• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 1999

The author observed and compared the radiographic features of 49 cases of the fibrous dysplasia and 14 cases of the ossifying fibroma in the osteoblastic or mature stage radiologically and histopathologically. The obtained results were as follows: 1. Fibrous dysplasia occurred most frequently in the 2nd decade, but ossifying fibroma in the 3rd and 4th decades, and both lesions occurred with slight predilection in females. 2. In most cases, chief complaints were painless facial swelling. And 61.1％ of fibrous dysplasia occurred in the maxilla, 92.9％ of ossifying fibroma in the mandible, and most of these lesions occurred in the premolar-molar region. 3. In the mandibular lesions, ossifying fibroma was shown more oval and round shape. but fibrous dysplasia was shown fusiform shape. 4. Fibrous dysplasia was shown homogeneously distributed. complete radiopaque shadow at 63％, and ossifying fibroma was shown concentric. mixed appearance of radiolucent and radiopaque shadow at 92.9％. 5. Fibrous dysplasia was entirely shown poorly outlined and blended to normal surrounding bone, but ossifying fibroma was shown well-defined border. 6. Cortical thinning and expansion were observed in these lesions. but degree of cortical expansion was more severe in ossifying fibroma than fibrous dysplasia. 7. Loss of lamina dura. tooth displacement. and displacement of mandibular canal were observed in both lesions. but root resorption was observed in ossifying fibroma only.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.217-221
• /
• 1991

Ossifying fibroma is a rare benign tumor of the maxilla and the mandible. And its nosology and diagnosis have had many problems. It occurs more common in young adult, especially in female, and there is a predilection for the mandible. The lesion is generally asymptomatic and recurrence is rare after conservative excision. Among ossifying fibroma, juvenile active ossifying fibroma grows rapidly, produces many symptoms, and frequently recurs after conservative excision. Authers experienced a case of juvenile active ossifying fibroma which recurred after two times of conservative surgery, and report is with review of the literatures.

• Imaging Science in Dentistry
• /
• v.50 no.1
• /
• pp.65-71
• /
• 2020

Ossifying fibroma is a slow-growing benign neoplasm that occurs most often in the jaws, especially the mandible. The tumor is composed of bone that develops within fibrous connective tissue. Some ossifying fibromas consist of cementum-like calcifications, while others contain only bony material; however, a mixture of these calcification types is commonly seen in a single lesion. Of the craniofacial bones, the mandible is the most commonly involved site, with the lesion typically inferior to the premolars and molars. Ossifying fibroma of the jaw shows a female predominance. Some reports of ossifying fibroma have been published in the literature; however, this report continues the research on this topic by detailing 3 types of ossifying fibroma findings on panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomographic images of 4 patients. The radiographs of the presented cases could help clinicians understand the variations in the radiographic appearance of this lesion.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.27 no.5
• /
• pp.478-481
• /
• 2005

Ossifying fibroma is a rare, benign, fibro-osseous tumor of mesenchymal origin. It develops mainly in the mandible, where it is usually slow growing and asymptomatic, whereas in the maxilla and paranasal sinus, it is more aggressive. The vast majority are located in the posterior region of the mandible; however, ossifying fibroma involving the maxillary sinus is uncommon. It may reach a very large size and cause facial asymmetry. It shows a female predilection, and most cases are seen in the third and fourth decades of life. Radiographically, ossifying fibroma is radiolucent or radiopaque depending on the amount of calcification. Histologically, the tumor consists of a cementum-like or bony mass. Ossifying fibroma shares many histopathologic features with fibrous dysplasia. Their radiographic features may help to separate these entities when pathological differentiation is uncertain. It is important to differentiate ossifying fibroma from fibrous dysplasia. The treatment of ossifying fibroma involves its complete removal using curettage, enucleation, excision, or en bloc resection. This case report presents an unusual case of ossifying fibroma of the maxillary sinus. We describe a Caldwell-Luc operation with a lateral window approach for excision of an ossifying fibroma of the maxillary sinus.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.27-36
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to obtain information on the clinical and radiographic features of the fibro-osseous lesions in the jaws. For this study, the author examined and analysed the clinical records and radiographs of 71 cases of 68 patients in fibrous dysplasia, 35 cases of ossifying fibroma and 30 cases of 16 patients of periapical cemental dysplasia diagnosed by clinical and radiographic or histopathological examinations. The obtained results were as followings: L Fibrous dysplasia occurred most frequently in the 2nd decade (30.0％), ossifying fibroma in the 3rd-4th decades, periapical cemental dysplasia in the 4th decade, and all of three lesions showed slight predilection in females. In most cases, chief complaints were painless facial swelling in fibrous dysplasia and ossifying fibroma, and periapical cemental dysplasia was found accidentally in radiographs. 2. Fibrous dysplasia was occurred more frequently in maxilla, ossifying fibroma in mandible and both lesions in premolar-molar area. Periapical cemental dysplasia was occurred most frequently in the mandibular anterior area. The size of fibrous dysplasia was larger than that of ossifying fibroma, and the shape of ossifying fibroma was more round and elliptical than fibrous dysplasia whose was fusiform. 3. Fibrous dysplasia was shown homogeneous radiopaque shadow of 57.6％ and ossifying fibroma & periapical cemental dysplasia were shown mixed appearance of radiolucency and radiopacity shadows at 74.2％, 60.0％, respectively. 4. Fibrous dysplasia was entirely shown poorly defined at 87.7％, but ossifying fibroma & periapical cemental dysplasia were shown well outlined at 60.0％, 70.0％, respectively. 5. Cortical thinning and expansion were observed in fibrous dysplasia and ossifying fibroma, and severe in ossifying fibroma than fibrous dysplasia, and those signs were not seen in periapical cemental dysplasia. Loss of lamina dura was dominant in fibrous dysplasia and root resorption was dominant in ossifying fibroma. Displacement of mandibular canal and the degree of the increase of vertical dimension were alike in both lesions. Displacement of maxillary sinus or nasal cavity, thinning & expansion of the maxillary sinus were dominant in fibrous dysplasia. 6. Polyostotic fibrous dysplasia was occurred at 5.9％, Multiple periapical cemental dysplasia at 43.7％. Occurrence rate in the edentulous area of fibrous dysplasia and ossifying fibroma were 7.0％, 8.6％, respectively.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.27 no.2
• /
• pp.161-172
• /
• 1997

