• 제목/요약/키워드: Organizational innovation capacity

검색결과 46건 처리시간 0.025초

국내 중소기업의 내·외부 요인이 스마트팩토리의 도입에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구 : 금속가공업을 중심으로 (Effects of Internal and External Characteristics of Korean SMEs on the Introduction of Smart Factory : An Exploratory Investigation on the Metal Processing Industry)

  • 이종각;김주헌
    • 한국IT서비스학회지
    • /
    • 제19권6호
    • /
    • pp.97-117
    • /
    • 2020
  • Five years have passed since the introduction of the smart factory amid the new opportunities for growth and job creation in relation to domestic manufacturing companies. Nevertheless, there is a lack of analysis on SMEs introduction smart factories. This study empirically analyzed the effects on the introduction of smart factories of domestic metal processing SMEs by distinguishing the characteristics of enterprises In this study, 103 companies which introduced smart factories and another 106 companies which did not introduce them were sampled. The Introduction of the Smart Factory was analyzed by four categories such as the Company characteristics (R&D capability, product production capability, organizational change), entrepreneur characteristics (risk sensitivity), relational characteristics (trust, dependence, cooperation, Influence), and structural characteristics (competition). As a result of the research, we found out product production capacity, risk sensitivity, trust and cooperation, Influence, and competition are statistically significant in the introduction of smart factory. But competition was characterized by a negative (-) sign opposite to the hypothesis. This study is meaningful in that the scope of the analysis has been expanded by analyzing whether smart factory was introduced or not considering the characteristics of the company. And there should be continuous research on its utilization as well as the introduction of smart factory.

Computer Aided Innovation 역량이 연구개발역량에 미치는 효과: 국내 중소기업을 대상으로 (The Effects of the Computer Aided Innovation Capabilities on the R&D Capabilities: Focusing on the SMEs of Korea)

