• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.74-83
• /
• 2006

The purposes of this study were to (1) identify the evaluation categories, areas, attributes, and criteria of the school food service program using both a qualitative and a quantitative analyses, (2) define the relative importance of the evaluation categories, areas, attributes, and criteria of the school food service program using analytic hierarchy process, (3) organize the evaluation system to improve quality of the school food service in Korea. A survey was conducted from August to October 2004 to collect data from 172 dietitians, 15 school food service officials at the educational board, 10 professionals of school food service. Statistical analyses were performed on the data utilizing the SPSS 12.0 for Windows and Excel, such as Descriptive statistics and analytic hierarchy process was performed. The result of the analytic hierarchy process indicated that relative importance of evaluation category was 0.4319 (food service manage ment), 0.2369 (nutrition education), 0.1455 (satisfaction) and 0.0912 (parent involvement program). 'Sanitation, safety and facility (0.1739)' was the most important area among the subcategories of food service management, followed by nutrition management (0.1581), procurement (0.1375), production (0.1345), organization and personnel management (0.0662), planning (0.0644), food service evaluation (0.0585), financial accountability (0.0555), and information management (0.0554). There existed a relative importance on the three areas of the nutrition program and satisfaction evaluation category: students (0.5281, 0.6221), parents (0.1812, 0.1491), and teachers (0.1838, 0.1618). In the parent involvement program evaluation category, relative importance of committee and monitoring management was 0.4658 and information communication was 0.3724. The quality of food and service to school children can be improved by the appropriate application of the developed evaluation tool for the school food service program.

• 한국산업융합학회 논문집
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.317-327
• /
• 2018

The perception of earthquake in Korea has changed due to the earthquake that occurred in Gyeongju and Pohang, and the earthquake has become an important factor in infrastructure management. Damage to infrastructures in the event of an earthquake is extensive. In particular, damage to infrastructures that perform public function used to spread to the whole area. From the point of view of earthquake disaster prevention, it is very important for the public to define what infrastructures are important management targets and to prepare a countermeasure. In this study, we propose a method to evaluate the importance of infrastructure to effectively manage infrastructures for earthquakes. For this purpose, important factors for the railway bridges, power generation and electric power facilities, and apartment complexes are suggested. AHP analysis is conducted to suggest priorities. In addition, the evaluation criteria for infrastructure importance are presented.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.643-652
• /
• 2018

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to review the systems used to evaluate dental hygiene education and to establish priorities for the evaluation index for accreditation to enhance competitiveness and facilitate quality control of dental hygiene education. Methods: A survey of priorities for accreditation evaluation was developed based on input from professors at 43 universities. Data were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process method with Expert Choice 2000 software. Results: The relative importance of each evaluation area, ranked in descending order, was as follows: vision and operating system; administration and finances; facilities and equipment; educational outcomes; professors; educational process; and students. The importance of the evaluation part was highest in field training at the education process part and scholarship at the student part. The importance after applying complex weights was highest in establishing a development plan for the vision and operating system. Conclusions: Practical accreditation evaluation based on objectivity and validity is needed to control the quality of dental hygiene education. Therefore, priorities in accreditation evaluation standard must be determined to establish a basis for quality improvement in education at dental hygiene departments.

• 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
• /
• 제7권9호
• /
• pp.815-823
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 특수교육 기본교육과정 학업성취도 평가 영역에 대한 중요도-실행도 분석에 근거하여 특수교육 현장의 실제적 평가에 대한 요구를 고찰한 것이다. 중요도-실행도 분석을 위한 평가영역 및 요소는 델파이 분석으로 도출한 특수교육 기본교육과정 대상학생의 4개 생활교육 범주, 22개 내용영역과 국가 교육과정의 7개 교과 범주, 27개 내용영역으로 설정하였다. P광역시에 소재하는 126명의 지적장애 특수학교 교사를 대상으로 중요도-실행도 분석을 실시한 결과, 모든 범주에서 중요도와 실행도 간에 통계적 유의차가 나타났다. 또 이를 평균점을 기준으로 실행도를 x축, 중요도를 y축으로 하여 산점도로 분석한 결과 교과교육의 일부영역은 중요도와 실행도 모두 낮은 인식수준을 보였다. 이러한 연구결과는 특수교육 기본교육과정의 학업성취도 평가영역 및 평가체제에 대한 재구조화의 필요성을 제기하며, 더 나아가 국가수준 기본교육과정의 교과목 편제 및 내용영역, 내용요소의 양에 대한 심도 깊은 개정 논의가 필요함을 암시한다.

