• 한국화재소방학회논문지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.84-90
• /
• 2007

UN에서는 위험물의 분류, 표지, 제조, 수송, 저장, 사용과 폐기에 관한 통합된 시스템(GHS, Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, 화학물질의 분류와 표지에 관한 세계조화시스템)을 구축하고 이 사항을 OECD에 가입한 모든 나라들에게 자국에 도입하여 실시하도록 권고하고 있다. GHS는 위험물분류와 운송부분에 관하여 물리 화학적 위험성과 급성독성의 분류와 표지사항을 기본으로 출발하였으므로 기존의 UN 시행방법과 큰 차이는 없다. 본 연구에서는 UN에서 권고하고 있는 GHS와 위험물안전관리법의 위험물분류와 위험물표지사항 및 위험물판정시험방법을 비교 검토하였다.

• 농약과학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.201-207
• /
• 2011

인류 생활 수준의 증진 및 향상을 위해 화학제품의 사용이 세계적으로 널리 확대 되고 있다. 그러나 이러한 화학제품은 많은 이점을 가지고 있는 반면에 사람과 환경 약영향을 미칠 우려가 있어서, 안전한 사용을 위한 제도를 각국에서 시행하고 있다. 2003년 UN에서 권고된 화학물질의 분류기준과 표시방법을 전세계적으로 통일하기 위한 GHS는 2008년부터 각국에서 도입하도록 권고되었다. 기존의 농약분류체계와 표시방법과 가장 많이 달라지는 것은 물질분류기준이다. 그리고, 그림문자가 표시방법이 정사각형에서 마름모형으로 변화되었고, 3종이 추가되고 1종이 폐지되었다. 따라서, 기존의 농약분류 및 표시제도와 GHS를 면밀한 비교평가와 선진국의 도입방향의 조사를 바탕으로, 우선적으로 물질분류기준변경을 하면서 유독성제품부터 부분적으로 시행하는 것이 타당할 것이다.

• 생명과학회지
• /
• 제24권7호
• /
• pp.804-811
• /
• 2014

Cyclohexanone의 GHS 분류 기준에 따른 화학물질의 변이원성 구분을 위해, 다른 연구에서는 아직까지 수행된 바 없는 ICR계 마우스의 골수세포를 이용하는 in vivo 소핵시험을 수행하였다. 7주령의 수컷 ICR계 마우스에 동 시험물질의 3가지 농도를 투여하였으며, 경구투여 24시간 후에 도살, 골수세포를 채취하여 슬라이드 표본을 제작하였고, 2,000개의 다염성적혈구 중 소핵을 갖는 다염성 적혈구(MNPCE)를 계수하였다. 모든 투여군에서 cyclohexanone은 골수세포의 증식을 억제하지 않았으며, 소핵을 유발하였다. 이 골수세포를 이용한 소핵시험의 결과로 동 시험물질(cyclohexanone)은 GHS 분류기준에 의거, 변이원성 구분2로 분류하였다.

• 한국환경독성학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경독성학회 2006년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.53-77
• /
• 2006

• 월간포장계
• /
• 통권220호
• /
• pp.42-44
• /
• 2011

• Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.197-208
• /
• 2006

The hazards of chemicals can be classified using classification criteria that are based on physical, chemical and ecotoxicological endpoints. These criteria may be developed be iteratively, based on scientific or regulatory processes. A number of national and international schemes have been developed over the past 50 years, and some, such as the UN Dangerous Goods system or the EC system for hazardous substances, are in widespread use. However, the unnecessarily complicated multiplicity of existing hazard classifications created much unnecessary confusion at the user level, and a recommendation was made at the 1992 Rio Earth summit to develop a globally harmonized chemical hazard classification and compatible labelling system, including material safety data sheets and easily understandable symbols, that could be used for manufacture, transport, use and disposal of chemical substances. This became the globally harmonized system for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). The developmental phase of the GHS is largely complete. Consistent criteria for categorizing chemicals according to their toxic, physical, chemical and ecological hazards are now available. Consistent hazard communication tools such as labelling and material safety data sheets are also close to finalizations. The next phase is implementation of the GHS. The Intergovernmental Forum for Chemical Safety recommends that all countries implement the GHS as soon as possible with a view to have the system fully operational by 2008. When the GHS is in place, the world will finally have one system for classification of chemical hazards.

• 농약과학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.141-147
• /
• 2008

최근 국제적으로 화학물질에 대하여 분류체계를 단일화하기 위하여 "화학물질의 분류표지 등에 대한 세계 조화시스템(Globally Harmonized classification system, GHS)" 분류체계를 도입하고 있고, 또한 동물보호법에 따라 실험동물수를 축소한 급성경구독성시험법-고정용량법, 급성독성등급법(acute toxic class method, ATC), Up-and Down법을 새롭게 적용하고 있다. 본 시험은 국내 농약 등록시 수행하고 있는 급성경구독성시험인 $LD_{50}$ 시험법과 개정된 시험법 중 급성독성등급법(ATC)을 비교하여 새로운 시험법 적용과 GHS 분류체계 도입여부를 평가하기 위하여 실시하였다. 시험 농약은$LD_{50}$이 GHS 분류기준의 경계부분에 있는 농약 13종을 선발하여 $LD_{50}$ 시험법과 급성독성등급법을 동시에 수행한 결과 Methidathion EC, Parathion-ethyl의 $LD_{50}$은 $LD_{50}$ 시험법은 각각 57.3, $60\;mg\;kg^{-1}$ 이었고, 급성독성등급법은 $200\;mg\;kg^{-1}$ 으로 $LD_{50}$ 차이가 있었으나, GHS 분류체계의 독성구분 결과 모두 3급으로 동일하게 분류되었고, Carbofuran GR은 $LD_{50}$ 시험법은 $310\;mg\;kg^{-1}$, 급성독성등급법은 $300\;mg\;kg^{-1}$ 으로 비슷하였으나 GHS 분류 3급 기준이 $300\;mgvkg^{-1}$이하이므로 각각 4등급, 3등급으로 분류되었으며, Phosphamidon SL, Endosulfan EC, EPN EC, Dimethoate EC, Phenthoate EC, Zeta-cypermethrin EW, Bifenthrin EC, Fenthion EC, Carbaryl WP, Chlorpyrifos.Diflubenzuron WP의 $LD_{50}$ 은 두 시험 모두 비슷하였고, GHS 독성분류도 동일하였다. 이상의 결과 농약 등록시 급성경구독성시험에 급성독성등급법과 GHS 분류체계에 대한 적용가능성을 제시하고 있다.

