• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제21권
• /
• pp.129-151
• /
• 2003

Nowadays even if environment of international commercial transaction is changing quickly municipal law could not meet with such change accordingly. So far, however, efforts towards unification have prevailingly taken the form of binding instruments, such as non-national or supranational legislation, international conventions or international model laws. Among them, the UNIDROIT Principles with parties' autonomous and yet non-binding character do not only meet the substantive requirements of a true law merchant. In addition they also counter some of the main points of criticism against the modern lex mercatoria. As such the Principles constitute a cornerstone in the lex mercatoria debate and may become the heart of the new lex mercatoria. The purpose of this article is to ask whether there could be applied the Principles in international commerce. For the purpose it is to investigate when the Principles are applied in international commerce and how effectively the Principles are applied for the decision in international commercial disputes. Even though the Principles are used for reference by parties involved for the voluntary regulation of their contract, it is sufficiently expected that the Principles are to be a stepstone of uniform contract law in international commerce. Until now cases of appling the Principles are not satisfied with its expectation as a source of non-legislative means of unification or harmonization of law. Given the party's autonomy in the contract, this is among other things because business parties are strongly tend to observe their national laws in their international commerce. And also, even though there are a number of neutral and uniform regulations for international commercial contracts, parties do not often recognize their usefulness with being up to expectation. In order to explore the applicability of the Principles a number of cases of ICC International Court of Arbitration and others are quoted.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.169-190
• /
• 2017

중국과의 무역거래가 지속적으로 증가하고 있는 가운데 상사분쟁 발생 가능성도 커지고 있으며 사회주의 국가체제에 익숙하지 못한 한국 기업의 입장에서는 중국의 상사중재제도에 대한 연구는 필수불가결하다. 근래 중국은 국제표준과 시장경제에 맞추어 국내법규를 개정함으로써 외국기업들에게 법적 안정성 보장을 위한 지속적인 노력을 하고 있지만 여러 가지 문화적, 정치적, 사회적 특성으로 말미암아 법규의 내용에 한계점과 실무상의 문제점이 존재한다. 중국 상사중재제도는 국내중재와 국제중재 일부 구별 적용, 임시중재 불인정, 당사자자치의 제한, 중재기관의 독립성 부족, 중재에 대한 사법간여, 판정집행의 곤란 등 다른 국가와 차이점이 있다. 또한 중국의 중재기관에서는 중재절차 중에 판정부가 직접 조정을 진행하고 조정결과를 판정서로 작성하는 중재와 조정의 결합이 이루어지고 있다. 이와 같은 본 논문은 중국 상사중재제도의 법적 주요내용을 살펴봄으로써 중국 기업과의 상사분쟁해결에 대한 법적 실무적 대응방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제46권
• /
• pp.145-177
• /
• 2001

This paper seeks to analyze how the welfare state has developed both in the Kim Young Sam government and in the Kim Dae Jung government. Among other things, the two governments share some similarities: compared to the previous authoritarian governments, both of them enjoyed a high level of democratic legitimacy; the two were under pressure to win the elections to acquire and remain in power; and finally, the two tried to strengthen welfare system. But there exist more critical differences. The Kim Dae Jung government was a minority government, while the Kim Young Sam government was a majority one. Compared to the latter one, the former came to power in an extremely bad economic condition. Fortunately, however, the Kim Dae Jung government was able to enjoy a relatively high level of state autonomy resulting from an exceptional situation of foreign currency crisis. In addition, it was more reformist in policy orientation and had a more open cooperative network with civil society. All these differences added up to produce remarkable differences with regard to the improvement in welfare development. Especially, it is noted that the Kim Dae Jung government was very successful in several respects: provision of national minimum, integration of national medical insurance, development of productive welfare system, and final1y increase in welfare spending. Recently, criticisms from the opposition party, the press, and middle and upper class people mount against the Kim Dae Jung government which has made significant mistakes in instituting the separation of medical and pharmaceutical businesses. However, the important improvements in welfare institutions and programs by the Kim Dae Jung government need to be maintained to deal with all the negative effects of a naked market economy. They must also be sustained to keep alive democracy that Korean people have fought for nearly half a century.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.113-137
• /
• 2005

In the provisions of 'the Arbitration Law of China, there are special provisions for international arbitration. When a court refuses the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards or cancel the domestic awards relating to international arbitration, they have to adopt the provisions of 'Chinese Civil Procedure Law'. These provisions are the same as the provisions of Korean Civil Procedure Law concerning the reasons of renewal. In the Korean Arbitration Act, those provisions disappeared when it was revised on December 31, 1999. Among the characteristics of the Chinese arbitration system, a serious question is that it provides only institutional arbitration and there is no ad-hoc arbitration in the Chinese Arbitration Law. On the other hand, when the parties appoint three arbitrators according to their agreement, the parties appoint the third arbitrator by mutual agreement and when they fail to agree, the Arbitration Committee appoints the third arbitrator. In practice, as the parties hardly agree on the third arbitrator or sole arbitrator, the Committee usually appoints them. And appointing an arbitrator from out of their panel of arbitrators is permitted these days only under examination by the Arbitration Committee in accordance with the arbitration rules of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, Other arbitration committees except the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission are still prohibited from making appointments from out of their panel of arbitrators. Accordingly, arbitration in China cannot be predicted and poses a question about legal stability as party autonomy is restricted in the appointment of arbitrators and arbitral procedure. Such being the case it is strongly recommended to select Korea as the place of arbitration in transactions with China. However it is better to arbitrate than to file a law suit in China.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.3005-3012
• /
• 2013

