• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.263-270
• /
• 2009

Busan North port is facing crisis due to the opening of the New port. The North Port and NewPort are competing for a limited volume of cargoes and this competition is leading after all to price competition, lowering cargo work fee that may result in the failure of both This paper proposed the balanced development plans, which are the strategies of business tie-up and activation between the North Port and NewPort by introducing the strategy of "co-opetition" and the analysis for the success factor of co-opetition: to solve this operational problems on Busan port. It is found out that activation strategy is more successful co-opetition strategy than business tie-up strategy. The execution for the two co-opetition strategies will lead Busan Port to the balanced development as well as the enhanced competitiveness and will leap Busan port into global hub port as well.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.251-258
• /
• 2019

This study was conducted to propose an effective port operation method in terms of the design capacity of waiting anchorage by comparing the ratio and the number of waiting anchorage according to the port operation method of Busan New Port. For this, the Arena simulation program compared the rates of waiting vessels according to the application of the multi-user terminal, liner terminal and hybrid liner terminal operation methods. As a result, analysis suggested the necessary anchorage space can be reduced to about 18 % when using the multi-user terminal operation method and about 15.6 % when using the hybrid liner terminal operation method, as compared with the liner terminal operation method. Specifically, it was effective to apply the multi-user terminal operation method in terms of the anchorage capacity to be designated to Busan New Port. This study can apply to the designation of the new anchorage in the Busan New Port by reflecting the contents of the design of the anchorage in accordance with the port operation method.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.1-23
• /
• 2008

세계의 선진항만인 싱가포르항과 홍콩항의 여건 및 특성은 물론 이에 근거한 이들 두 항만의 발전전략을 비교분석하여 부산 신항의 합리적인 발전전략을 모색한 결과는 다음과 같다. 싱가포르항과 홍콩항의 공통적인 발전전략에서 부산 신항의 발전전략으로 합당한 것으로 부산 신항이 이미 실시하고 있는 것은 주요 전략산업으로 항망물류산업을 성장동력신업으로 육성, 하역 보관 배송 등 전통적 물류활동보다 항만배후단지에서 이루어지는 부가가치 물류활동의 강화, 외국자본과 상품에 대한 우호적인 인식 등이다. 여기에 새로운 전략으로서는 환적화물 무료 장치기간의 연장, 하역료의 최대한 인하 및 우대요율 적용, 행정절차 및 관행의 수요자 중심으로 개선, 연구 개발 및 인력 양성의 추진 및 국제적 언어 구사능력의 제고 등을 들 수 있다. 그리고 싱가포르항의 발전전략 중에서 부산 신항의 발전전략으로 유용한 것은 포트넷시스템과 Cargo D2D체제의 도입이며, 홍콩항의 발전전략 중에서는 수출입화물의 운송원가 절감전략이다. 그리고 이들 두 항만과 차별화된 부산 신항의 발전전략으로는 유 라시아 대륙을 잇는 철도운송의 추진, 3 port system의 구축전략, 신항의 배후단지 조기개발에 의한 자체 물동량의 확보, 항만 생산성의 획기적인 제고 및 항만마케팅 활동의 차별화 등이다.

• Journal of Multimedia Information System
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.265-272
• /
• 2018

Busan is Korea's No. 1 trading port, and the logistics industry plays an important role in the regional industry as a whole. In Busan, various efforts are being made to revitalize the port logistics industry, but it is necessary to develop various policies and related technologies linked with the 4th industry. In this study, we propose a smart refrigeration logistics center, which is required for the activation of Busan New Port and the new port of Pusan New Port, which is connected with the 4th industry. I would like to present the operation direction of the center.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.1-31
• /
• 2005