  • 심재억;변무장;문효곤;오재인
    • Asia pacific journal of information systems
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.25-53
    • /
    • 2013
  • This study analyzes the effect of Computer Aided Innovation (CAI) to improve R&D Capabilities empirically. Survey was distributed by e-mail and Google Docs, targeting CTO of 235 SMEs. 142 surveys were returned back (rate of return 60.4%) from companies. Survey results from 119 companies (83.8%) which are effective samples except no-response, insincere response, estimated value, etc. were used for statistics analysis. Companies with less than 50billion KRW sales of entire researched companies occupy 76.5% in terms of sample traits. Companies with less than 300 employees occupy 83.2%. In terms of the type of company business Partners (called 'partners with big companies' hereunder) who work with big companies for business occupy 68.1%. SMEs based on their own business (called 'independent small companies') appear to occupy 31.9%. The present status of holding IT system according to traits of company business was classified into partners with big companies versus independent SMEs. The present status of ERP is 18.5% to 34.5%. QMS is 11.8% to 9.2%. And PLM (Product Life-cycle Management) is 6.7% to 2.5%. The holding of 3D CAD is 47.1% to 21%. IT system-holding and its application of independent SMEs seemed very vulnerable, compared with partner companies of big companies. This study is comprised of IT infra and IT Utilization as CAI capacity factors which are independent variables. factors of R&D capabilities which are independent variables are organization capability, process capability, HR capability, technology-accumulating capability, and internal/external collaboration capability. The highest average value of variables was 4.24 in organization capability 2. The lowest average value was 3.01 in IT infra which makes users access to data and information in other areas and use them with ease when required during new product development. It seems that the inferior environment of IT infra of general SMEs is reflected in CAI itself. In order to review the validity used to measure variables, Factors have been analyzed. 7 factors which have over 1.0 pure value of their dependent and independent variables were extracted. These factors appear to explain 71.167% in total of total variances. From the result of factor analysis about measurable variables in this study, reliability of each item was checked by Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. All measurable factors at least over 0.611 seemed to acquire reliability. Next, correlation has been done to explain certain phenomenon by correlation analysis between variables. As R&D capabilities factors which are arranged as dependent variables, organization capability, process capability, HR capability, technology-accumulating capability, and internal/external collaboration capability turned out that they acquire significant correlation at 99% reliability level in all variables of IT infra and IT Utilization which are independent variables. In addition, correlation coefficient between each factor is less than 0.8, which proves that the validity of this study judgement has been acquired. The pair with the highest coefficient had 0.628 for IT utilization and technology-accumulating capability. Regression model which can estimate independent variables was used in this study under the hypothesis that there is linear relation between independent variables and dependent variables so as to identify CAI capability's impact factors on R&D. The total explanations of IT infra among CAI capability for independent variables such as organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, technology-accumulating capability, and collaboration capability are 10.3%, 7%, 11.9%, 30.9%, and 10.5% respectively. IT Utilization exposes comprehensively low explanatory capability with 12.4%, 5.9%, 11.1%, 38.9%, and 13.4% for organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, technology-accumulating capability, and collaboration capability respectively. However, both factors of independent variables expose very high explanatory capability relatively for technology-accumulating capability among independent variable. Regression formula which is comprised of independent variables and dependent variables are all significant (P<0.005). The suitability of regression model seems high. When the results of test for dependent variables and independent variables are estimated, the hypothesis of 10 different factors appeared all significant in regression analysis model coefficient (P<0.01) which is estimated to affect in the hypothesis. As a result of liner regression analysis between two independent variables drawn by influence factor analysis for R&D capability and R&D capability. IT infra and IT Utilization which are CAI capability factors has positive correlation to organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, technology-accumulating capability, and collaboration capability with inside and outside which are dependent variables, R&D capability factors. It was identified as a significant factor which affects R&D capability. However, considering adjustable variables, a big gap is found, compared to entire company. First of all, in case of partner companies with big companies, in IT infra as CAI capability, organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, and technology capability out of R&D capacities seems to have positive correlation. However, collaboration capability appeared insignificance. IT utilization which is a CAI capability factor seemed to have positive relation to organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, and internal/external collaboration capability just as those of entire companies. Next, by analyzing independent types of SMEs as an adjustable variable, very different results were found from those of entire companies or partner companies with big companies. First of all, all factors in IT infra except technology-accumulating capability were rejected. IT utilization was rejected except technology-accumulating capability and collaboration capability. Comprehending the above adjustable variables, the following results were drawn in this study. First, in case of big companies or partner companies with big companies, IT infra and IT utilization affect improving R&D Capabilities positively. It was because most of big companies encourage innovation by using IT utilization and IT infra building over certain level to their partner companies. Second, in all companies, IT infra and IT utilization as CAI capability affect improving technology-accumulating capability positively at least as R&D capability factor. The most of factor explanation is low at around 10%. However, technology-accumulating capability is rather high around 25.6% to 38.4%. It was found that CAI capability contributes to technology-accumulating capability highly. Companies shouldn't consider IT infra and IT utilization as a simple product developing tool in R&D section. However, they have to consider to use them as a management innovating strategy tool which proceeds entire-company management innovation centered in new product development. Not only the improvement of technology-accumulating capability in department of R&D. Centered in new product development, it has to be used as original management innovative strategy which proceeds entire company management innovation. It suggests that it can be a method to improve technology-accumulating capability in R&D section and Dynamic capability to acquire sustainable competitive advantage.

ICT기업 융합성과의 결정요인에 관한 연구 (Determinants of Convergence Performance in ICT Firms)

  • 이무순;손달호
    • 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
    • /
    • 제26권3호
    • /
    • pp.1-23
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose With the advent of the 4th Industrial Revolution era, ICT convergence industry is leading the wave of new change. These changes in the industrial field are recognizing convergence as a strategic cooperation tool of management for creating new value. In order to achieve the research purpose, conceptual understanding of ICT convergence is summarized by focusing on concepts, features, types and cases. In addition, this study established the theoretical rationale for the determinants of ICT convergence performance, and examined previous researches related to ICT convergence. Design/methodology/approach The empirical research method is based on a survey of 510 companies including managers and mid-level practitioners who understand the contents of the relevant field, 305 data were used for analysis. We conducted exploratory factor analysis to verify the grouping of these questionnaire items and conducted confirmatory factor analysis to analyze the validity and reliability of the measurement model. Through the statistical analysis, we analyzed the structural relationship of ICT firms' competencies for convergence performance. Findings Linkage of ICT strategies established by corporations is an important factor for enhancing resource capacity and convergence ability. It is important to ensure that product innovation, consumer-oriented strategies, and ICT strategies for the implementation of business strategies are closely linked. In addition, in the convergence environment, companies should make efforts to develop convergence ability and improve organizational performance through utilization of ICT resources. From the CEO's perspective, it is necessary to understand the knowledge, technology and resources arising from the convergence environment, and to integrate with the resources possessed by the enterprise to induce the organization's performance.