The purpose of this study was to know the proper diagnosis and to establish the treatment plan of cementifying and ossifying fibroma in the jaws through the clinical, raiological, and histopathologic considerations. The authors compared and analyzed the c1inicoradiologic features of the thirteen cases of cementifying and ossifying fibroma, diagnosed at the Dental college hospital in Yonsei university, Seoul, Korea, during the period from 1980 to 1995. The obtained results were as follows : 1. Cementifying and ossifying fibroma occured in the mean age, 44 years, ranged from 29 to 65 years and the male to female ratio was approximately 1:5. 2. Swelling was the most common frequent presenting complaints. Other reported symptoms included pain, tooth mobility and asymptom. 3. The frequency of the lesions was twelve cases in the mandible and one case in the maxilla. And eleven of thirteen cases were distributed on the premolar and molar region. 4. Radiologically, eight of thirteen cases were well defined lesions, five cases were relatively well defined lesions. And nine of thirteen cases were mixed lesions, three cases were radiopaque lesions, and only one case was purely radiolucenct lesion. 5. Histologically, seven of thirteen cases were classified ossifying fibroma, four cases were cemento-ossifying fibroma, and two cases were cementifying fibroma.

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.16 no.5 s.108
• /
• pp.401-404
• /
• 1978

The author have observed a case of ossifying fibroma at the upper left canine & first premolar region of 1 32 years old female. Enuncleation was performed under general anesthesia and the post operative course was uneventful and the result was excellent.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• v.37 no.2
• /
• pp.127-132
• /
• 2011

Juvenile ossifying fibroma is an expansive intraosseous lesion of the bones. In most patients, the tumors are located in the facial bones. The main characteristics of juvenile ossifying fibroma are the early age of onset, localization of the tumor, radiological pattern and a tendency for recurrence. This article describes a case of expanded juvenile ossifying fibroma in the right maxilla in a 12-year old boy. The lesion was removed totally by surgery under general anesthesia. The patient showed no radiological signals of recurrence approximately two years after surgery.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• v.41 no.1
• /
• pp.48-51
• /
• 2015

Cemento-ossifying fibromas are benign tumors, and, although cases of an aggressive type have been reported, no cases of cemento-ossifying fibroma transforming into osteosarcoma have been documented previously. Low-grade osteosarcoma is a rare type of primary bone tumor, representing 1%-2% of all osteosarcomas. A 45-year-old female patient was diagnosed with cemento-ossifying fibroma, treated with mass excision several times over a period of two years and eight months, and followed up. After biopsy gathered because of signs of recurrence, she was diagnosed with low-grade osteosarcoma. The patient underwent wide excision, segmental mandibulectomy, and reconstruction with fibula free flap. The aim of this report is to raise awareness of the possibility that cemento-ossifying fibroma can transform into osteosarcoma and of the consequent necessity for careful diagnosis and treatment planning.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.261-273
• /
• 1991

This study was undertaken to document and better defined this condition to help clarify this clinical and radiographical appearances by the analysis of clinical and radiographical features of fibro-osseous lesions in the jaws. A study was made of a series of 128 cases with fibro-osseous lesions. The obtained results were as follows. 1. Fibrous dysplasia of the jaws occurred with equal predilection for males and females. But the females occurred in 68% of cemento-ossifying fibroma and 75% of periapical cemental dysplasia. 2. 43% of fibrous dysplasia and 32% of cemento-ossifying fibroma occurred in the 2nd decades and 33% of periapical cemental dysplasia in 5th decades. 3. 62% of fibrous dysplasia occurred in the maxilla, 73% of cemento-ossifying fibroma in mandible, 90% of periapical cemental dysplasia in mandible. 4. 98% of fibrous dysplasia occurred in premolar-molar region, 77% of cemento-ossifying fibroma in molar region, 68% of periapical cemental dysplasia in incisor region. 5. In serial radiographic features, mature stage were 55% of fibrous dysplasia, 45% of cemento-ossifying fibroma, 59% of periapical cemental dysplasia. 6. 87% of fibrous dysplasia had monostotic lesion, 67% of periapical cemental dysplasia had multiple lesions. 7. In fibrous dysplasia and cemento-ossifying fibroma, migration of tooth occurred in 61.7% and 36.4%, retention of tooth occurred in 4.3% and 9.1%, loss of lamina dura occurred in 6.4% and 9.1%, and root resorption had not occurred in fibrous dysplasia, but occurred in 18% of cemento-ossifying fibroma, displacement of mandibular canal occurred in 14.9% and 31.8%.