• 한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.15-20
• /
• 2023

최근 모든 산업에 있어서 디지털 전환이 가속되고 있고 그로 인해 생산되고 이용되는 정보 및 개인정보의 활용이 기업의 성패에 있어서 매우 중요하다. 그러나 이에 대한 역기능으로서 기업의 주요 정보 및 개인정보를 탈취하거나 유출하려는 시도는 계속 증가하고 있고, 이에 대한 적절한 방어 및 대응이 절대적으로 필요하다. 그러나, 중소기업의 경우 대기업에 비해 정보보호에 대한 우선순위나 전문인력 보유 면에서 매우 미흡한 상황이다. 본 논문에서는 국내에서 시행되고 있는 인증 및 진단에 대해 살펴보고, 개인정보보호법 고시 기준 확대 적용 및 지원 제도의 상시 운영을 통해서, 중소기업에 적합한 정보보호 인증 확대 적용 및 지원 제도의 실효성 제고 방안을 제시한다.

• 법제연구
• /
• 제41호
• /
• pp.303-335
• /
• 2011

통신산업에서 급격한 변화는 통신법 규제체계에 많은 영향을 미치고 있으며, 개인정보 보호의 측면에서도 이러한 변화가 요구되고 있다. 전통적인 통신법에서는 개인정보(privacy)의 비밀을 보호하는 것이 가장 중요한 정책 목표였지만, 디지털화된 통신 환경에서는 정보의 형성, 저장, 전송 등의 모든 과정에서 개인정보의 보호가 문제가 되고 있으며, 특히 통신사업자 등이 개인정보 보호의 주체로서 중요한 의미가 있다. 2003년 EU의 프라이버시 지침의 제정이나 1996년 미국 통신법의 개정을 통하여 새로운 관점에서 개인정보 보호의 필요성을 반영하고 있으며, 우리 통신법 체계에서도 이러한 제도 개선이 이루어져 왔다. 즉 개인정보 보호에 관한 일반법으로서 "개인정보보호법"이 제정되고, 통신산업에서의 특별한 규율의 의미가 있는 "정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호 등에 관한 법률"과 "위치정보의 보호 및 이용 등에 관한 법률" 등이 특별법으로서 개인정보 보호의 근거가 되고 있다.주제어:개인정보, 통신산업, 프라이버시 지침, 개인정보보호법, 정보통신망법이와 같은 개인정보 보호를 위한 통신법 체계는 긍정적인 것으로 평가할 수 있지만, 개인정보 보호의 구체적인 유형에 상응하는 규제 내용을 보완하고, 개인정보 보호의 기본 요건으로서 정보주체의 동의를 실질화 하는 방안을 지속적으로 강구해야 할 것이다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제13권
• /
• pp.1013-1032
• /
• 2000

At present, the scale of Electronic Commerce through internet has been rapidly increasing due to the development of information & communication technology, and aggregated to 2.4 billion dollar in America last year (1998). The market scale of worldwide electronic commerce is also presumed to be about 130 billion dollar in 2000, and to occupy more than 20% of the whole world trade in world 2020. Since the right of trademark, despite of being effective only in registered nations on the principle of territorialism, is unified on the cyber space of internet without domestic barrier or local limitation which make it easier to conduct the distribution of information rapidly through the address-internet domain name, those are very important that the systematic dispute-solving plan on problems such as decision of its Act and international jurisdiction to be established, in an effort to prevent the newly emerging dispute instances such as trademark infringement and improper competitiveness. In addition, it is natural that on the threshold of the electronic commerce age which formed with an unified area without the worldwide specific regulation, each country including us makes haste with the enactment of "electronic commerce Act" aiming at coming into force in 1999, in keeping with getting through "non-tariff law on electronic commerce" by U. S. parliament on May, 1998. In view of the properties of electronic commerce transactions through internet, there are the large curtailment of distributive channel, surmounting of restrictions on transaction area, space and time and the easy feedback with consumer and the cheap-required capital, from which the problems may arise - registration of trademark, the trademark infringement of domain name and the protection of prestigious trademark. Therefore, it is necessary to take the counter-measure, with a view of reviewing the infringement of trademark and domain name and the instances of each national precedent and to preventing the disputes. The improvement of the persistent system should be needed to propel the harmonious protection of those holding trademark right's credit and demanders' expectant profit by way of the righteous use of trademark.