• 한국재난정보학회 논문집
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.363-371
• /
• 2023

연구목적: 본 연구는 BCMS의 정량적 평가체계 도입을 위해 BCMS 분야의 국제표준인 ISO 22301 (2019)의 PDCA(Plan-Do-Check-Act) 요구항목 중 Plan- '조직의 이해' part의 평가지표를 개발하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 연구방법: 20명의 BCMS 분야 전문가 그룹에 수정 델파이 기법을 활용하여 ISO 22301의 Plan- '조직의 이해'의 세부요건의 타당성을 검토하고, 평가지표의 상대적 중요도를 조사하였다. 연구결과: 효과적인 BCMS 역량평가가 가능하도록 상대적 중요도가 포함된 12개의 평가지표를 개발하여 제안하였다. 결론: BCMS의 정량적인 평가체계 도입을 위해서는 효과적인 평가가 가능하도록 상대적 중요도가 포함된 평가지표를 선별하여야 한다는 결론을 도출하였다.

• 대한지역사회영양학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.154-164
• /
• 2013

The objectives of this study were to assign reasonability to importance of weight selection issue in key performance indicator for performance evaluation of Centers for Child-care Foodservice Management (CCFSM) developed by using Balanced Scorecard (BSC), to draw key performance indicator (KPI) by perspective and to analyze differences in recognition on importance. From September 25 to October 9, 2012, we conducted a questionnaire-based study via e-mail, targeting chiefs and team leaders of nationwide 21 CCFSMs (43 persons), officials of local governments where CCFSM was established (21 persons), officials of Korea Food and Drug Administration (2 persons) and foodservice management experts (27 persons) in order to estimate the relative importance on 4 perspectives and 14 KPIs and analyzed its results by using 61 collected data. The results showed that relative importance of perspectives was estimated in order of importance as follows: business performance (0.3519), customer (0.3393), resource (0.1557), learning and growth (0.1531). Relative importance of KPIs was in order of importance as follows: Evaluation of sanitary management level in child-care foodservice facilities (0.1327), Level of customer recognition and behavior improvement (0.1153), performances of round visiting inspection on foodservice, sanitary, safety management, and foodservice consulting (0.0913). Our results showed that the recognition differences exist on the relative importance of perspectives and KPIs between officials of CCFSM, KFDA, local government and foodservice management experts. These observations will form the basis for developing evaluation systems, and it is considered that performance indicators developed on this basis will suggest direction of operation which CCFSM will have to perform.

