• International Journal of Oral Biology
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.191-197
• /
• 2016

The present study was to evaluate effects of vitamin E on intravenous administration of lidocaine-induced antinociception. Experiments were carried out using male Sprague-Dawley rats. Orofacial formalin-induced nociceptive behavioral responses were used as the orofacial animal pain model. Subcutaneous injection of formalin produced significant nociceptive scratching behavior. Intraperitoneal injection of 5 and 10 mg/kg of lidocaine attenuated formalin-induced nociceptive behavior in the 2nd phase, compared to the vehicle-treated group. Intraperitoneal injection of 1 g/kg of vitamin E also attenuated the formalin-induced nociceptive behavior in the 2nd phase, compared to the vehicle-treated group. However, low dose of vitamin E (0.5 g/kg) did not affect the nociceptive behavioral responses produced by subcutaneous injection of formalin. The present study also investigated effects of intraperitoneal injection of both vitamin E and lidocaine on orofacial formalin-induced behavioral responses. Vehicle treatment affected neither formalin-induced behavioral responses nor lidocaine-induced antinociceptive effects. However, intraperitoneal injection of 0.5 g/kg of vitamin E enhanced the lidocaine-induced antinociceptive effects in the 2nd phase compared to the vehicle-treated group. Intraperitoneal injection of naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, did not affect antinociception produced by intraperitoneal injections of both vitamin E and lidocaine. These results suggest that treatment with vitamin E enhances the systemic treatment with lidocaine-induced antinociception and reduces side effects when systemically treated with lidocaine. Therefore, the combined treatment with vitamin E and lidocaine is a potential therapeutic for chronic orofacial pain.

• 대한치과마취과학회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.26-31
• /
• 2001

The wide deep penetrating wound of maxillofacial region should be early closed under emergency general anesthesia for the prevention of complications of bleeding, infection, shock & residual scars. But, if the emergency general anesthesia wound be impossible because of pneumoconiosis, obstructive pulmonary disease & hypovolemic shock, early primary closure should be done under local anesthesia by use of much amount of the anesthetic solution. The maximum dose of dental lidocaine (2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine) is reported to 7 mg/kg under 500 mg (13.8 ampules) in normal adult. But the maximum permissible dose of dental lidocaine can be changed owing to the general health, rapidity of injection, resorption, distribution & excretion of the drug. The blood level of overdose toxicity is above $4.0{\mu}g/ml$ in central nervous & cardiovascular system. The injection of dental lidocaine 1-4 ampules is attained to the blood level of $1{\mu}g/ml$ in normal healthy adult. The duration of anesthetic action in the dental 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1 : 100.000 epinephrine is 45 to 75 minutes and the period to elimination is about 2 to 4 hours. Therefore, authors selected the following anesthetic methods that the first injection of 6 ampules is applied into the deeper periosteal layer for anesthetic action during 1 hour, the second injection into the deeper muscle & fascial layer, the third injection into the superficial muscle and fascial layer, the fourth injection into the proximal skin & subcutaneous tissue and the fifth final injection into the distal skin & subcutaneous tissue. The total 26-28 ampules of dental lidocaine were injected into the wound as the regular time interval during 5-6 hours, but there were no systemic complications, such as, agitation, talkativeness, convulsion and specific change of vital signs and consciousness.

• 대한후두음성언어의학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.94-97
• /
• 2021

Muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is a voice disorder characterized by excessive tension of the laryngeal muscles during phonation. Voice therapy is the gold standard of treatment for MTD. However, patients with MTD do not always respond to voice therapy. Multidisciplinary approaches have been attempted to treat intractable MTD such as lidocaine instillation, lidocaine injection to recurrent laryngeal nerve, botox injection and excision of false ventricle using CO₂ laser. Recently, injection laryngoplasty is suggested that assists in more efficient phonation and voice therapy to MTD patients. A patient with intractable MTD underwent lidocaine injection and injection laryngoplasty showed improved voice quality and remained stable until postoperative 3 months without any complications.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.276-282
• /
• 2005

Inferior alveolar nerve block using lidocaine is the most frequent local anesthetic method in the dental treatment, but clinically it is not always successful. The 2% lidocaine cartridge has been used commonly in dental anesthesia. It contains vasoconstrictor and antioxidant, which presents low pH which provides chemical stability and longer shelf life. But alkalinized local anesthetics has less tissue trauma, easier dissociation of the non-ionized base which penetrates nerve sheath, rapid onset and more intensity. In this study, in inferior alveolar nerve block, alkalinized lidocaine using sodium bicarbonate (experimental group) is compared with plain lidocaine (control group) about injection pain, anesthetic onset, duration and postinjection discomfort. In inferior alveolar nerve block, alkalinized lidocaine using sodium bicarbonate showed lower injection pain. There was significant difference statistically from plain lidocaine(p=0.019). Comparing with plain lidocaine, alkalinized lidocaine produced more rapid onset (lip & pulp anesthetic onset), there was no significant difference(p>0.05). but there was boundary significance (0.050.05). These results suggest that addition of sodium bicarbonate to 2% lidocaine(1:100,000 epinephrine) for inferior alveolar nerve block is more effective for reduction of injection pain and onset time.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.25.1-25.11
• /
• 2022

