• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.249-271
• /
• 1999

This article deals with concept and theory of privacy and personal data on the basis of understanding of this matter, Especially concerns the infringement and protection of privacy and personal data that is violated by new media and electronic commercial transaction through case study and research of literature. The article seek to find out the resolution of legal problems on the protection of privacy and personal data. The resolution is in other words, that privacy and personal data protection law shall be established as a part of efforts to protect personal data and to activate electronic commercial transactions.

• 복식
• /
• 제66권5호
• /
• pp.33-48
• /
• 2016

Upon the needs to draw the judicial elements of creativity in the copyrighted character designs, this paper aims to draw and categorize the elements based on the analysis of preceding court decisions. The results are as follows: the form of body, the features in its face and its composition, the overall image, the degree of personification, and aesthetic sensation. These elements reflect formative skills required to portray the intrinsic quality of a character. This paper is of significant interest in that it suggested the legal basis and elements of creativity in character design to professionals in both areas of design and judicial decisions.

• 대한전자공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전자공학회 2002년도 ITC-CSCC -2
• /
• pp.1260-1263
• /
• 2002

This paper takes the region segmentation in image processing and the semantic importance in an image analysis into consideration for digital image watermarking. A semantic importance for an object region, which is segmented by specific features, is determined according to the contents of the region. In this paper, face images are the targets of watermarking for their increasing importance, the use of frequency and strong necessity of protection. A face region is detected and segmented as an object region and encoded watermark information is embedded into the region. Employing a masking and filtering method, experiments are carried out and the results show the usefulness of the proposed method even when there are high compression and a synthesis as a case of copyright infringement.

• 한국방송∙미디어공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국방송공학회 2009년도 IWAIT
• /
• pp.508-511
• /
• 2009

The infringement of the copyright is a problem by the distribution of digital contents copied illegally. The digital watermark is expected as a thing preventing unjust copying by burying information in digital data such as image, animation, the sound, TV, radio and movies. [1] [2]But a noise is included in a digital watermark reproduction image. So there is the case that the certification of the reproduction image has difficulty with. If a computer cannot recognize the information reproduced from digital watermarking, the information does not have a meaning. This paper aimed at improvement of the proof of a digital-watermarking reproduction image. And it is verified whether the difference of the form of a character affects the degree of correlation.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.197-257
• /
• 2008

Current crown law punishes crime related to unborn child with abortion crime. So we might think that any infringement on unborn child is pretty well protected. But, in terms of illegal abortion, a charge of injuring person and homicide, there are lots blind spots in punishing criminals. Especially, there are numerous unclear cases in illegal abortion. If a doctor killed an unborn child by accident in medical operations, we can't punish him because it was an accident. There still exist controversial cases such as, if an unborn child was somehow damaged and was dead after birth, or was born with disabilities, how are we supposed to punish that? Recently, in a case where a doctor left alone a mother who had a baby and the baby died, our Supreme Court of Korea (Supreme Court of Korea 2007.6.29 2005do 3832) had given a verdict of "not guilty". It looked like they were very fair with current crime law. But, we want this case to be investigated if there weren't any logical contradictions as well as concurrent translation within Constitution Law.

• 한국농촌건축학회논문집
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.67-74
• /
• 2008

Recently, construction of bridges in rural areas has been increased to preserve the natural environment. However this brings forth the disputes over rights of light in farmland. In urban areas, the disputes over rights of light have been settled on the authority of the national architectural law and only sunshine hours for winter solstice are considered. Basically, the point at issue is different between each case. The main issues of the dispute in rural area were the reduction of the crop cultivation and the increase of the heating cost in winter. The purpose of this study is to review the mediation process in national environmental dispute resolution commission to resolve these issues, and to set up the analysis method of rights of light and modelling equation of solar position. Furthermore, we aimed at analyzing the damaged hours of daylights in rural housing and the infringement rate of daylight in farmland through the case study. In conclusion, we estimated the sunshine hours during the whole damaged periods according to the elements of bridges, and presented the solution process of dispute over rights of light due to the construction of bridge in rural area.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.153-175
• /
• 2013

The issue of patent validity becomes a subject of dispute under the FTA and there is a definite difference of opinion between China, Japan, and Korea. In other words, the validity of a judgment on the patent was exclusively under the jurisdiction of the administrative agency at a particular patent office. Thus, the issue arises where there is a potential judgment on patent validity. In this case, the Supreme Court rather than the patent office can offer a judgment from a judicial institution and can make a judgment in the case of a medication. In China, however, the lowest possibility of judgment on patent validity is predicted to occur in judicial institutions. Such a judgment is recognized as the Grand Bench Decision in Korea, and the court can judge the patent validation rather than the patent office. That is just the case in the Kilby case-it is invalid for reasons obvious in Japan. Therefore, there is a substantial difference between the three countries. Especially in Japan, where after the Kilby case, they revised the patent law in 2004 to introduce Article 104-3, placing the judgment of patent validity in the court, even if the "Apparentness"is not requisite. Per this law, infringers can argue for patent invalidity not only the judgment of the patent invalidation but also the infringement lawsuit. From the point of view of Japan, Korea became the judgment of trademark validation by extension and obvious cases can become directly to judge through the Supreme Court about the right that needs to examinations and registrations. In terms of the mediation, it also provides a clue about the judgment of intellectual property validation and expands the scope of the mediation in the future. From now on, in order to have active mediation procedures in the three countries, China, Japan, and Korea would need to unify regulations and application scopes for mediation in the FTA negotiation and to look forward to achieve a vigorous mediation approach.