조직기업가정신이 예비창업자에게 주는 시사점 (Case Study on Organization Entrepreneurship for preliminary Entrepreneurs)

  • 선승원;장아성;한정희
    • 벤처창업연구
    • /
    • 제9권2호
    • /
    • pp.221-232
    • /
    • 2014
  • 새롭게 창업을 준비하는 이들과 창업을 실행 단계에 옮기고 있는 이들에게는 많은 어려움들이 존재한다. 그리고 이를 극복하는데 무엇보다 중요한 요소로서 기업가정신이 요구된다. 하지만 기업가정신에 대한 이론과 연구들은 이들 창업자들과 예비창업자들에게는 접근하고 이해하기 어려운 것이 현 실정이다. 본 연구는 이러한 기업가정신이 실제 사례에서 어떻게 적용되고 있는지, 또한, 개인적인 기업가정신 조직 기업가정신이 창업초기서부터 어떠한 영향을 미치는지에 대해 중점을 두었다. 연구의 진행은 이론적인 어려움을 실제 사례로서 해석하기 위하여 국내의 2개의 중견 중소기업을 선정하였고, 이들 기업이 각각 30년, 20년을 성장할 수 있었던 원인에 대하여 기업가정신적인 요인을 파악하였고 쉽게 간과될 수 있는 조직기업가정신적인 특성을 함께 연구하였다. 2개 기업의 사례분석 결과는 크게 3가지로 요약할 수 있다. 첫 째, 창업초기부터 내부 네트워크 시스템을 잘 정비하였다. 이러한 숙달된 내부 네트워크는 장기적으로 외부 네트워크를 통해 직접적, 간접적인 네트워크 효과를 시장에서 빠르게 얻을 수 있었다. 두 번째, 최근 확산되고 있는 기업의 조직문화에 대한 창업자 개인과 조직적 차원의 수용이 시기적으로 매우 빨랐다. 이는 중소기업이 겪을 수 있는 인적자원문제를 해결하는 기초적인 원동력이 되었다. 마지막으로 기술혁신역량이다. 창업초기 사업을 진행하면서 나타나는 재무적인 어려움에도 불구하고 기술역량의 개발에 대한 집중적인 투자를 지속하였고, 이는 수익적인 성과 이외에도 최근 강조되는 지식재산 관리까지 빠르게 수용할 수 있는 결과를 가져왔다. 이 세 가지 특성은 창업자 개인들의 기업가적인 특성이면서도 동시에 조직이 보유한 초기부터의 특성이기도 하였다. 그리고 이러한 조직기업가적인 특성이 예비 창업자들에게 창업초기부터 꾸준하게 기업을 성장시킬 수 있는 핵심 요소로 본 연구에서는 판단하였다.

  • PDF

시스템 설계전제의 변화와 공공부문 과학기술발전관리시스템 구조의 개혁 (The Changes of System Design Premises and the Structural Reforms of Korean Government S&T Development Management System)

