• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2019

In the case of a sea transport contract, the decision of the governing law, together with the choice of lex fori, shall be a legal issue in all legal disputes involving damage to the goods. In sea transport contracts, a paramount clause is often established in conjunction with the governing law clause, which can lead to conflict between these two clauses. Most B/L's back clauses contain a paramount clause that provides that the Hague Rules, Hague-Visby Rules, or foreign laws that prevail over other provisions of the terms. The Hague Rules and the Hague-Visby Rules, however, set different standards regarding the extent of the sea carrier's liability. Therefore, in the interpretation of ground conditions, it is an important question whether the Hague Rules or the Hague-Visby Rules are applied or whether each rule is applied as a law. For example, the paramount clause in the Superior Pescadores case was problematic in the interpretation of the term 'Hague Rules.' In this case, the English Court held that the expression 'Hague Rules' could be used to mean the Hague-Visby Rules, and not exclusively the Hague Rules. Therefore, the Hague-Visby Rules were applied in the judgment of this case, which suggests that this case can be a valuable precedent in future legal matters.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.3-27
• /
• 2022

Climate change is a man-made disaster that has become a major global concern today. With increasingly visible symptoms of climate change in recent years, it has become evident that climate action can no longer be dismissed as a mere matter of choice, but as a matter of survival for the human being. To address the impending climate change crisis in a collaborative and sustainable manner, the international community has been taking various measures including Kyoto protocol and the Paris Agreement. With respect to the private investor's project investment in line with international agreements on climate change, recently we have seen multiple legal judgments which clearly indicate the subject of judicial responsibility for investment in climate change related projects. However, in order to hold judicial responsibility occurring during the implementation of climate change related projects, a causal relationship between the responsible entities and clear responsibility must be demonstrated, and applicable institutional arrangements need to be arranged. It may be the right time for global community to consider shifting not only to human ethical obligations but also legal obligations. In this regard, concerned governments should consider legislating arbitration laws, regulations, and institutional arrangements in more specific and applicable manner.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.111-118
• /
• 2017

The Legal Consciousness is a feeling or attitude toward the law from the people. Most Korean had a traditional consciousness that did not consider the law so friendly, also, the perception of law is also very negative is the common result of various investigations so far. This is caused by a distrust of the political power that operates the law than just distrust of law. Moreover, it is a serious problem that these negative attitudes are getting stronger over time. Especially when looking at the situation of the monopoly of government affairs in Park Geun-hye administration, the law was not a means of realizing social justice on the side of the socially weak, it has come to the fact that the law has been recognized as a tool of oppression by the ruling group, which seizes power in a fraudulent manner and accumulates economic wealth. It was a really ridiculous incident. In addition, not all citizens need to be experts in law, but the law is a bowl for society, and filling the bowl is a moral form or value of society in general. And since society has a peculiar law, and the modern state has the rule of law as its basic principle, most human acts have a direct relationship with law. In particular, it is true that the problem of the legal consciousness of college students is frequently mentioned today. Therefore, in this study, through the examine the contents of the legal consciousness of the K university female students in Gwangju and will consider the cause of this.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.29-60
• /
• 2004

Recently stand-by credits are using as surety devices in various global business transactions including sale of goods. Stand-by credits have lots of merits but simultaneously have high possibility of improper demand by the beneficiary due to the characteristics of the documents required. So so-called fraud rule has developed as a solution to the improper demand in letter of credit transactions. And the actual way of the fraud rule is the injunction by the competent court. The purpose of this article is to examine the applicability of the injunction in stand-by credit transactions by means of case studies. For this purpose, the author examined the concept of the injunction, necessity of the injunction in stand-by credit transactions and the cases of injunction granted and injunction denied. Firstly, the courts have legal standard of the application of injunction due to the legislation of the relative articles in the United Nations Convention on Independent Guarantees and Stand-by Letters of Credit and the Uniform Commercial Code. Secondly, the courts have taken a negative attitude granting injunction in order to observe the independence principle. Thirdly, the courts have a tendency to grant injunction when the demand has no conceivable basis and the applicant will suffer irreparable injury without injunction. Finally, like the saying 'prevention is the best cure', the applicant always pays attention with reasonable care before improper demand by the beneficiary.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2023년도 봄 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.389-390
• /
• 2023