• 한국재난정보학회 논문집
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.49-66
• /
• 2019

연구목적: 본 연구는 드론의 테러위협으로부터 민간 다중이용시설이 안전하고 유익하게 사용될 수 있도록, 민간시설의 드론테러 방어를 위한 법제도의 개선방안을 제시하고자 한다. 연구방법:연구를 위해 국가가 민간시설에 대해 시행하고 있는 대테러활동 운영실태를 조사 분석하였으며, 국외의 모범사례를 기술하고 비교하여 국내에 필요한 드론테러에 대한 국가 대테러정책의 방향을 제시하고 있다. 연구 결과: 국내 드론테러에 대한 법제도 한계점에 대하여 연구한 결과, 국내 적용 가능한 안티드론 기술을 구축 활용하기 어려워짐에 따라 드론테러에 대한 위협 뿐만 아니라, 사생활 침해, 스토킹 등의 범죄에도 취약점이 드러났다. "전파법과" 정보보호관련 법률 등 국민의 안전에 관한 법률은 안티드론기술의 도입을 방해하는 장애요인이 되고 있으므로 본 논문에서 제시하고 있는 법제도의 개선이 요구된다. 결론: 본 연구를 통해 민간시설 드론테러 취약요인과 피해경감대책의 법제도적 한계점과 개선방안을 하였다. 따라서 본 연구의 개선방안을 검토하여 드론테러의 대책방안이 마련되어야 한다.

• 인터넷정보학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.78-85
• /
• 2013

The revelations made possible by Edward Snowden, a contractor of the US intelligence service NSA, are a sobering reminder that the Internet is not an 'anonymous' means of communication. In fact, the Internet has never been conceived with anonymity in mind. If anything, the Internet and networking technologies provide far more detailed and traceable information about where, when, with whom we communicate. The content of the communication can also be made available to third parties who obtain encryption keys or have the means of exploiting vulnerabilities (either by design or by oversight) of encryption software. Irrebuttable evidence has emerged that the US and the UK intelligence services have had an indiscriminate access to the meta-data of communications and, in some cases, the content of the communications in the name of security and protection of the public. The conventional means of judicial scrutiny of such an access turned out to be ineffectual. The most alarming attitude of the public and some politicians is "If you have nothing to hide, you need not be concerned." Where individuals have nothing to hide, intelligence services have no business in the first place to have a peek. If the public espouses the groundless assumption that State organs are benevolent "( they will have a look only to find out whether there are probable grounds to form a reasonable suspicion"), then the achievements of several hundred years of struggle to have the constitutional guarantees against invasion into privacy and liberty will quickly evaporate. This is an opportune moment to review some of the basic points about the protection of privacy and freedom of individuals. First, if one should hold a view that security can override liberty, one is most likely to lose both liberty and security. Civilized societies have developed the rule of law as the least damaging and most practicable arrangement to strike a balance between security and liberty. Whether we wish to give up the rule of law in the name of security requires a thorough scrutiny and an informed decision of the body politic. It is not a decision which can secretly be made in a closed chamber. Second, protection of privacy has always depended on human being's compliance with the rules rather than technical guarantees or robustness of technical means. It is easy to tear apart an envelope and have a look inside. It was, and still is, the normative prohibition (and our compliance) which provided us with protection of privacy. The same applies to electronic communications. With sufficient resources, surreptitiously undermining technical means of protecting privacy (such as encryption) is certainly 'possible'. But that does not mean that it is permissible. Third, although the Internet is clearly not an 'anonymous' means of communication, many users have a 'false sense of anonymity' which make them more vulnerable to prying eyes. More effort should be made to educate the general public about the technical nature of the Internet and encourage them to adopt user behaviour which is mindful of the possibilities of unwanted surveillance. Fourth, the US and the UK intelligence services have demonstrated that an international cooperation is possible and worked well in running the mechanism of massive surveillance and infiltration into data which travels globally. If that is possible, it should equally be possible to put in place a global mechanism of judicial scrutiny over a global attempt at surveillance.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.681-694
• /
• 2018

본 연구에서는 SNS 이용자의 개인정보와 자기표현정보의 보호행동을 두 번의 연구를 통해 규명하였다. 제1차 연구에서는 연구에 자원한 88명의 대학생들에게 평소 개인정보 중요도 인지와 이를 보호하기 위한 행동의지에 대해 연구하였다. 제2차 연구에서는 정보검색 전문가가 연구에 자원한 88명의 대학생들이 SNS에 공개한 자기표현정보들을 수집 조직화한 다음, 이를 자원자 각각에게 보여주어 확인하게 한 다음, 자기표현정보의 중요도와 이에 대한 정보보호 행동의지에 대해 연구하였다. 제1차 조사연구에서는 개인정보 중요도 인식이 개인정보 비공개에 가장 큰 영향을 미쳤고, 다음으로 공개범위축소와 법제도화요구에 영향을 미쳤다. 제2차 연구에서는 SNS 이용자들이 평소 자신의 의견이나 생활상을 SNS에 공개적으로 표현하고 있지만, 실험적 조치를 통해 이러한 자기표현정보도 누적되고 조직화되면 민감한 정보가 될 수 있다는 점을 인식하게 해주면, 자기표현정보 비공개, 공개범위축소, 법제도화요구의 정보보호 행동의지를 갖게 됨을 확인하였다. 본 연구의 시사점은 개인정보 및 자기표현정보 보호행동에 관한 기존의 연구를 자구적 보호 노력과 외부적 보호요구 노력으로 확장 세분화함으로써 SNS 상의 정보보호행동을 설명하지 못하는 기존 연구의 한계를 극복하였다는 점이다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.351-371
• /
• 2007

