• 교육녹색환경연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.32-40
• /
• 2014

In an effort to resolve environmental pollution problems, developed countries enforce green building certification systems. The same is true in Korea. However compared professional accreditation system to certification systems did not systematically in Korea. Therefore, in accordance with development of green building related systems and technology the requirement for foster green building professionals is urgent. Accordingly this study is purposed to analyze and propose that green building professional accreditation system development and operation of the direction. Through data analysis domestic and international green building professional accreditation system for draw a development plan. And then conduct an expert Delphi survey reflected in the survey results to development plan.

• 대한약침학회지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.91-102
• /
• 2010

This study was done in order to present clinical trial method for safety and efficacy of Pharmacopuncture. The results were summarized as follow: Objective : The purpose of this study is to verify about safety and effectiveness of pharmacopuncture. Methods : We use questionnaire created by expert group. Survey was conducted to target clinicians who using pharmacopuncture more then 5 years. Results & Conclusion : Pharmacopuncture is effective. and that is widely used in the musculoskeletal diseases. but treatment method has not been organized to objectivity. Some pharmacopuncture causes specific symptoms, but no serious side effects. Generally, pharmacopuncture is effective and safety.

• 지질공학
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.165-172
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 델파이 기법을 활용하여 최적화 단면 설계 도출 및 시공중 터널 붕괴위험도 평가를 위해 필요한 평가영향인자를 정립하는 것을 목표로 하였다. 평가영향인자 정립은 문헌조사, 선행연구 및 전문가 집단의 브레인스토밍과정을 통하여 총 5개의 상위분류체계를 구축하였다. 21명의 전문가 패널을 구성하여 총 1, 2, 3차의 델파이 조사 과정을 통해 전문가 판단과정에서의 오류 및 편향을 방지하여 신뢰성을 향상시켰다. 델파이 1차 조사에서는 개방형 설문조사를 통해서 각 전문가 패널의 의견을 수렴하여 총 22개의 평가영향인자 후보군을 도출하였다. 델파이 2차 조사에서는 수집된 총 22개의 평가영향인자 후보군을 대상으로 리커트 7점 척도를 기반으로 중요도 설문을 수행하였으며 타당성 검증을 위해 CVR (Content Validity Ration)분석을 수행하여 부적합한 후보군을 제외하였다. 마지막으로 3차 조사에서는 2차 조사에서 도출된 결과를 가지고 재조사를 수행하였으며, 최종적으로 전문가 답변에 대한 CVR 및 COV (Coefficient of Variation)분석을 수행하여 총 14개의 평가영향인자를 도출하였다.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제55권6호
• /
• pp.539-548
• /
• 2022

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the organizational effectiveness of the introduction of a healthcare information system (electronic medical records and databases) in healthcare in Kazakhstan. Methods: The authors used a combination of 2 methods: expert assessment and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. SWOT analysis is a necessary element of research, constituting a mandatory preliminary stage both when drawing up strategic plans and for taking corrective measures in the future. The expert survey was conducted using 2 questionnaires. Results: The study involved 40 experts drawn from specialists in primary healthcare in Aktobe: 15 representatives of administrative and managerial personnel (chief doctors and their deputies, heads of medical statistics offices, organizational and methodological offices, and internal audit services) and 25 general practitioners. Conclusions: The following functional indicators of the medical and organizational effectiveness of the introduction of information systems in polyclinics were highlighted: first, improvement of administrative control, followed in descending order by registration and movement of medical documentation, statistical reporting and process results, and the cost of employees' working time. There has been no reduction in financial costs, namely in terms of the costs of copying, delivery of information in paper form, technical equipment, and paper.

• 농촌지도와개발
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.221-232
• /
• 2016

This study aims to improve the Korean Farmers' Occupational Disease and Injury Survey (KFODIS), using the questionnaire improvement model, and systematic appraisal tools. The questionnaire improvement model comprises three stages: pretesting, redesign, and field-testing. The survey was evaluated by 13 expert reviewers, using a modified version of the Questionnaire Appraisal System (QAS-99). Based on the results of pretesting, survey questions were modified at a group meeting of experts. To identify potential issues with the improved survey questions, data were collected from 20 interviews and 31 respondents before behavior coding analysis was conducted. The questionnaire improvement model and systematic appraisal tools were useful in identifying, evaluating, and correcting miscommunication and other similar issues in the KFODIS.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.116-124
• /
• 2022