To improve the cost performance of construction sites, various systems and standards are constantly being developed and implemented. Although legal requirements for these system and standard improvements have been increasing, the cost efficiency performance of construction sites remains stagnant. We have digitized documents generated through construction supervision work at 39 building construction sites and proposed a model that can support decision-making in cost efficiency evaluation. This model selects key keywords that are considered to be highly related to cost efficiency by identifying the patterns and relationships of keywords through associated rule analysis and social network analysis using keywords derived from documents. In addition, it is expected to be used as a decision-making aid to determine the cost efficiency of a specific building construction site by establishing a logistic regression model using core keywords. As a systematic database of construction supervision documents and an integrated system of massive data generated by digital technology are established in the future, the accuracy and reliability of the cost efficiency evaluation model are expected to be reinforced.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 1991년도 춘계공동학술대회 발표논문 및 초록집; 전북대학교, 전주; 26-27 Apr. 1991
• /
• pp.135-135
• /
• 1991

• 법제연구
• /
• 제53호
• /
• pp.9-59
• /
• 2017

최근 북한의 법제 정비의 양상은 양적으로 증가하고, 종래 체제정합성이 미비하다는 평가에 대한 개선 면모를 보여준다. 과거 북한 입법은 입법기관의 기능과 역할의 부재, 법령체계의 애매모호 등으로 부정적으로비판되었으나 최근 이러한 평가를 달리 하는 현상이 나타나고 있다. 특히북한의 법제정비 동향과 관련하여 새로 채택한 '법제정법'은 북한의 입법체계와 절차를 파악하는 데에 중요하고 명확한 내용을 담고 있다. 법제정법의 내용은 북한입법의 체재와 절차 등이 보다 체계적으로 정리되어 나아가는 과정을 보여주는 법률임을 엿보게 한다. 기실 북한법령은 김정은체제 하에서 대내외적 정책추진의 법제도적 근거를 제시해준다. 북한은 핵문제에 집중되어 있어 정작 다른 부분에 대해서는 정보가 제한되어 있는 상황이다. 이를 감안하여 여기서는 북한의 입법이론과 체계를 알아보되, 북한이 강조하는 사회주의법무생활 강화, 사회주의법제사업과 사회주의법치국가론을 중심으로 그 이론적 토대를 개관한다. 또한 북한의 입법이론과 체계에 비추어 실제의 법제정비의 내용을 파악해본다. 이어 북한의 입법기관과 입법절차 등을 살펴봄으로써 북한의 입법체계와 그 특징을 고찰한다. 아울러 북한의 입법기관과 입법절차에 관해서는 중국의 '입법법'의 내용을 비교하여 그 특징을 알아본다. 그리고 북한의 입법체계에 대한 과제를 살피고 앞으로의 입법 방향과 관련하여 전망해본다. 김정은 정권에서 2016년의 증보판 법전의 발간을 통해 최근까지 정비된 법령을 공표한 것은 현행 북한법령 현황을 파악하는 데에 중요한 자료이다. 이미 민주조선의 법령해설을 통해 알려진 법령의 내용을 확인하여주기 때문이다. 그러나 여전히 북한체제와 관련한 법령의 경우 그 공표가 늦어지거나 미공개 내지 비밀로 남아 있는 것은 여전히 낙후된 입법의 잔영이라 할 수 있다. 북한에서 법이란 시대적 변화에 따라 발전되고변화한다. 특히 외국인투자 및 대외경제법제와 관련 대내법제의 정비내용을 보면, 사회경제제도의 발전적 방향에 대응하여 변화하고 있음을 발견하게 된다. 김정은체제가 나아가야 할 방향을 경제부문에서의 개혁과 개방으로의 길로 확대하는 경우 이에 관련한 법령의 정비는 가속화될 것이다. 북한입법과정과 절차의 투명성과 객관성의 확보는 남북법제의 이해의 폭을넓히는 동시에 남북통합의 제도적 방안을 모색하는 데에 도움이 될 것이다. 앞으로 북한법제에 관한 심층연구는 궁극적으로 남북의 통일법제의형성을 위한 토대라는 점에서 강조된다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.23-50
• /
• 2008

In a global economy where, private parties increasingly favour arbitration over litigation, many foreigners are unfortunately reluctant to arbitration with China's parties because the China national courts do not scrutinize the merits when deciding whether to recognize and enforce foreign awards. As a result, the finality of arbitral awards hangs in uncertainty. Overseas concern is that China's courts may abuse "Public Policy" grounds provided for in the New York Convention to set aside or refuse to enforce foreign awards. The purpose of this article is to examine the distrust to enforcement of arbitral awards whether that is just an assumption. In spite of the modernize and internationalize her international arbitration system and many reforms provided in the related law and rules, the most vexing leftover issues are caused of the lack of "rule of law" in China. This situation imply the risk of pervert 'Public Policy' as the ground for refusing enforcement of arbitral awards. Some cases reflect the fear. But it is unclear whether those cases caused from the lack of "rule of law" in China. Same uncertainty present between Hon Kong-China under th one country-two legal system after the return of Hong Kong to China on 1 July 1997. While China is striving to improve its enforcement mechanism in regard to the enforcement of arbitral awards, it can only be expect following the establishment of rule of law in the future.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.199-236
• /
• 2014

