• 무역학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.159-184
• /
• 2017

OECD는 투자위원회를 중심으로 각국 NCP들이 OECD 가이드라인을 효과적으로 이행하기 위한 일환으로 NCP 간 동료평가(Peer Review)를 강조하는 추세이다. 각 NCP로서는 동료평가가 자발적인 성격이라고는 하지만 부정적인 평가를 받게 되는 경우 국제적으로 많은 비난을 받을 소지가 크고 국가 이미지에도 심각한 타격을 입을 가능성이 높다. 더군다나 지난 2017년 3월, 기업책임경영에 관한 작업반(Working Party on Responsible Business Conduct) 회의에서 한국 NCP에 대하여 2019년 동료평가를 시행하기로 결정하였다. 이에 본 논문에서는 NCP 동료학습의 의의와 현황, 최근 시행되었던 덴마크와 벨기에 동료평가 사례들을 검토함으로써 우리 정부가 2019년 동료평가에 어떻게 대비해야 하는지 정책적 제언을 하고 있다.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.87-101
• /
• 2024

As the academic publishing environment evolves rapidly and the open science paradigm emerges, the demand for efficient and transparent peer review is growing. This study outlines efforts to actively introduce advanced concepts in scholarly communication into the submission and review system. AccessON Peer Review Management System Plus (ACOMS+), developed and operated by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, is an online submission and peer review system that aims for open science. This study provides an overview of ACOMS+ and presents its four main features: open peer review, open access publishing and self-archiving, online quantitative/qualitative evaluation, and peer reviewer invitation. The directions for further developing ACOMS+ to fully support open science are also discussed. ACOMS+ is the first system in Korea to introduce the open peer review process and is distinguished as a system that supports open access publishing and digital transformation of academic journals. Furthermore, ACOMS+ is expected to contribute to the advancement of the academic publishing environment through the increasing shift toward open access publishing, transparent peer review, and open science.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권10호
• /
• pp.59-73
• /
• 2022

개방형동료심사는 투고된 학술논문을 투명하게 심사할 목적으로 심사자의 신원, 심사의견, 심사결과를 저자를 포함한 일반 독자에게 공개하는 심사 방식이다. 개방형동료심사 인식에 관한 선행연구가 진행되었지만, 국내 과학기술 분야 학술지 편집담당자 관점에서 이러한 인식을 조사하고 분석한 연구는 찾아볼 수 없었다. 구체적으로, 학술지 편집위원의 개방형동료심사 적용 의향, 적용 시기 및 새로운 심사 방식을 채택할 때 예상되는 도전과 기회, 개방형동료심사 지원을 위한 투고심사시스템 요구사항에 관한 조사 및 분석은 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 논문은 개방형동료심사에 대한 학술지 편집담당자의 인식을 조사하고 이러한 심사를 편리하게 지원하는 투고심사시스템의 핵심적인 요구사항을 이해하기 위해, 설문문항 준비, 설문조사 실시, 응답 결과를 분석하였다. 또한, 일부 과학기술 학술지 편집위원장을 대상으로 개방형동료심사에 관한 표적집단인터뷰를 수행하였다. 이후, 개방형동료심사 인식에 관한 본 연구의 분석 결과, 표적집단인터뷰 결과 및 국외 유사 설문조사 사례를 비교, 분석하고 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구 결과는 국내 학술단체에서 새로운 논문심사 방식의 정책 수립 및 시행, 투고심사시스템의 개방형동료심사를 위한 기능 탑재 및 선택 등의 의사결정에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.538-542
• /
• 2022

Performing the first peer review of a plastic surgical research article can be an overwhelming task. However, it is an essential scholarly skill and peer review is used in a multitude of settings: evaluation of journal articles, conference abstracts, and research proposals. Furthermore, peer reviewing provides more than just the opportunity to read and help improve other's work: peer reviewing can improve your own scientific writing. A structured approach is possible and recommended. In these ten tips, we provide guidance on how to successfully conduct the first peer reviews. The ten tips on peer reviewing concern: 1) Appropriateness: are you qualified and prepared to perform the peer review? 2) Familiarization with the journal and its reviewing guidelines; 3) Gathering first impressions of the paper followed by specific tips for reviewing; 4) the abstract and introduction; 5) Materials, methods, and results (including statistical considerations); and 6) discussion, conclusion, and references. Tip 7 concerns writing and structuring the review; Tips 7 and 8 describe how to provide constructive criticism and understanding the limits of your expertise. Finally, Tip 10 details why-and how-you become a peer reviewer. Peer review can be done by any plastic surgeon, not just those interested in an academic career. These ten tips provide useful insights for both the aspiring and the experienced peer reviewer. In conclusion, a systematic approach to peer reviewing is possible and recommended, and can help you getting started to provide quality peer reviews that contribute to moving the field of plastic surgery forward.