Background: High-alert medications (HAMs) are medications that bear a heightened risk of causing significant patient harm if used in error. To facilitate safe use of HAMs, identifying specific HAM lists for clinical setting is necessary. We aimed to develop the national level HAM list for acute care setting. Methods: We used three-step process. First, we compiled the pre-existing lists referring HAMs. Second, we analyzed medication related incidents reported from national patient safety incident report data and adverse events indicating medication errors from the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS). We also surveyed the assistant staffs to support patient safety tasks and pharmacist in charge of medication safety in acute care hospital. From findings from analysis and survey results we created additional candidate list of HAMs. Third, we derived the final list for HAMs in acute care settings through expert panel surveys. Results: From pre-existing HAM list, preliminary list consisting of 42 medication class/ingredients was derived. Eight assistant staff to support patient safety tasks and 39 pharmacists in charge of medication safety responded to the survey. Additional 44 medication were listed from national patient safety incident report data, KAERS data and common medications involved in prescribing errors and dispensing errors from survey data. A list of mandatory and optional HAMs consisting of 10 and 6 medication classes, respectively, was developed by consensus of the expert group. Conclusion: We developed national level HAM list for Korean acute care setting from pre-existing lists, analyzing medication error data, survey and expert panel consensus.

• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.95-109
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 말과 노래와 놀이가 통합된 종합 예술로서의 한국 전래동요를 분석하기 위한 분석 준거를 마련하는데 그 목적을 두었다. 이러한 목적을 달성하기 위해 분석 준거에 대한 전문가 의견조사를 2차에 걸쳐 실시하였다. 조사 대상 전문가들은 유아교육및 관련 전문가 30명을 대상으로 하였고, 수집된 응답들은 spss 12.0의 프로그램을 이용하여 평균과 표준편차를 계산하였다. 2회에 걸친 전문가 의견 조사를 통해 최종적으로 노랫말, 음악, 연행의 대분류 3항목, 그에 따른 하위분석 준거 중분류 11항목, 소분류 33개 항목이 분석 준거로 확정되었다.

• 보건의료산업학회지
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.99-111
• /
• 2016

Objectives : This study developed an iPad-based animation for an electronic informed consent to directly help patients prepare an informed consent. The goal was to raise patients' understanding about the contents contained in a DNR informed consent in the current medical situation in which DNR informed consents are mostly written by a guardian. Methods : The development of a DNR electronic informed consent was done in 3 stages: analysis, design and development. The analysis stage was done with a survey on the real status of preparing a DNR informed consent in a medical institution. The design stage was done with the contents in the DNR electronic informed consent through a primary and secondary Delphi survey. The development stage created a DNR electronic informed consent and evaluated it through a tertiary Delphi survey. Results : After evaluating the appropriateness of the composition of the contents, the understanding of the contents, the convenience of use, the reflection of an expert opinion, and the suitability of the application, all had scores higher than 4 points. Conclusions : The results of this study show that our proposed DNR electronic informed consent can help patients better understanding the contents of a DNR informed consent.

• 한국유기농업학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.681-698
• /
• 2016

With increasing public concern for environmentally friendly agriculture, ecological aspect of landscape management is of growing importance. AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) analysis were conducted based on the delphi survey of 31 experts to evaluate the relative importance and the preference of landscape elements. Landscape components of organic farmland were classified into 2 landscape fields, 5 landscape types, 14 landscape units, and 37 landscape elements. Overall relevance score for the proposed landscape components were about 5.5 on the seven point scale. While the relative importance weight of cropland landscape field was 0.71, the weight of intra-structure landscape field was 0.29. Among the cropland landscape, relatively higher weight was assigned to farming system (0.47) and margins (0.31), as compared with hydrological system (0.22). In the farming system, crop (0.40) and farm land (0.39) were the most important landscape units. In the margins, higher weight was given to Buffer zone (0.44) and Trees (0.42). Biological habitat (0.43) ranked the highest score in the hydrological system. Preferable landscape elements were glass house, companion plants, rice paddy field, diverse crop species, small pond, and small river, which are representing ecological advantage of organic farming systems. This result indicated that the landscape elements identified in the study would be suitable to evaluate ecological aspect of rural landscape in organic farmland.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.1-29
• /
• 2018

This study aims to develop the constructs for evaluating team presentations performed by undergraduate international students in Korea. To achieve the goal, this study reviews related research and sets the criteria to analyze the problems of team presentations performed in Korean by undergraduate international students. Through this analysis we got to know which problems they were making. They were failing to reorganize the resources they had referenced and to organize the contents into one. And errors or mistakes of grammar and spelling were found often in their PPT files, and the editing styles of the PPTs were not consistent. Moreover, their performances were not unlike their PPT files. One made a good presentation but the other students just recited the script without interaction with the audience. Moreover, they could not operate the Q&A part and lead the discussion well, and components for wrapping up the presentation also were omitted frequently. After the analysis, this study conducted a survey with 23 Korean language educators asking about the validity of the construct and description of the survey. Based on the collected feedback, the construct list has been modified primarily, and carried out a second survey with an expert group. Based on their opinion, the final construct list was fine-tuned.