• 도시과학
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.21-27
• /
• 2018

With the increase of the skyscraper center, the development of large-diameter and high-strength reinforcing bars is being carried out to solve the dense reinforcement. In case of the steel reinforced concrete with a small cross section such as beam-column joints, the development length becomes short when straight bars are used. Therefore, it is possible to solve the problem that the development length becomes short by using the bearing strength of the hooked bar and headed bar. In this study, the exterior beam-column joint test of SD700 hooked bar and headed bar with anchorage length of 20db was conducted to extend the development length limitation of hooked bar and headed bar. As a result of the evaluation of the anchorage strength using the design equation by KCI, the average of the [measured value]/[predicted value] ratio was 1.31 for the hooked reinforcing bars. In the case of headed bars, the average of the [measured value]/[predicted value] ratio was 1.12. In addition, in order to compare the anchorage performance of the hooked bar and the headed bar, the measured values were divided by the square root of the compressive strength of the concrete to compare the anchorage strength. Under the same conditions, the anchorage strength of headed bars was 8.5% higher than the hooked bars.

• 콘크리트학회논문집
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.411-420
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 반복 수평 하중을 받는 외부 보-기둥 접합부에서 작은 헤드를 사용한 headed bar의 사용성을 검증하기 위해 $90^{\circ}$ 표준갈고리로 정착한 실험체와 headed bar로 정착한 접합부 실험체를 제작하여 각각의 실험 결과를 비교하였다. 또한, headed bar 정착 성능에 영향을 주는 헤드 단면적, 단조 및 반복 가력 여부, 헤드와 보강근의 용접 여부등의 headed bar 인발 성능에 관한 영향을 구명하기 위한 인발실험을 병행하였다. 인발실험의 결과, headed bar의 인발강도는 헤드 면적 증가에 따라 증가하였고, 헤드와 보강근의 용접 유무, 가력 조건 (단조하중 및 반복하중)은 실험 결과에 큰 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 외부 보-기둥 접합부 실험의 결과, $90^{\circ}$ 표준갈고리로 정착한 실험체와 headed bar로 정착한 실험체가 초기 균열, 균열의 발생 등 모두 거의 비슷한 양상이었으나, 최종 파괴 시에는 headed bar로 정착된 실험체가 $90^{\circ}$ 표준갈고리로 정착된 실험체에 비해 최대 강도 도달 이후 연성 거동, 연성비 및 변형 성능, 에너지소산 면적 등에서 우수한 거동을 보여주었다. 따라서 ACI 352 위원회의 설계지침을 따라서 제작된 접합부 상세와 동일한 조건으로 표준갈고리 대신 상대적으로 작은 headed bar를 사용할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2004년도 춘계 학술발표회 제16권1호
• /
• pp.506-509
• /
• 2004

This paper proposes Headed bar as reinforcement of beam-column joint, and proves seismic performance and reduction of reinforcement congestion. In these case, the use of Headed bars have obvious advantages. The greatest benefit of using Headed bars is not only improved structural performance of beam-column joints, but also the ease of fabrication, construction, and placement. Three-dimensional finite element analysis model is compared with test program which was fulfilled by the proposed model with Headed bar. Also, the plastic hinge region is relocated to the center of the longitudinal beam length according to the strong column-weak beam design philosophy, so Headed bar is used as the joint reinforcement. Therefore, this paper presents results of a computer analysis of a practical solution for relocating potential beam plastic hinge regions by the placing of straight - Headed bar.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.33-39
• /
• 2020

In this study, side-face blowout failure strength of high strength headed reinforcing bar, which is vertically anchoring between RC or SFRC members, is evaluated throughout pullout test. The major test parameters are content ratio of high strength steel fibers, strength of rebar, length of anchorage, presence of shear reinforcement, and the side concrete cover thickness planned to be 1.3 times of the rebar. In pullout test, tensile force was applied to the headed reinforcing bar with the hinged supports positioned 1.5 and 0.7 times the anchorage length on both sides of the headed reinforcing bar. As a result, the cone-shaped crack occurred where the headed reinforcing bar embedded and finally side-face blowout failure caused by bearing pressure of the headed reinforcing bar. The tensile strength of specimens increased by 13.0 ~26.2% with shear reinforcement. The pullout strength of the specimens increased by 3.6 ~15.4% according to steel fiber reinforcement. Increasing the anchoring length and shear reinforcement were evaluated to reduce the stress bearing ration of the total stress.

• 한국방재학회 논문집
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.95-104
• /
• 2002

이 논문은 콘크리트 콘 파괴에 의해 지배될 때의 인장력의 예측과 Headed bar의 인발 파괴 양상을 보여준다. 1개의 다른 플레이트 형상과 세가지의 서로 다른 용접 방법에 따라 시험이 이루어졌다. 시험의 변수는 Headed plate에 연결된 철근의 직경(16mm, 19mm, 22mm), 형상(원형, 직사각형, 정사각형)과 head plate의 차원(면적, 두께), 철근과 head plate와의 연결을 위한 용접 방법(일반용접, 마찰용접)이다. Headed bar는 ASTM 970-98에 기초한 모양과 두께를 가진 다른 단면적으로 제조되었으며 콘크리트의 부착 길이는 CSA 23.3-94에 의거하여 산정되었다. 정적 인장하중이 적용되었으며 시험 인발 성능은 ACI-349와 CCD 방법과 같은 현재의 설계방법에 의해 산출된 값과 비교하였다. 실험결과와 기존식을 비교하면 Headed bar가 앵커와 달리 넓은 플레이트 면적과 이형철근으로 인해 기준식에 비해 높은 강도와 큰 파괴 반경을 나타내었다.

• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제90권1호
• /
• pp.71-81
• /
• 2024

Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) bars have now been widely adopted as an alternative to traditional steel reinforcements in infrastructure and civil industries worldwide due variety of merits. This paper presents a numerical methodology to investigate FRP bar-reinforced beam-column joint behavior under quasi-static loading. The proposed numerical model is validated with test results considering load-deflection behavior, damage pattern at beam-column joint, and strain variation in reinforcements, wherein the results are in agreement. The numerical model is subsequently employed for parametric investigation to enhance the end-span beam-column joint performance using different joint reinforcement systems. To reduce the manufacturing issue of bend in the FRP bar, the headed FRP bar is employed in a beam-column joint, and performance was investigated at different column axial loads. Headed bar-reinforced beam-column joints show better performance as compared to beam-column joints having an L-bar in terms of concrete damage, load-carrying capacity, and joint shear strength. The applicability and efficiency of FRP bars at different story heights have also been investigated with varying column axial loads.

• International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.77-85
• /
• 2011

The use of headed bars as opposed to standard 90- or 180-degree hooked bars in beam ends, beam-column joints or other steel congested areas for anchorage and bond has become more favorable due to the fact that steel congestion is often created by large bend diameters or crossties. This research mainly focuses on evaluating the code provisions regarding the use of headed bars. Nine simply supported rectangular concrete beams with headed longitudinal reinforcement were tested under a four-point monotonic loading system. The design clear spacing, which varies from 1.5 to 4.25 times the bar diameter, was the only parameter for the experimental investigation. The test results showed that the closely-spaced headed bars were capable of developing to full yield strength without any severe brittle concrete breakout cone or pullout failure. Bond along the bar was not sufficient due to the early loss of concrete integrity. However, the headed bars were effective for anchorage with no excessive moment capacity reduction. This implies that the clear spacing of about 2 times the bar diameter for headed bars may be reasonable to ensure the development of specified yield strength of headed bars and corresponding member design strength.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2003년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.512-517
• /
• 2003

The repeated loading responses of four shear-critical reinforced concrete beams, with two different shear span-to-depth ratios, were studied. One series of beams was reinforced using pairs of bundled stirrups with $90^{\circ}C$ standard hooks, having free end extensions of $6d_b$. The companion beams contained shear reinforcement made with larger diameter headed bars anchored with 50mm diameter circular heads. A single headed bar had the same area as a pair of bundled stirrups and hence the two series were comparable. The test results indicate that beams containing headed bar stirrups have a superior performance to companion beams containing bundled standard stirrups, with improved ductility, larger energy adsorption and enhanced post-peak load carrying capability. Due to splitting of the concrete cover and local crushing, the hooks of the standard stirrups opened, resulting in loss of anchorage. In contrast, the headed bar stirrups did not lose their anchorage and hence were able to develop strain hardening and also served to delay buckling of the flexural compression steel. Excellent load-deflection predictions were obtained by reducing the tension stiffening to account for repeated load effects.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.129-135
• /
• 2018

In order to compare the development performance of headed reinforcing bar and straight reinforcing bar in tension for steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC), pullout test of specimens with reinforcing bar which was anchored on simple beam perpendicularly was conducted. The experimental variables were steel fiber volume ratio ($V_{Rsf}$), concrete compressive strength, and existence of head. As the result of test, splitting failure of concrete in the development direction of reinforcing bar in most specimens was observed. For development detail of headed reinforcing deformation bar, specimens with 1% $V_{Rsf}$ showed approximately 63%~119% increase in pullout strength compare to specimens with 0% $V_{Rsf}$. Test result shows that SFRC is more effective in increasing pullout strength for headed reinforcing bars than increasing pullout strength of straight bars.

• Steel and Composite Structures
• /
• 제48권2호
• /
• pp.131-143
• /
• 2023

The CFRP bar was used to achieve more ductile and durable headed-stud shear connectors in composite components. Three series of push-out tests were firstly conducted, including specimens reinforced with pure steel fibers, steel and CFRP bars. The distributed stress was measured by the commercial PPP-BOTDA (Pre-Pump-Pulse Brillouin optical time domain analysis) optical fiber sensor with high spatial resolution. A series of numerical analyses using non-linear FE models were also made to study the shear force transfer mechanism and crack response based on the test results. Test results show that the CFRP bar increases the shear strength and stiffness of the large diameter headed-stud shear connection, and it has equivalent reinforcing effects on the stud shear capacity as the commonly used steel bar. The embedded CFRP bar can also largely improve the shear force transfer mechanism and decrease the tensile stress in the transverse direction. The parametric study shows that low content steel fibers could delay the crack initiation of slab around the large diameter stud, and the CFRP bar with normal elastic modulus and the standard reinforcement ratio has good resistance to splitting crack growth in headed stud shear connectors.