공공적 주체로 대표되는 한국자산관리공사가 시행하였던 국유지 위탁 시범개발사업의 특성분석을 통하여 공공성의 확보를 위한 유휴공간의 공간재생 시 고려되어야 할 내용을 공간, 용도, 과정의 측면에서 분석한다. 여기에서 각각 다음의 한계를 나타내는데 비연속적 공공공간은 공공주체가 민간주체의 개발이익 사업과 다름이 없음을 보여주며, 비 공공적 용도의 배치는 공공성과 이익성의 균형을 맞추기에 원천적인 한계를 나타낸다. 또 폐쇄적인 과정에서는 공개성이라는 공공성의 원칙을 지키기 힘들며 공공의 참여와 관심을 유도하는 공공적 재생의 실현에 한계를 보일 수밖에 없다. 이상과 같이 공간, 용도, 과정의 측면에서 살펴본 바 다음과 같은 결론을 도출하였다. 1. KAMCO가 시행하는 프로젝트는 공공기관이나 공공성을 적정한 수준에서 담보하는 절차가 반드시 필요하다. 2. 수탁기관이 청구하는 위탁수수료의 적정한 보장과 이익의 한계선을 공공주체는 프로젝트 기획 시 명확히 하여 일정부분이 공공성을 향상시키는데 쓰여야 한다. 3. KAMCO의 다양화된 공개방식의 개발과 건축계획이 필요하다. 그리고 KAMCO 개발의 건축적 공간계획에서 공공성을 담보할 수 있는 자율성과 심의 할 수 있는 전문기구와 예산이 요구된다.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제27권
• /
• pp.31-57
• /
• 2012

The 19th century could not relatively receive attention from local researchers because it was treated as the past cut off from the present as the formative period of modern states of Latin America. According to the characteristics of area studies which focus on changes of politics and society, studies on past affairs could not have been the main focus of attention. But as new liberalism has appeared in Latin America, is throwing the spotlight on liberalism. In addition, the studies on the 19th century have been activated and gradually expanded. And interpretation about the 19th century's history has been variously arranged. Especially, discussion on liberalism and conservatism was established as the key words which can understand and reconsider Latin America in the 19th century. Colombian liberalism which could not overcome heritage of the colonial period in the 19th century and did appear advocating reformation was another form of authoritarianism. Reformation promoted by liberalism was utilized to keep privilege of the ruling class, not to remove the social and economic structure derived from the colonial period. New reformist forces which advocated mercantilism after the middle of the 19th century but they were formed based on the existing system. Colombian Liberal Party was developed as "Another name of conservatization" by reflecting understanding of the conservatives. Colombian liberalists preferred federalism to cut off from repressive characteristics of Spanish colonial rule and secure autonomy of local control through reformation based on economic understanding. Therefore, discussion on the form of government which focused on federalism and centralism acted as the causes of conflict between Colombian liberalism and conservatism. Based on this point, this study tries to analyze liberalism reforms which is the main issue in the Colombian history in the 19th century and consider history of Colombian political conflicts focusing on federalism. The origin of Violencia which is the political violence and Colombian history in the 19th century which has been a series of rebellion can be considered through this procedure.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.129-154
• /
• 2021

As our society and industry develop, disputes are becoming ever more complicated and diversified to the point that it is alleged that dispute resolution by court proceedings has certain limits and setbacks. Therefore, it is commonly suggested that mediation by a qualified mediator should come as an alternative method, and there have been many attempts to establish and provide mediation service in the courts and government authorities. To comply with a party's autonomy, which is the essential basis of mediation, and to promote the use of mediation, it is highly recommended that private mediation, rather than court-driven or administrative mediation, shall take the initiative. In the meantime, despite a number of academic research and attempts to increase the awareness and use of mediation nationwide, we have not yet seen meaningful developments due to the longstanding misunderstanding and discredit of mediation. In contrast, Italy has begun to revitalize mediation by enacting 'Legislative Decree No. 28/2020' following the 'Directive 2008/52EC' of the European Parliament and encouraging the so-called via-mediation policy. It is acknowledged to have significantly contributed to the development of private mediation in Italy and the increased use of mediation as a dispute resolution method. It shall be particularly noted that Italy's mediation proceedings have certain traits, including preliminary mediation meetings, mandatory involvement of legal counsel, and tax benefits for the settled cases by mediation. Italy's efforts would provide people with meaningful lessons and perspectives. As society strives to promote private mediation to distribute and utilize the judicial resources' inefficient ways, institutions need to develop practical measures to increase the number of civil and commercial disputes in the mediation proceedings. To that end, legislative efforts to enact relevant laws necessary to provide incentives to disputing parties and establish integrated education and certification programs to train qualified mediators need to start soon.

