• Title/Summary/Keyword: Government Innovation

Search Result 1,457, Processing Time 0.029 seconds

Government Support Mechanisms and Open Innovation: An Empirical Look at Korean Manufacturing Firms

  • Chung, Jiyoon
    • Asia-Pacific Journal of Business
    • /
    • v.13 no.3
    • /
    • pp.135-155
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine how a broad palette of government support measures and firms' membership in government-developed clusters are related to firms' openness in innovation processes. Design/methodology/approach - Empirically, this study analyzes the Korea Innovation Survey 2018 data on the innovation activities of 1,450 Korean R&D-active manufacturing firms in a three-year period from 2015 through 2017. Findings - The results suggest that firms engage in open innovation to a greater extent--as measured by the breadth of external collaborating partners and of the utilized external sources of knowledge--when they are provided with a broader palette of government support measures and are located in government-developed clusters. However, the effect of diverse government support measures is attenuated for firms located in these clusters. Research implications or Originality - This study contributes to the innovation literature by illuminating how firms' open innovation can be understood in a national innovation system. Moreover, it provides valuable implications for firms seeking to obtain government support and collaborate with others.

Government R&D Programs and Innovation Activities (정부 기술개발 지원사업이 중소기업의 혁신활동에 미치는 영향)

  • Lee, Byungheon;Park, Sangmoon
    • Asia-Pacific Journal of Business
    • /
    • v.11 no.4
    • /
    • pp.177-188
    • /
    • 2020
  • Purpose - The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of government R&D programs on firm innovation activities. Design/methodology/approach - This study analyzed survey data on innovation survey in Korea. To investigate our research hypothesis we used ordered logit regression analysis. Findings - This study unveils different effects of diverse government R&D programs on firm innovation activities. Most of government programs-R&D tax incentives, information/training, and marketing supports-have positive effects on management innovation activities and negative effects of the usage of procurement programs on management innovation efforts. Some government programs-R&D tax incentives, R&D grants, information/training-have positive effects on technological innovation activities. Research implications or Originality - This paper investigates the effects of diverse government R&D programs on technological and management innovation activities. We examine simultaneous effects of multiple government R&D programs rather than effects of independent R&D programs. This result can contribute to develop more effective government R&D programs to support firm innovation activities.

Evaluating Innovation Policies in Australian Government: Backing Australia's Ability

  • Moon, Yong-Eun;Yoon, Joseph
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.1 no.1
    • /
    • pp.31-44
    • /
    • 2003
  • In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement, launched by the Australian Prime Minister in January 2001, commits an additional 53 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government also undertakes analysis and comparisons of innovation policies, instruments and approaches to maintain a leading-edge National Innovation System. This includes analysis of the innovation activities of other nations, and evaluation of the impacts of innovation policies and programs on Australia's institutions and enterprises. This paper examines Australia's Innovation policies, Backing Australian Ability.

  • PDF

Management of Government Innovation Ecosystem through the Neuro-cybernetics : A Case Study (신경사이버네틱스를 통한 정보혁신생태계 관리 : 사례연구)

  • Lee, Hong;Han, Byungchul
    • Knowledge Management Research
    • /
    • v.9 no.4
    • /
    • pp.143-156
    • /
    • 2008
  • The main purpose of this study is to suggest a way that how government innovation ecosystem can be successfully managed by applying neuro-cybernetics approach. Innovation ecosystem is not a rare phenomenon around us. Especially national innovation managed by government relies on heavily innovation ecosystem. Unfortunately discussions of successful management of this ecosystem are rare. This study strongly urged necessity of such management by observing the case of introduction of CDMA mobile communication technology in Korea. Neuro-cybernetics was suggested as one alternative approach for the such management.

  • PDF

Evaluating Innovation Policies in Australian Government: BACKING AUSTRALIA'S ABILITY

  • Moon, Yong-Eun;Yoon, Jo-Seph
    • 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2003.12a
    • /
    • pp.101-114
    • /
    • 2003
  • In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement, launched by the Australian Prime Minister in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government also undertakes analysis and comparisons of innovation policies, instruments and approaches to maintain a leading-edge National Innovation System. This includes analysis of the innovation activities of other nations, and evaluation of the impacts of innovation policies and programs on Australia's institutions and enterprises. This paper examines Australia's Innovation policies, Backing Australian Ability.

