• 한국영어학회지:영어학
• /
• 제2권4호
• /
• pp.537-553
• /
• 2002

This paper discusses various problems related to the teaching of English grammar at Korean universities. We first discuss whether English grammar should be taught at universities, and, if it is, what kind of English grammar needs to be taught. We propose that the English grammar we teach to Korean undergraduate students be eclectic in the sense that the traditional grammar established by Jespersen and others be the major source of instruction, supplemented, if necessary, by school grammar and also by linguistically oriented grammars such as generative grammar or cognitive grammar. Then we discuss the content of the English grammar that should be included in the curriculum : (i) present perfect vs. past, (ii) will vs. be going to, (iii) must vs. have to, (iv) may vs. can, (v) infinitives vs. gerunds, (vi) conative constructions, and (vii) the passive.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.267-286
• /
• 2006

The purpose of the study was to investigate what kinds of learning strategies EFL learners use to learn English grammar and what is benefit from structured grammar input processing. Students of the study consisted of 48 college students who took Practical English Grammar at a university in Kyung-Gi area and were divided into two groups based on grammar scores. The students were asked to take two grammar tasks and grammar tests and complete a survey including questions on grammar strategy and input processing. The results of the study are as follows. First, learners' grammar level has an effect on use of grammar attack strategy including asking teachers, using grammar books and given contexts whereas there was no significant difference between groups in the planning strategies, Among memory strategies, using grammar exercise and linking with already known structure demonstrated a significant difference between groups. Second, with regard to input processing, high level students got higher score on how much they understood the structured grammar input compared with low level students. Third, explicit implicit instruction added to input processing seems more comprehensible and more available than structured input only, Finally, it showed that there is positive relationship between perception and score of input processing tasks and grammar tests. Especially, learners' perception of input processing correlated more with final tests and tasks. Therefore, it suggests that the more input processing task need to develop and utilize in order to facilitate learners' intake.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.307-329
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to examine the presentation of Korean grammar on the Korean grammar textbooks for foreigners. Through the results, this study suggests some examples of grammar based on the discourse and context. Since the communicative approach received much attention, some Korean language forms have been researched in the discourse and context. In that sense, we need to survey the grammars presented in the grammar textbooks. The expressions of Korean epistemic modality and discourse function, ('-지요, -잖아(요), -군요', '-기는 하다') in the grammar textbooks have been analyzed. These expressions need to be described with much contextual and situational information and presented in the discourse. However it is a little insufficient to supply a proper amount of information for Korean language learners. To overcome the deficiency, this study presents some situational and contextual information of certain language forms.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.197-220
• /
• 2017

This study aims to suggest principles of making example sentences when describing grammar items and examines aspects of example sentences presented in Korean integrated textbooks. The requirements of example sentences in grammar descriptions have been mentioned in several preceding research. However, there is little research which focuses particularly on example sentences in grammar descriptions and examines the appropriacy of example sentences presented in Korean integrated textbooks. Therefore, this study sets up five principles to make appropriate example sentences and examine if these principles are in line with example sentences in Korean integrated textbooks published recently. Comprehension and use of grammar items are two significant aspects when making sentences. Thus, example sentences should show meaning, form and pragmatic information unambiguously. The findings show that most textbooks follow the five principles. However, some example sentences do not meet the requirements to be effective examples. In particular, the integrated textbooks need to include more example sentences related to the topic and the goals of the unit considering the role of grammar.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제39권
• /
• pp.485-499
• /
• 2015

Initially, the word 'usage' in the rule of Korean orthography was used to indicate the whole grammatical knowledge to separate between stems and inflectional affixes and nominals and case markers. Nowadays the word 'usage' in the rule of Korean orthograph is understood to indicate both 'usage' as the principles of the orthographic rule and 'grammar.' Even though 'usage' and 'grammar' can be understood as two different words, the discrepancy between them is not clear. In fact, if examining the rule of Korean orthography, it is not difficult to find that the principles of the orthography is written based on the grammar rules. Thus, the original principle is damaged because the rule of Korean orthography depends on the grammar rules too much. In addition, the rule of Korean orthography forces to change the grammar rules when describing them. Incorrect description of the grammar rules often causes the spelling mistakes. Therefore, it is necessary to divide two areas such as 'usage' and 'grammar' when dealing with 'the orthographic rules' and describing them.