• 한국환경보건학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경보건학회 2005년도 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.240-248
• /
• 2005

To implement a globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS) in Korea, an interminsterial GHS working group involving 6 ministries established an expert working group composed of 7 experts from relevant organizations and one private consultant to prepare an officialKorean GHS version by March, 2005. As such, the translation and review of the official Korean GHS version, including annexes, started in October, 2004 and was completed on March 15, 2005. The official Korean GHS version has now been posted on the websites of the relevant ministries and organizations to solicit public opinions. The official Korean GHS version will be finalized after a public hearing scheduled forMay, 2005. Collaborative efforts as regards implementing and disseminating the GHS in Korea will be continued to avoid any confusion or duplication and for effective use of resources. The globally harmonized system of classifying and labeling chemicals (GHS) was originally adopted in 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), as subsequently reflected in Agenda 21 chapter 19. The work was coordinated and managed under the auspices of the Interorganization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals(IOMC) Coordinating Group for the Harmonization of Chemical Classification Systems (UNCEGHS). The technical focal points for completing the work were the International Labour Organization (ILO); Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); and United Nations Economic and Social Council's Subcommittee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UNSCETDG). The work was finalized in October 2002, and the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg on 4 September 2002 encouraged countries to implement the new GHS as soon as possible with a view to having the system fully operational by 2008 (UN, 2003). Implementation has already started with pilot countries introducing the system to their national practices in different regions of the world. The GHS text, called the purple book, becameavailable as a W publication in early 2003. The GHS text, called the purple book, becameavailable as a UN publication in early 2003. The GHS system will be kept dynamic, and regularly revised and made more efficient as experience is gained in its implementation. While national or regional governments are the primary audiences for this document, it also contains sufficient context and guidance for those in industry who will ultimately be implementing the national requirements that will be introduced (UN, 2003). The Japanese government published their official Japanese GHS version, the first in Asia, in April 2004 after starting work in January 2003 based on an interministerial chemical coordination committee involving 7 ministries, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, and Ministry of Environment (MOE, 2004). Accordingly, similar to the Japanese GHS efforts, this paper presents the interministerial efforts involved in publishing the official Korean GHS version.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.347-362
• /
• 2009

The United Nation agreed to adopt the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) until 2008 to solve the significant differences enough to result in different labels or MSDS for the same chemical in different jurisdictions. Though the GHS is an ideal solution in the respect of pursuing only one format of a MSDS throughout the world, it may cause confusion at the beginning due to lack of information. So the Korean Ministry of Labor (MOL) revised the Industrial Safety and Health Act (ISHA) and related public notice on the classification & labelling of chemicals according to the GHS in 2006. The transition period for the implementation of the GHS for substances was set until Jun 30, 2010, and for mixtures until Jun 30, 2013. To promote the implementation of the GHS in Korea, we developed an application program for constructing MSDS database and a management program for providing MSDS contents on the web in accordance with the GHS. We analyzed the sixteen sections of MSDS by the GHS guideline, and the result showed the necessity to construct logically connected DB for chemical identifier, hazard classification, label, standard phrases and regulatory information. Each section of a MSDS was divided into sub-databases to update the database efficiently. According to Relational Database Management System (RDBMS), the sub-databases were automatically assembled and subsequently a full MSDS is produced. At present, MSDS database for 6,314 substances has been built and provided through internet as the MSDS Editing program. During the service period from January 1 to March 31, 13,666 users have searched MSDSs for 33,401 substances. During program review, some comments about the classification results and other MSDS element sources were reported but no technical bug reported. We expect that the MSDS DB management system in accordance with GHS will accelerate the implementation of the GHS in Korea.

• Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry
• /
• 제56권4호
• /
• pp.191-197
• /
• 2013

To classify the chemical hazard according to globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS), we investigated the genotoxicity of three chemicals, methyl myristate, 2-ethylhexanoic acid zinc salt, N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(2-hydroxyethyl) ethylenediamine, using male ICR mice bone marrow cells for the screening of micronucleus induction. Although these three chemicals have already been tested numerous times, a micronucleus test has not been conducted. The seven week-old male ICR mice were tested at three dosages for the three chemicals, respectively. After 24 h of oral administration with the three chemicals, the mice were sacrificed and their bone marrow cells were prepared for smearing slides. As a result of counting the micronucleated polychromatic erythrocyte (MNPCE) of 2,000 polychromatic erythrocytes, all treated groups expressed no statistically significant increase of MNPCE compared to the negative control group. There were no clinical signs related with the oral exposure of these three chemicals. It was concluded that these three chemicals did not induce micronucleus in the bone marrow cells of ICR mice, and there was no direct proportion with dosage. These results indicate that the three chemicals have no mutagenic potential under each test condition, and it is not classified these chemicals as mutagens by GHS.