• 제목/요약/키워드: Inquiry-Based General Chemistry

검색결과 7건 처리시간 0.02초

Argument Structure in the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach

  • Choi, Ae-Ran
    • 한국과학교육학회지
    • /
    • 제30권3호
    • /
    • pp.323-336
    • /
    • 2010
  • The purpose of this study was to evaluate students' written arguments embedded in scientific inquiry investigations using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. Argument components defined in this study are questions, claims, questions-claims relationship, evidence, claims-evidence relationship, multiple modal representations, and reflection. A set of criteria for evaluating each argument component was developed to evaluate writing samples of students from college freshman general chemistry laboratory classes. Results indicate that students produced, on average, moderate to powerful questions, claims, and evidence. They also constructed reasonable questions-claims relationship and claims-evidence relationship. Compared to other component scores, the average score for reflection was relatively low. Overall, the average Total Argument score was 21.4 out of a possible 36, that is, the quality of the written arguments using the SWH approach during a series of inquiry-based chemistry laboratory investigations was moderate to powerful. The findings of this study suggest that students, on average, developed reasonable scientific arguments generated as part of scientific inquiry. In other words, students are capable of putting together reasonable arguments as they participate in inquiry-based laboratory classrooms.

탐구적 일반화학실험 수행 평가 준거 개발 (The Development of Performance Scoring Rubrics for the Inquiry-Based General Chemistry Experiments)

  • 강순희;김양현;박종윤
    • 한국과학교육학회지
    • /
    • 제19권4호
    • /
    • pp.507-515
    • /
    • 1999
  • 본 연구에서는 과학 교사를 양성하는 사범대학 과학교육과 학생들의 일반화학실험 수행평가를 위한 분석적인 채점 준거를 개발하였다. 개발된 채점준거는 크게 두 가지로 나눌 수 있다. 첫 번째는 학생들이 실험을 수행하면서 나타나는 탐구 능력을 평가하기 위한 실험 보고서를 평가하는 분석적 채점 준거이다. 이 분석적 채점 준거는 일곱 가지 탐구 기능 요소로 나누어져 있으며, 한 학기용 실험 주제 9개에 대해서 모두 개발하였다. 두 번째는 학생들이 실험하는 동안에 교수와 조교가 직접적인 관찰에 의해 점검하는 형태로 평가하는 수공적 기능 채점 준거와 실험에 임하는 학생들의 태도를 평가하기 위한 분석적 채점 준거이다. 또한 학생들의 탐구 능력을 평가하는 실험 보고서에 대한 분석적 채점 준거의 기초가 되는 일곱가지 탐구 기능 요소에 대한 일반적 채점 준거도 개발하였다. 모든 채점 준거에 대한 타당도는 과학교육 전문가 6인에 의하여 검증 받았으며, 채점 준거로 실험 보고서를 평가한 결과로부터 채점자간 신뢰도를 검증하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 평가 도구를 사용하여 얻어진 학생들의 일반화학실험 수업 성취도와 일반화학 이론 수업 성취도는 상관이 있는 것(r=.663.p<.01)으로 나타났으며. 44%($r^2$=.440)의 공통 분산 영역을 보여주었다. 따라서 본 연구에서 개발한 실험 평가 도구는 이론 수업 평가 도구에서 측정하지 못하는 다른 영역(56%)도 평가하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 결과로부터 간접적으로나마 본 연구에서 개발한 실험 평가 도구가 전통적인 지식 이해만이 아닌, 실험을 수행하면서 나타난 탐구 기능, 수공적 기능, 실험 태도를 평가하는 도구라고 할 수 있다.

