• 제목/요약/키워드: Government Innovation Ecosystem

검색결과 69건 처리시간 0.021초

신경사이버네틱스를 통한 정보혁신생태계 관리 : 사례연구 (Management of Government Innovation Ecosystem through the Neuro-cybernetics : A Case Study)

  • 이홍;한병철
    • 지식경영연구
    • /
    • 제9권4호
    • /
    • pp.143-156
    • /
    • 2008
  • The main purpose of this study is to suggest a way that how government innovation ecosystem can be successfully managed by applying neuro-cybernetics approach. Innovation ecosystem is not a rare phenomenon around us. Especially national innovation managed by government relies on heavily innovation ecosystem. Unfortunately discussions of successful management of this ecosystem are rare. This study strongly urged necessity of such management by observing the case of introduction of CDMA mobile communication technology in Korea. Neuro-cybernetics was suggested as one alternative approach for the such management.

  • PDF

A multipronged approach to innovation: The Mauritius Case Study

  • Madhou, Madhvee;Moosun, Salma Bibi;Modi-Nagowah, Divya Naginlal
    • Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
    • /
    • 제11권1호
    • /
    • pp.50-68
    • /
    • 2022
  • Innovation is broadly defined as the creation or adoption of new ideas and technologies, which has become an instrumental tool to determine the success and development level of a country as it leads to competitiveness and productivity of companies. Innovation is influenced by many factors including geographic and socio-economic factors as well as a political framework. In fact, innovation is systemic in nature, and it focuses on interactions amongst a nexus of processes such as Research and Development (R&D), production, business, and education, amongst other factors. However, not all innovation ecosystems have the same architectural models or internal collaboration. This paper aims to review the structure of the National Innovation Ecosystem by highlighting the different actions taken by the Government of Mauritius over the years. The multipronged approach of the government will be demonstrated through the different lines of actions to boost the innovation culture and offers a foundation for other small island developing state to follow to be at par with other innovative economies.

한국의 혁신 생태계: 진화 과정과 차세대 모델에 대한 탐색 (Innovation Ecosystem of Korea: Its Evolution Process and Exploring The Next Model)

  • 이정원;임채성
    • 기술혁신연구
    • /
    • 제31권3호
    • /
    • pp.1-37
    • /
    • 2023
  • 한국 혁신 생태계는 후발 추격자에서 '민간 주도의 건강하고 역동적인 생태계 조성을 위한 정부의 역할이 중요한' 창조적 선도자 단계로 진화해 왔다. 한국의 혁신 생태계는 그동안의 획기적인 발전과 양적 확대에도 불구하고 혁신 성과의 정체 현상, 생태계 내 및 글로벌 연계 활동의 부족 등을 보여주고 있다. 미래 지향적인 혁신 생태계 조성을 위한 차세대 혁신 생태계 모델이 요구되는 상황이다. 기존의 이론적 근거를 바탕으로 혁신 생태계의 바탕을 이루는 것이 기업간 네트워크라는 관점에서 차세대 혁신 생태계의 요소로 기업간 네트워크 외에, 기업 역량, 공공 연구기관, 민간 산업단체, 기술 인프라, 정책 주체를 바탕으로 5개 요소를 설정하고, 불연속적 기술 및 시장 변화에 부응하는 '민간 주도의 건강하고 역동적인' 혁신 생태계로서의 차세대 혁신 생태계 모델을 제시하였고 혁신 생태계구축 역할을 담당하는 정책 주체의 구체적인 방향을 제시하고, 본 연구의 의의를 제시하였다.

Evolution of High-Tech Start-Up Ecosystem Policy in India and China: A Comparative Perspective

  • Krishna, HS
    • Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
    • /
    • 제7권3호
    • /
    • pp.511-533
    • /
    • 2018
  • As the developed and developing economies make the transition to knowledge-based economies, the high-tech sector has been the primary engine in enabling this transformation. Given this context, the policy making and implementation abilities of the countries' local administration assume significance. This study therefore attempts to examine the policy evolution undertaken by China and India which resulted in the emergence of high-tech startup ecosystems in these countries. Further, using a theoretical framework for an ideal entrepreneurial ecosystem, it tries to understand the similarities and differences prevalent currently in the Indian and Chinese high-tech startup ecosystem. The results of the study indicate that although both the countries took different paths, from a macro-perspective, they follow the same pattern as observed in the US and Israel policy making - that of the change in the role of Government as a regulator to that of an enabler of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. The differences and similarities between the key entrepreneurial ecosystem components provide additional knowledge about the currently prevailing conditions of the ecosystem in these countries.