• 한국철학논집
• /
• 제38호
• /
• pp.7-38
• /
• 2013

노자 철학에서 우리는 유위적 개인과 무위적 개인이라는 두 가지 유형의 개인을 유추할 수 있다. 유위적 개인은 확장성을 그 특징으로 하는데, 이들의 확장성은 곧 타인의 권리를 침해하는 공격성으로 나타나고, 이것이 문화적으로 고착된 사회가 허위적 사회이다. 무위적 개인은 허위적 권력과 권위를 버리고 자신의 참모습과 생명에 집중하며, 나아가 자발적으로 자신의 권리를 제한한다. 이들의 이러한 행위 방식은 상대방에게 자율공간을 마련해 줌으로써 상대방 스스로 자신의 생명력을 충실히 할 수 있게 한다. 이러한 무위적 개인들의 관계로 형성된 것이 현동 사회이다. 노자의 현동 사회는 개인권을 제한하지만 오히려 개인의 자율, 생명, 행복을 보장하고, 공동선을 세우지 않지만 오히려 공동선이 끊임없이 생성되는 개인-공동체 모형을 제시한다. 이는 개인권을 보장하는 동시에 공동선도 함께 실현하려는 시도와 다른 관점이다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.59-84
• /
• 2017

The effects of an arbitration agreement depend on the legislative policy of the nation where arbitral awards are made and where awards are worked out in the private procedures. According to the main body of Article 35 of the Korean Arbitration Act, arbitral awards have the same effects on the parties as the final and conclusive judgment of the court. This is only possible if the awards are formed by satisfying all the legal requirements, have gone into effect, and have become final and conclusive. It is for the legal stability and the effectiveness of the settlement of disputes that the Act grants arbitral awards. While investigating the effects of an arbitral award, the character of the arbitration in which the party's autonomy applies should be considered, along with the substance of the disputes which parties intend to resolve by an arbitration agreement. The proviso of Article 35, which was added in the 2016 Act, says that the main body of the Article shall not apply if recognition or enforcement of arbitral awards is refused under Article 38. Two stances have been proposed in interpreting the proviso. One of them is that there are grounds for refusing the recognition and enforcement of the awards. The other one is that the ruling of the dismissal of a request for enforcement has been final and conclusive. According to the former, it is really unexplained as to its relations with the action for setting aside arbitral awards to court and the distinction between nullity and revocation, and so on. Therefore, its meaning must be comprehended on the basis of the latter so that the current Act system with revocation litigation could be kept. The procedures of setting aside, recognizing, and enforcing arbitral awards are independent of one another under the Act. It is apprehended that the duplicate regulations may lead to the concurrence or contradiction of a court's judgment and ruling. Thus, we need to take proper measures against the negative sides by interfacing and conciliating these proceedings.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제41호
• /
• pp.327-356
• /
• 2014

지방자치의 궁극적인 목적은 지역사회의 주인인 주민의 복리증진이다. 주민의 복리증진은 주민의 생명과 재산의 보호로부터 시작된다. 이러한 보호활동의 대부분은 경찰의 기능이다. 따라서 주민의 복리증진을 위해서는 지역의 자율성을 바탕으로 하는 자치경찰이 개념적으로 전제가 되어야 한다. 지역사회에 뿌리를 두고 지역사회를 위하여 활동하는 자치경찰활동은 경찰과 지역사회를 재결합시켜주는 것이며, 지역의 문제해결을 중심으로 이루어지는 자치경찰활동은 범죄와 무질서, 범죄에 대한 두려움을 감소시킬 뿐만 아니라 지역주민을 동반자로 인식하며 지역사회의 전반적인 삶의 질을 개선시키기 위한 지역주민 자체의 노력의 표현이다. 자치경찰이 전면적으로 도입될 경우 정부와 지방자치단체에서는 그동안 준비해 온 여러가지 대안들을 면밀히 검토 분석하여 최적의 대안을 마련하여 시행착오를 줄이는 것이 무엇보다 중요하다. 최우선적으로는 자치경찰을 도입하려는 이유가 무엇인지 정확하게 파악해야 한다. 즉, 자치경찰의 도입은 중앙정부와 지방정부, 국가경찰과 자치경찰, 여당과 야당, 광역자치단체와 기초자치단체 간의 보이지 않는 주도권 다툼이 아니라 지방자치시대를 맞아 진정으로 지역주민들의 '안전'과 '삶의 질 향상'에 있음을 직시해야 한다.