• 제목/요약/키워드: New York Convention.

검색결과 70건 처리시간 0.029초

러시아 투자 환경 변화에 따른 한국기업의 분쟁 대응 전략에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Dispute Resolution Strategy of Korea Companies on Russia's Investment Environment Changes)

  • 김성룡
    • 무역상무연구
    • /
    • 제67권
    • /
    • pp.143-162
    • /
    • 2015
  • Russia has a huge amount of energy resources. It is an attractive factor to countries which spend loads of energy. Republic of Korea is also one of large energy consumption countries. Therefore, It will be needed to raise energy cooperation with Russia. It's companies will increase trade focusing on the energy industry in the long term. Recently, However, Foreign companies should be careful when they enter the rapidly changing Russia market. In other words, companies will need a strategic approach to prepare the early case assessment and how to solve a possible dispute as they analyze cost and profit in business. This study is analyzing several dispute cases related in Russia. It presents some strategies for Korean companies such as dispute resolution method, arbitration institution selection method and so on. In addition, it proposes the introduction of the early case assessment for reducing a waste of time and cost. Furthermore, according as the importance of OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises is highlighted in international community, companies should prepare practical division to establish a system of responsible business conduct. Finally, they will have to get an advice and counseling from the Russia legal experts in the early stages of the contract.

  • PDF

The ICC Scrutiny Process and Enhanced Enforceability of Arbitral Awards

  • Flecke-Giammarco, Gustav
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제24권3호
    • /
    • pp.47-77
    • /
    • 2014
  • Ever since its introduction in the 1927 ICC Arbitration Rules, scrutiny of awards by the ICC Court has been a cornerstone feature of ICC arbitration. Most players involved in the arbitral process are likely to concede that a certain level of review of arbitral awards is both desirable and beneficial. Indeed, proponents among the users are frequently influenced in their choice of the ICC as the administering arbitral institution, based on their strong conviction that time and money invested in the resolution of a dispute is ultimately only well spent if awards are voluntarily complied with or at least less susceptible to be set aside. By providing a look behind the scenes of the scrutiny process, the article does away with tales of excessive intervention on behalf of the arbitral institution when reviewing and approving awards and demystifies the role played by the ICC Court throughout its close interaction with arbitral tribunals operating under the ICC Rules. The article further argues that the scrutiny process can be a highly efficient tool that helps to increase the quality and enforceability of awards rendered under the aegis of the ICC.

  • PDF

사이버무역에서 중재의 역할과 온라인중재에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Roles of Arbitration and Online Arbitration in International Cyber Trade)

  • 오원석;유병욱
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.61-101
    • /
    • 2004
  • Information and communications technologies are affecting an economic and social transformation of all countries. Without exception international commercial dispute resolution systems are faced with change its mechanism to online technology. Dispute parties can seek redress through arbitration other than litigation or mediation. Traditional dispute resolutions do not match the cyber trade environment which is basically pursuit the speed and efficiency in cyberspace. Arbitration other than resolution methods have been considered to be match with the online environment which is including party autonomy, speed and internationally accepted and binding awards. Traditional arbitration, however is lack of time and different physical location relating all parties. So we now think cyberspace as for the resolving place which is online arbitration. Even the parties exist in different space and time they may meet in the same time and space without moving or trips. Nowadays there are many online arbitration service provider serving the resolution of dispute arising with online transaction. In this paper we study the tendency for online arbitration, the recognize uncertain matters and avoiding programs its matters when use the online arbitration between disputing parties under cyber trade environment.

  • PDF

ASEAN 국가들의 외국중재판정에 관한 승인 및 집행 - 말레이시아·싱가포르·인도네시아의 법제 및 판례를 중심으로 - (Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in ASEAN)

  • 김영주
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제25권2호
    • /
    • pp.19-47
    • /
    • 2015
  • International arbitration is an increasingly popular means of alternative dispute resolution for cross-border commercial transactions. The primary advantage of international arbitration over court litigation is enforceability. An international arbitration award is enforceable in most countries in the world. Especially, statistics indicate of ASEAN such as Malaysia and Singapore that the vast majority of defeated companies comply with the terms of international arbitral awards against them or settle soon after the award is rendered. Unlike Malaysia and Singapore, in Indonesia, there are several grounds for refusal of enforcement of an award including where both the nature of the dispute and the agreement to arbitrate do not meet the requirements set out in the Arbitration Law. Because Indonesia does not acknowledge decisions of foreign courts, theoretically they could enforce an international arbitral award which was set aside by the court in the seat of arbitration. This paper introduces the legal system and cases of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in ASEAN, especially Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. Secondly, by comparing their law and cases, the paper emphasized the international suitability and global fitness in involved in recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards.