R&D 생산성 제고와 기술 혁신 생태계 활성화를 위한 연구 서비스산업 혁신 방안 (R&D Service Industry Innovation Plan to Improve R&D Productivity and Vitalize Technology Innovation Ecosystem)

  • 장병열
    • 서비스연구
    • /
    • 제13권1호
    • /
    • pp.144-158
    • /
    • 2023
  • 기업과 정부의 연구개발(R&D: Research and Development) 투자는 지속적으로 증가해, 2021년 공공과 민간의 전체 연구개발비는 102조 1,352억 원으로 100조원을 돌파하였고, GDP 대비 R&D 투자 비중이 4.96%로 이스라엘에 이어 전 세계 2위 수준으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 100조원을 돌파한 국내 연구개발 투자의 R&D 생산성 제고 측면에서 국내 연구 서비스산업 현황과 연구개발(R&D) 혁신 생태계를 통계청의 기업활동조사 데이터를 바탕으로 분석하고 글로벌 연구 서비스산업과 기업 현황과 연구(R&D) 서비스 산업 지원을 위한 정부 정책을 조사 및 분석하였다. 특히, 본 연구에서는 기업활동조사 데이터를 바탕으로 업종별 연구개발(R&D) 서비스 외부 위탁에 대한 분석과 연도별 연구개발(R&D) 서비스 외부 위탁에 대한 조사를 통해 국내 연구(R&D) 서비스산업 현황에 대해 조사 분석하였다. 이를 통해 업종별 국내 연구(R&D) 서비스 산업 수요에 대한 주요 변화 추이를 제조업과 서비스업 관점에서 도출하였다. 분석 결과 국내 R&D 생태계는 전통적인 제조기업의 R&D 아웃소싱 수요가 정체된 것에 비해 서비스기업의 R&D 아웃소싱 수요가 급속도로 증가하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 국외 위탁기업이 지속적으로 확대되는 반면에 국내 연구개발 위탁 기업은 비중이 감소 추세를 보이고 있는 상태이다. 또한 서비스 업종별로 차별적인 특징을 보여주었다. 본 연구에서는 글로벌 연구 서비스 기업에 대한 조사와 연구(R&D) 서비스산업 지원 정책에 대한 분석을 바탕으로, 이러한 변화하는 기술 혁신과 연구(R&D) 서비스 수요에 대응하기 위해 제조기업과 서비스기업 R&D 아웃소싱 균형지원, 국내 연구개발 외부위탁 확대, 서비스업종 특화 R&D 아웃소싱 전략수립, 개방형 R&D 생태계 구축, 소재·부품·장비 전략과의 연계 혁신 방안을 제시하였다.

국가 초고성능컴퓨팅 혁신 생태계 구축 지원을 위한 이종데이터 기반 통합 플랫폼: 생명·보건분야를 중심으로 (Integrated Platform on the Basis of Heterogeneous Data to Support the Establishment of an Innovative Ecosystem for National High-Performance Computing: Focusing on Life Science & Public Health Area)

  • 이도연;고명주;함재균;김근환
    • 한국산업융합학회 논문집
    • /
    • 제26권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-14
    • /
    • 2023
  • To secure national future competitiveness, the Korean government announced the 『National Ultra-High Performance Computing (HPC) Innovation Strategy (2021.5.28.)』 and set three innovation strategy goals throughout establishing an innovation ecosystem. This study presented a heterogenous data-based strategic support framework that allowed to understand both the current status of domestic & foreign R&D areas and domestic industrial economy areas in terms of strategic fields related to ultra-high performance computing, and the empirical research was conducted in the life science and public health area. The HPC innovation ecosystem platform based on the connection of heterogeneous data (domestic R&D project-technology-industry-overseas R&D project) presented in this study provided useful and essential information that allowed establishing a specific action plan for the national HPC innovation strategy and contributing to vitalizing the innovation ecosystem. Since the evidence-based policy assumes that a more reasonable consensus is reached through a non-biased decision- making process among stakeholders, the proposed platform may contribute to enhancing policy momentum by increasing legitimacy and trust of planning of the national HPC strategy.

대덕 바이오클러스터의 기술현황: 특허 분석을 중심으로 (Technological status of Biocluster in Daedeok Innopolis: With the focused on the patent analysis)

  • 김윤동;최종인
    • 기술혁신연구
    • /
    • 제16권1호
    • /
    • pp.215-237
    • /
    • 2008
  • KIPRIS patent database was analyzed for identifying the technological status of Daedeok Innopolis Biocluster. It was found that the pattern of activities among various technological areas in Daedeok Biocluster is similar to that of an advanced country rather than those of other cities in Korea. The technological growth in Daedeok Innopolis Biocluster is in the progressive stage, which may be due to the innovative activities rather than the rise in the number of new firms or institutes. The concentration of technology in Daedeok Innopolis Biocluster is a favorable condition for the innovation activities. The trend for the technological concentration was remarkably consistent with the growth curve that a population increases according to the logistic equation. The logistic growth may be represented by the result of competition due to the limited resource allocation and then innovation cluster is corresponding to the ecosystem composed by biological individuals. There is strong competition in Daedeok Innopolis Biocluster in around 2009, so the government might make a policy to encourage the technological diversity for healthy knowledge ecosystem.