• 한국유기농업학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.759-774
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 동일한 평가점수 체계를 이용하여 HACCP 심사를 하고 있는 소 농장 HACCP 평가항목에 대한 문제점을 개선하기 위한 방안으로 최근 3년간 심사결과 지적비율 분석, 위해의 심각도 수준 분석 그리고 중요도 수준 분석 등을 평가항목별로 분석하여 이를 토대로 평가점수를 차등 부여하였다. 최근 3년간 지적사항 발생비율을 조사하여 평가항목별로 발생 비율을 조사하였다. 위해의 심각도 수준은 한국식품안전관리인증원의 심사관 자문을 통해 해당 평가항목이 가축(원유) 또는 인체에 미치는 영향이 안전성에 직접 관련 된 경우와 시정조치에 많은 시간이 걸리는 경우에는 '상(3점)', 해당 평가항목이 가축(원유) 및 인체에 미치는 영향이 안전성에 간접적으로 관련된 경우(위해정도가 상대적으로 낮은 경우)와 시정조치에 많이 시간이 걸리는 경우에는 '중(2점)', 해당 평가항목이 가축(원유) 및 인체에 미치는 영향이 안전성에 간접 관련된 경우와 즉시 시정이 가능한 경우에는 '하(1점)'으로 설정하였다. 지적사항 발생비율과 위해의 심각도 수준을 이용하여 포트폴리오 맵을 사용하여 선행요건 관리 분야에서 최종적으로 중요도가 높은(발생비율, 위해 심각도가 높은 영역에 포함된 평가항목) 항목으로 11개(19.0%,) 중요도가 중간(발생비율, 위해 심각도 중 한 곳만 높은 영역에 포함된 평가항목)인 항목은 18개(31.0%) 그리고 중요도가 낮은(발생비율, 위해 심각도 모두 낮은 영역에 포함된 평가항목) 평가항목 29개(50.0%)로 구성되었다. HACCP 관리 분야는 중요도가 높은 항목 4개, 중간항목 5개, 낮은 항목은 6개로 구성되었다. 배점기준은 중요도 높은 항목은 3점, 중간 항목은 2점, 낮은 항목을 1점으로 하였다. 본 연구를 통하여 개발된 평가항목별 배점기준과 현재 사용하고 있는 평가항목별 배점 기준을 소 농장에 적용하여 비교분석한 결과 그 차이점이 명확하게 나타나 심사의 객관성이 향상될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다. 아울러 HACCP 제도의 목적인 안전한 축산물의 생산과 소비자에게 안전한 축산물 공급에도 부합할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.1-20
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to identify the criteria of evaluating a price-comparison website, and to investigate the consumers' perceived importance and satisfaction of each criterion. Also, it compared both the importance and satisfaction levels based on consumers' socio-economic and Internet-usage characteristics. Data for this study came from a questionnaire completed by consumers (n=417), who had used the price-comparison website, and were analyzed through factor analysis, t-test, and ANOVA. The findings of the study were as follows: First, the evaluation criteria of the price-comparison website were categorized into five variety of information, accuracy, convenience, credibility, and the website system. Second, convenience of searching information was seen by consumers as both the most important and most satisfactory criterion. Variety of information was also considered important. For most of the evaluation criteria, the level of consumers' satisfaction was significantly lower than the level of consumers' recognized importance. Third, consumers in their 20s, students, and housewives were less likely to be satisfied by the price-comparison website overall. Older people were less likely to be satisfied with the convenience of the website, and the higher-income group was less likely to be satisfied with the variety of information on hand.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.209-225
• /
• 2022

Purpose - The domestic technology trading market is composed of a technology trading platform with the participation of technology trading institutions. The institution that operates the technology trading platform provides various support for technology transaction. The purpose of this study is to suggest improvement plans through analysis of the services provided by the technology trading platform. Design/methodology/approach - TA model was built based on existing research and the importance and satisfaction of each evaluation item of the model were identified through the hierarchical analysis process and expert opinion gathering. Then importance-satisfaction correlation analysis was applied. Findings - As a result of analyzing the importance of the technology trading platform, supply technology information, technology value evaluation, and demand technology information are in order. Technology marketing and demand technology information are areas that require focus management and there are differences according to experience and low-skilled people suggest the need to improve technology value evaluation service. Research implications or Originality - This study is significant in that it evaluated the operational performance of a technology trading platform that had not been addressed for 15 years and suggested improvement measures. Initially a series of technology transaction processes such as technology value evaluation technology matching and technology commercialization support were expanded from simple information on previous technology and this study includes these changes.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.30-39
• /
• 2023

This study was conducted with analyzing the perceptions of universities and industry regarding need analysis, curriculum design-implementation-outcomes, and the educational environment of the university evaluation institution from an industry perspective. First, as a result of analyzing the importance and implementation level of needs analysis, universities and industries recognized 'industrial trends in related fields' as the most important, but both groups perceived the implementation level to be significantly low. Second, as a result of analyzing the importance of implementing a curriculum based on industry needs, there was a difference in that universities recognized the 'adequacy of curriculum implementation based on industrial needs' and industries recognized the 'field training participation rate' as the most important. Third, as a result of analyzing the importance of curriculum outcomes based on industrial needs, it was found that both groups recognized 'field connection of major curriculum' as the most important. Fourth, as a result of analyzing the importance of the industry-university cooperative educational environment, it was found that both groups recognized 'construction and operation of experimental.practice educational facilities and infrastructure' as the most important. In short, the results of this study are expected to resolve the problem of mismatch between universities and industry in terms of talent development and education, and contribute to the effective implementation of the university evaluation institution from an industry perspective.