessary.

일부 과수재배 남성 농업인의 농약 살포 시 보호구 착용 여부에 따른 피레스로이드계 농약노출평가 (Evaluation of Exposure Level to Pyrethroid Pesticides according to Protective Equipment in Male Orchard Farmers)

  • 오정순;노상철
    • 한국지역사회생활과학회지
    • /
    • 제28권3호
    • /
    • pp.391-401
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study was conducted to evaluate the relationships between exposure level to pyrethroid pesticide and wearing of protective equipment in 194 Chung-nam orchard male farmers. The urinary metabolites of pyrethroid pesticides, including Cis, Trans, DBCA, and 3-PBA, were analyzed by GC/MSD. As a result of this study, the detection rate and exposure level of 3-PBA was the highest among pyrethroid metabolites discovered by orchard farmers. As a result of analyzing the actual conditions of wearing protective equipment by the subjects of this study, the rate of agricultural farmers who wore four pieces of protective equipment compared to agricultural farmers wearing a single piece of protective clothing was as high as 35.1%. Pyrethroid exposure levels were low when farmers wore more personal protective equipment (PPE). In conclusion, training with regards to pesticide hazards and protective equipment for farmers who spray pesticides will help reduce pesticide exposure levels.

계획적 행위이론을 적용한 근로자의 보호구 착용행위 분석 (Analysis of the Use of Personal Protective Equipment Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior)

  • 기미영;구정완;장원기;정혜선
    • 지역사회간호학회지
    • /
    • 제14권4호
    • /
    • pp.639-645
    • /
    • 2003
  • This study was purposed to apply Aizen's Theory of Planned Behavior to workers using personal protective equipment. For this purpose, occupational health nurses conducted a survey of 173 male workers who were working at 6 different factories during the period from August to October 2003. The score of each variable related to the Theory of Planned Behavior was calculated: attitude (3.74); subjective norm(4.10); and perceived behavioral control (3.48). Four preceding factors were also assessed: behavioral belief(3.63); outcome evaluation(4.05); normative belief (4.20); and motivation to comply(4.03). Analysing the results, we found that two factors of the Theory of Planned Behavior are important in this case, which were subjective norm and perceived behavioral control that were found to be in a strong positive linkage with the use of personal protective equipment. Thus enhancing subjective norm and perceived behavioral control must be the most important goal of health education for workers who must use personal protective equipment. In addition, though behavioral intention, an intermediate factor of the Theory of Planned Behavior, was not measured in this study, subsequent studies are expected to include the factor in their models.

  • PDF