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제11권10호
• /
• pp.138-143
• /
• 2021

현재, Covid-19의 밀접접촉자를 찾아내어 진단검사를 통해 Covid-19 확산을 차단하고 있다. 하지만 확진자의 잠복 기간이 2주가 되고, 확진자의 동선을 추적하여 접촉자를 찾기에 많은 인력과 시간, 비용이 소요된다. 특히, 확진자의 수가 증가할수록 접촉자를 찾아 사전에 차단하는 비용이 기하급수적으로 증가하여 한계점을 가진다. 접촉자를 찾기 위해 전 국민이 상점이나 식당 등 편의시설을 방문할 때마다 전자출입명부를 기록해야 하는데 이는 개인의 위치 정보에 대한 프라이버시 침해 가능성이 높다. 본 연구에서는 자신의 위치와 시간을 실시간으로 저장하고, KDCA에서 수집된 감염자의 동선 정보를 다운받아 겹치는 지점이 있을 경우에 사용자에게 통지하여 사전에 진단검사를 유도하는 시스템을 설계하고자 한다. 제안 기법은 상점을 방문할 때 전자출입명부를 기록해야 하는 번거로움을 해결하면서 개인정보를 사전에 KDCA에 제공하지 않아 프라이버시 침해를 차단할 수 있다.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.121-130
• /
• 2022

최근 병사의 휴대전화 사용이 허용되면서 범죄 행위와 연루되어 경찰에서 군대로 사건 이송 소요가 빈번하게 발생하고 있으며, 사건 이송 시 디지털 증거의 인수가 이루어짐에도 불구하고 경찰에서 진행하였던 압수·수색 절차를 중복하는 등 이전 수사의 신뢰성과 별개로 디지털 증거를 재수집하는 사례가 발생하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 군대·경찰·법원에서 디지털 증거를 담당하는 실무자를 대상으로 심층 인터뷰 및 포커스그룹인터뷰(FGI)를 통해 사건 이송 시 인적 요소와 절차 중복으로 인한 증거능력 침해가 발생하는 등의 디지털 증거 취급에 관한 문제점을 도출하였고 이를 분석하여, 사건 이송 효율성을 향상할 수 있는 준비-수집-추출-정리-결과의 5단계로 구성된 디지털 증거 처리 절차를 제시한다. 제시한 절차는 사례 분석을 통해 절차의 실효성을 검증하였고 디지털 증거의 증거능력 보장과 사건 처리 효율에 기여할 것으로 기대한다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.455-492
• /
• 2009

(Background) Recent biotechnological breakthroughs are shedding new lights on various ethical and legal issues about human biological material. Since Rudolph Virchow, a German pathologist, had founded the medical discipline of cellular pathology, issues centering around human biological materials began to draw attention. The issues involving human biological materials were revisited with more attention along with series concerns when the human genome map was finally completed. Recently, with researches on human genes and bioengineering reaping enormous commercial values in the form of material patent, such changes require a society to reassess the present and future status of human tissue within the legal system. This in turn gave rise to a heated debate over how to protect the rights of material donors: property rule vs. no property rule. (Debate and Cases) Property rule recognizes the donors' property rights on human biological materials. Thus, donors can claim real action if there were any bleach of informed consent or a donation contract. Donors can also claim damages to the responsible party when there is an infringement of property rights. Some even uphold the concept of material patents overtaking. From the viewpoint of no property rule, human biological materials are objects separated from donors. Thus, a recipient or a third party will be held liable if there were any infringement of donor's human rights. Human biological materials should not be commercially traded and a patent based on a human biological materials research does not belong to the donor of the tissues used during the course of research. In the US, two courts, Moore v. Regents of the University of California, and Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute, Inc., have already decided that research participants retain no ownership of the biological specimens they contribute to medical research. Significantly, both Moore and Greenberg cases found that the researcher had parted with all ownership rights in the tissue samples when they donated them to the institutions, even though there was no provision in the informed consent forms stating either that the participants donated their tissue or waived their rights to ownership of the tissue. These rulings were led to huge controversy over property rights on human tissues. This research supports no property rule on the ground that it can protect the human dignity and prevent humans from objectification and commercialization. Human biological materials are already parted from human bodies and should be treated differently from the engineering and researches of those materials. Donors do not retain any ownership. (Suggestions) No property rule requires a legal breakthrough in the US in terms of donors' rights protection due to the absence of punitive damages provisions. The Donor rights issue on human biological material can be addressed through prospective legislation or tax policies, price control over patent products, and wider coverage of medical insurance. (Conclusions) Amid growing awareness over commercial values of human biological materials, no property rule should be adopted in order to protect human dignity but not without revamping legal provisions. The donors' rights issue in material patents requires prospective legislation based on current uncertainties. Also should be sought are solutions in the social context and all these discussions should be based on sound medical ethics of both medical staffs and researchers.