1 |
Hand, B., Wallace, C. W., & Yang, E. (2004). Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh grad science: quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131-149.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Prothero, W. (2000). The epistemological framing of a discipline: Writing science in university oceanography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 691-718.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Kelly, G. J. & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: an analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86, 314-342.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Klein, P. (2000). Elementary students' strategies for writing to learn in science. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 317-348.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Giere, R. N. (1991). Understanding scientific reasoning ( ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
|
6 |
Hohenshell, L. M., & Hand, B. (2006). Writing to learn strategies in secondary school cell biology: A mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 261-289.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Keys, C. W. (1999b). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science, Science Education, 83, 115-130.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 676-690.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the Science Writing Huerisitic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Gardner, P. L. (1980). The identification of specific difficulties with logical connectives in science among secondary school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(3), 223-229.
DOI
|
11 |
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
|
12 |
Hand, B., & Keys, C. W. (1999). Inquiry Investigation: A new approach to laboratory reports. The Science Teacher, 66(4), 27-29.
|
13 |
Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2002). Teachers implementing writing to learn strategies in junior secondary science: A case study. Science Education, 86(6), 737-755.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
|
15 |
Bell, P. & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 797-817.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J. & Hand, B. M. (2006). Implementing the Science Writing Heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education. 83(7), 1032-1038.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Choi, A., Notebaert, A., Diaz, J., & Hand, B. (2010). Examining Arguments Generated by Year 5, 7, and 10 Students in Science Classrooms. Research in Science Education. 40(2), 149-169.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. Teacher's College Press, New York.
|
20 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
21 |
Willett, J. B., Yamashita, J. M., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). A meta analysis of instructional systems applied in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 405-417.
DOI
|
22 |
Wallace, C. S. (2004). An illumination of the roles of hands on activities, discussion, text reading, and writing in constructing biology knowledge in seventh grade, School Science and Mathematics, 104(2), 70-78.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Wallace, C. S., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2004). Introduction: Does writing promote learning in science? In C. S. Wallace, B. Hand, & V. Prain (Eds.), Writing and learning in the science classroom (pp.1-8). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
|
24 |
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
|
25 |
Wise, K. C., & Okey, J. C. (1983). A meta analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 419-435.
DOI
|
26 |
Wu, H., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88, 465-492.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., and Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Yore, L. D & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 291-314.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Osborne, J. (2002). Science without literacy: A ship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 203-218.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood. K. A. (2005) The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanation. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
33 |
Sandoval, W. A. & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry, Science Education, 88, 345-372.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W. C., Jr., & Alport, J. M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 387-404.
DOI
|
35 |
Taylor, C. (1996). Defining science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
|
36 |
Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning ( Ed.) New York: Macmillan.
|
37 |
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
|
38 |
Norris, S. P., and Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224- 240.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
|
40 |
Newton, P., Driver. R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
|
42 |
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337.
DOI
ScienceOn
|