• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.67-86
• /
• 2003

이 연구는 제7차 교육과정에서 기술ㆍ가정 과목의 실시로 과거 가정교과와 기술ㆍ산업 교과의 통합에 따른 운영실태와 문제점을 파악하여 그 개선방안을 탐색하는데 목적이 있었다. 분석을 위한 설문조사는 제주도에서 기술 가정 교과를 담당하고 있는 교사들로서, 현재 제주도의 가정과 교사 100명 중 기술ㆍ가정을 지도하고 있는 교사 89명(제주도 교육청. 2003)과 기술ㆍ가정과목을 맡고 있는 40명의 기술전공 교사들을 대상으로 하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교사들은 현재 기술 가정교과가 비인기 과목으로 취급되는 이유를 무엇보다도 입시에서 주요과목이 아니기 때문이라고 인식하고 있었다. 둘째, 교사들은 현재 제 7차 교육과정에서 기술ㆍ가정 교과가 기술과 가정교과의 통합이 아니라 병합이라는 것과 두 교과의 내용 구성에 연관성 체계성이 없는 것과 같은 교과관련 요인을 가장 큰 문제점으로 인식하였다. 셋째, 교사들은 앞으로 효율적인 기술ㆍ가정 교과 운영을 위해 해결되어야 할 과제로 교과관련 요인 중 교사 개인의 잡무 해결과 국가 및 지방단체에서의 충분한 교원수급으로 인식하고 있었다.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.115-128
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 교과역량 함양을 위한 가정과교육이 나아갈 방향을 모색해 보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 역량기반 가정과 수업의 현장 적용 방안을 탐색하고, 수업 사례를 개발하였다. 이 연구의 주요한 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교과역량 함양을 위해서는 교육과정-수업-평가의 일체화를 통해 학생을 교육과정, 수업, 평가의 중심에 두어 삶의 주체로 성장시킬 수 있도록 해야 한다. 둘째, 교과역량 함양을 위해 교육과정-수업-평가 일체화를 중심으로 의생활 수업 사례를 개발하였다. 본 연구는 실제 가정과 수업에서 교과역량의 함양을 위한 교육과정-평가-수업의 일체화를 활성화 할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.33-42
• /
• 1989

By the comparative analysis of high school Home Economics curricula in the U.S., Japan and Taiwan, this study first attempts to understand the current Home Economics education and to access its treads for each country. Based on the findings of the analysis, the study also seeks to get the major implications of the analysis for the betterment of the Korea Home Economics Education. The main sources of information and data analyzed here are： 1) curricula for both Oklahoma and Ohio state as representatives of the U.S.； 2) Home Economics Teaching Guidelines in Japan； and 3) Home Economics curriculum in Taiwan. Content Analysis technique is applied in this study. The major elements of contents include：1) structure of the curriculum； 2) subject name； 3) unit (time) allotment； 4) goals； 5) subject areas and content composition； and 6) other related characteristics for the implementation of the curriculum. Summarized results of the study outline as follows： 1) Home Economics is offered as independently required subject with equal status to Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies subject in all three countries； 2) Sex discrimination is prohibited both in the U.S. and Taiwan, while in Japan sex equity is not secured for Home Economics educations； 3) Time allotment for Home Economics in Japan and Taiwan is similiar to that in Korea；4) Subject areas cover such fields as Foods and Nutrition, Clothing and Textiles, Home Management, and Human Development in all three countries, which is similiar to those of Korea. In addition, Consumer Education and Career Education are also covered in the U.S., whereas in Japan Child Care is offered； and 5) Curriculum can be utilized as instructional planning material due to the clear specification of instructional methods, materials, and evaluation methods on the curriculum, especially in the U.S. and Taiwan.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.43-55
• /
• 2003

