• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.292-295
• /
• 2006

The diagnosis of chronic abdominal pain due to abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment can be elusive. Tenderness in patients with abdominal pain is naturally assumed to be of either peritoneal or visceral origin. Studies have shown that some patients suffer from prolonged pain in the abdominal wall and are often misdiagnosed, even after unnecessary and expensive diagnostic tests, including potentially dangerous invasive procedures, and treated as having a visceral source for their complaints, even in the presence of negative X-ray findings and atypical symptoms. Abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome is rarely diagnosed, which is possibly due to failure to recognize the condition rather than the lack of occurrence. The accepted treatment for abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome is a local injection, with infiltration of anesthetic agents coupled with steroids. Careful history taking and physical examination, in conjunction with the use of trigger zone injections, can advocate the diagnosis of abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment and preclude any unnecessary workup of these patients. Herein, 3 cases of abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome, which were successfully treated with local anesthetics and steroid, are reported.

• 대한정형도수물리치료학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.93-97
• /
• 2009

Anatomy: Facet joint syndrome most often affects the lower back and neck and refers to pain that occurs in the facet joints, which are the connections between the vertebrae in the spine that enable the spine to bend and twist. Many physicians have believed that the usual lesion of facet syndrome was an anatomical impairments of facet joint itself.. Facet joint injection using local anesthetics is a reliable method for the diagnosis and treatment for facet syndrome. Etiology: One of many possible causes is imbalances that can occur in stress levels, hormone levels, and nutritional levels. These imbalances can adversely affect posture, which can lead to neck and back pain. The common disorder called facet syndrome exhibits lower back pain, with or without, radiating pain to buttock and thigh due to facet joint arthropathy. Pain in the facet joint is supposedly the secondary effect of narrowing of joint space by sustained muscle contracture around joints. Syndrome: Facet joint syndrome tends to produce pain or tenderness in the lower back that increases with twisting or arching the body, as well as pain that moves to the buttocks or the back of the thighs. Other symptoms include stiffness or difficulty standing up straight or getting out of a chair. Pain can be felt in other areas such as the shoulders or mid-back area. Treatment: Non-drug treatments include hot packs, ultrasound, electrical stimulation, and therapeutic exercises. Stimulating blood flow using massage or a hot tub may also help. Alternative treatments include yoga and relaxation therapy. If your pain persists after trying these treatments, a surgical procedure called radiofrequency rhizotomy, which destroys the sensory nerves of the joint, may bring relief. Facet joint injection has been helpful in diagnosis and therapy for this facet syndrome. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation of medial branches is known to be an effective method of relieving pain caused by facet joint problems. We conclude that spasmolytic treatment of muscles connecting the two vertebral articular space would be better for treatment and diagnosis of facet syndrome rather than facet block with local anesthetic and steroid only.

• 한국임상수의학회지
• /
• 제39권5호
• /
• pp.226-234
• /
• 2022

To evaluate butorphanol and tramadol as adjuvants to lidocaine in dogs undergoing mandibular nerve block. Fifteen beagles were allocated to groups based on the following treatments: lidocaine alone (L group), lidocaine + butorphanol (LB group), or lidocaine + tramadol (LT group). After mandibular nerve block with opioids as an adjunct to local anesthetics, the onset time, duration of action, and depth of anesthesia were evaluated using a quantitative method through neuromuscular blockades (NMBs) monitoring. The onset time of nerve block was 4.60 ± 2.06 min, 2.00 ± 0.00 min, and 2.60 ± 1.62 min in the L, LB, and LT groups, respectively; however, there was no statistically significant difference. The duration of nerve block was 111.88 ± 34.78 min, 302.00 ± 76.72 min, and 260.40 ± 49.88 min in the L, LB, and LT groups, respectively, with a significant difference between L and LB groups. The LB group demonstrated a more profound depth of anesthesia compared to the L and LT groups. In this study, using a quantitative method through NMBs monitoring, it was demonstrated that lidocaine and butorphanol in combination can increase the duration of nerve block and more profound the depth of anesthesia rather than lidocaine alone. Additionally, the combined use of lidocaine and opioids presented an objective indicator that could provide a more clinically stable nerve block.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.216-229
• /
• 2023

