DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Influence of the Government's Innovation Promotion Policy on the Innovation Performance of the Service Industry

정부의 혁신 촉진 정책이 서비스 산업의 기술 혁신 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Woo, Jihwan (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, YoungJun (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Korea University)
  • 우지환 (고려대학교 기술경영대학원) ;
  • 김영준 (고려대학교 기술경영대학원)
  • Received : 2018.10.08
  • Accepted : 2019.02.01
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effects of government support systems, regulation, and innovation promotion policy on technological innovation performance of companies in the service industry using 4,000 Korean service industry companies. Multiple and hierarchical multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the correlation between the individual factors and process innovation and product innovation. Government support, regulation and technology innovation in the service industry were tested. In addition, government innovation promotion policy includes government support and regulation and the technological innovation performance of service firms. As a result, the government support system affects both the process innovation and the product innovation performance in the service industry, but affects only the process innovation performance in the case of regulation. Innovation promotion policy was found to regulate the relationship between government support systems and regulation and innovation performance of the service industry. Therefore, these findings provide strategic implications for the management of enterprises in relation to government support systems and innovation policy. It is necessary to reorganize regulations that are outdated to improve the effect of innovation policies on innovation performance.

본 최근, 4차 산업혁명 시대에 접어들면서, 서비스 산업의 기술 혁신에 대한 관심이 늘어나고 있다. 이러한 시대적 흐름에서, 본 논문에서는 현재 정부의 지원 제도, 규제, 혁신 촉진 정책이 서비스 산업에 속한 기업들의 기술 혁신 성과에 미치는 영향을 4,000개의 대한민국 서비스 산업 기업들을 대상으로 실증적으로 분석하였다. 다중 회귀 분석과 위계적 회기분석을 적용하여 개별 요소 간의 상관관계를 분석하였고, 이를 이용해서, 정부의 지원과 규제와 서비스 산업의 기술 혁신의 두 축인 공정 혁신 및 제품 혁신에 대한 영향력을 검정하였다. 또한, 정부의 혁신 정책이 정부의 지원 및 규제와 서비스 기업의 기술 혁신 성과를 조절하고 있음을 살펴보았다. 그 결과, 정부의 지원 제도는 서비스 산업의 공정 혁신 및 제품 혁신 성과 모두에 영향을 미치지만, 규제의 경우에는 공정 혁신 성과에만 영향을 미치는 것으로 파악하였다. 그리고 혁신 정책은 정부의 지원 제도 및 규제와 서비스 산업의 혁신 성과의 관계를 조절하는 것으로 평가되었다. 따라서 이러한 연구 결과는 기업의 경영층에게 정부의 지원 제도와 혁신 정책을 정확히 파악해서 이를 활용하도록 전략적인 시사점을 제공한다. 또한, 정부가 서비스 산업의 기술 혁신을 촉진하기 위해서는, 혁신 정책의 기술 혁신 성과에 대한 조절 효과를 높이기 위해서, 시대에 맞지 않는 규제들을 다시 정비하고, 기업의 규모나, 서비스 내용의 특성 등에 맞는 세분화된 정책을 만들어야 하는 정책적인 시사점을 제공한다.

Keywords

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Model

Table 1. Government Support Program

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Types and contents of government regulation

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Government Support System

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Government Regulations

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Innovation Promotion Policy

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Innovation Performance

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Correlation Analysis

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. The Impact of Government Policy on Product Innovation

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. The Impact of Government Policy on Process Innovation

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. The Moderating Effect of Innovation Promotion Policy on the Relationship between Government Policy and Product Innovation

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. The Moderating Effect of Innovation Promotion Policy on the Relationship between Government Policy and Process Innovation

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_469_t0011.png 이미지

References

  1. Tamlin Magee, "World Economic Forum," News Article on Computer World UK, 2017
  2. Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Report, 2011
  3. Dosi, "Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation," J. Econ. Lit., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1120-1171, 1988.
  4. B. Crepon, E. Duguet, and J. Mairessec, "Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at The Firm Level," Econ. Innov. New Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 115-158, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599800000031
  5. A. Gawer and M. A. Cusumano, "Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation," J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 417-433, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
  6. F. W. Geels, "From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insight about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory," Res. Policy, vol. 33, no. 6-7, pp. 897-920, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
  7. Kwak, S. Hwan, Choi, and S. Bong, "Determinants of innovation in service industry:Resource based and industrial organization perspectives," J. Korea Serv. Manag. Soc., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-25, Jun, 2009.
  8. D.-H. Ko, H.-S. Moon, and S.-M. Lee, "A Study on the Effect of Government R&D Supports on Firm"s Innovation Activities," Korean Jouranl Bus. Adm., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1325-1344, May, 2015.
  9. K. A. Kim, "The Impact of Supporting Policies in the Technological Innovation of the firm in the Service Industries," Korean J. Local Gov. Adm. Stud., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 215-239, 2014. https://doi.org/10.18398/KJLGAS.2014.28.2.215
  10. K.-N. Kang and Y.-S. Lee, "Determinants of technological innovation in the small firms of Korea Biotechnology Industry," J. Ind. Econ. Bus., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1723-1740, Aug, 2006.
  11. S.H.Baek, "Analysis of the Causal Structure Among Innovation Support Policy, Innovation and Performance : Focusing on Knowledge Service Firms," J. Technol. Innov., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 324-357, Jun, 2016.
  12. D. H. Kim, Y. H. Choi, and S. C. Lee, "Effects of Government Regulations on Innovation in the Public Sector / The Case of Government R&D Institutes," J. Korean Policy Stud., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 121-140, 2002.
  13. S. I. Jeong, B. W. Kim, W. S. Lee, S. J. Son, B. Y. Jang, and E. S. Yoo, "Effects of Regulations on the Firm's Technological Innovation", STEPI J. Proj. Rep, 2007.
  14. Y. W. Seo, S. J. Choi, and S. W. Lee, "How Does the Regulation of Location Affect Firm's Management and Innovation Performance?," J. Technol. Innov., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 586-603, Sep, 2012.
  15. J. P. Davis and K. M. Eisenhardt, "Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation recombination processes in symbiotic relationships," Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 159-201, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211428131
  16. C. S. Kim and S. W. Kim, "The Performanc and Reform of the Regulatory Registration and Management in Local Government: The Experience of Busan Metropolitan City," Korean J. Local Gov. Stud., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 273-293, 2016.
  17. H. D. Yoon, R. B. Seo, and D. Y. Jeon, "The Effects of Government R&D Subsidies and Innovative Clustering Policies on the Technological Innovation and the Managerial Performance of Venture Business," Adv. Small Enterp. Innov. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 91-117, 2011.
  18. S. B. Choi, J. E. Kim, and S. D. Jang, "The Effects of Empowering Leadership on the Innovative Behavior -Creativity as a Mediator and Innovative Support as a Moderator," Journal Hum. Resour. Manag. Res., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 209-229, 2013.
  19. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. Multirative data analysis: A global perspective, 2010.
  20. J.H. Woo, Y.J. Kim, "An Analysis of the Hampering Factors of Innovation: Focusing on SMEs in Korean Manufacturing Industry," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 19 no.8, pp. 116-126, 2018