  • PDF

공공데이터 생태계 조성을 위한 주요 국가별 정책에 관한 비교 분석 (Comparative Analysis of National Policies for Open Data Government Ecosystem)

  • 송석현;이재용
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제41권1호
    • /
    • pp.128-139
    • /
    • 2018
  • As The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Intelligent Information Age came into full-scale, the policy of open government data has become a hot topic for each country. The United States, the United Kingdom, and other countries are shifting policy direction to "creating value" of open government data. Also, in the age of the digital economy where the data market is soaring, open government data is gradually being recognized as a new raw material for new business and start-ups. In addition, Korea ranked first in the OECD open government data evaluation twice in a row, and was highly evaluated in the international evaluation. However, domestic firms are still lacking in qualitative openness of government data, data is dispersed among institutions, lack of public-private data linkage, and development of app-oriented development. This study attempts to analyze major national policies for the creation of a data ecosystem that considers data lifecycle, from production to storage, distribution and utilization of data. First, the target countries were the leading public data countries among the OGP member countries, the USA, the UK, Australia and Canada. The results of this study are as follows. As a result of analyzing the results and comparing Korea's policies, it was concluded that most of Korea is superior in open government data policy. However, improvement of data quality, development of open data portal as an open platform, support for finding various users including apps and web development companies, and cultivation of open government data utilizing personnel are analyzed as policy issues. In addition, the direction of policy for the balanced ecosystem of Korea is presented together.

대전지역 혁신클러스터와 지역발전 (Innovation Cluster and Regional Development In Daejeon Regional)

  • 류덕위
    • 벤처창업연구
    • /
    • 제2권3호
    • /
    • pp.103-122
    • /
    • 2007
  • 본 연구는 지역발전을 위한 다양한 이론모형들을 살펴보았고, 경쟁적으로 추진되고 있는 각국이 혁신클러스터 육성정책과 성공요인, 대전지역을 중심으로 혁신클러스터 활성화를 위한 정책과제 등을 살펴보았다. 혁클러스터의 활성화를 통해 지역을 발전시키기 위해서는 산업혁신클러스터가 발전할 수 있는 여건의 조성과 체계적이고 지속적인 정부의 지원정책이 중요하다. 세계적으로 성공적이라고 평가받고 있는 미국의 실리콘밸리, 샌디에고의 UCSD, 중국의 중관촌(中關村), 스웨덴의 시스타(Kista), 핀란드의 울루(Oulu) 등은 연구개발, 생산, 지원시스템 외에 이들 요소들을 유기적으로 연결시켜주는 역동성과 해외 클러스터 및 시장과의 긴밀한 네트워크가 발달되어 있다. 그러나 유리한 여건에도 불구하고 대전지역의 벤처산업은 수도권 등에 비하여 활성화되지 못하고 있다. 산업혁신 클러스터가 성공적으로 작동하고 발전하기 위해서는 혁신클러스터와 산업(생산)클러스터, 지원시스템과 인프라 혹은 선도적 대기업 등이 유기적인 네트워크를 구축하여 역동성을 발휘해야 한다. 구체적인 활성화 전력으로는 (1)기업환경 개선과 연구 성과의 사업화, (2)벤처금융지원 강화, (3)첨단기업의 유치와 네트워크 강화, (4)정부의 체계적인 지원과 혁신클러스터 구축 등이 있다.

  • PDF

방산물자 공급 기업의 혁신역량이 경영 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증연구 (An Empirical Study on the Effects of Defense Materials Supplier's Innovation Capability on Business Performance)

  • 이재하;박우종;조정용;김홍유;오형술
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제44권4호
    • /
    • pp.177-185
    • /
    • 2021
  • Over the past 40 years, Korea's defense industry has been deepening into a low-efficiency industrial structure as the government directly controls prices, quantities, and costs. By implementing the Defense Industry Building Act in 2021, the government is creating a healthy ecosystem for the defense industry and strengthening its global competitiveness. In this study, based on KPC's Productivity Management System (PMS), a diagnostic model of defense companies implemented since 2013, the on-site diagnosis was performed from 4 to 28 days depending on the size of the company data was collected based on the results. The causal relationship was analyzed through structural equation model path analysis for the effect of innovation capability on productivity performance. As a result, it suggests that defense materials suppliers should focus on which core processes to innovate and strengthen and improve their innovation capabilities.