A purpose of this study is to develop multimedia materials of “Technology and Home Economics” subject matter in a national level. Researchers. writers. examiners. deliverers and developers in order to develop multimedia materials were organized of us with 40 People. First. we analyzed the textbooks of "Technology $.$ Home Economics" subject matter and made the idea design Second we got storyboards based on the idea design. Finally. we developed the 1021 multimedia materials based with storyboards. The developed materials were uploaded to the Edunet website. If the materials developed in this study are utilized. students of middle school will be get easily educational motive. and teachers are able to use the multimedia materials to the Technology $.$ Home Economics 1" subject instruction.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.17-30
• /
• 1995

Home Economics has been confronted with many disciplinary challenges in and/or out of it. We, as the home-economists, have to find out ourselves and re-identify Home Economics. This study aims to analyze the treatises reported on KHERJ through the contents classification for the purpose of establishing the academic identification of Home Economics. Korean Home economics Research Journal made its first appearance in 1959 and has been published serial number 100 at the end of 1994. At this moment, it seems to be valuable to identify the state(tendency) of researches during that time, So this study analyzed the contents of all articles91165) printed in the Journal of Korean Home Economics Association from 1959 to 1994. In this study, articles were classified by subject matter(theme categories), relevant facts of researcher, research method, etc. The results of the study were indicated by the publication state(situation) of Journal, status and place of colleges and universities of head researcher, number of articles according to college and universities, distribution of subject matter, number of researcher, research fund, transition of subject matter, research method according to subject matter, and transition of statistic technique applied and research objects.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.91-106
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to provide the information for the development of gender-equality oriented content of Technology Home Economics subject. For this purpose, a total of 404 male and female middle high school students in Chuncheon city were sampled and asked to estimate the degree of practical use and preference for the 47 units of Technology Home Economics subject. Results were summarized as following : 1. The 47 units were classified into 4 groups on the basis of similarity in the degree of practical use and preference: 23 units estimated as 'better than average' by male and female students were classified into group 1; 4 units estimated as 'better than average' by female students but as 'less than average' by male students were classified into group 2; 10 units estimated as 'less than average' by male and female students were classified into group. 3; 10 units estimated as 'far less than average' by male and female students were classified into group 4. Most of the units in Home Economics area were classified Into group 1 or 2, but most of the units in Technology area were classified into group 3 or 4. 2. Gender difference was confirmed between male and female students' estimation of the degree of practical use and preference for the 47 units. In about three-quaters of the units in Home Economics area, female students' estimation of the degree of practical use and preference was higher than male students' estimation. In about half of the units in Technology area, male students' estimation of the degree of practical use and preference was higher than female students' estimation. However, possibility was detected in several units of Technology Home Economics subject that gender difference could be decreased.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.31-43
• /
• 1993

The purpose of this study was to investigate middle school students’perception about Home Economics Education in order to provide the basic materials to improve Home Economics curriculum. For this purpose reviewing literatures and empirical research were conducted. the subjects were 661(fourteen-year-ole(8th graders) enrolled in middle school in Seoul and Gyeongsang-nam-do. Statistical methods adopted for data analysis were frequencies, mean standard deviation, ONEWAY ANOVA, Chi-square. Major findings were as follows: 1. The middle school students’perception about Home Economics Education differed with sex of subjects. That is, girl students’perception was higher than boy students’perception. 2. The middle school students’perception about Home Economics subject varied across parents’education level. 3. There was no significant difference in the middle school students’perception about Home Economics Education according to existence of mother’s Job. 4. There was a significant difference in the middle school students’perception about Home Economics Education according to region. That is the perception about the contents of eating life role was high in rural and the daily life as a consumer and resources application was high in Seoul. 5.The middle school students’perception about Home Economics Education varied across subject distinction. That is the perception of boy students who chose Industrial Arts$.$Home Economics subject was high.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 1993

