• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2002

A performance evaluation model of an R&D module in the quality management system for M Company Is constructed using QFD. The company produces telecommunication devices and employs the performance evaluation model based on ISO 9000 family. However, the model has some problems, one of them is that all check items are regarded as equally important Customer requirements are gathered from internal customers and QFD is utilized to obtain weights for each check item.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.161-175
• /
• 2007

Face recognition technology has lately attracted considerable attention because of its non-intrusiveness, usability and applicability. Related companies insist that their commercial products show the recognition rates more than 95% according to their self-testing. But, the rates cannot be admitted as official recognition rates. So, performance evaluation methods and tools are necessary to objectively measure the accuracy and performance of face recognition systems. In this paper, I propose a reference model for biometrics recognition evaluation tools, and implement an evaluation tool for the face recognition system based on the proposed reference model.

• 정보처리학회논문지D
• /
• 제16D권3호
• /
• pp.395-406
• /
• 2009

현재 정부 각 부처는 “정보시스템의 효율적 도입 및 운영 등에 관한 법률”에 의해 EA를 도입하여 운용하고 있으나 이의 평가 체계 및 지표는 제대로 갖춰져 있지 않다. 특히 EA의 성과평가를 위한 모델이 없을 뿐만 아니라 측정 할 수 있는 방법도 미흡하다. 본 연구에서는 EA성과평가를 위해 국내 범정부 성과참조모델과 미 연방 성과참조모델을 기반으로 8개의 평가 영역 및 17개의 평가지표를 도출하였다. 또한, 미 OMB 및 국내 범정부 EA성숙도 모델을 기반으로 8개의 평가 영역 및 10개의 평가지표를 도출하여, 이를 기반으로 EA 성과평가를 위한 업무, 고객, 프로세스, 인적자본 및 기술의 5개 영역으로 구성된 성과평가 모델을 제안하였다. 제안한 모델의 검증을 위해 3개 기관에 적용하여 각 기관의 EA 성과를 평가하였고, 평가 결과를 검증하기 위해 범정부 EA성숙도 모델의 성과평가 영역과도 비교 평가하였다. 또한, 제안한 성과평가모델의 측정지표를 기존의 EA성숙도 모델 및 성과참조모델과도 비교 분석하였다. 이러한 비교 분석 결과를 바탕으로 제안한 성과평가모델을 검증하였다.

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2010년도 학술발표회
• /
• pp.591-595
• /
• 2010

Conventional methods of model evaluation usually rely only on model performance based on a comparison of simulated variables to corresponding observations. However, this type of model evaluation has been criticized because of its insufficient consideration of the various uncertainty sources involved in modeling processes. This study aims to propose an extended model evaluation method using multiple assesment indices (MAIs) that consider not only the model performance but also the model structure and parameter uncertainties in rainfall-runoff modeling. A simple reservoir model (SFM) and distributed kinematic wave models (KWMSS1 and KWMSS2 using topography from 250m, 500m, and 1km digital elevation models) were developed and assessed by three MAIs for model performance, model structural stability, and parameter identifiability. All the models provided acceptable performance in terms of a global response, but the simpler SFM and KWMSS1 could not accurately represent the local behaviors of hydrographs. In addition, SFM and KWMSS1 were structurally unstable; their performance was sensitive to the applied objective functions. On the other hand, the most sophisticated model, KWMSS2, performed well, satisfying both global and local behaviors. KMSS2 also showed good structural stability, reproducing hydrographs regardless of the applied objective functions; however, superior parameter identifiability was not guaranteed. Numerous parameter sets could lead to indistinguishable hydrographs. This result supports that while making a model complex increases its performance accuracy and reduces its structural uncertainty, the model is likely to suffer from parameter uncertainty. The proposed model evaluation process can provide an effective guideline for identifying a reliable hydrologic model.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제9권6호
• /
• pp.165-172
• /
• 2011

