• 아동학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.85-100
• /
• 2006

In this study of the relationship between moral judgment, moral emotions and moral behavior, 137 five-year-olds were interviewed to measure moral judgment and moral emotions. Their teachers measured children's moral behavior. Results showed that children judged moral and conventional rules by using the 4 criterion judgments of seriousness, rule contingency, generalizability and punishment. Children with highly felt moral emotions had higher scores in moral behavior. Moral judgment, moral emotions and moral behavior were highly interrelated. Children's moral behavior was related to rule contingency and generalizability. Their moral behavior was highly related to positive moral emotions. Positive moral emotions were related to the rule contingency and generalizability. Negative moral emotions were highly related to seriousness and punishment.

• 한국지역사회생활과학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.169-180
• /
• 2009

This study was performed to examine the emotion expectations and explanations of four participants(an actor, a recipient, a child observer, and an adult observer) in moral, social-conventional, and personal rule transgression situations. Six vignettes describing the rule transgressions were presented to 200 children who were either five or seven years old. The children were asked to predict and explain each participant's emotions. The children's emotion expectations were different depending on the domain of the rule transgressions and on the type of the participant. The actors were predicted to feel happy during all transgressions, while the recipients and two observers(a child and an adult) were predicted to feel unhappy. The seven-year-old children attributed more happiness to the actors, and more negative affect to the recipients compared to the five-year-olds. This result was inconsistent with the previous findings that older children attributed more happiness to actors. This finding was discussed in relation to the 'happy victimizer'. Some categories of emotion explanations were differentiated according to the domain of rule transgressions. The personal rule transgressions, newly defined and examined in this study, were judged to be less serious than the moral rule transgressions in terms of the intensity of the negative affect.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.49-62
• /
• 1996

This paper is to examine the development of Korean young children's judgement on moral and conventional rules. The subjects are 120 children, 30 each at four age levels; age 3(2.8-3.5), age 4(3.7-4.4), age 5(4.8-5.5), and age 6(5.7-6.5) in a day care center in Taegu. Results are summarized as follows: 1. In terms of nonpermissibility, there was a significant difference in regard to the moral and the conventional rule transgression between the group of age 3 years and three groups of ages 4, 5, and 6. 2. In terms of seriousness, there was a significant difference according to domain. Three groups ages 4, 5 and 6 years evaluate moral transgressions to be more serious than conventional transgressions. 3. In terms of rule contingency and generalizability, there was a significant difference in regard to the moral and conventional transgression between the group of age 3 years and three groups of ages 4, 5 and 6. 4. In terms of punishment, there was significant difference according to domain. Three groups of age 4, 5, and 6 years evaluate moral transgressions to be more punishable than conventional transgressions. 5. Children of age 5 with institutional experience do not make a distinction between moral and conventional rules on punishment criterion.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.9-17
• /
• 2021

이 연구는 상황행위이론을 디지털 저작권침해의 다운로드와 업로드 행위에 적용함에 있어 자기통제력과 처벌억제의 통제작용을 살펴보았다. 상황행위이론에 따르면 개인의 도덕성은 높은데 도덕규칙이 약한 환경일 때는 자기통제력이, 도덕규칙 환경은 높은데 개인의 도덕성이 낮을 때는 처벌억제가 범죄에 통제요인으로 조절효과를 갖는다고 보았다. 이에 본 연구는 서울시 재학중인 317명 대학생을 대상으로 다운로드와 업로드 행위로 나누어 각각 상황행위이론의 논의를 상호작용효과 분석을 통해 검증했다. 분석결과 다운로드의 경우는 도덕성이 높지만 도덕규칙이 낮은 경우에서 자기통제력이, 그리고 도덕규칙이 높지만 도덕성이 낮을 때 처벌억제가 유의미하게 작용할 것이라는 상황행위이론을 지지하지 못했고 상호작용효과 결과가 유의미하지 않았다. 그리고 업로드의 경우는 상황행위이론과는 달리 도덕성은 높지만 도덕규칙이 낮은 경우에서 자기통제력이 업로드를 통제하기보다 오히려 유발하는 요인으로 작용하는 것을 제시했고, 또한 상황행위이론과 반대로 도덕성은 높지만 도덕규칙이 낮은 경우에서 처벌억제가 조절효과를 갖는 것을 제시했다.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.45-60
• /
• 1987