  • PDF

Using the Writing Template provided by the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach for Quality Arguments

  • Choi, Aeran
    • 한국과학교육학회지
    • /
    • 제32권9호
    • /
    • pp.1470-1488
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study examined changes in the quality of written arguments produced by freshman students in general chemistry laboratory classes using the SWH approach over a semester; difference in the quality of written argument between the original writing template (year I) and the extended writing template (year II); and any difference between Total Argument and Holistic Argument scores. 140 writing samples from 14 students on the year I and 228 samples from 19 students on the year II were collected. Results indicated that despite fluctuations, the students were producing stronger argument by the end of semester compared to the beginning of the semester. Original SWH template group received significantly higher argument scores than extended SWH template group. For the most of year I laboratory investigations, there was no significant difference in the quality of argument between Total Argument and Holistic Argument scores. An implication of this study would be to provide opportunities for students to practice constructing arguments using the original SWH writing template including questions, claims, evidence, and reflection.

약선(藥膳)의 과학적 원리를 통한 상주곶감 소비촉진 방안 연구 (A Study on Promoting the Consumption of Sangju-Dried Persimmons as Functional Food through Scientific Inquiry)

  • 최정훈;김창만
    • 한국환경과학회지
    • /
    • 제25권4호
    • /
    • pp.543-556
    • /
    • 2016
  • Sangju, a city in the North Gyeongsang Province, is well known as "Three Whites", representing its three main agricultural products: rice, silkworm, and dried persimmons. Therefore, development of a variety of dishes or products that can promote the consumption of dried persimmons is an urgent requirement for this region. This study was designed to provide fundamental information for revitalizing community-based specialized agriculture through scientific inquiry into medicinal foods and to develop a medicinal food menu based on the results of previous research and pre-survey. The pre-survey results and incompatibility revealed that palatability influenced people's decision to consume dried persimmons far more than pharmacological functionality. Therefore, palatability played an important part in the development of dried persimmon puddings with acceptable texture. These dishes are in high demand as they suit the tastes of variety of consumers. The inclusion of various additives lowered the sugar content in the developed foods and made the products alkalescent (pH > 7), thereby improving functionality. Unique color and flavor additives were also important criteria that determined the selection attributes of the developed medicinal foods. In addition, the additives had a positive effect on the fragrance and texture of the foods. In conclusion, the results suggested that use of additives provides significant advantages in promoting the consumption of Sangju-dried persimmons by improving both functionality and palatability.

초등 과학영재 학생과 일반 학생의 과학 동시 특성 및 과학 동시 쓰기에 대한 인식 비교 (Comparing Characteristics and Perceptions of Writing Science Poems for Scientifically-Gifted and General Elementary Students)

  • 김민지;강훈식
    • 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
    • /
    • 제38권1호
    • /
    • pp.130-148
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study compared the characteristics of scientific poems written by scientifically-gifted and general elementary students, and their perceptions of writing scientific poem. To do this, 5~6 graders (n=100) at two gifted science education institutes and 5~6 graders (n=93) at a elementary school in Seoul were selected. Scientific poems written by the students were analyzed according to their numbers and types. Their perceptions of writing scientific poems were also analyzed through a questionnaire and group interviews. The analysis of the results revealed that the general students wrote more scientific poems than the scientifically-gifted students for thirty minutes. The general students mainly named the titles in a direct way, while scientifically-gifted students did it in an implicit way. The free verse poems in both general students and scientifically-gifted students appeared most frequently, and the prose or narrative poems also often appeared. The general and scientifically-gifted students frequently used impersonation, and some students did not use metaphors. They didn't connect the scientific knowledge for multiple grade. While the poems of the general students evenly included the scientific knowledge for various academic fields, those of scientifically-gifted students tended to include the scientific knowledge for physics or chemistry. The poems of scientifically-gifted students tended to include more science process skills, especially in basic inquiry skills, than those of general students. The scientifically-gifted students wrote scientific poems in a more expanded form regarding the scientific knowledge, than the general students. Scientifically-gifted students perceived the educational benefits of writing scientific poems more positively based on various cognitive and affective aspects. However, many scientifically-gifted and general students had also several difficulties in the processes of writing scientific poems. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