  • 노화준
    • 기술혁신연구
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.1-21
    • /
    • 1997
  • The objective of this paper is to think about what structural reforms of the Korean government S&T development management system might be. Korean society is currently experiencing a drastic socio-economic transformation. The results of this transformation should be reflected on the determining process of the directions and breadths of structural reforms of government S&T development management system. Because the government system design will be based on the premises of socio-economic conditions under which administrative activities perform and also this socio-economic changes can influence on changes of the premises of government management system design. Moreover, S&T development management system is a subsystem of government system so that the directions of structural reform of those subsystems should be considered in the broad framework changes in the development management system of the government. For the last forty years, the Korean government S&T development management system has been based on the premises including transformation from an agrarian society to an industrial society, authoritarianism and centrally controlled institutions, and exteremely small portions of private investments for science and thechonology R & D of the total. Recently, however, the premises of Korean government S&T development management system have rapidly changed. the characteristics of these changes are including tranformation from an industrial society to a knowledge and information intensive society, globalization, localization, and relatively large portion of private investments for science and technology R & C of the total. The basis of government reforms in Korea was the realization of the performances and values through the enhancement of national competitive capacity, attainment of lean government, decentralization and autonomy. However, the Korean government has attached a symbolic value of strategic organizations representing strong policy intentions of government for the science and technology based development. Most problems associated with the Korean government S&T development management system have grown worse during 1990s. Many people perceive that considerable part of this problem was generated because the government could not properly adapt itself to new administrative environment and the paradigm shift in its role. First of all, the Korean government S&T development management system as a whole failed to develop an integrated vision under which processes in formulating science and thechology development goals and developing consistent government plans concerning science and technology development are guided. Second, most of the local governments have little organizational capacity and manpowers to handle localized activities to promote science and technology in their regions. Third, the measure to coordinate and set priorities to invest resources for the development of science and technology was not effective. Fourth, the Most has been losing its reputation as the symbol of ideological commitment of the top policy maker to promote science and technology. Various ideas to reform government S&T development management system have been suggested recently. Most frequently cited ideas are as follow : (ⅰ)strengthen the functions of MoST by supplementing the strong incentive and regulatory measures; (ⅱ)create a new Ministry of Education, Science & Technology and Research by merging the Ministry of Education and the MoST; (ⅲ)create a new Ministry of Science & Technology and Industry ; and(ⅳ)create a National Science and Technology Policy Council under the chairmanship of the President. Four alternatives suggested have been widely discussed among the interested parties and they each have merits as well as weaknesses. The first alternative could be seen as an alternative which cannot resolve current conflicts among various ministries concerning priority setting and resource allocation. However, this alternatives can be seen as a way of showing the top policymaker's strong intention to emphasize science and technology based development. Second alternative is giving a strategic to emphasize on the training and supplying qualified manpower to meet knowledge and information intensive future society. This alternative is considered to be consistent with the new administrative paradigm emphasizing lean government and decentralization. However, opponents are worrying about the linkages and cooperative research between university and industry could be weakening. The third alternative has been adopted mostly in nations which have strong basic science research but weak industrial innovation traditions. Main weakness of this alternative for Korea is that Korean science and technology development system has no strong basic science and technology research traditions. The fourth alternative is consistent with new administrative paradigms and government reform bases. However, opponents to this alternative are worried that the intensive development of science and technology because of Korea's low potential research capabilities in science and technology development. Considerning the present Korean socio-economic situation which demands highly qualified human resources and development strategies which emphasizes the accumulations of knowledge-based stocks, I would like to suggest the route of creating a new Ministry of Education, Science & Technology and Research by intergrating education administration functions and science & technology development function into one ministry.

  • PDF

과기특성화대학 학생창업정책에 대한 인식분석: KAIST 사례를 중심으로 (Analysis of Perceptions of Student Start-up Policies in Science and Technology Colleges: Focusing on the KAIST case)

  • 안태욱;류춘렬;백민정
    • 벤처창업연구
    • /
    • 제19권2호
    • /
    • pp.197-214
    • /
    • 2024
  • 본 연구는 과학기술특성화대학의 학생창업 지원정책에 대한 학생들의 인식을 조사하고, 상향적 접근 방식을 적용하여 정책 수행 대상자인 학생들의 요구 사항을 반영한 정책개선 방안을 도출하고자 수행되었다. 이를 위해 KAIST 학생들을 대상으로 한 설문 조사 및 분석을 통해 학생창업 지원 정책의 효과적인 실행 방안을 탐색하였다. 연구 결과, 학생창업 현장과의 정책목표 공유, 정책 수립 시 학내 학생창업 현장의 의견 반영, 학생 창업가 육성을 위한 창업친화적학사제도 체계의 구축에 대한 개선의 시급성이 높게 나타나고 있었다. 관련하여 집행기관의 역량 강화, 교육과정 내에서의 마케팅 및 시장개척 역량, 사업가로서의 조직관리 및 실무역량 향상의 필요성이 제기되었다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 다음과 같은 개선방안을 제안하고자 한다. 첫째, 창업지원 정책의 투명성 및 접근성 강화가 요구되며, 학생들이 정책목표를 명확히 이해하고, 창업지원정책에 쉽게 접근할 수 있도록 정보의 투명성과 접근성을 향상시켜야 한다. 둘째, 학생 중심의 창업정책개발이 요구되며, 학생창업지원 정책을 개발함에 있어 학생들의 의견을 적극적으로 반영하여, 학생들의 요구와 실제 창업 환경을 고려한 맞춤형 정책을 수립해야 한다. 셋째, 과기특성화대학 특성이 반영된 창업친화적학사제도의 개선이 요구되며, 학생들이 창업활동에 더욱 적극적으로 참여할 수 있도록 적극적인 창업친화적학사제도를 도입하거나 개선하여, 창업 활동을 학점으로 인정하거나 창업 관련 교과목을 확대하는 등의 조치를 취해야 한다. 이 연구 결과를 토대로 과학기술특성화대학에서 학생창업을 더욱 적극적으로 지원하고, 창업가정신을 고취시키는 데 의미 있는 기초자료를 제공하고, 대학이 기술혁신과 사회적 가치 창출에 기여하는 혁신 창업생태계 조성에 기여할 수 있기를 기대한다.

  • PDF