• 교육시설 논문지
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.51-59
• /
• 2011

This research suggests that the Design Quality Indicator for School(DQIfS) could be applied on the education facilities construction process not only as a building design assessment tool, but also as a participation tool. From the analyze of the background, the aims, the implementation processes and the case studies of the DQIfS, the results are: 1. DQI was formulated with the social requirement for the public participation in the public building design processes.; 2. DQI was articulated with the aim to involve the wide range of the stakeholders in the design processes, to hear the various opinions of the stakeholders, and to apply these opinions in the planning or the decision-making processes.; 3. In the implementation stage, it was found that the implementation methods of the DQIfS was devised to involve the wide range of the stakeholders. Moreover, the DQIfS has transformed its representation way to convey the results to the stakeholders and make a base for the discussion. 4. Through the case studies, it was found that the DQIfS was used with various participatory planning methods in the implementation process. Furthermore, the DQIfS was used as a main method to provide the basis of the discussion about the educational facility design. Thus, it could be concluded that DQIfS is a specialized participation tool for making participatory processes in the educational building design processes.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제75호
• /
• pp.91-134
• /
• 2023

대통령기록관에 이관된 참여정부 대통령기록은 e지원시스템 문서관리카드로 상징되는 기록 생산시스템 혁신의 결과물이다. 기록은 의사결정과정을 기록화하여 정책 결정 과정을 드러낸다. 본고는 대통령비서실 기록관리비서관실에서 생산한 기록관리 혁신 관련 기록의 존재 형태를 파악하고, 기능-활동-주제-행위로 재조직하였다. 주제별 기록 유형은 관련 사안의 전개 과정과 기록의 특성을 체계적으로 이해하는 데 도움을 준다. 기록 건 상세정보를 작성하여 개별 기록 건의 성격을 파악하였다. 이러한 시도는 대통령기록의 평가, 이용 활성화를 위한 기초자료를 제공한다는 점에 그 의미가 있다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.107-129
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this paper is to critically examine Korean government's efforts in policy making and implementation regarding the Korea National Health Insurance System in the past and suggest a new paradigm for future policy changes. The structural and political characteristics of the Korea National Health Insurance, where health care services are provided almost exclusively by the private providers and funding for health comes equally from public and private sources, imply persistent difficulties in the operation of the system This may partially explain why the Korean system has continually experienced conflicts among stakeholders whenever there was an attempt to change policy. In this paper, we discuss four cases to illustrate such difficulties and barriers. We propose that in order to address these challenges and reduce policy errors as well as unintended results, it is necessary to restructure policy making process from being oriented toward 'quantitative expansion' to 'qualitative maturity', from a 'linear thinking' to a 'system thinking', from taking a 'top-down' to a 'governance and participatory' decision making process.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제35권6호
• /
• pp.21-28
• /
• 2008

This study deals with the participatory design process of renovating a children's park. The process should proceed with two major elements. Firstly, the children's park should be designed from the perspective of children. Secondly, it should be designed in consideration of the context of the community. This study is divided into two parts. First is the review of theory concerning the meaning and roles of the children's park as a community space, the importance of children's participation in the design and the participatory method of the children. The second is the case study. The site for the case study is Ssial Park in Nowon-Gu, Seoul. The entire process of the case study is with community participation, from identifying the park's problems to the actual construction. At every step, through the participatory programs, the community participates in the decision making. In addition, mutual understanding among participants is pursued through diverse means of communication. The following results of the case study were found. Firstly, diverse participatory programs and the active trial to enable the community to communicate contribute to the sense of ownership and responsibility concerning the park Secondly, the community can negotiate the differences in opinions without needing the help of experts. Of course, there are limits in the case study, such as the fact that the community organization, which is the core of communication and maintenance concerning the park, is not organized through the process of a case study. Another is that more diverse methods, which inform all community members of the participatory process, should have been used.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제61호
• /
• pp.5-29
• /
• 2019

참여정부 대통령기록은 기록 생산 방식 혁신의 결과로 남겨졌다. 그 기록은 의사결정 전 과정을 증거하고 있으며, 투명성과 설명책임성을 제고하는 수단으로 작용하였다. 본고는 기록의 존재형태를 분석하여 기록 재조직의 필요성을 주장하였다. 기록 재조직 방향으로 기록 분류체계 재설계, 기록의 논리적 재편철, 기록 건 상세정보의 기술 등을 제안하였다. 대통령기록의 이용을 활성화하기 위해서는 대통령기록관이 조속히 이러한 작업을 진행해야 한다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.53-60
• /
• 2013

Apartments amount to 58.3%, the highest proportion of domestic housing types. These apartments' lifespan (approximately 27 years) are one-third of the developed countries' housing lifespan due to the property developers and mass production. It is significantly short-cycle period considering the original physical lifespan of the apartment housing are 60 years. It has caused economic loss and environmental degradation. In recent years, research and development for the long life of the apartment housing has been actively performed, but it is limited on reconstruction and new construction. Reconstruction of existing a number of high-rise apartments is difficult owing to restrictions on the floor area ratio allowing for 40 years limit of decay resistance after the completion. Improving lifespan of the building has recently begun to receive attention as an alternative to remodeling. However, These sort of remodeling techniques tend to be focused on technology developed for the physical life extension. That means developing the techniques about dwelling-unit environment for residents satisfaction are required as well as improving physical construction. The purpose of this study is to propose and verify the Participatory Design Technique which can help the residents as the active participation in the design decision-making process.

