Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3745/KIPSTD.2009.16-D.3.395

A Study on the Design of EA Performance Evaluation Model and the Application Case  

Lee, Seok-Kyun (숭실대학교 컴퓨터학과)
Lee, Young-Min (숭실대학교 컴퓨터학과)
Rhew, Sung-Yul (숭실대학교 컴퓨터학과)
Publication Information
The KIPS Transactions:PartD / v.16D, no.3, 2009 , pp. 395-406 More about this Journal
Abstract
Korean government has operated EA by the act on efficient introduction of information system and operation, etc. But the evaluation system for EA and the criteria don't prepare well. Particularly, There is no model for EA performance measurement and the way is insufficient. In this study, we derived 8 areas and 17 criteria for the performance evaluation based on the Performance Reference Model of U.S FEA and Korea. And we also derived 8 areas and 10 criteria for it based on the OMB EA Assessment Framework and the EA maturity model in Korea. We propose the performance evaluation model of the five areas that consists of the business performance, customer performance, process, human resource and the technology for EA performance evaluation. To verify the model, we applied the model to three organizations and evaluated EA performance. In addition, we compared the performance result with the performance evaluation area of EA maturity model of Korea to verify the result. We also analyzed the criteria of the proposed performance evaluation model with the current EA maturity model and Performance Reference Model of Korea. As a result of the evaluation, we verified of the proposed performance evaluation model, too.
Keywords
EA/ITA; Performance Measurement; Architecture;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Office of Management and Budget, EA Assessment Framework, http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/documents/OMB_EA_Assessment_Framework_2_FINAL.pdf, 2005
2 The Chief Information Officers Council, 'Federal Enterprise Architecture Frame- work Version 1.1', 1999
3 노재범, 이팔훈, 이승현, '서비스 이노베이션엔진 6시그마', 삼성경제연구소, 2005
4 John A. Zachman, 'A Framework for Information Systems Architecture', IBM Systems Journal, Vol.26, No.3, 1987   DOI
5 이헌중, 'ITA 개념', 한국 전산원 ITA 정기 세미나, 2006
6 Andrew Josey, 'TOGAF Version 9, Enterprise Edition', www.opengroup.org, 2009
7 행정자치부, 전자정부아키텍처 도입을 위한 실무 가이드, 2005
8 W.H.Delone, E.R.Mclean, 'The DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success : A Ten-Year Update', Journal of Management Information System, Vol.19, No.4, pp.9-30, 2003   DOI
9 정보통신부, 정보기술아키텍처 도입/운영 지침, 2006
10 정보통신부, '범정부 PRM 1.0', 2005
11 Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P, The balanced scorecard: measures that drive perfor mance, Harvard Business Review, pp.71-80, 1992
12 Porter M.E, What is Strategy?, Harvard Business Review, pp.61-78, 1996
13 유은숙, '전자정부의 효율성 측정을 위한 정보화 성과 평가 모델', 숭실대학교 박사학위 논문, 2004
14 Fred D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, pp.319-341, 1989   DOI   ScienceOn
15 'Enterprise Architecture', 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_Architecture', Wikipedia, 2008
16 Icek Ajzen, The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, pp.179-211, 1991   DOI
17 Peter Weill, MIT Center for Information Systems Research, Sixth e-Business Conference, 2007
18 Joseph A. De Feo, William Barnard, 'Six Sigma Breakthrough and Beyond - Quality Performance Breakthrough Methods', McGraw-Hill, 2005