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 5% lidocaine and 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine topical anesthetic on pain during needle insertion and infiltration injection in the labial mucosa of anterior maxillary teeth, and to assess the relationship between patients' anxiety and pain scores. Materials and Methods: The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale questionnaire was applied and recorded. Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 30), as follows: G1 group: 5% lidocaine and placebo for 1 minute, G2 group: 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine and placebo for 1 minute, G3 group: 5% lidocaine and placebo for 3 minutes, and G4 group: 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine and placebo for 3 minutes. Before the application of topical anesthesia, one side was randomly selected as the topical anesthesia and the contralateral side as the placebo. The pain levels were measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) immediately after needle insertion and injection and were compared. The correlation between anxiety and pain scores was analyzed. Results: Administration of 5% lidocaine for 1 minute had significantly higher pain scores for both insertion and infiltration injection than the other groups (p < 0.05). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between dental anxiety and the injection-induced VAS pain score in the placebo side in all groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Topical anesthetics significantly reduced the pain caused by both needle insertion and injection pain in comparison to the placebo side. The pain scores of patients with dental anxiety were lower on the topical anesthesia compared to the placebo side.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.345-351
• /
• 2005

근막동통(myofascial pain syndrome, MPS)은 근막발통점에 의해 야기되는 지각, 운동 및 자율신경계의 증상으로 발통점이 자극되면 이환부에 동통을 발생할 뿐 아니라 연관통, 연관압통, 운동신경장애, 자율신경반응을 야기할 수 있다. 본 연구는 근막동통의 다양한 치료법 중에서 botulinum toxin type A(BTX-A)의 주사의 효과를 국소마취제인 lidocaine의 주사효과와 비교하였다. 상부 승모근에 6개월 이상 활동성 발통점을 가진 21명의 환자를 선정한 다음, 무작위로 두 군으로 나누어 한 군(BTX-A 주사군, n=12)에는 발통점에 BTX-A(15 unit of $Botox^{(R)}$ / 0.3 ml per trigger point (TrP))를 주사하고 다른 군(lidocaine 주사군, n=9)에는 0.5% lidocaine (0.3 ml /TrP)를 주사하였다. 두 군 모두 주사는 1 회만 시행하였으며 운동요법이나 물리치료 및 약물치료는 시행하지 않았다. 주사 후 동통의 변화를 관찰하기 위하여 주사 전 및 주사 후 2 주, 4 주, 6 주, 8 주에 주관적 동통척도인 VAS와 압력통각역치(PPT)를 측정하였으며 실험은 이중맹검으로 시행되었다. 실험결과, BTX-A 주사군은 주사 후 8 주의 시간이 경과되는 동안 VAS가 지속적으로 감소하였으며 PPT는 지속적으로 증가하였으나 lidocaine 주사군에서는 VAS의 감소만이 관찰되었다. 즉, 주관적인 동통척도에 있어서는 BTX-A 주사군과 lidocaine 주사군 사이에 유의한 통계학적 차이가 나타나지 않고(p=0.347), 두 군 모두 시간경과에 따라 동통이 감소하는 양상을 보여주었다. 그러나 PPT의 경우에는 BTX-A 주사군에서만 감소하여 두 군 사이에 유의한 통계학적 차이가 관찰되었다(p=0.000). 본 연구의 결과에 따르면 상부승모근 발통점에 대한 BTX-A 주사는 효과적이고 신뢰할 만한 치료법이라고 생각된다.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.30-34
• /
• 1994

염산 lidocaine의 피하 주입시 발생되는 고통을 감소시키기 위하여 8.4% sodium bicarbonate로 중화시켜 사용해 보았다. 지원자를 대상으로한 실험군의 100%에서 예상된 효과를 얻을 수 있었다.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 2005