Background: The role of the sympathetic nervous system appears to be central in causing pain in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). The stellate ganglion block (SGB) using additives with local anesthetics is an established treatment modality. However, literature is sparse in support of selective benefits of different additives for SGB. Hence, the authors aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of clonidine with methylprednisolone as additives to ropivacaine in the SGB for treatment of CRPS. Methods: A prospective randomized single blinded study (the investigator blinded to the study groups) was conducted among patients with CRPS-I of the upper limb, aged 18-70 years with American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I-III. Clonidine (15 ㎍) and methylprednisolone (40 mg) were compared as additives to 0.25% ropivacaine (5 mL) for SGB. After medical treatment for two weeks, patients in each of the two groups were given seven ultrasound guided SGBs on alternate days. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to visual analogue scale score, edema, or overall patient satisfaction. After 1.5 months follow-up, however, the group that received methylprednisolone had better improvement in range of motion. No significant side effects were seen with either drug. Conclusions: The use of additives, both methylprednisolone and clonidine, is safe and effective for the SGB in CRPS. The significantly better improvement in joint mobility with methylprednisolone suggests that it should be considered promising as an additive to local anaesthetics when joint mobility is the concern.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.293-302
• /
• 2023

This review paper delves into the comparative study of epinephrine and phenylephrine as vasoconstrictors in dental anesthesia, exploring their histories, pharmacological properties, and clinical applications. The study involved a comprehensive literature search, focusing on articles that directly compared the two agents in terms of efficacy, safety, and prevalence in dental anesthesia. Epinephrine, with its broad receptor profile, has been a predominant choice, slightly outperforming in the context of prolonging dental anesthesia and providing superior hemostasis, which is crucial for various dental procedures. However, the stimulation of beta-adrenergic receptors caused by epinephrine poses risks, especially to patients with cardiovascular conditions. Phenylephrine, a selective alpha-1 adrenergic agonist, emerges as a safer alternative for such patients, avoiding the cardiovascular risks associated with epinephrine. Moreover, its vasoconstrictive effect may not be as deleterious as that of epinephrine, due to its selective action. This review reveals that despite the potential benefits of phenylephrine, epinephrine continues to dominate in clinical settings, due to its historical familiarity, availability, and cost-effectiveness. The lack of commercially available pre-made phenylephrine dental carpules in most countries, except Brazil, and a knowledge gap within dental academia regarding phenylephrine, contribute to its limited use. This review concludes that while both agents are effective, the choice between them should be based on individual patient conditions, availability, and the practitioner's knowledge and familiarity with the agents. The underuse of other vasoconstrictors like levonordefrin and the unavailability of phenylephrine in pre-mixed dental cartridges in many countries highlights the need for further exploration and research in this field. Furthermore, we also delve into the role of levonordefrin and examine the rationale behind the exclusion of phenylephrine from commercially available pre-mixed local anesthetic carpules, suggesting a need for a responsive approach from pharmaceutical manufacturers to the distinct needs of the dental community.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.37-45
• /
• 2024

Background: The delivery of profound local anesthetics helps children receive successful treatment by reducing fear, anxiety, and discomfort during dental procedures. Local anesthetic injections are the most anticipated stimuli in dental surgery. Children's perceptions of pain can be altered by applying cryotherapy to precool the oral mucosa or by diverting their minds through taste distractions before administering local anesthetic injections. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cryoanesthesia and xylitol sweet-tasting solution at the injection site in 7-10-year-old children. Methods: A total of 42 participants, aged 7-10 years, who underwent dental treatment requiring local anesthesia, were enrolled in the study. The children were randomly divided into three groups. In group I, sterile water was held in the mouth for 2 minutes before anesthetic administration, similar to group II, and in group III, a xylitol sweet-tasting solution was used for 2 minutes before needle insertion. The analysis of pain perception was carried out based on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Sound, Eyes, and Motor (SEM) scale. For VAS analysis, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for intergroup comparison, and a post hoc Tukey test was performed for subgroup analysis. For the categorical SEM scale, the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the post hoc test was performed for intergroup comparison. Where a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence intervals. Results: Cryoanesthesia significantly reduced pain scores on VAS (4.21 ± 1.42) when compared to those on VAS with xylitol sweet-tasting solution (5.50 ± 1.40) and that with sterile water (6.14 ± 2.47). Intergroup comparison of the VAS scores among the three groups was performed using one-way ANOVA, which demonstrated statistically significant differences (P value <0.026) on the VAS scale. Intergroup comparison of the SEM scale was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by post hoc comparison, which exhibited statistically significant differences (P < 0.007) among the three groups for the SEM scale. Conclusion: Cryoanesthesia demonstrated higher efficacy in reducing injection pain than that exhibited by the xylitol sweet-tasting solution.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.270-276
• /
• 1994