온라인분쟁해결의 활용과 문제점에 관한 연구 - 온라인중재를 중심으로 - (A Study on the Utilization and Problems of Online Dispute Resolution : Focusing on the Online Arbitration)

  • 유병욱
    • 무역상무연구
    • /
    • 제19권
    • /
    • pp.191-223
    • /
    • 2003
  • Electronic commerce and the Internet offer unprecedented opportunities. The explosive expansion of the use of the Internet makes it possible for businesses to expand their markets and render services. Global transaction costs are easy to cut off using Internet and transaction speed is faster than before. Where cyberspace is not free from claims, Offline transaction can lead to problems and disputes the same is for cyberspace transactions. However ADR is not meet for the online transaction for speed, cost and open network system, ODR methods to resolve electronic commerce conflicts is crucial for building confidence and permitting access to justice in an online business environment. The use of the Internet and the network in dispute resolution has an impact on the types of communication implied in the relevant processes such as automated negotiation, online mediation and online arbitration and involves new technological issues such as the integrity and confidentiality of data and communication used to transmit and store data. Among the ODR systems Online Arbitration is currently binding both parties disputed and can achieve the aim of dispute award the same as the traditional arbitration. Arbitration is based on the New York Convention 1958, Arbitration Model law 1985 and national Arbitration Act that are founded on territorial area and rested on arbitration agreement, constitution of the arbitral tribunal, due process, final and binding award and enforcement of the arbitration award. To compare with this issues Online arbitration has unnecessarily legal unstability and risk. ODR is the burgeoning field and has created a new issues. All such issues which have been debated in the ADR are composed with ODR. But these are not limited Some of issues are further complicated by the nature of the online environment such as confidentiality and principle of parties. It is true that online arbitration should comply with legal provisions, but which is impossible to adhere of the law. Flexible translation and functional equivalence of legal provisions are needed for acceptance of electronic commerce disputes. Finally electronic commerce now takes place on the Internet, it is inevitable that the commercial world wants access to dispute resolution process that best suits the new commercial environment. ODR methods are processing for development and legal issues are considered by both national and international authorities. Introduction of new Conventions or amend Convention and Model law of ODR comes near.

  • PDF

장애 권리 기반한 국제협력: 북한 관련하여 (Disability-Rights Based International Cooperation: With Some References to North Korea)

  • 김형식;우주형
    • 재활복지
    • /
    • 제22권2호
    • /
    • pp.1-30
    • /
    • 2018
  • 본 논문은 2006년 유엔 장애인권리협약의 맥락에서 사회복지 관점으로부터 인권 및 장애인 권리의 현주소를 탐구하려고 시도하였다. 전반적인 논의는 일반적인 인권과 특히 장애인권의 과제들에 대한 과감한 해결이 어려운 북한의 상황에 초점이 맞춰져 있다. 유엔 장애인 권리협약은 모든 비준 당사국이 협약을 이행하기 위해 법제도의 개혁과 조화, 정책 및 프로그램 개발을 시작하도록 촉구한다. 남북한도 모두 예외가 아니다. 북한 인권에 관해서는 유엔 조사위원회에 의하지 않더라도 그 비참한 상황은 잘 드러나 있다. 그러나 이 논문에서는 한국의 인권이 북한보다 우월하다고 보는 것은 아니다. 이 논문은 그 문제에 대해 남북한과 그밖에 다른 나라들에게 공통된 추가 조치를 위한 영역들을 제시하였다. 장애인 권리에 관한 일반적인 논의와 별개로 본 논문의 특별한 기여는 북한에 관한 최신 정보와 자료를 도출하려고 노력한 사실에 있다. 그것은 유엔과 북한 자체로부터 나온 여러 출처에 의존하였다. 북한 장애인 당국은 장애인의 인권 개선을 위해 외부로부터의 도움을 청하려는 열의로 매우 노력하고 있음을 알 수 있다. 또한 그것은 재정적 지원 및 물질적 지원에 대한 국제적 협력의 많은 필요성을 보여준다. 본 논문은 유엔장애권리협약 제32조가 규정하는 국제협력의 기치 아래, 남북한의 장애인단체간 협력에 긍정적 신호로 평화와 안정을 위한 단계적 조치를 취하는 남북한 간의 최근 정치발전에 주목하고 있다. 보다 비판적으로, 본 논문에서는 균형 잡힌 법제도 개혁, 정책 개발을 보장하며 국제 협력 분야를 선명하게 하기 위해 전반적인 데이터 기반을 개선해야 할 필요성을 지적하였다.

비키니 수영복에 관한 연구 -1946년에서 1960년대까지 미국을 중심으로- (Bikinis in the United States, from 1946 to the 1960s)

  • 이예영
    • 복식
    • /
    • 제56권7호
    • /
    • pp.142-151
    • /
    • 2006
  • Bikini, a brief two-piece bathing suit revealing the wearer's navel, was first introduced in Paris, in 1946. However, it was not until the late 1950s that Americans were ready to adopt bikinis. Therefore, I focused on the following research questions to understand the popularization process of bikinis in the United States, from 1946 to the 1960s: 1. Why were Americans initially hesitant to adopt the bikini? 2. What were the factors that influenced the popularization of the bikini among Americans in the late 1950s? Primary sources including Bazaar. Madmoiselle, Vogue, The New York Times, and Life were reviewed. I referred to secondary sources on the history of fashion and American popular culture to interpret primary sources. According to the primary sources, Americans were hesitant to adopt the bikini, partly due to the excessive demand on the wearer's figure. However, the conservative social atmosphere during Cold War would not accept immorality and obscenity which would threaten America's future. Therefore, the campaigns against the sex industry, which developed prominently after WWII, predominated American society during the 1950s. Under this atmosphere, a small number of pictures and articles on bikinis appeared in the primary sources. Bikinis were only found in advertisements including sun lotions and hair removers. However, American society had to accept the change in sexual mores by the end of the 1930s. Body-revealing fashions including miniskirts, hot pants, and see-through material reflected the change in social convention. By the end of the 1950s, the number of pictures and articles on bikinis also began to increase in the primary sources. More Americans adopted bikinis with the increasing number of private pools and European trips. The vogue of sun-tanning and movies featuring bikinis further contributed to their popularity in the late 1930s and into the 1960s.