측두하악장애 및 구강안면통증 환자들 중 근막통증에 의한 기능제한이나 통증을 호소하는 경우를 흔히 볼 수 있다. 근막통증환자를 치료할 때 여러 가지 물리치료가 유용하지만, 즉각적인 통증완화효과를 나타내는 발통점주사요법이 근막통증의 치료로서 널리 적용되고 있다. 발통점주사요법에 흔히 사용하는 화학약제로 생리식염수, 국소마취제, 스테로이드 등이 있으며, 국소마취제는 근육에 대한 부작용이 보고되어 있어 사용상 주의가 필요하다. 이 연구는 상품화된 lidocaine과, dexamethasone 주사제의 혼합용액을 근육내 주사한 후 조직학적 변화를 관찰함으로써 근육에 대한 위해성 여부를 평가하고자 하였다. 또한 용액의 농도에 따라 각각 조직학적 변화를 관찰함으로써 위해성이 없는 적정한 농도를 제시하고자 하였다. 이 연구에서는 생후 9주된 BALB/c 생쥐 (자성) 63마리를 7군으로 분류하여, 앞정강근 (전경골근, tibialis cranialis) 에 각각 생리식염수, dexamethasone, 2.0% lidocaine, 생리식염수와 혼합한 1.0% lidocaine, 생리식염수와 혼합한 1.5% lidocaine, dexamethasone과 혼합한 1.0% lidocaine, dexamethasone과 혼합한 1.5% lidocaine을 주사하였다. 그 후 1일, 7일, 14일째에 희생시켜 실험부위를 절취한 후 조직절편을 만들어 HE염색과 Van-Gieson염색을 거쳐 광학현미경으로 관찰하여 다음의 결론을 얻었다. Lidocaine과 dexamethasone의 혼합용액을 근육내 주사하였을 때, lidocaine의 농도가 1.5% 이하인 경우 조직학적으로 유해하지 않았으며, 통증완화효과와 항염증작용을 동시에 기대할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다. 향후 상기 혼합용액을 발통점주사요법의 약제로 사용할 경우, 인체에서도 동일한 결과가 나올 것인가에 대해서는 추가적인 연구가 필요하다.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.93-98
• /
• 1995

Arthritis is one of the most common disease of mankind. Major of arthritis is osteoarthritis(OA), but the cause is not clear and the characters are chronic and often progressive. So the management and the pain control of OA are very difficult and adequate ways of controlling it have not been discovered. In the present study we investigated the effects of Knee Intra-articular Injection(KII) of lidocaine with aspirin on OA of the knee. Thirty OA patients with Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) above 8 were studied and they were divided into two groups as follows; Group I(n=15); KII with 1% lidocaine 5 ml Group II(n=15); KII with 2% lidocaine 2 ml and aspirin 2 ml(180 mg, diluted with normal saline) In two groups, KII was done 2 times a week for 4 weeks and we compared the changes of VAS between two groups. The results were as follows; 1) Before the KII, initial mean VAS of group I and II was 8.8 and 8.9. After KII 2 times, VAS of group I and II was 6.6 and 6.4. These deceases were statistically significant, but there was no significant difference of VAS between two groups. 2) After KII 4 times, VAS of group I and II was 6.3 and 5.5, significant decrease was observed in group II. 3) After KII 6 times and 8 times, VAS of group I and II was not decreased anymore, but the VAS of group II was maintained in significant decreased state that of group I. We experienced that KII of lidocaine with aspirin was more effective than that of lidocaine only. So we suggest that KII of mixed solution of lidocaine and apsirin may be one of treatments for OA of the knee.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.121-128
• /
• 2015

Background: The authors studied the hemodynamic effect influent by using the novel high concentration of lidocaine HCl for surgical removal impacted lower third molar. The objective of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic change when using different concentrations of lidocaine in impacted lower third molar surgery. Methods: Split mouth single blind study comprising 31 healthy patients with a mean age of 23 years (range 19-33 years). Subjects had symmetrically impacted lower third molars as observed on panoramic radiograph. Each participant required 2 surgical interventions by the same surgeon with a 3-week washout period washout period. The participants were alternately assigned one of two types of local anesthetic (left or right) for the first surgery, then the other type of anesthetic for the second surgery. One solution was 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and the other was 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A standard IANB with 1.8 ml volume was used. Any requirement for additional anesthetic and patient pain intra-operation was recorded. Post-operatively, patient was instructed to fill in the patient report form for any adverse effect and local anesthetic preference in terms of intra-operative pain. This form was collected at the seven day follow up appointment. Results: In the 4% lidocaine group, the heart rate increased during the first minute post-injection (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant change in arterial blood pressure during the operation. In the 2% lidocaine group, there was a significant increase in arterial blood pressure and heart rate in the first minute following injection for every procedure. When the hemodynamic changes in each group were compared, the 4% lidocaine group had significantly lower arterial blood pressure compared to the 2% lidocaine group following injection. Post-operatively, no adverse effects were observed by the operator and patient in either local anesthetic group. Patients reported less pain intra-operation in the 4% lidocaine group compared with the 2% lidocaine group (P < .05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that a 4% concentration of lidocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine has better clinical efficacy than 2% lidocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used for surgical extraction of lower third molars. Neither drug had any clinical adverse effects.