• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.11-19
• /
• 2013

In modern systems design and development, one of the key issues is considered to be related with how to reflect faithfully the stakeholder requirements including customer requirements therein, thereby successfully implementing the system functions derived from the requirements. On the other hand, the issue of safety management is also becoming greatly important these days, particularly in the operational phase of the systems under development. An approach to safety management can be based on the use of the failure mode effect and analysis (FMEA), which has been a core method adopted in automotive industry to reduce the potential failure. The fact that a successful development of cars needs to consider both the complexity and failure throughout the whole life cycle calls for the necessity of applying the systems engineering (SE) process. To meet such a need, in this paper a method of FMEA is developed based on the SE concept. To do so, a process model is derived first in order to identify the required activities that must be satisfied in automotive design while reducing the possibility of failure. Specifically, the stakeholder requirements were analyzed first to derive a set of functions, which subsequentially leads to the task of identifying necessary HW/SW components. Then the derived functions were allocated to appropriate HW/SW components. During this design process, the traceability between the functions and HW/SW components were generated. The traceability can play a key role when FMEA is performed to predict the potential failure that can be described with the routes from the components through the linked functions. As a case study, the developed process model has been applied in a project carried out in practice. The results turned out to demonstrate the usefulness of the approach.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.137-153
• /
• 2007

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a preventive technique in reliability management field. The successful implementation of FMEA technique can avoid or reduce the probability of system failure and achieve good product quality. The FMEA technique had applied in vest scopes which include aerospace, automatic, electronic, mechanic and service industry. The marking process is one of the back ends testing process that is the final process in semiconductor process. The marking process failure can cause bad final product quality and return although is not a primary process. So, how to improve the quality of marking process is one of important production job for semiconductor testing factory. This research firstly implements FMEA technique in laser marking process improvement on semiconductor testing factory and finds out which subsystem has priority failure risk. Secondly, a CCD position solution for priority failure risk subsystem is provided and evaluated. According analysis result, FMEA and CCD position implementation solution for laser marking process improvement can increase yield rate and reduce production cost. Implementation method of this research can provide semiconductor testing factory for reference in laser marking process improvement.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2016

최근 건설업계의 해외진출이 불가피한 상황에서 국내 설계도면의 경쟁력은 뒤처져있다는 평가를 받고 있다. 따라서 객관적 도면평가를 통해 국내도면수준을 파악하고, 설계경쟁력 확보방안을 마련하고자 한다. 실시설계도면을 기반으로 설계속성을 도출하고, 기존 유사연구와 전문가 인터뷰를 거쳐 속성을 보완한 뒤, 이들을 평가항목으로 Likert척도와 FMEA기법을 이용하여 실무자를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 그 결과 국내도면의 상대적 수준에 대한 시공사와 설계사의 의견이 다르고, 중요성을 인지하는 속성이 상이함을 확인하고 그 이유를 분석하였다.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.629-640
• /
• 2021

2018년 국토교통부 통계에 따르면 재건축 연한이 도래한 주거용 건축물은 2018년 기준 약 37%에 달한다, 해체물량의 증가는 해체산업의 성장과 함께 환경 및 안전사고 등 많은 부작용을 일으키고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 해체공법 선정에 있어 안전성, 경제성, 환경성 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 현장 적용에 가장 적합한 공법 의사결정 방법을 제시하고, 특히 해체공사의 안전성을 고려하여 현장 공법 적용 시 위험요인에 대한 사전평가를 통해 공법선정뿐만 아니라 선정 공법의 현장 적용성을 평가한다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 QFD 기반의 TOPSIS 해체공법선정과 FMEA 위험성평가 통합모델을 제안한다.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.49-57
• /
• 2021

In the case of military supplies, any potential failure and causes of failures must be considered. This study is aimed at examining the failure modes of a rotorcraft landing system to identify the priority items. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is applied to the rotorcraft landing system. In general, the FMEA is used to evaluate the reliability in engineering fields. Three elements, specifically, the severity, occurrence, and detectability are used to evaluate the failure modes. The risk priority number (RPN) can be obtained by multiplying the scores or the risk levels pertaining to severity, occurrence, and detectability. In this study, different weights of the three elements are considered for the RPN assessment to implement the FMEA. Furthermore, the FMEA is implemented using a fuzzy rule base, similarity aggregation model (SAM), and grey theory model (GTM) to perform a comparative analysis. The same input data are used for all models to enable a fair comparison. The FMEA is applied to military supplies by considering methodological issues. In general, the fuzzy theory is based on a hypothesis regarding the likelihood of the conversion of the crisp value to the fuzzy input. Fuzzy FMEA is the basic method to obtain the fuzzy RPN. The three elements of the FMEA are used as five linguistic terms. The membership functions as triangular fuzzy sets are the simplest models defined by the three elements. In addition, a fuzzy set is described using a membership function mapping the elements to the intervals 0 and 1. The fuzzy rule base is designed to identify the failure modes according to the expert knowledge. The IF-THEN criterion of the fuzzy rule base is formulated to convert a fuzzy input into a fuzzy output. The total number of rules is 125 in the fuzzy rule base. The SAM expresses the judgment corresponding to the individual experiences of the experts performing FMEA as weights. Implementing the SAM is of significance when operating fuzzy sets regarding the expert opinion and can confirm the concurrence of expert opinion. The GTM can perform defuzzification to obtain a crisp value from a fuzzy membership function and determine the priorities by considering the degree of relation and the form of a matrix and weights for the severity, occurrence, and detectability. The proposed models prioritize the failure modes of the rotorcraft landing system. The conventional FMEA and fuzzy rule base can set the same priorities. SAM and GTM can set different priorities with objectivity through weight setting.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 2009년도 춘계학술대회 논문집 전기설비전문위원
• /
• pp.315-317
• /
• 2009