본 논문에서는 3차원 평가환류체계를 기반한 성과측정모델을 제안하며, 제안하는 평가모델을 이용하여 2008년과 2009년에 수행한 7개의 공공 u-IT 서비스의 사용자 만족도와 활용도를 분석한다. 본 연구를 통해, 당초 공공 u-IT 서비스 지원사업이 목표하였던 대부분의 연구목적을 달성하였음을 알 수 있었으며, 성과측정 및 분석결과는 향후 추진할 신규과제의 추진방향 제시한다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.65-81
• /
• 2007

Recently, the affiliates of the Ministry of Information and Communication have been conducting a performance evaluation study on IT policy projects, based on the performance evaluation model of the U.S. Office of Management and Budgets, with regard to investment in computerization. The performance evaluation model for the policy project could provide the objective information required for the planning, development, and operation of the policy project. However, the performance of the most policy project is likely to be evaluated using the subjective evaluation criteria of evaluators. Therefore, this case study evaluates the relative efficiency using DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) in order to improve the performance evaluation method of the digital pioneer' project implemented by the Korea IT Industry Promotion Agency. The improvement value of inefficient Decision Making Units (DMUs) was measured by a static efficiency analysis. The measured value will suggest a objective viewpoint of the performance between DMUs to evaluators. In doing so, it will show an appropriate direction for the policy project to be evaluated successfully.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.63-79
• /
• 2002

During the last decade many enterprises spent a huge amount of money for investment on Information Technology (IT) & Information System (IS) to attain competitive advantage and to maximize their business performance by satisfying the various requirements of customers. Under such circumstances, methodologies for evaluating IT impact on business performance are very important issues for strategic decision making on investment. In this study, we propose a performance evaluation model that adopts the concept of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and the Value Chain to analyze the financial impact and non-financial impact of IT & IS at each critical work area. This model combines the 4 evaluation areas from BSC and 6 critical work areas from Value Chain and measures the Key Performance Indicator (HPI) and the effect of KPI. Also, we present a case study of which the evaluation model has been conducted on a major manufacturing company. finally. we address some important notes to improve the IT & IS performances in the real-world.

• Journal of Advanced Research in Ocean Engineering
• /
• 제4권4호
• /
• pp.174-184
• /
• 2018

We herein propose a new design procedure of a flexible container ship model where the vertical bending and torsional vibration modes are similar to its prototype. To achieve similarity in torsional vibration mode shapes, the height of the shear center of the model must be located below the bottom hull, similar to an actual container ship with large opening decks. Therefore, we designed a ship model by imparting appropriate stiffness to the hull, using urethane foam without a backbone. We built a container ship model according to this design strategy and validated its dynamic elastic properties using a decay test. We measured wave-induced structural vibrations and present the results of tank experiments in regular and freak waves.

• Geomechanics and Engineering
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.369-376
• /
• 2022

Accurately evaluating and predicting the performance of facilities is a key task in establishing a maintenance strategy for facilities. The importance of performance evaluation is becoming more pronounced, especially when the aging of facilities requires a huge budget. In this study, performance assessment models were developed for road and railway tunnels. Delphi analysis was performed to identify sub-elements necessary to evaluate the performance of a tunnel. The relative importance of the evaluation factors was derived from the AHP analysis. The correlation analysis was performed between each assessment factor and the final result to verify the significance of the model. For the correlation analysis, the survey data measured through precision safety diagnosis in tunnels in use was applied. The cost effectiveness analysis was also conducted according to the scenarios with different composition of performance factors in order to improve the practical applicability of the evaluation model developed in this study.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.73-78
• /
• 2003

In order to improve the safety performance oi construction projects, effective and corporative safety management program between head office and job site must be implemented. And its performance must be measured and analyzed for the identification of the problems in the safety management area. This study proposes a previous evaluation model of safety performance for the large construction firm in order to enhance their safety level. The fundamental data for proposed model is based on the past research(Son 2002), which is structured of evaluation criteria. weighted factor. statistical evaluation formula. The model would help the firm management in identifying the weak areas of safety performance in terms of the degree performing certain safety tasks. It is expected that the model could contribute to achieving the "zero accident" level.ot; level.