This research examined children's perception of parental authority within three different types of rules : moral, social-conventional, and personal issue. Specifically, two major aspects of parental authority-legitimacy and obedience-were explored. The subjects of this study were 120 children from an elementary school in Kwangju. There were 40 subjects (20 males and 20 females) in each of three age groups: 7-, 9-, and 11- year-olds. The subjects were administered an interview individually. Based on Tisak (1986) open-ended questions concerning three family rules (moral rule, social-conventional rule, personal issue) were administered. Responses to the assessment questions were coded as positive or negative. Responses to the judgment conception questions were coded into 7 categories : Other's Walfare, Social Coordination, Personal choice, Deservedness of Punishment for Wrongdoing, Existence of Authority, Conflicting Personal Interest and Authority, and Personal Development. Statistical analysis of obtained data was by percentage and ${\chi}_2$ test using log linear procedure. The results were as follows : (1) There was a significant main effect of type of rule on the children's assessment regarding legitimacy and obedience of parental authority. The children (average 96%) stated that it was all right for parents to make rules prohiliting an act when it pertained to moral and social conventions. However, the majority of the children (average 40%) stated that it was not right for parents to regulate personal issues. (2) There was a significant interaction effect between type of rule and age. (3) There was a significant main effect of rules on the children's judgment conception of parental authority. (4) There was a significant interaction effect between rules and ages on children's judgment conception of parental authority.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제19권
• /
• pp.1-20
• /
• 2005

In spite of the ethics of sangsaeng is based on Daesoon thoughts, we can regard it as a moral theory independent on religion. Like other reasonable moral theories, It has three levels, moral standard, moral rules and moral acts or judgements. Sangsaeng is moral standard in the ethics of sangsaeng. moral rules are derived from it and could justify many particular moral judgements and acts. The ethics of sangsaeng belongs to metaphysical ethics and holistic ethics because it is derived holistic, sangsaeng's world view of Daesoon thoughts. The ethics of sangsaeng, first of all, extends the realm of moral community to all beings of world. Therefore it might works well on as a solution for environmental problem recently issued. Secondly, because beings are fundamentally all equal in holistic world, the principle of equality is basic principle in the ethics of sangsaeng. Finally, in relation to the principle of equality, the ethics of sangsaeng needs 'Haewon' as the first moral rule because it is a practical method for solution to various social inequality - racism, sexism, regionalism and so on.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2005

This study investigated moral judgment and moral reasoning about aggressive behavior by intention, presentation of results of aggressive behavior, and age of child. Forty-four 3-year old and forty-six 5-year-old day-care children in Seoul and Kyonggi Province were interviewed individually with 20 pictorial tasks. Data analysis was by frequencies, percentiles, means, standard deviations, paired t-test, and ANOVA(repeated measures). Both age groups judged instrumental and resentment-based types of aggression to be worse than prosocial or rule observance-based aggression. Both age groups judged aggressive behavior to be worse when results of aggression were presented. Five-year-olds judged aggression to be worse on instrumental than on retributive types of intent. Level of reasoning on aggressive behavior was lowest in cases of satisfying resentment Level of reasoning about aggression increased with age.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제29권5호
• /
• pp.113-131
• /
• 2008

This study examined mothers' ratings of everyday rules for their young children. Participants were 294 mothers of 2- to 5-year-old children attending kindergartens and nursery schools in Korea. Data were collected by questionnaire and were analyzed by $x^2$. Results indicated that the majority of mothers' rules for their children pertained to safety, interpersonal issues, and as children got older, social conventions. Mothers endorsed prudential justifications for safety and self-care, moral justifications for interpersonal rules, practical and moral justifications for safeguarding property, and conventional justifications for obedience/order and food/mealtime routines. Analyses of mothers' judgments of rule independence indicated that rules on interpersonal and safety issues were to be kept without exception.