• 한국컴퓨터교육학회 학술대회
• /
• 한국컴퓨터교육학회 2017년도 하계학술대회
• /
• pp.29-30
• /
• 2017

W-grammar(Van Wijngaarden grammar)[1].란 형식 문법의 한 종류인 문맥 자유 문법(Context-free grammar, CFG)의 대안으로, 두 개의 CFG가 서로 상호작용하면서 언어를 정의하도록 구성된 문법을 말하며 그 구성상의 특징을 감안하여 2-level grammar라고도 부른다. 현재 많은 프로그래밍 언어는 CFG를 기반으로 구성되어 있는데, 본 연구에서는 W-grammar로 교육용 프로그래밍 언어를 정의하여 CFG 기반이 아닌 W-grammar 프로그래밍 언어의 진입점을 제공함과 동시에 기저의 문법에 따른 계산가능성에 대해서 연구하는 토대를 쌓는 것을 목표로 한다.

• 한국언어정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국언어정보학회 2007년도 정기학술대회
• /
• pp.96-104
• /
• 2007

We explore a computational algebraic approach to grammar via pregroups. We examine how the structures of Japanese causatives can be treated in the framework of a pregroup grammar. In our grammar, the dictionary assigns one or more syntactic types to each word and the grammar rules are used to infer types to strings of words. We developed a practical parser representing our pregroup grammar, which validates our analysis.

• 정보학연구
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.113-123
• /
• 2003

본 논문은 사이클이 없는 속성문법을 사용한 코드 생성에 관한 연구이다. 이 연구를 수행하는 목적은 비 순환 속성문법을 기술하고 속성 문법을 표현하는 메타 언어인 속성 기술 언어를 설계하는 것이다. 여기서, 비 환형 속성 문법으로 L-attributed grammar를 사용한다. 본 시스템은 속성 문법으로부터 정보를 얻기 위한 분석기와 속성 평가기로 구성되어 있다. 속성 문법 분석기는 속성 기술 언어를 취하고 속성 평가기에 의해 요구되는 유용한 정보를 생성한다. 속성 평가는 이 정보를 사용하여 속성 값을 계산한다.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.39-62
• /
• 2017

This study is to examine grammar understanding with beginner English speakers according to presentational methods of grammatical content. 18 English-speaking Korean beginners were randomly assigned and divided into two groups. We first examined if there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in grammar comprehension with and without illustrations. It was found that the group given the presentation illustrations showed greater understanding than the group without them. Second, no statistically significant difference in grammar understanding was found between the groups with and without materials marked for their awareness. Third, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups with the order of presenting content elements related to grammatical items. This study is to affirm the importance of illustrations as a component of Korean textbooks.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.650-660
• /
• 2017

본고는 한국어 교재의 초급 단계에 나오는 문법 항목을 조사․분석한 연구로, 우선 문법 항목을 아우르는 명칭을 비롯한 한국어 문법 항목에 대한 논의를 하고 본격적으로 문법 항목의 제시 양상을 살펴보았다. 교재에서 사용하는 문법의 명칭이 예전에는 다양하였으나 연구 대상의 교재에서는 거의 동일하게 칭하고 있다. 그러나 교재마다 문법 항목의 내용 및 범위가 달라서 공통적으로 다루는 문법 항목의 개수는 적었다. 문법 항목의 제시 양상은 크게 표기 방식과 내용 기술로 나누어 살펴보았다. 표기 방식에서는 표시유형, 배열순서, 선행요소 표시 등을, 내용 기술에서는 문법의 의미를 비롯하여 기술한 범위와 내용을 주로 조사하였다. 조사 결과, 제시 양상 중 표시유형이 다양하게 나타나므로 간단하면서 배열순서나 부호가 달리 사용되지 않는 대표 형태로 제시할 것을 제안하였다. 또한 내용 기술에서도 교재마다 의미 기술을 비롯한 내용의 범위도 다르게 제시되어 있었다. 이와 같이 달리 제시되는 것은 교재 제작과 관련하여 다양한 원인이 있을 수 있으나 의미 기술, 결합 및 제약 정보는 기본적으로 유사하게 제시하고 나머지는 추가하는 방식을 채택할 것을 논의하였다.