본 논문은 인류가 공유해야 할 유한한 우주자원인 정지궤도(geostationary orbit)의 국제적 배분기제를 분배적 정의의 관점에서 분석한 것이다. 배분의 주체인 국제통신연합(ITU)은 체약국이 합의한 헌장 및 협약의 하위규정인 무선규칙에 의해 주파수와 궤도자원을 분배하고 있으므로 논문은 무선규칙을 세밀히 검토하는데 중점을 두었다. 현행 배분메커니즘은 크게 두 가지 원칙에 따른다. 하나는 먼저 등록한 행정청에 우선권을 주는 선착순 원칙('first come, first served' principle)에 의한 사후배분체제(a posteriori system)이고, 다른 하나는 선착순원칙을 적용할 경우 배제될 수 있는 국가(행정청)를 위해 미리 계획을 통하여 배분하는 사전배분체제(a priori system)이다. 논의는 우선 사후배분체제가 우주후진국에 불리하다는 확립된 관점을 전제로 출발한다. Philip De Man은 사후배분체제의 기저에 있는 선착순원칙에도 예외가 있다면서 이에 관한 7가지의 예를 들어 선착순원칙에 의한 배분적 정의의 형해화 가능성이 배제될 수 있음을 보여주려 시도한다. 하지만 본 논문은 그가 주장하는 각각의 논거에 대해 반박하고, 이를 근거로 여전히 선착순원칙이 대부분의 우주자원배분에 적용되고 있으며 따라서 배분적 평등의 실현에 걸림돌이 되고 있음을 보여준다. De Man이 주장하는 근거는 다음과 같다: 1) 선착순 원칙은 유해간섭을 일으키는 할당에만 적용된다; 2) 선착순 원칙 외에도 국제적 권리의 형성에는 규정합치성원칙(rule of conformity)이 상호 적용된다; 3) 선착순 원칙에 반해 정보목적 및 임시로 등록이 가능하다; 4) 선착순 원칙 외에도 서비스의 종류에 따른 우선순위가 존재한다; 5) 먼저 등록했다는 사실만으로는 이득을 볼 수 없도록 선언한 절차규정(Rule of Procedure)이 있다; 6) 선착순 원칙과 동등하게 적용되는 기술적 요소의 고려와 국제 및 국내법에 따른 평등원칙이 있다; 7) 할당의 기본성격(basic characteristics)에 변경이 있을 경우 선착순 원칙이 배제된다. 논의의 또 다른 부분은 우주후진국을 위한 사전배분체제마저도 그 본래의 목적을 달성할 수 없으며, 이를 가능케 하는 구조화된 메커니즘을 관련 무선규칙과 그 부속서의 면밀한 분석을 통해 밝혀낸다. 분석대상은 방송위성계획(Broadcasting-Satellite System) 및 고정위성계획(Fixed-Satellite System)에 따라 각 행정청이 자신의 할당을 국제적으로 등록하는 세부절차이며, 이 사전배분체제 에서도 선착순원칙이 압도하고 있음을 드러내면서 본 논문의 주장을 뒷받침한다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제51권
• /
• pp.159-185
• /
• 2011

This paper is intended to discuss the controversial issue of the principles of change circumstances under the legal system of international commercial transactions. The principles of change circumstances, so called clausula rebus sic stantibus is the legal doctrine allowing for treaties to become inapplicable because of a fundamental change of circumstances. It is essentially an "escape clause" that makes an exception to the general rule of pacta sunt servanda (promises must be kept). The practical needs of international transactions differ from the established concepts of national contracts law. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the legal system and theories under the regimes of international commercial transactions such as the CISG, the PICC, and the PECL. Clausula rebus sic stantibus does not apply if the parties to a treaty had contemplated for the occurrence of the changed circumstance. It only relates to the changed circumstances that were never contemplated by the parties. This paper has shown that the hardship provisions in the CISG, PICC, PECL has similarities to each a validity defense and an excuse defense. it was provisions that CISG governs this issue in Article 79, PICC Article 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.3(in addition to Article 7.1.7), PECL Article 6.111(in addition to 8.108). It is time when we should reconsider its legal system with great interest in order to harmonize with the international standpoint. It will be the turning point of our viepoint under the international commercial transactions.