• 한국게임학회 논문지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.149-160
• /
• 2021

최근 게임 시장에서는 플레이밍(flaming), 트롤링(trolling) 및 불법 프로그램 활용과 같은 비도덕적 게임행동에 대한 우려가 급증하고 있다. 이러한 게임행동이 게임산업에 미치는 부정적 영향이 적지 않지만, 관련 연구는 여전히 부족한 상황이다. 본고는 게임추론 가설을 통해 비도덕적 게임 행동 양상을 정리하고, 연관요인으로 이용자의 게임규칙 인식과 공정성 지각, 사회적 정체성 및 도덕적 정체성, 도덕적 포지셔닝 등에 대해 209명의 <리그 오브 레전드> 이용자 데이터를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 도덕적 정체성과 형식적 규칙 인지는 비도덕적 게임 행동에 부적 영향력을 미친 반면, 도덕적 포지셔닝과 사회정체성은 비도덕적 게임 행동에 정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 도덕적 정체성과 도덕적 포지셔닝은 상호작용 효과를 보였다.

• 한국철학논집
• /
• 제29호
• /
• pp.125-152
• /
• 2010

본고는 유가에서 도덕원리의 원천이라고 할 수 있는 선(善)은 무엇이며, 그 선에 근거를 두고 제시된 도덕법칙은 어떻게 정식화되는 지를 살피면서, 유가의 도덕원리와 도덕법칙이 내포하고 있는 함의가 칸트의 『도덕 형이상학 정초』에서 제시된 학적 윤리학의 성립요건을 어떻게 충족하고 있는 지를 살펴보는 것을 목표로 하였다. 먼저 유가 윤리학에서 선(善)의 문제를 살피면서 유가에서 선의 본원은 하늘이라고 할 수 있지만, 하늘의 명령은 인간의 본성으로 내재한다(천명지위성(天命之謂性))는 점에서, 인간의 본성이 도덕법칙의 원천이 된다고 하는 점을 제시하였다. 그리고 선한 인간 본성이 우리에게 갖추어져 있다는 사실을 어떻게 알 수 있는가 하는 문제를 맹자의 「유자입정(孺子入井)의 비유(譬喩)」를 통해 살펴보았다. 다음으로 본고는 유가의 도덕법칙의 함의를 풀어내고, 그 함의를 칸트가 제시한 학적 윤리학이 성립하기 위한 요건과 연관하여 대비적 분석을 하였다. 유가에서 도덕법칙의 근거로서 인간의 인(仁)한 본성은 인간의 자기정립의 근거이자, 관계적 존재로서 인간이 마땅히 실현해야 할 의무이다. 그런데 이러한 인(仁)의 구현방법으로 유가는 '충서(忠恕)'를 일이관지(一以貫之)의 도(道)로 제시하고 있다. 따라서 본고는 '충서(忠恕)'의 도(道)에서 제시되는 도덕법칙(역전환성의 원리, 동등고려의 원리, 자율의 원리 등)을 사서(四書)에 근거를 두고 제시하였다. 그리고 이러한 유가의 도덕법칙은 칸트가 제기한 1) 보편법칙의 정식, 2) 목적 자체의 정식, 3)자율의 정식과 연관하여 어떤 관계에 있는가 하는 점을 논구하였다. 나아가 우리는 칸트가 제기한 황금률 비판을 살펴보면서, 칸트의 이 비판은 유가의 도덕법칙에 적용될 수 있는가 하는 문제를 제기하며, 그 대답을 추구하였다.