• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2022년도 가을 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.63-64
• /
• 2022

In this study, the quality of mineral admixture, Comparison of blast-furnace slag(BS) and fly ash(FA)in Korea and China. In the case of BS, Korea is mainly classified into 1 type to 4 types according to the specific surface area, whereas China is classified into S105, 95, and 75 according to the activity index of 28 days of age. In the case of FA, Korea is like BS, is mainly classified into types 1 to 4 according to specific surface area, whereas China is classified into F, C (class F, class C) by ingredients and class I, II, and III according to powder and ignition loss.

• 동아시아경상학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.95-108
• /
• 2022

Purpose - This study attempts a multifaceted analysis utilizing the Chinese test takers' results of the Economy & Business Aptitude Test. Since Chinese students study socialist theories of economics along with market-based ones, comparing Chinese university students' basic knowledge of economics and business and its application to those of Korean test takers is also very meaningful from the perspective of economics education research. Research design, data, and methodology - This study investigates the results on the test of economy and business understanding between Korea and China. For comparison of the result, we conducted MK-TEST for two universities in China. Result - This study finds that the average correct answer rate of Korea is higher than one of China according to the overall results. The average difference rate is about 15% between Korea and China. More concretely, the correct answer rate of business area is higher than one of economy area, identifying them by subject area. Conclusion - According to the results, this study can infer that there are no or little differences in the ability of examinee to solve applied questions between Korea and China and the differences of the scope and emphasis point in an academic curriculum between both countries might bring these kinds of results. Finally, Chinese students shows higher correct answer rate to the questions about the economy issues and policies related to China than one of Korea examinee.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.131-148
• /
• 2011

Our work empirically investigates the cultural differences of Social Networking Service (SNS) users in China, Korea and U.S. We construct a survey questionnaire from existing literature and test it for reliability, validity, and model fit. Then we collect data and validate the cultural differences of SNS users in three nations. Our results show different rankings from existing literature in cultural dimensions about three nations. In terms of masculinity, we find China > U.S. > Korea, similar to Hofstede. In individualism, we find U.S. > Korea > China, different from Hofstede (U.S. > China > Korea). In power distance, it is shown that Korea > China > U.S., different from Hofstede (China > Korea > U.S.). Uncertainty avoidance is found that U.S. > Korea > China, lowered ranking of Korea from the top among three nations in Hofstede. We find that these outcomes would be useful in updating national culture of the three nations and for future research about cultural impacts on SNS adoption.

• 국제교류와 융합교육
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.80-90
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 한·중 현직교사교육의 목적, 내용, 모형에 대한 비교를 통하여 서로의 차이점과 공통점을 알아보는 데에 있다. 그 차이점과 공통점을 통하여 양국 현직교사교육에 대한 계시 점을 제시하도록 한다. 연구결과는 중국에서 교사의 도덕 교육과 과목지식을 중시하며 한국은 교사의 문화 역량, 전공 지식을 중시하는 것, 구체적인 연수 내용과 이수 시간 모두 정확하게 규정되어 있는 것 등이 있다. 연구력과를 바탕으로 중국 측에게 개인중심으로 진행하는 연수 지원, 한국 측에게 교육연수기관 간 협력 체제 내실화 등 계시 점을 제시하도록 하였다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.217-241
• /
• 2011

관세는 국가재정수입 또는 국내산업보호를 목적으로 수출입물품에 대하여 부과하는 조세이고, 관세환급은 원자재를 수입 가공해 만든 완제품을 수출할 때 해당 원자재의 수입 관세를 돌려주는 것으로 수출상품의 경쟁력을 지원하는 것이다. 특히 한국과 중국의 교역규모는 2010년 현재 다른 국가에 비해 가장 크므로 중국과 관련된 기업은 중국의 관세제도, 즉 관세환급에 대해 정확히 이해하는 것이 필요하다. 중국의 수출재화에 대한 증치세 관련 규정은 다소 복잡하고 일관성 없는 정책으로 인하여 이해하기 어렵기 때문에 본 연구의 결과는 의미가 있다. 또한 2010년 현재 한국의 경우 관세환급은 4조176억6백만원이고, 중국의 경우에도 7328억위안에 달해 금액으로도 그 중요성이 크다고 볼 수 있으므로 한국과 중국의 관세환급에 대해 비교하여 이해하는 것은 의미 있는 연구이다.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.37-44
• /
• 2021