Major companies in USA, Europe and Japan as well as even China and Russia put more overseas investment in Asian regions than before, while northeast Asian regional trade gets more attractive and important under the influence of China's super-speed economic growth. Possibly, it is expected that such ever-increasing gravity of regional trade will help spotlight the importance of local trade route considerably. In particular, northeast Asian region's economic briskness and step-up in international economic partnerships will expectedly contribute to much boosting up the quantity of goods transported via local coasting route. Thus, it is advisable that both Busan New port specialize in dealing with freights via East Sea rim, while Gwangyang port specialize in dealing with freights via Yellow Sea rim. Furthermore, it is required that both ports share some of their own roles as hub port and hub & spoke port respectively, so that both of them can be devoted to stepping up into northeast Asian hub ports.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제64권
• /
• pp.187-210
• /
• 2014

As port functions change to act as an economic catalyst and take on a central position in industries engaged in international trade, port hinterland has become a significant component in international shipping. The success of port hinterland as a strategic base of logistic activities critically depends on location selection factor for international distribution center that links elements of global supply chain management. By examining multi-measurement items empirically, this paper analyzed location selection factor for international logistics distribution center in port hinterland, and evaluated Busan new port hinterland from the user's perspective. Employing exploratory factor analysis, the results revealed that the model structured around five factors incorporating geo-location and accessibility, availability, political supports, cost factors, and quality of business environment is valid and reliable in the context of the location selection factors for logistics distribution center in the context of port hinterland operations. The evaluation of Busan new port hinterland provides useful insights for strategic improvement to accommodate the users' expectation. Further, the model offers both a descriptive and diagnostic strategic management tool for port hinterland development and operations, to guide future improvement.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.173-189
• /
• 1997

Whether over taking or parallel sailing of two or more vessels is allowable on marine traffic route or not, the traffic congestion due to traffic volume has to be evaluated separately. In Gaduk-sudo, overtaking or parallel sailing is so allowable that the Bumper Model is introduced to evaluated the traffic congestion. But the channels within the habour limit such as the route of Ulsan New Port are so prohibited overtaking or parallel sailing that the traffic congestion has to be evaluated by using theoretical traffic capacity or by traffic simulation. In this paper, the congestion of Southern New Port and Mipo Port was evaluated the congestion by using theoretical traffic capacity and the other area of Ulsan Port by traffic simulation. The incresed traffic volumes on Ulsan Channels according to Ulsan New Port Development in 2011 were evaluated to have no effect with the traffic congestion.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.239-258
• /
• 2005

Port e-Transformation would employ new technologies such as CRM, SCM, ERP to all the port facilities and improve the efficiency of management for ports. In this paper, firstly, we analyze classification organization of Port e-Transformation technology. Secondly, understand the current situation on each component of Port e-Transformation. Thirdly, present tasks for each component of it. Finally, propose problems and its solving methods for these tasks. However, rationalization of management for internal structure occurred during process of Port e-Transformation and new adjustment of laws related to port are not included in this paper.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제27권5호
• /
• pp.547-555
• /
• 2003

항만공사는 항만을 관리하는데 가장 유용한 형태이다. 우리나라는 이와 같은 항만공사를 곧 부산에 설립하려고 한다. 그러나 가덕도에 위치하는 부산신항은 행정구역으로는 부산과 경상남도에 걸쳐 위치하고 있기 때문에 항만관리체계의 형태가 불투명하다. 연구의 방법론은 속성간 중복도를 고려하여 연산 할 수 있는 계층퍼지분석법(HFP)을 이용하였다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제35권7호
• /
• pp.581-588
• /
• 2011

Globalization of production, changing technology in ocean shipping sector, shifting bargaining power from port service provider to port users, changing distribution patterns of the containerization and new implementation for the environment and safety concerns introduced new ways of administration in port sector. In these days, port industries cannot survive alone. Port operation and management has to be proactive to cooperate and integrate with other port operators or other industries. In the 21st century, cooperation in maritime sector is more common than that in the past with several different reasons in a mixture of forms of cooperation. Cooperation among port authorities, port operators, shipping line, inland transport service providers and/or related organizations themselves becomes to exist to overcome the challenges and development of the global transport chain. This paper investigates the concept of port cooperation and the case analysis of the cooperation in the port industry.