When happen the electrical facilities accident, the one's diagnosis system of fault cause was constructed by FMEA method. From the verification of system, the one's diagnosis system agreed well with result that analyzed actual stale. Thus, the system is judged to be used effectively examine for accident cause of electrical facilities.

• 정보처리학회논문지:컴퓨터 및 통신 시스템
• /
• 제2권12호
• /
• pp.541-552
• /
• 2013

최근 우리 생활에 스마트 기술의 빠른 전파 때문에 정보 과학 및 기술 분야에 있어서는 스마트 폰의 소프트웨어 보안성이 중요한 이슈가 되고 있다. 보안성 중요 시스템인 스마트 폰은 은행 서비스, 유비쿼터스 홈 관리, 항공 고객의 검색 등의 서비스 시스템에 이용되기 때문에 비용의 리스크, 손실의 리스크, 이용가능 리스크, 그리고 사용상의 리스크에 관련 되어 있다. 스마트 폰의 보안성 이슈는 이들의 관찰된 고장들을 사용하여 소프트웨어 장애 분석을 하는 것이 핵심 접근 방법이다. 본 연구에서는 손으로 조작하는 디바이스들의 수렴하는 보안성과 신뢰성 분석 기법을 얻기 위해서 결함 트리 분석 (FTA)와 고장 모드 효과 분석(FMEA)을 사용하여 스마트 폰의 소프트웨어 보안성 분석을 위한 하나의 유효한 통합적 프레임 워크를 제안한다. 그리고 만약 하나의 고장 모드 효과 분석이 더욱 더 간단해지면 스마트 디바이스들의 보안성 개선뿐만 아니라 고장효과 의 감소를 위해서 제안된 통합적인 프레임 워크는 핵심 해법이 됨을 논의한다.

• 대한기계학회논문집A
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.69-76
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 대표적 정성적 신뢰성 분석 기법인 FMEA(고장모드 및 영향 분석)와 준-정량적 분석 방법인 치명도 분석을 이용하여 소형 하이브리드 로켓 설계를 수행하였다. 설계 중인 하이브리드 로켓을 총 31개의 부품으로 나누고 각 부품에서 발생할 수 있는 총 72개의 고장모드를 고려하여 FMEA를 수행하였으며 고장모드의 원인과 영향을 분석하였다. 또한 고장모드들의 정성적인 심각도 평가를 수행하고, 고장모드의 고장률 데이터를 이용하여 치명도 분석을 추가적으로 수행하였다. 분석 결과 설계 시 중점적으로 고려해야 할 고장모드를 파악하였으며 하이브리드 로켓의 신뢰도를 높이기 위해 고장모드들의 설계 및 재질 변경 등의 개선 조치를 설계에 반영하였다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.327-338
• /
• 2018

Purpose: A risk evaluation procedure is proposed for common failure causes in FMEA(Failure Mode and Effects Analysis). The conventional FMEA does not provide a proper means to compare common failure causes with other failure causes. This research aims to develop a risk evaluation procedure in FMEA where common failure causes and other failure causes exist together. Methods: For each common failure cause, the effect of each combination of its resulting failures is recommended to be reevaluated considering their interactive worsening effect. And the probability that each combination of failures is incurred by the same common cause is also considered. Based on these two factors, the severity of each common cause is determined. Other procedures are similar to the conventional method. Results: The proposed procedure enables to compare and prioritize every failure cause. Thus, the common causes, each of which incurring two or more failures, and other causes, each of which is corresponding to one failure, can be fairly compared. Conclusion: A fair and proper way of comparing the common failure causes and other causes is provided. The procedure is somewhat complicated and requires more works to do. But it is worth to do.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제42권3호
• /
• pp.311-324
• /
• 2014

Purpose: It can deduce improvement plan that recognizes any risk factors in initial production and mass production by using FMEA and through this process, the appropriate criteria for defence items can be established. Methods: It proposes two methodology - Apply DT/OT data achieved from the beginning mass production stage based on FMECA data of the design stage, to risk management, and risk management plan that reflected line and field faliure data in case of is offered. Results: It proposes the risk management plan through Bayesian method and the risk identification that considered MTTF estimated value in case of initial production process. In case of mass production process, both risk identification by using fault occurrence frequency scores and Byaesian method, In case of the Initial production and mass production, it proposes use both two methods. Conclusion: A more realistic risk identification method can be applied, and by this method the quality improvement effect is expected.