Logistics standardization not only stands for logistics industry competitiveness, but also it is core competitive power. And Logistics industry makes smooth the exchange of goods, service and information in improving economic efficiency. Logistics cooperation between Korea and China becomes important issue because it has strategic meaning for two countries' benefit. Korea and China should reform logistics standardization and cooperate each other. This study based on analysing the China's logistics standardization policy, and comparison of ywo countries' logistics standardization, explored the alternatives of its cooperation between Korea and China in the new perspective.

• 조명전기설비학회논문지
• /
• 제23권11호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2009

To compare the lighting environment of the living rooms in the apartments in Korea and China, this research conducted a study of the current status, targeting 79 households in Korea and 68 households in China. The results are the following. First, the two nations use mostly fluorescent light as the general lighting for the living room. China, in particular, share of not using the local lighting is very high. Secondly, levels of illumination was measured. The result demonstrates that the brightness of the lighting is higher in Korea compared to China while China demonstrates higher uniformity ratio for the levels of illumination compared to Korea. However, levels of illumination in general are very low in China. Thus, it cannot be concluded that China offers favorable lighting environment. Third, study on the degree of living room lighting's brightness and satisfaction level demonstrates that they are both average in Korea and China. As for the important points for the house lighting, most Koreans cited 'brightness of the lighting' while most Chinese said 'ease of maneuvering'.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2006년도 춘계학술논문 발표대회 제6권1호
• /
• pp.159-162
• /
• 2006

This study generally compared and investigated cement type and quality of China and Korea. Cement in Korea is divided into five such as ordinary, high early strength, moderate heat, low heat and sulfate resistance portland cement. However cement in China is divided into portland cement($P{\cdot}I,\;P{\cdot}II$) and ordinary portland cement($P{\cdot}O$) with admixture displacement ratio and it is again divided into 6 level and 7 level with 28 days compressive strength. In addition China classified cement into several standards, such as Mgo, SO3,, igloss, blame, setting time, stability, strength, alkali and sampling test. Therefore it should be careful to conclude so quickly without right understanding whether quality of China cement is bad or good. The better way to evaluate China cement is synthetically understanding a value engineering and consumer awareness.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권40호
• /
• pp.37-81
• /
• 2016

This paper aims to use crossover analysis to uncover similarities and differences between the U.S-Japan relationship in the World War II era and the modern U.S-China relationship, and to forecast the possibility of the outbreak of war between U.S and China by applying the steps to war theory. The steps to war theory argues that the probability of the outbreak of war between two states within five years would approach 90 percent, if they have ongoing territorial dispute, alliance, rivalry, and arms race. The comparison exposes some similarities with the territorial dispute, alliance, rivalry, but reveals dissimilarities with arms race. U.S-Japan relationship in the World War II era had the arms race, which does not exist the modern U.S-China Relationship. The result of comparison is that the probability for the Outbreak of War between U.S and China correspond to third stage(Risk Level). it means that the probability for the Outbreak of War between U.S and China is 55%. But, There are four elements(① Perception of Leader ② Mutual dependence of economy ③ Possession of nuclear weapon ④ Ravages of war) that reduce the probability for the Outbreak of War. Considering the four elements, the probability for the Outbreak of War between U.S and China is a slim chance. But the probability for the Outbreak of War between U.S and China is excluded because of territorial dispute, alliance, rivalry. So, This paper suggests three points.(① Developing military options ② Reducing the misconception of intend, ③ Promoting navy exchanges) to prevent of Outbreak of War.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.323-341
• /
• 2001

In this paper, we analyse the competitiveness of Korean If sector with international trade data. We focus on importance of emerging Chinese IT sector. It is specifically summarized as follows. First, China as competitor in US market reveals relative disadvantage than Korea. Next, Korea has lost competitiveness in China. To make a international comparison we work hard In set up trade data of specific country.