최근 소아과 영역에서 통증 완화를 위해 사용되기 시작한 통증 완화용 연고 제재인 EMLA를 영아의 예방 접종시에 사용함으로써 영아의 통증 완화 효과를 알아 보기 위해 영남대학교 의과대학 부속병원 육아 상담실에서 DPT 예방 접종을 시행한 2개월에서 8개월 사이의 영아 80명을 대상으로 하여 통증 완화용 연고제를 사용한 40례(남아 25례, 여아 15례)와 사용하지 않은 40례(남아 21례, 여아 19례)로 나누어 비교 관찰하였다. 통증에 대한 반응을 McGrath's face scale과 Oucher pain scale, MBPS로 비교 관찰하였으며, 접종후 울음 시작 시간, 첫 울음 지속 시간, 총 울음지속 시간 등을 비교하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1) 대상 환아의 성별이나 연령의 분포상의 차이가 보이지 않았다.(EMLA 사용군의 평균 연령 : $4.0{\pm}0.2$개월, 대조군 : $4.5{\pm}0.8$개월) 2) 통증의 정도는 McGrath's face scale(p<0.05), Oucher pain scale(p<0.05), MBPS(p<0.01)을 이용하여 측정한 결과 EMLA 사용군에서 대조군에 비해 유의한 통증의 감소를 볼 수 있었다. 3) 주사후 첫 울음 시작 시간의 경우 EMLA 사용군에서도 $2.1{\pm}1.3$초, 대조군에서도 $2.0{\pm}0.9$초를 보여 차이가 없었으나, 평균 첫 울음 지속 시간의 경우 EMLA 사용군에서는 $6.9{\pm}4.0$초 대조군에서는 $14.2{\pm}9.2$초를 보여 현저한 감소를 보였다.(p<0.05) 평균 총 울음 지속시간의 경우도 EMLA 사용군에서 $9.8{\pm}6.0$초, 대조군에서 $21.9{\pm}12.8$초로 EMLA 사용군에서 현저한 울음 시간의 감소를 보였다.(p<0.05) 4) 부작용으로는 일시적 발작이 5례에서만 관찰되었다. 국소마취 연고를 영아에 대한 예방접종시에 사용함으로써 부작용 없이 통증이 완화되는 것을 관찰하였다. 그러나 EMLA 연고로 통증이 완화될 뿐 완전히 없어지는 것이 아니고, 연고 제재의 효과발현을 위하여 1시간 동안 부착하여야 하는 불편과 연고의 비용이 고가인 점 등의 문제점이 있어 예방접종시에 일상적으로 사용하기에는 아직 현실적으로 부적당하다고 생각되었다.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.378-385
• /
• 2020

Background: The thoracic paravertebral block is an effective analgesic technique for postoperative pain management after breast surgery. The ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block (RLB) is a safer alternative to conventional paravertebral block. Thus, we assessed the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided RLB for postoperative pain management after breast surgery. Methods: Patients requiring breast surgery were randomly allocated to group C (retrolaminar injection with saline) and group R (RLB with local anesthetic mixture). The RLB was performed at the level of T3 with local anesthetic mixture (0.75% ropivacaine 20 mL + 2% lidocaine 10 mL) under general anesthesia before the skin incision. The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) at 24 hour postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 1, 6, 24, and 48 hour postoperatively and the occurrence of adverse events and patient satisfaction after the surgery. Results: Forty-six patients were included, 24 in group C and 22 in group R. The cumulative morphine consumption using IV-PCA did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.631). The intraoperative use of remifentanil was higher in group C than in group R (P = 0.025). The resting and coughing VAS scores at 1 hour postoperatively were higher in group R than in group C (P = 0.011, P = 0.004). The incidence of adverse events and patient satisfaction was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: A single injection of ultrasound-guided RLB did not reduce postoperative analgesic requirements following breast surgery.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제27권5호
• /
• pp.463-471
• /
• 2005

