• Title/Summary/Keyword: Fixed-detachable prosthesis

Search Result 9, Processing Time 0.031 seconds

Implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation of severely atrophic mandible with fixed detachable prosthesis (심하게 흡수된 하악골에서 fixed detachable prosthesis를 이용한 임플란트 지지 보철 수복증례)

  • Lee, Hak-Joo;Lim, Young-Jun;Kwon, Ho-Beom;Kim, Myung-Joo
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.55 no.2
    • /
    • pp.180-186
    • /
    • 2017
  • Implant supported prostheses have improved the quality of lives of totally edentulous patients. However, there are some limitations on the number of implants related to the residual bone level or the economic concern and so on. In this situation, applying fixed detachable prosthesis with bilateral cantilevers can be considered. This clinical report describes implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with severe bone resorption. The patient was satisfied and felt comfortable with upper complete denture and lower fixed detachable prosthesis.

The Esthetic Gingival Porcelain Restoration as Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis (도재치은 보철법에 의한 심미적 임프란트 상부구조의 제작)

  • Lee, Sung-Bok;Lee, Kyung-Ho
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry
    • /
    • v.10 no.1
    • /
    • pp.104-113
    • /
    • 2001
  • This article described a procedure for fabricating an esthetic gingival porcelain restoration as an implant-supported fixed prosthesis for edentulous maxilla. Alternative treatments for fully edentulous patients include an implant-supported overdenture or a fixed implant-supported prosthesis with bilateral distal cantilevers. But, from a functional and biomechanical point of view, the fixed implant-supported prosthesis with posterior cantilevers or implant-supported tissue-borne overdenture do not significantly improve masticatory effectiveness compared with a distributed implant restoration as a fixed implant-supported prosthesis. The fact that the prosthesis is supported by distributed implants over eight for edentulous maxilla in general, provides increased masticatory efficiency as a fixed restoration and similar gingival appearance with esthetic gingival porcelain. It is also detachable by dentist to allow easier after-care of soft tissue and the prosthesis.

  • PDF

Esthetic Full Zirconia Fixed Detachable Implant-Retained Restorations Manufactured from Monolithic Zirconia : Clinical Report (Monolithic zirconia framework으로 제작된 fixed detachable prostheses를 이용한 심미적인 임플란트 전악 수복 증례)

  • Hong, Jun-Tae;Choi, Yu-Sung;Han, Se-Jin;Cho, In-Ho
    • Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
    • /
    • v.28 no.3
    • /
    • pp.253-268
    • /
    • 2012
  • Full-mouth reconstruction of a patient using dental implants is a challenge if there is vertical and horizontal bone resorption, since this includes the gingival area and restricts the position of the implants. however, hard- and soft-tissue grafting may allow the implants to be placed into the desired position. Although it is possible to regenerate lost tissues, an alternative is to use fixed detachable prostheses that restore the function and the esthetics of the gingiva and teeth. Various material combinations including metal/acrylic, metal/ceramic, and zirconia/ceramic have been used for constructing this type of restoration. Other problems include wear, separation or fracture of the resin teeth from the metal/acrylic prosthesis, chipping or fracture of porcelain from the metal/ceramic or zirconia/ceramic prosthesis, and fracture of the framework in some free-end prostheses. With virtually unbreakable, chip-proof, life-like nature, monolithic zirconia frameworks can prospectively replace other framework materials. This clinical report describes the restoration of a patient with complete fixed detachable maxillary and mandibular prostheses made of monolithic zirconia with dental implants. The occluding surfaces were made of monolithic zirconia, to decrease the risk of chipping or fracture. The prostheses were esthetically pleasing, and no clinical complications have been reported after two years.

Full mouth fixed implant rehabilitation in a patient with generalized aggressive periodontitis

  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk;Shin, Hyung-Joo;Kim, Dae-Gon;Park, Chan-Jin;Cho, Lee-Ra
    • The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.2 no.4
    • /
    • pp.154-159
    • /
    • 2010
  • BACKGROUND. Generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP) is a destructive periodontal disease that can develop in young age. Only a few cases of full mouth rehabilitation, using dental implants, have been reported in a patient with aggressive periodontitis. CASE DESCRIPTION. This clinical report describes the treatment procedures and results of full mouth rehabilitation in a patient with aggressive periodontitis. After all teeth were extracted, 6 implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible, respectively. Fixed detachable implant prostheses were made. The patient was satisfied with the final results. She was followed for 10 months postloading. CLINICAL IMPLICATION. For a long-term success, continuous maintenance care is critical, as the contributing factors of the disease (such as immune factors or periodontal pathogens) may not be controlled adequately.

The rehabilitation of an edentulous maxilla with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis using a zirconia framework: A case report (상악 완전무치악에서 지르코니아 framework을 이용한 임플란트 지지형 고정성 보철 수복 증례)

  • Byun, Jae-Joon;Jang, Eun-Sun;Kong, Dae-Ryong;Song, Joo-Hun;Lee, Gyeong-Je
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.58 no.4
    • /
    • pp.342-348
    • /
    • 2020
  • Anatomical changes in the facial and alveolar bones occur after multiple teeth are extracted. In the maxilla, the alveolar bone is absorbed in the direction and inclination of the root, and the remaining alveolar bone becomes shorter, reducing the diameter of the arch. In addition, as the nasolabial angle increases, the support of the lips and the aesthetics of the face are lost. This case reports a functional and aesthetically satisfactory results of full mouth rehabilitation with the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using a zirconia framework.