중국에 있어서 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행 거절 사유인 공서와 법의 지배 (The Public Policy Ground for Refusing Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Rule of Law in Chinese)

  • 김선정
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제18권3호
    • /
    • pp.23-50
    • /
    • 2008
  • In a global economy where, private parties increasingly favour arbitration over litigation, many foreigners are unfortunately reluctant to arbitration with China's parties because the China national courts do not scrutinize the merits when deciding whether to recognize and enforce foreign awards. As a result, the finality of arbitral awards hangs in uncertainty. Overseas concern is that China's courts may abuse "Public Policy" grounds provided for in the New York Convention to set aside or refuse to enforce foreign awards. The purpose of this article is to examine the distrust to enforcement of arbitral awards whether that is just an assumption. In spite of the modernize and internationalize her international arbitration system and many reforms provided in the related law and rules, the most vexing leftover issues are caused of the lack of "rule of law" in China. This situation imply the risk of pervert 'Public Policy' as the ground for refusing enforcement of arbitral awards. Some cases reflect the fear. But it is unclear whether those cases caused from the lack of "rule of law" in China. Same uncertainty present between Hon Kong-China under th one country-two legal system after the return of Hong Kong to China on 1 July 1997. While China is striving to improve its enforcement mechanism in regard to the enforcement of arbitral awards, it can only be expect following the establishment of rule of law in the future.

  • PDF

남북 상사중재기구의 운영과 실행과제 (Administration and Practical Problems of South-North Commercial Arbitration Organization)

  • 김상호
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제18권2호
    • /
    • pp.55-77
    • /
    • 2008
  • The purpose of this paper is to make a research on the administration and practical problems of the arbitral organization called "uth-North Commercial Arbitration Commission". The Arbitration Commission shall be set up under the South-North Agreements officially called "reement on Settlement Procedure of Commercial Dispute" and "reement on Organization and Administration of the South-North Arbitration Commission" between the South and the North of Korea. A variety means of dispute settlement including friendly consultations, conciliation and arbitration called Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR) will be used frequently and institutionally to settle commercial disputes and conflicts arising from economic transactions between the South and the North of Korea. Under the circumstances, it is becoming a problem of vital importance how to operate the Arbitration Commission for the prompt and effective settlement of the South-North commercial disputes. First of all, the South and the North of Korea should recognize the availability of prompt and effective means of dispute resolution such as arbitration and conciliation to be made by the Arbitration Commission would promote the orderly growth and encouragement of th South-North trade and investment, for which the following measures should be taken as soon as possible : 1. Enactment of the South-North Arbitration Rules. 2. Designation of the arbitral institution by North-Korean side. In this connection, the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board(KCAB) was already designated officially as the arbitral organization of South Korean side as of April 17, 2007. 3. Arbitration shall be held in the place where the respondent has his domicile, in case that both parties fail to agree as to the place of arbitration. 4. Permission of a third country arbitration in case that both parties agree to do so. 5. To become a member country of international arbitration agreements including the New York Convention.

  • PDF

중국과 대만간 중재판정의 상호집행에 관한 연구 (A Study on Enforcement of Arbitral Awards between China and Taiwan)

  • 하현수
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제19권1호
    • /
    • pp.45-65
    • /
    • 2009
  • China and Taiwan had opened complete Three Linkages era December 2008, in the 59 years. The improvement of two countries' relationship is expecting to spur two countries more on the economy exchange. However the increasement of investment and trade between two countries will increase disputes to ratio. In order to settle the disputes related to economy between two countries, the most favorite way is to use arbitral system which involve less public power. After China and Taiwan recognized this point, they announced provisions which allow to solve controversies through the arbitration between parties of two countries since 1980, and prepared legal basis for dispute settlement between two countries. However, because China and Taiwan do not authorize each party as a country, the execution application made by each party based on New York Convention related to foreign arbitral awards cannot be approved. Because of these kind of reasons China and Taiwan should agree in order to guarantee mutual execution of arbitral awards which is an ultimate purpose of arbitration. However because of the political situation of two countries there are provisions related to execution for arbitral awards decided by each party. In this paper, I separated the provision related to mutual execution for arbitral awards of each party of China and Taiwan, examined exposed problems, and suggested ways to improve. It can support some of assistance and implication to establish basis of arbitral system between South Korea and North Korea and to suggest direction to derive through this kind of study.

  • PDF