Recently, the number of diabetic patients have been increased with westernized living way and meal habitation. The regulation of blood sugar concentration is very important for diabetic patients to keep homeostasis and, to prevent acute or chronic complications. Epinephrine combined with lidocaine is used in dental clinic extensively. And epinephrine combined with lidocaine also effects on decreasing the blood leakage volume by constricting micro vessle and arteriole. But, So far there are few researches about the effect of epinephrine contained in dental local anesthetic agent on the blood sugar of diabetes during minor oral surgery. The purpose of this study was intended to investigate whether epinephrine which combined with dental local anesthetics influence body glucose level in diabetes patients by glucose monitoring. The subject of this study were 38 diabetic patients and 38 normal adults, each patient was checked body glucose after a meal 2 hours later with resting state, and injection 1:100000 epinephrine with dental lidocaine 54 ml or lidocaine 54 ml only. And then the body glucose level was checked 5 minutes and 30 minutes after injection. The results were analyzed by two way ANOVA test (p<0.05). The results were as follows: In the experimental group 1, the mean of the blood sugar level was 180.3 mg/dl before an anesthetic injection, 182.8 mg/dl after 5minutes of the anesthetic injection and 182.2 mg/dl after 30minutes of the anesthetic injection. The change of the blood sugar level was not statistically by two-way ANOVA tests (p<0.05). In the experimental group 2, the mean of the blood sugar level was 237 mg/dl before an anesthetic injection, 234.5 mg/dl after 5minutes of the anesthetic injection and 231.8 mg/dl after 30minutes of the anesthetic injection. The change of the blood sugar level was not statistically by two-way ANOVA tests (p<0.05). In the controlled group 1, the mean of the blood sugar level was 117.6 mg/dl before an anesthetic injection, 119.1 mg/dl after 5minutes of the anesthetic injection and 129.3 mg/dl after 30minutes of the anesthetic injection. The change of the blood sugar level was not statistically by two-way ANOVA tests (p<0.05). In the controlled group 2, the mean of the blood sugar level was 104.2 mg/dl before an anesthetic injection, 102 mg/dl after 5minutes of the anesthetic injection and 105.3 mg/dl after 30minutes of the anesthetic injection. The change of the blood sugar level was not statistically by two-way ANOVA tests (p<0.05).

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 2005

측두하악장애 및 구강안면통증 환자들 중 근막통증에 의한 기능제한이나 통증을 호소하는 경우를 흔히 볼 수 있다. 근막통증환자를 치료할 때 여러 가지 물리치료가 유용하지만, 즉각적인 통증완화효과를 나타내는 발통점주사요법이 근막통증의 치료로서 널리 적용되고 있다. 발통점주사요법에 흔히 사용하는 화학약제로 생리식염수, 국소마취제, 스테로이드 등이 있으며, 국소마취제는 근육에 대한 부작용이 보고되어 있어 사용상 주의가 필요하다. 이 연구는 상품화된 lidocaine과, dexamethasone 주사제의 혼합용액을 근육내 주사한 후 조직학적 변화를 관찰함으로써 근육에 대한 위해성 여부를 평가하고자 하였다. 또한 용액의 농도에 따라 각각 조직학적 변화를 관찰함으로써 위해성이 없는 적정한 농도를 제시하고자 하였다. 이 연구에서는 생후 9주된 BALB/c 생쥐 (자성) 63마리를 7군으로 분류하여, 앞정강근 (전경골근, tibialis cranialis) 에 각각 생리식염수, dexamethasone, 2.0% lidocaine, 생리식염수와 혼합한 1.0% lidocaine, 생리식염수와 혼합한 1.5% lidocaine, dexamethasone과 혼합한 1.0% lidocaine, dexamethasone과 혼합한 1.5% lidocaine을 주사하였다. 그 후 1일, 7일, 14일째에 희생시켜 실험부위를 절취한 후 조직절편을 만들어 HE염색과 Van-Gieson염색을 거쳐 광학현미경으로 관찰하여 다음의 결론을 얻었다. Lidocaine과 dexamethasone의 혼합용액을 근육내 주사하였을 때, lidocaine의 농도가 1.5% 이하인 경우 조직학적으로 유해하지 않았으며, 통증완화효과와 항염증작용을 동시에 기대할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다. 향후 상기 혼합용액을 발통점주사요법의 약제로 사용할 경우, 인체에서도 동일한 결과가 나올 것인가에 대해서는 추가적인 연구가 필요하다.