References
- What is research integrity? https://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/ucla/chapter1/page02.htm. Updated 2006. Accessed July 2, 2018.
- Poster E, Pearson GS, Pierson C. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2012;48(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6163.2011.00323.x
- Committee on Publication Ethics - core practices. https://publicationethics.org/core-practices. Updated 2018. Accessed July 16, 2018.
- Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Akazhanov NA, Kitas GD. Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact. Croat Med J 2014;55(1):61-72. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.61
- Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int 2011;31(11):1409-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3
- Gasparyan AY. Authorship and contributorship in scholarly journals. J Korean Med Sci 2013;28(6):801-2. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.801
- Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors. Rheumatol Int 2013;33(2):277-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2582-2
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. http://www.icmje.org. Updated 2018. Accessed July 8, 2018.
- 2017 ICMJE recommendations. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Updated 2017. Accessed July 20, 2018.
- Dyer C. Lancet withdraws research paper and warns authors about rules of “gift authorship”. BMJ 2008;337:a1711. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1711
- The Lancet. The role and responsibilities of coauthors. Lancet 2008;372(9641):778.
- Adams J. Collaborations: the rise of research networks. Nature 2012;490(7420):335-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/490335a
- Ghajarzadeh M. Guest authors in an Iranian journal. Developing World Bioeth 2014;14(1):15-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12002
- Schrock JB, Kraeutler MJ, McCarty EC. Trends in authorship characteristics in the American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994 to 2014. Am J Sports Med 2016;44(7):1857-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516639955
- Jawad F. Research ethics: authorship and publication. J Pak Med Assoc 2013;63(12):1560-2.
- Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Gorin SV, Koroleva AM, Kitas GD. Statement on publication ethics for editors and publishers. J Korean Med Sci 2016;31(9):1351-4. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351
- Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT). http://docs.casrai.org/CRediT. Updated 2018. Accessed July 13, 2018.
- Representing contributions by CRediT. https://blog.f1000.com/2016/02/10/beyond-authorship-recognising-the-contributions-to-research/. Updated 2016. Accessed July 13, 2018.
- Phillippi JC, Likis FE, Tilden EL. Authorship grids: practical tools to facilitate collaboration and ethical publication. Res Nurs Health 2018;41(2):195-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21856
- Co-author agreement. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/co-authors-gone-bad-how-to-avoid-publishing-conflicts. Updated 2014. Accessed July 9, 2018.
- Masic I. The malversations of authorship - current status in academic community and how to prevent it. Acta Inform Med 2018;26(1):4-9. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.4-9
- Sauermann H, Haeussler C. Authorship and contribution disclosures. Sci Adv 2017;3(11):e1700404. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700404
- Liao QJ, Zhang YY, Fan YC, Zheng MH, Bai Y, Eslick GD, et al. Perceptions of Chinese biomedical researchers towards academic misconduct: a comparison between 2015 and 2010. Sci Eng Ethics 2018.24(2):629-45.
- Rivera H. Inappropriate authorship and kinship in research evaluation. J Korean Med Sci 2018;33(13):e105. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e105
- Reviewer author co-authorship. https://publicationethics.org/case/suspected-contact-between-reviewer-and-author-led-coauthorship-reviewer. Updated 2009. Accessed July 9, 2018.
- Selling authors names to prestigious journals. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/for-sale-your-name-here-in-a-prestigious-science-journal/. Updated 2014. Accessed July 7, 2018.
- Campos-Varela I, Ruano-Ravina A. Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors. Gac Sanit 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009.
- Journal rankings in rheumatology. https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=2745&page=1&total_size=60. Updated 2018. Accessed June 28, 2018.
- Peer review. https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/editors/peer-review/32888. Updated 2018. Accessed July 20, 2018.
- What is peer review? https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/what-is-peer-review/index.html. Updated 2018. Accessed July 20, 2018.
- Haug CJ. Peer-review fraud--hacking the scientific publication process. N Engl J Med 2015;373(25):2393-5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1512330
- Dyer O. Major publisher retracts 43 papers, alleging fake peer review. BMJ 2015;350:h1783. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1783
- Greene J. Fraudsters strike peer review: stolen passwords, fake reviews threaten biomedical literature. Ann Emerg Med 2015;65(4):A13-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.02.017
- Cheung BM. Fake peer review - too good to be true. Postgrad Med J 2017;93(1102):498. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134506
- Dadkhah M, Kahani M, Borchardt G. A method for improving the integrity of peer review. Sci Eng Ethics 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9960-9.