  • PDF

Rethinking Path Dependency and Regional Innovation - Policy Induced 'Government Dependency': The Case of Daedeok, South Korea

  • Lee, Taek-Ku
    • World Technopolis Review
    • /
    • v.1 no.2
    • /
    • pp.92-106
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study focuses on exploring the behaviours of high-tech start-up firms in response to the policy interventions undertaken to promote regional innovation in South Korea since 1997. High-tech start-ups and their technological entrepreneurship are increasingly considered by policy makers and academics to play a crucial role in the generation of innovation and economic development. However, this study started from a basic concern of why government intervention does not necessarily result in an increase of regional innovation capacity. To explain this concern, we constructed a new conceptual framework of 'government dependency' and apply this to 'Daedeok,' a regional innovation system in South Korea, to explore the reproduction of path dependency as an impact induced by innovation policy. This conceptual framework was developed by remodeling path dependency approaches through a systemic and interactive lens. An empirical study used qualitative interviews of start-up founders to delineate the emergence of a new development path and the extent to which dependency was reproduced in the Daedeok regional innovation system. Empirical analysis suggested that 'reliance' and 'persistence' were the crucial factors in the production and reproduction of the government dependency. Some firms accepted dependency as reliance, but others regarded it as policy utilization. Thus, a critical juncture could not be clearly identified in actors' behaviour. It was also unclear if dependency had hindered innovation, but it was shown that the regional and institutional contexts strongly influenced the reproduction process. The study concludes that the construct of government dependency can also provide useful insights into policy learning as well as the success of government interventions.

An Exploratory Analysis of the Efficiency of Government's Regional Innovation Programs from the Comprehensive Management Perspective and Its Implications (정부지역혁신사업 관리의 효율성에 대한 탐색적 분석과 시사점 : 종합적 수준에서의 접근)

  • Lee, Min-Hyung
    • Journal of Technology Innovation
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.235-250
    • /
    • 2007
  • The Korean Government has recently been pushing ahead with a variety of programs to support regional innovation. This paper examines whether the variety of regional innovation programs of the government are efficiently managed and effectively functioning in regions. To make the assessment, questionnaire surveys were executed targeting innovation actors in fourteen regions and evaluated the efficiency of government regional programs. Key points of assessment were the appropriateness of the program organization and the efficiency of program management for the effectiveness of program results. It was found that the appropriateness of the program organization and the efficiency of program management were related positively to performance of programs, but the performance of regional innovation programs overall was not high. Some problems were found in program organization and program management such as the overlapping of program objectives and functions, the inadequate synergy among programs, insufficient reflection of the needs of industry in planning, the overlapping investment in facilities and equipment, and low effectiveness of evaluation.

  • PDF

A Study on the Influence of the Government's Innovation Promotion Policy on the Innovation Performance of the Service Industry (정부의 혁신 촉진 정책이 서비스 산업의 기술 혁신 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구)

  • Woo, Jihwan;Kim, YoungJun
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.469-482
    • /
    • 2019
  • This paper analyzes the effects of government support systems, regulation, and innovation promotion policy on technological innovation performance of companies in the service industry using 4,000 Korean service industry companies. Multiple and hierarchical multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the correlation between the individual factors and process innovation and product innovation. Government support, regulation and technology innovation in the service industry were tested. In addition, government innovation promotion policy includes government support and regulation and the technological innovation performance of service firms. As a result, the government support system affects both the process innovation and the product innovation performance in the service industry, but affects only the process innovation performance in the case of regulation. Innovation promotion policy was found to regulate the relationship between government support systems and regulation and innovation performance of the service industry. Therefore, these findings provide strategic implications for the management of enterprises in relation to government support systems and innovation policy. It is necessary to reorganize regulations that are outdated to improve the effect of innovation policies on innovation performance.

Evaluation of Kyunggi Provincial Government`s Regional Innovation Capability (지역혁신역량의 평가: 경기도 지방정부의 노력을 중심으로)

  • Park, Hyeon-A;Lee, Jin-Hui;Jeong, Seon-Yang
    • Proceedings of the Technology Innovation Conference
    • /
    • 2004.02a
    • /
    • pp.132-151
    • /
    • 2004
  • Regional innovation capabilities have been regarded as essential in developing regional economy. Many regional governments all over the world have been pouring great efforts to increase their regional innovation capabilities. In these days, this trend has been prevailed among Korean regional governments. In line with the active support of the central government, Korean regional governments have started their own regional innovation policies. This paper aims at discussing a regional government`s efforts in enhancing its innovation capabilities. As a representative region, we select Kyunggi Province, because it is one of the most advanced regions in Korea. We discuss Kyunggi Province`s innovation promotion efforts in terms of organization, budget, and programs. According to our analysis, the Kyunggi`s provincial government increased its innovation capabilities to a large scale. It has extended its S&T promotion organization, increased its R&D budget to a large scale, and increased its R&D promotion programmes and even initiated its own programs.

  • PDF

Altitude Plans of Local Administration Innovation Through Level Diagnosis (수준진단을 통한 지방행정혁신 고도화 방안 - C 도 혁신진단 조사를 바탕으로-)

  • Lee, Seung-Hee;Noh, Kyoo-Sung
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.3 no.2
    • /
    • pp.159-186
    • /
    • 2005
  • Local decentralization and administration innovation is the most important problem the government confronted with at the present time. So local government must be follow them. Therefore, local government need to prepare whole process on this. From now on, local government must be develop own innovation model and strategy then, forward with innovation plan classified by step. This study reviewed the significance and necessary of local administration innovation and examined the necessary of level diagnosis of local administration innovation. And We diagnosed administration innovation of C province, then analyzed the result and proposed Altitude plans of administration innovation.

  • PDF