실업계 고등학교 과학교육의 실태분석과 개선방안 (A Status Survey and Improvement Plan for the Science Education in Vocational High Schools)

  • 박승재;권재술;김창식;오대섭;오종옥;이화국;조희형
    • 한국과학교육학회지
    • /
    • 제8권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-22
    • /
    • 1988
  • The educational policy of a nation should be based on the results of nation-wide studies and their analyses. This study is the third one in a series of research on "development of improvement plan and monitoring system for secondary school science", focusing on the three major areas, such as students' achievements, science instruction and conditions for science education in vocational high schools. In general, the results showed that science achievements in vocational high schools were significantly lower than those of general high schools. While the achievement level in physics was lower by one percent, the achievement levels in chemistry and biology were significantly lower by more than 5 percents. In the case of scientific inquiry, the results showed much lower scores compared to those of general high schools. Concerning the inquiry abilities, most of the students did not possess the formal operational thinking skills such as controlling variables and combinatorial thinking. The ability of experimental skills seemed to be closely related to the students' majors. Students in industrial arts schools could measure electric resistance very well, while students in agricultural high school students failed completely. In the area of students' attitude toward science, the greater part of the students had the experiences of using scientific equipments (68.6 %), experimentation (54.3 %), and extracurricular science activities (56.9 %). They also showed positive attitude towards the nature of science (59.8%). The results of the survey on science instruction and school conditions for science education showed the needs for improvement In general, the priority of science education in vocational high schools was very low compared to their major subjects. The teachers as well as students thought science text books nor to be difficult These responses and the low achievement levels seemed to be contradictory to each other. The facilities for science experiments were better equipped and installed to general high schools. However. the lack of budget was a major problem for performing experiments uning the facilities. Therefore. science education in vocational high school have many things to be improved For the improvement of science education in vocational high schools, financial support as well as the intention for the improvement must be the essential factors.

  • PDF

예비교사를 위한 실감형 콘텐츠 활용 메타인지 학습전략 기반 화학 프로그램의 효과 및 관계성 분석 (Effectiveness and Relationship Analysis of Chemistry Programs Based on Metacognitive Learning Strategies Using Realistic Contents for Pre-service Teachers)

  • 이다은;김현경
    • 대한화학회지
    • /
    • 제67권4호
    • /
    • pp.271-280
    • /
    • 2023
  • 본 연구에서는 실감형 콘텐츠를 활용한 메타인지 학습전략 기반 화학 프로그램이 예비 교사의 창의적 사고역량 및 과학과 핵심 역량에 미치는 효과와 이에 대한 인식을 조사하는데 목적이 있다. 특히, 메타인지를 강화시키는 전략을 도입하여 프로그램의 효과를 더욱 향상시키고자 하였다. 참가자는 새로 개발한 화학 프로그램을 적용 받는 실험반과 실감형 콘텐츠와 메타인지 전략을 포함하지 않은 일반적인 수업을 적용 받는 전통반으로 분류하였다. 두 집단 모두에게 프로그램 적용 전과 적용 후 설문을 실시하여 메타인지 역량과 창의적 사고역량 및 과학과 핵심역량의 변화 정도를 측정하였다. 또한 메타인지 역량과 과학과 핵심역량이 창의력 사고역량에 미치는 영향에 대해 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 실험반의 메타인지 역량, 창의적 사고역량 하위요소 중 적절성과 합리성, 과학과 핵심 역량 중 과학적 참여 및 평생 학습 능력을 제외한 모든 하위요소가 유의하게 향상되었다. 또한 메타인지 역량 중 메타인지적 지식, 과학과 핵심역량 중 과학적 탐구능력과 과학적 사고력이 창의적 사고역량에 영향을 미친다는 결과가 도출되었다. 결과를 통해 창의력 사고역량의 향상을 위해 메타인지 학습전략을 접목시킨 실감형 콘텐츠 개발이 필요하며 이를 활용할 수 있는 학습모형 및 프로그램 개발이 필요하다는 시사점을 얻었다.