A COMPARISON OF THE MASTICATORY FUNCTION BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED PROSTHESES AND COMPLETE DENTURE FOR FULLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS

  • Lee, Jae-Hoon;Kim, Woo-Hyun;Shin, Rie-Hye;Lee, Keun-Woo
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.46 no.6
    • /
    • pp.591-601
    • /
    • 2008
  • STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The improvement in oral function and comfort from the dental implant appears to depend on the particular type of implant support used with the denture. The number and positioning of implants have an influence on the force transfer and subsequent stress distribution around implants. Nevertheless, a quantitative comparison has not been made between the types of implant prosthesis used with different materials compared to conventional complete denture. PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to assess the masticatory performance, bite force and impact of two different type of implant supported prostheses on oral health-related quality of life compared to conventional complete denture with GOHAI, validated oral-specific health status measures, the sieving method, and the Prescale Dental System. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the years 1999 to 2006, a total of 30 completely edentulous patients in a single arch were selected from the Yonsei University Dental Hospital, Department of Prosthodontics and Implant Clinic in Seoul, S. Korea. Patients were divided into 3 groups of 10 each. Group HR was restored with fixed-detachable hybrid prostheses with resin teeth. Group FP had fixed dentures with porcelain teeth while Group CD had a complete denture. The masticatory performance was compared between 3 groups. RESULTS: The results showed a significant improvement in oral health-related quality of life with dental implants compared to a conventional denture in GOHAI comparison. Overall, implant prostheses showed a higher masticatory performance ($S_{50}$) and maximum bite force compared with conventional dentures (P < .05) but no differences between different implant supported prostheses (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, the numbers of implant and material of implant prostheses does not appear to impact patient satisfaction, masticatory performance or bite force.

A HISTOLOGIC COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LOADED AND UNLOADED TITANIUM IMPLANTS (LOADED IMPLANT와 UNLOADED IMPLANT의 조직학적 비교 연구)

  • Kim, Yung-Soo;Ko, Jea-Seung;Hwang, Sung-Myung
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.29 no.2
    • /
    • pp.1-16
    • /
    • 1991
  • In order to see the possible effect of the functional load-bearing after osseointegration of the titanium root form implant in dog a histologic study was conducted. One side of lower jaw was surgically prepared edentulousness and titanium implants were inserted. Some implants were functionally loaded through fixed detachable prosthesis and some are isolated and unloaded. The dog was sacrificed four months later and bone sections with implants were processed for histologic evaluation and the results were as follows ; (1) The bone to implant interface after four months of load bearing presented no mobility and no marginal bone loss radiographically and histologically. (2) The interface zone between compact bone and implant revealed a direct bone to implant contact and in some areas marrow tissue contacts were examined at the light microscopic level. (3) At the ultrastructural level the interface of surrounding compact bone matrix and implant, three types of superficial layers were found ; one with moderate electron dense amorphous granular substance layer, other with high electron dense fine granular substance layer, and another type of amorphous granular substance covered with high electron dense line of minute granules. (4) The osteoblasts in the marrow tissue neighboring implants and osteocytes in compact bone showed typical normal characteristics and in the marrow tissues some of lymphocytes and mast cells were observed. (5) The abscence of abnormal tissue reactions at a cellular level indicates a high degree of biocompatibility for the experimental titanium implant and basically no difference was found between functionally loaded and unloaded implants.

  • PDF

EFFECT OF ANCHORAGE SYSTEMS ON LOAD TRANSFER WITH MANDIBULAR IMPLANT OVERDENTURES : A THREE-DIMENSIONAL PHOTOELASTIC STRESS ANALYSIS (하악 임플란트 overdenture에서 anchorage system이 하중전달에 미치는 영향)

  • Kim Jin-Yeol;Jeon Young-Chan;Jeong Chang-Mo
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.40 no.5
    • /
    • pp.507-524
    • /
    • 2002
  • Load transfer of implant overdenture varies depending on anchorage systems that are the design of the superstructure and substructure and the choice of attachment. Overload by using improper anchorage system not only will cause fracture of the framework or screw but also may cause failure of osseointegration. Choosing anchorage system in making prosthesis, therefore, can be considered to be one of the most important factors that affect long-term success of implant treatment. In this study, in order to determine the effect of anchorage systems on load transfer in mandibular implant overdenture in which 4 implants were placed in the interforaminal region, patterns of stress distribution in implant supporting bone in case of unilateral vertical loading on mandibular left first molar were compared each other according to various types of anchorage system using three-dimensional photoelastic stress analysis. The five photoelastic overdenture models utilizing Hader bar without cantilever using clips(type 1), cantilevered Hader bar using clips(type 2), cantilevered Hader bar with milled surface using clips(type 3), cantilevered milled-bar using swivel-latchs and frictional pins(type 4), and Hader bar using clip and ERA attachments(type 5), and one cantilevered fixed-detachable prosthesis(type 6) model as control were fabricated. The following conclusions were drawn within the limitations of this study, 1. In all experimental models. the highest stress was concentrated on the most distal implant supporting bone on loaded side. 2. Maximum fringe orders on ipsilateral distal implant supporting bone in a ascending order is as follows: type 5, type 1, type 4, type 2 and type 3, and type 6. 3. Regardless of anchorage systems. more or less stresses were generated on the residual ridge under distal extension base of all overdenture models. To summarize the above mentioned results, in case of the patients with unfavorable biomechanical conditions such as not sufficient number of supporting implants, short length of the implant and unfavorable antero-posterior spread. selecting resilient type attachment or minimizing distal cantilever bar is considered to be appropriate methods to prevent overloading on implants by reducing cantilever effect and gaining more support from the distal residual ridge.