The purpose of this study is to find the differences between home economics before and after korean Independence of the dominance of Japanes Empire. The specific aimes are to compare the subject organization, educational purpose and subject contents etc. of home economics in korean school before with after the Korean Independence of the dominance of Japanes Empire. The methods to study were to analyze some documents(laws or regulations)and textbooks etc. at that time. The result of this study is summerized as follow. 1. The subject of home economics in primary school were‘Jaibong(sewing)’,‘Kasa(household affairs)’just before Korean Independence of Japan in 1945. But the subject of home economics changed to‘Yori(cooking)’,‘Jaibong’after Korean Independence in 1945. In 1946,‘Yori’and Jaibong were integrated in‘Kasa’. In 1954, ‘Kasa’changed to ‘Silkwa(Practical Course)’. The subject of home economics in middle or high girl school were‘Kajeong(home)’, ‘Yuga(nursing)’,‘Bogeon(preservation of health)’,‘Pibok(clothing)’just before Korean Independence in 1945. But the 4 subjects changed to‘Kasa’,‘Jaibong’,‘Suye(embroidery)’and the 3 subjects changed‘Sileop and Kajeong(home affairs)’again. 2. The hours per week assigned to home economics education were higher in high school years than in low school years both in primary schools and middle or high schools. 3. Among various home economics subjects, the hours assigned to‘Jaibong’were higher than any other home economics subjects. But The hours assigned to the‘Kasa’tended to increase in high school years. 4. The purpose of home economics education in schools before Korean Independence of Japan focused of fostering korean's loyalty to Japan Empire in the end and on cultivating womanly virtue etc. This tendency was more prominant in middle or high school than primary school. 5. Korean home economics education during about 10 years generally followed the home economics education of Japanes Empire. 6. The home economics education in primary school for school boys was practised after 1955(The period of 1th curriculum). Before that time was practised home economics education for school girls. 7. Generally home economics education in Korean schools was weakened after Korea became Independant of Japanes Empire in 1945. 8. The contents of home economics education after Korean Independence tended to follow those of Japan. Among domains of the home economics the rate of contents of‘siksainghwall(life of foods)’tended to be largest, the rate of‘Jusainghwal(life of house)’lowest in primary, while the contents of‘oeusainghwal(life of clothing)’tended to be largest, the rate of‘Jusainghwal(life of house)’lowest in middle education.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.115-130
• /
• 1997

The purposes of this study are：(1) to analyze the learning content & subjects on the area of clothing and textiles in Home Economics for Young Men： A Teaching Guide, (2) to compare it with the learning content & subjects on the area of clothing and textiles in Home Economics teaching guides in the middle school in Korea, (3) to provide preliminary data for developing the learning content & learning method on clothing and textiles education for middle school students. To implement these proposals, Home Economics for young Men： A Teaching Guide in U.S.A and 6 Home Economics teaching guides for the middle school in Korea are reviewed and analyzed. The research findings were as follows： 1. Home Economics for Young Men is characterized as including： (1) interesting learning contents for girls and boys in the middle school, (2) learning contents for helping students to work on their own initiative (3) learning contents related to actual life, (4) practical consumer education content related to clothing and textiles area, (5) learning contents for developing originality, (6) learning contents related to vocational education. 2. The subjects in Home Economics for Young Men give careful considerations especially on how to learn. They are based on the idea that middle school students have to learn and to solve the subject by themselves. 3. Learning contents on Home Economics teaching guides for middle school in Korea are different from learning contents in Home Economics for Young Men in the subject & the form of description, the subject matter of practice in clothing area, the standpoint of description on clothing matters. The subjects in Home Economics teaching guides for middle school in Korea don’s give careful consideration on how to learn. There are little idea that middle school students have to learn and to solve the subject by themselves.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.13-24
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in the perception of Home Economics between female and male among high school students who have learned Home Economics and who have never learned. The number of 400 samples were analyzed with frequencies, percentages, t-test, regressions and $\chi$(sup)2 analyses by SPSS/Win. The results showed that the male students who have taken Home Economics were more likely than those who have never taken perceived Home Economics as a living science and to be interested in the subject. There were sexual differences among high school students who have learned the subject in favorite units, increases in interests, satisfaction with the contents, etc. Sex and the level of participating household works were the most influential factors on the perception of the subject of high school students.