• 한국디지털건축인테리어학회논문집
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.33-41
• /
• 2013

Considering the fact that quality of life(QOL) conceptually has objective and subjective attributes but difficulties in measuring the subjective aspect cause a number of studies not to be balanced, this study exploits AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process) which has been used for systematic decision making to include the other aspect. As the first step of the process decision making hierarchy model is set by content analysis of the UNDP QOL index and additional review of previous studies. 'Improving urban QOL' is a goal on top, 'Economical QOL', 'Environmental QOL', 'Social QOL' and 'Physical QOL' are dimensions of sub-goal(means objectives), and further decomposition follows. AHP shows that the dimensions of economical, physical, environmental and social QOL scored higher respectively. The aim of the model is to measure and prioritize the urban QOL in the two case study cities. The final score of the each city could be computed by integration of relative weights of dimensions for urban QOL. The final score of QOL for city A was 0.6642 and for city B the figure decreased to 0.3358. The method of this study could be used in stages of the process of urban planning. First stage is when planners try to have a correct and reliable perspective from the existed conditions of the city. Second stage is when the projects should be investigated to be confirmed for their efficiency. In other words planners can direct the scarce resources towards the aspects of QOL which are more important. And the results revealed that using AHP creates opportunity to involving the different groups in the stage of criteria weighting so that the attitudes of local community could be integrated well to the decision making to be suitable for a new paradigm of participatory and communicative planning.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제12권7호
• /
• pp.37-47
• /
• 2014

이 연구는 박상중 고찬이 제안한 '정책흐름 및 전문가집단 위상변동모형'(Policy Stream and Expert Group Standing Change Framework, 이후 PSECF)을 활용하여 참여정부의 전시작전통제권(이후 전작권) 결정을 분석하는 것이다. 전작권 전환 결정과정에서 노무현 전 대통령과 진보성향의 국가안전보장회의(National Security Committee, 이후 NSC)의 강력한 의지는 정책개발과정의 주요 동인으로 작동하였으며, 국방부 및 합참 등 군사전문가집단의 의견은 정책에 수동적이라는 이유로 철저하게 배제되었다. 전문가집단의 위상변동 측면에서 볼 때 전작권 전환 결정이후 8개월 만에 보수성향의 정부가 출범하게 됨으로써 참여정부에서 전작권 전환을 주도한 NSC는 위상이 약화된 반면에 국방부 및 합참과 같은 보수진영은 그 위상이 향상되었다. 결론적으로 참여정부의 전작권 전환에 관한 이 연구는 상위 수준의 국가정책을 설명하는 정책도구로서 PSECF의 적용가능성을 제고하였다는데 의의가 있다.

• 한국지역지리학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2004

지역균형발전이 노무현정부에 의하여 당면한 국가적 의제로 부활되고 있다. 지역 균형 정책은 보다 발전 기회의 형평성을 확보한다는 의미로 정당화되어 왔다. 그러나 공간적 균형과 노무현정부의 '참여 민주주의'가 가진 내재적 연관이 보다 검토되어야 할 것이다. 참여 민주주의는 신사회운동이 주장하는 대안적 발전을 달성하는 중요한 수단으로 평가되었다. 그러나 교통과 인터넷과 같은 전자 통신수단의 발전은 공간적 집중, 특히 권위적 자원의 집중을 강화한다. 이러한 집중은 이데올로기적 정치적 의사결정에 지방의 참여를 배제하는 경향이다. 따라서 참여 민주주의 실현을 위한 지역균형 발전 정책은 신수도 건설과 같은 행정기관 분산으로는 부족하다. 상징적 행위와 관련되는 부문의 지방 배치 및 중점 육성이 매우 중요하다. 문화 산업, 교육 등이 그 예가 될 수 있다.

• 대한지역사회영양학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.120-132
• /
• 1998

A major goal of the Community Plant Food Project is to develop partnerships between the Cornell Community Nutrition Program and Community-based organizations, including Cooperative Extension. A core principle behind this work is integrating research and intervention. Based on our work in Rochester, New York, we have developed a process and principles for effective partnerships. This new paradigm what we call the University-Community Partnership Model is a team effort that builds on the experiential literature in the fields of communication, leadership, community and team development, sociology, and participatory research and action. We have applied this model both to increase our understanding of Family Food Decision-making and to develop programs for families. In this project, we have used a variety of qualitative methods to understand food decisions from the perspectives of families and community stakeholders, including a group method for analyzing our qualitative interview data. For our survey of families, we developed the Enhanced Response Method, an approach for improving the validity and reliability of community surveys with families and, at the same time, building relationships with families and other stakeholders in the community for integrated and sustainable interventions. Because the knowledge we develop through the partnership and the interventions we seek to implement are products of the process, we are constantly seeking to refine this knowledge and to adapt emerging interventions through an ongoing evaluation process we call the Continuous Improvement Method.