- Hadi MA. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity. Int J Pharm Pract 2016;24(5):309-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12307
- Dadkhah M, Lagzian M, Borchardt G. Identity theft in the academic world leads to junk science. Sci Eng Ethics 2018;24(1):287-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9867-x
- Peer review fraud. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/07/china-cracks-down-after-investigation-finds-massive-peer-review-fraud. Updated 2017. Accessed July 7, 2018.
- Beadling L, Leopold SS. Editorial: why some authors make bad choices--peer review for hire and other sad stories. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473(8):2441-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4356-0
- Editorial independence. https://forbetterscience.com/2016/02/15/oa-publishers-hindawi-vs-frontiers-similar-yet-different/. Updated 2016. Accessed July 14, 2018.
- Qi X, Deng H, Guo X. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Postgrad Med J 2017;93(1102):499-503. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-133969
- Institutional and professional email addresses. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/06/21/institutional-versus-commercial-email-addresses-which-one-to-use-in-your-publications/. Updated 2018. Accessed July 15, 2018.
- Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Yessirkepov M, Endovitskiy DA, Voronov AA, Kitas GD. Researcher and author profiles: opportunities, advantages, and limitations. J Korean Med Sci 2017;32(11):1749-56. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1749
- Publons. https://publons.com/home/. Updated 2018. Accessed August 22, 2018.
- Verma IM. Preprint servers facilitate scientific discourse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114(48):12630. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716857114
- Knoepfler P. Reviewing post-publication peer review. Trends Genet 2015;31(5):221-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006
- Kowalczuk MK, Dudbridge F, Nanda S, Harriman SL, Patel J, Moylan EC. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models. BMJ Open 2015;5(9):e008707. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008707
- Should peer review stop being anonymous? https://massivesci.com/articles/peer-review-anonymous-signed/. Updated 2018. Accessed August 22, 2018.
- Hvistendahl M. China's publication bazaar. Science 2013;342(6162):1035-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6162.1035
- Woolley KL, Lew RA, Stretton S, Ely JA, Bramich NJ, Keys JR, et al. Lack of involvement of medical writers and the pharmaceutical industry in publications retracted for misconduct: a systematic, controlled, retrospective study. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27(6):1175-82. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2011.573546
- Portable peer review services. https://www.nature.com/news/company-offers-portable-peer-review-1.12418. Updated 2013. Accessed July 15, 2018.
- Masic I, Begic E, Donev DM, Gajovic S, Gasparyan AY, Jakovljevic M, et al. Sarajevo declaration on integrity and visibility of scholarly publications. Croat Med J 2016;57(6):527-9. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2016.57.527
- Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Koroleva AM, Kitas GD. Updated editorial guidance for quality and reliability of research output. J Korean Med Sci 2018;33(35):e247. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e247
Cited by
- Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils vol.34, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e6
- Unjustified Authorship Should Not Be Tolerated vol.34, pp.45, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e310
- Bridging the Gap with Clinicians: The Issue of Underrecognition of Pathologists and Radiologists as Scientific Authors in Contemporary Medical Literature vol.26, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00125-z
- Innovative Strategies for Peer Review vol.35, pp.20, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e138
- Moving towards online rheumatology education in the era of COVID-19 vol.39, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05405-9
- Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers vol.58, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5114/reum.2020.101999
- Top Central Asian Educational Institutions on Publons: Analysis of Researchers and Reviewers vol.36, pp.21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e144
- No room for ambiguity: The concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications vol.69, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_2221_20
- ¿Quién es autor? Las autorías múltiples, criterios y lineamientos vol.44, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2021.2.1758
- A new method of co-author credit allocation based on contributor roles taxonomy: proof of concept and evaluation using papers published in PLOS ONE vol.126, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04075-x
- ‘Some glimpses of an Asian PhD journey in tourism’ - An ethnodrama vol.40, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100908
- Elusive tuberculous meningitis with rare neurological complication of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis: a case report vol.7, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-021-00445-y