• Journal of Korean Medical Science
• /
• 제33권46호
• /
• pp.287.1-287.14
• /
• 2018

Integrity of authorship and peer review practices are important considerations for ethical publishing. Criteria for authorship, as delineated in the guidelines by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), have undergone evolution over the decades, and now require fulfillment of four criteria, including the need to be able to take responsibility for all aspects of the manuscript in question. Although such updated authorship criteria were published nearly five years ago, still, many major medical and specialist journals have yet to revise their author instructions to conform to this. Inappropriate authorship practices may include gift, guest or ghost authorship. Existing literature suggests that such practices are still widely prevalent, especially in non-English speaking countries. Another emerging problem is that of peer review fraud, mostly by authors, but also rarely by handling editors. There is literature to suggest that a proportion of such fake peer review may be driven by the support of some unscrupulous external editing agencies. Such inappropriate practices with authorship malpractices or disagreement, or peer review fraud, have resulted in more than 600 retractions each, as identified on the retractions database of Retractionwatch.com. There is a need to generate greater awareness, especially in authors from non-English speaking regions of the world, about inappropriate authorship and unethical practices in peer review. Also, support of any external editing agency should be clearly disclosed by authors at the time of submission of a manuscript.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.376-381
• /
• 2009

일반적으로 프로젝트를 수행하는 과정에서 적절한 기술 계획에 따라 진척도 및 성과에 대한 기술검토를 규칙적으로 실시하게 된다. 그러나 일정 시점에서 수행되는 기술검토를 진행하는 과정에서 불명확한 진척도 및 성과 보고, 의견의 불일치, 시간지연 등 여러 가지 문제가 발생한다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 규칙적인 기술검토 이전에 동료검토를 진행하게 된다. 본 연구에서는 연구개발을 수행하는 과정에 활용되는 효과적인 동료검토 프로세스를 개발하였으며, 추가적으로 동료검토에 관한 일반적인 오해와 개선방안에 대해 서술하였다.

• Toxicological Research
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2004

Evaluation of toxicological pathology is to some extend subjective judgments by pathologist and the accuracy of pathologist's works is based on the individual training and experiences. It has been required to establish a peer review system for toxicologic pathology and these review system has been employed by various practice of toxicological pathology. It would be pointed out that the possible causes of drifts in pathology are due to 1) lack of knowledge or experience of individual pathologists, 2) poorly maintained consistence of grading among animals in study, 3) different interpretation of findings between pathologists, or 4) pathology data processing. Example cases of diagnostic errors and current practice of peer review including tissue selection criteria, documentation and problem resolution for short-term and carcinogenicity studies were introduced. For sound regulatory system and high integrity of practice in toxicological pathology, current approaches of peer review system were reviewed.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.151-168
• /
• 2009

The present study investigates the impact of trained peer feedback on the quantity and quality of revisions made by EFL students at a low-intermediate level. Peer review training was carried out in experimental group through four in-class training sessions and four peer dyad-instructor conferences after class. Students' $1^{st}$ drafts with written peer feedback and revised drafts prior to and post training were collected and analyzed. Results reveal that after training the students produced more revisions in response to their peer comments (96% of total revisions) and those revisions were counted as enhanced in quality (93% of peer-triggered revisions). In contrast, the results of paired t-test within control group indicate that there was no significant difference between two data collected from week 3 and week 16 (t = -.57, df =19, p = .577 at p < .05). The findings suggest that training as an ongoing process of teacher intervention contributes to effectiveness of the peer feedback activity. The study provides pedagogical implications for how to structure and implement peer review training for the sake of its direct strength in an EFL writing class.

• 한국정보관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보관리학회 2014년도 제21회 학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.73-78
• /
• 2014

피어리뷰(Peer Review)는 17세기 학술지가 만들어진 이래 오늘날까지 가장 널리 사용되는 논문의 질적인 수준과 학술지 게재 여부를 판단하는 전통적인 평가도구이다. 그러나 피어리뷰의 과정에서 발생되는 공정성 저해와 학술출판 분야에서 오픈 액세스 (OA, Open Access) 저널이 계속적으로 증가하는 디지털 미디어 시대에서 소수의 전문가가 검증하는 피어리뷰 시스템에 관한 불만들이 제기되면서 현 피어리뷰 시스템의 새로운 대안으로 오픈 피어리뷰(Open Peer Review)가 제시되기도 하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 피어리뷰의 이론적 배경을 살펴보고 이를 토대로 새로운 대안으로 떠오르고 있는 오픈피어리뷰의 평가도구로써의 활용가능성에 대하여 살펴보고자 한다.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.51-66
• /
• 2005

This study investigates the feasibility of incorporating student evaluations of peer review interactions into the course grade for an EFL writing course. The use of such evaluations offers a way to grade the process of writing more directly than using writing portfolios alone. Moreover, evaluating peer review interactions highlights the social aspect of writing, which is valuable in the current post-process climate in writing instruction. The 18 members of a semester-long EFL writing course at a Korean university were trained in peer response for one half of a semester; then performed evaluations of peer review interactions during the second half of the semester as part of their writing course. Student evaluations were examined to reveal whether any bias occurred due to relative age, gender, major, or question type. The results revealed no such biases. Therefore, it is suggested that students are capable of providing fair evaluations of peers, which means the evaluations can be factored into the course grade in order to evaluate the social aspect of the writing process.