This study article is a study on the rules of origin review and rules of origin judgement. and The purpose of this article shall be studies to korea foreign law and Korea American FTA in origin country regulation. this article are two most important elements in determining market access in a FTA. that is the coverage of tariff elimination and rules of origin. The rule of origin in a FTA greatly influences the creation of economic profit and distribution. Therefor, The Result of the article is review to protection of domestic customers and domestic industries in rules of origin. This study contributes to a understanding of judgement of rules of origin and extend level of generalization of exchange law, WTO, FTA Regulations by review interaction relation.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제19권
• /
• pp.23-61
• /
• 1990

Libraries and information centers are no different from any other institutions in our society. Today, their managers have to make many more decisions which have certain legal implications than before. The ignorance of the law on their parts can not be an acceptable excuse anymore, since. the consequences sometimes maybe quite serious. This paper outlines some important legal issues involved in the services and management of libraries and information centers. They are: constitutional rights on human knowledge activities: library act and it's related laws; censorship and right to know; information access and the protection of privacy: library services and copyright law; labor relations; protections of the people and properties of the institutions, etc. The laws are not static: rather, they change with the social, political and technological environments. The managers, as well as the staff members of libraries and information centers should be constantly updated with the changes in the field, in order to give the maximum service to the clients and to prevent any infringement of the laws, which may discredit their services and the institutions.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.547-584
• /
• 2004

Information technology(IT) is changing rapidly based on growth of internet and computer businesses. Therefore, computer programs and softwares are distributed to computer users promptly for their productivity increase and efficient work. So, in the distribution, the softwares will be copied or released through network or other methods which are not authorized by the program owners. In that case, copyright dispute is incurred and various issues are come out due to infringement of the software copyright. Thus, the purpose of this study is to research infringement cases of the software copyright and how to settle the dispute which is related with software programs. To achieve the purpose of this study, this research consisted of 5 chapters. At chapter 1 introduction, it mentioned necessity of this study, purpose and how to research this study, and at chapter 2 dispute factors indicated and summarized for technical resolution. At chapter 3, infringement cases of software copyright analyzed and studied upon intellectual property(IP) related laws. And methods of dispute settlement discussed and suggested to chapter 4 for copyright and intellectual property protection. Also, it emphasized importance of arbitration to resolve the issues timely and avoid time and economical consumption. Of course, arbitration law has to be matched with the trend of technology development for effective settlement. At chapter 5 conclusion, it summarized this research and suggested further research for empirical test of economic value of the software copyright upon the aspect of business, law, and engineering. In this study, the results are 1) IP related laws have to be enacted or revised to meet technical changes for the protection of software copyright on time. The enactment or the revision of law takes a long time, therefore, to deal the dispute effectively, 2) arbitration law has to be utilized efficiently in order to resolve issues and settle the dispute promptly. It is suggested the dispute settlement through arbitration to save time and economic matters for legislation, and to harmony with the technology trends. 3) Recognition of software copyright is to be improved by users and enterprises for development of software related industries and intellectual property protection. In conclusion, the protection of software copyright is important than any other things in the field of IT because of the development of industry and intellectual property related laws. The development is for areas of business, law and engineering, so research and practices are to be combined with the areas so that it could resolve the dispute settlement and IP protection effectively.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제17권
• /
• pp.129-146
• /
• 2002

The electronic technology development have occurred in the face of existing legal barriers to legal efficacy of computer information goods, and the liberating promise of electronic transactions cannot fully realized unless there is predictability in the legal rules that govern such transactions. This study analyzes some theoretical fundamentals of the Act. First, it proposes that the Act clarify and set forth uniform legal principles applicable to computer information transactions. Secondly, it suggests that if the individual is risk averse, the acceptance set for electronic transactions will be a convex set, and that the application of the Act will make the acceptance set more expanded by lowering the probability of conflicts and by downsizing the risk averness. Thirdly, it also suggest that through the mothod of contingent commodities analysis, the application of the Act by means of its restricted regulations will give more expected utility than the absence of the Act. Fourthly, it derives some implications that the degree of legitimate restriction will be affected by the objective risk inherent to the electronic transactions, and the individual's subjective risk-averseness. Finally, it concludes that harmonization of restriction and protection of individual's rights in electronic transaction process will be a necessary condition for more efficient body of law from the law-economic perspectives.