• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.297-307
• /
• 2008

At the spots of enterprises experiencing rapid environmental changes, necessity for ceaseless managemental innovation is raised. We can't deny that management quality is also a part of such managemental innovation. Introduction of management quality by an organization is different from introduction of other individual innovative techniques. Management quality is not one time project but complete historical change program to be pursued continuously. Furthermore, it must be understood as a strategic 'Quality Journey' looking for far future of an organization. Malcolm Baldrige Model has been increasingly used in Korea as a global standard for management quality. The model, however, has shown a number of limitations in application due to nonsystematic elements in the implementation process. The deployment process of the model should be detailed through a real world case study. In this research, we proposed a quality evaluation standard model which is suitable for the Korean public enterprise based on the Malcolm Baldrige Non-profit Criteria, and examined the model. A 7-Point Likert Scale was used based on the seven categories within the 2007 Malcolm Baldrige Non-profit Criteria: Leadership, Strategic Planning, Customer and Market Focus, Management Analysis and Knowledge Management, Workforce Focus, Process Management, and Results. Furthermore, we analysed the validity and causal relationship among the factors within the model. Through the above case study, following common factors for successful Malcolm Baldrige Model have been derived. The following is a summary of the results of this study. First, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs powerful support Leadership. Second, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs systematic Strategic Planning. Third, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs the continuous Customer and Market Focus. Fourth, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs systematic Measurement Analysis and Knowledge Management. Five, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs systematic Workforce Focus. Six, for Malcolm Baldrige Model management, needs systematic Process Management. The finding are surely necessary factors to arrange the human resource management for upgraded management quality, those factors help to explain why all enterprises consider human resource as the strategic view.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.102-113
• /
• 2010

In this research, we proposed a quality evaluation standard model which is suitable for the internet shopping mall based on the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award model. A 7-Point Likert Scale was used based on the seven categories within the 2008 Malcolm Baldrige Criteria : Leadership, Strategic Planning, Customer and Market Focus, Measurement Analysis and Knowledge Management, Workforce Focus, Process Management, and Result. Furthermore, we analysed the validity and causal relationship among the factors within the model. The goal of this research is to find a rational standard to evaluate internet shopping malls nationwide and help the structuring and the operation of these malls. The results may be used not only as a tool to evaluate internet shopping mall sites but also as a guideline to improve the quality of a internet shopping mall site that is under development.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.983-1000
• /
• 2018

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide academic and practical implications based on the analysis results of similarities and differentiation of Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) in healthcare institutes from 2007 to 2016. Methods: This study examined the characteristics and similarities, the changes made for the most importantly considered, a degree of improvement of patient satisfaction, and employee retention rate of the MBNQA awarded 8 healthcare institutes announced by NIST during the period of 2007-2016. Results: First, the MBNQA awarded 8 healthcare institutes that maintained and implemented effective plans for a long period of time to improve the quality of care services. Second, these organizations were selected among the top 10% of the institutional evaluations in the medical field in the United States. Third, they have tried to continuously improve patient and potential customer and employee satisfaction. Fourth, it is shown that the quality improvement efforts have made long-term and continuous improvement efforts on average 4-5 years. Lastly, the increased number of patients and the improved organizational performance are twice higher than those of other healthcare institutions. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that common and differentiation strategies of healthcare institutions should be a good benchmarking model for other competitive healthcare institutions.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.65-76
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to contribute to escalation of a management quality of local public enterprise through integrating local public enterprise evaluation(LPEE) and Malcolm Baldrige Model(MBM). In order to achieve the purpose, I suggested that develop an integration model of LPEE and MBM criteria and use AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) as a technique posting weight value to criteria. Of two suggests, it is the former to date or discuss seriously. Therefore the integration model is redesigned for leadership/strategy category(leadership, strategy), management system category(customer management system, business management system, measurement/knowledge management system), and management result category(business result, customer satisfaction result, human resource management result, financial management result).

• 제품안전
• /
• 통권49호
• /
• pp.26-31
• /
• 1996

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.31-58
• /
• 2009

디지털지식정보 환경에서 기록은 업무처리와 더욱 밀접한 관계를 가지면서 조직의 경영활동에 핵심적 요소로 부각되고 있다. 실제, 경영은 업무 성과물의 집합체로 표현되며, 조직의 컴플라이언스, 지식경영, 리스크 관리 측면에서 기록관리의 중요성은 날로 증대하고 있다. 하지만 이러한 경영 및 기록 환경의 변화에도 불구하고, 기록관리와 경영활동 간의 실제적 상관성을 밝히는 학술적 논의는 부재한 것이 현실이다. 이에 본 연구는 공공기관의 기록관리 발전을 위해, 양자간의 상관성에 대한 규명과 인지가 선행되어야 한다는 인식 아래, 현 공공기관 경영평가모델의 토대가 된 말콤 볼드리지 모델과 기록관리표준을 중심으로 기록관리와 경영품질 및 성과 간의 밀접한 상관성을 제시한다. 구체적으로는, 경영평가모델 평가지표 속의 기록관리 요소와 기록관리표준에서의 경영품질 요소를 추출 비교분석하며, 이를 통해 상호 공통된 요소와 사각지대로 남아있는 요소들을 기록관리 측면에서 고찰한다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.10-19
• /
• 2009

The objective of this study is to analyze the causal relationship among Non-profit Criteria of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award(MBNQA) and to compare the casuality among company, hospital and non-profit organization field. The survey instrument consists of 94 questions from the seven categories of the MBNQA. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is used to analyze the empirical data and estimates the path coefficients among the MBNQA categories. The result of our research is as follows, First, the Leadership effects on as a driver of all factors. Secondly, the positive effect of the Foundation on the Direction and the System categories, Finally, the positive influence of the Direction on the System categories of the MBNQA model. In this study, most hypothesis are statistically significant.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.43-62
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the causal relationship among health care criteria in Korean National Mental Hospitals, using Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award(MBNQA). The survey instrument consists of 92 Questions from the seven the MBNQA health care criteria. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is used to analyze the empirical data and estimates the path coefficients among the seven categories. The result of this study indicates that Leadership drives Foundation and Direction, which influence on Systems that creates Results. Conclusively, among 18 hypotheses, 15 are statistically significant.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.82-92
• /
• 1998

This paper reviews major aspects of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award and introduces some evidences that the Baldrige criteria can assess the quality of management to some extent. It is also discussed that how can we improve our national quality award program.

• 한국품질경영학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국품질경영학회 2004년도 품질경영모델을 통한 가치 창출
• /
• pp.541-547
• /
• 2004