• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.31-46
• /
• 2002

The objective of this paper is to develop an evaluation model for pilot informatization projects. There are relatively many researches on evaluation models for information systems. These previous researches, however, lack of comprehensive view of informatization Projects and pilot systems. We apply and test a hybrid evaluation model for to measure the success of pilot informatization projects. A user satisfaction model has been used and hypotheses are developed to find relationships of evaluation factors. The hypotheses have been tested with 51 user surveys. The result of this research can give an insight for the evaluation of pilot informatization projects.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제51권2호
• /
• pp.185-202
• /
• 2023

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify key performance evaluation items and factors that are effective and practical for project management of defense standard standard improvement projects, and to develop a quantitative performance evaluation model. Methods: For the development of a performance evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects, we analyzed past major project performance and derived evaluation items and factors. To increase the objectivity and efficiency of project evaluation, we developed an evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of evaluation targets, and calculated the main importance of evaluation items using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the main opinions of expert groups. Results: The study resulted in the identification of main performance items for defense standard improvement projects, which were classified into defense standard conformity review performance and defense standard improvement performance items. We also simplified the evaluation model by integrating various evaluation items into similar evaluation factors. Additionally, we developed a quantitative evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of the targets and verified the objectivity and validity of the suggested performance evaluation model by reevaluating it using performance data from past commissioned professional institutions Conclusion: Developing a quantitative evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects is expected to provide a means of measuring the effectiveness of the project, and to be used as a tool to determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of medium and long-term project plans.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.41-61
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this paper is to construct $\ulcorner$CIDEAR(Cross Impact-DEA-AR)$\lrcorner$ model which evaluates proposed R&D projects considering cross impact among them and selects proper projects to utilize resources efficiently as well as to maximize efficacy of investments. For this purpose, $\ulcorner$CIDEAR$\lrcorner$ model is designed as the following six steps. $\ulcorner$Decision Theory Evaluation Model$\lrcorner$ is for setting and selecting the evaluation items according to the structured procedure of evaluation system. The priority of items is decided at $\ulcorner$AR Decision Model$\lrcorner$$\ulcorner$Cross Impact Estimation Model$\lrcorner$ is for computing the final probability of success and the result is used to revise the evaluation results of $\ulcorner$Decision Theory Evaluation Model$\lrcorner$. $\ulcorner$Resource Performance Analysis Model$\lrcorner$ classifies the proposed R&D projects on the basis of required resources and expected performance. Consequently, the possibility of bias of project selection can be prevented. $\ulcorner$Priority Oder Decision Model$\lrcorner$ is for computing the efficacy of proposed projects. Finally, $\ulcorner$Efficacy-Efficiency Cause Analysis Model$\lrcorner$ analyzes the structure of efficacy and efficiency of the projects. The major findings and significances of this study are summarized as follows: (1) $\ulcorner$CIDEAR$\lrcorner$ model can deal with the affairs of R&D projects having the characteristics of mutual independence as well as mutual dependence in the point of efficacy and efficiency. Hence, it is possible to evaluate and select R&D projects more accurately. (2) It can be possible to raise the possibility of projects success. R&D manager can use the information for project management because the efficacy-efficiency structure of selected projects can be analyzed. (3) We proved the usefulness of the constructed $\ulcorner$CIDEAR$\lrcorner$ model using an case about twenty-one R&D projects of a leading company of electronic industry in Korea.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.31-40
• /
• 2011

This paper explores and proposes the evaluation criteria of design projects in the entry-level design course. In the entry-level engineering design course the students proceeds various design projects to understand the concept of engineering design process and to develop the creativity. The evaluation criteria of design projects is very important component because the outcome of students in the engineering design course are effected from the evaluation criteria that enforces the students to focus on doing their task. According to this case study the evaluation criteria can be good solution to evaluate the design projects. By the outcome standard of ABEEK on the entry-level engineering design course the evaluation criteria was selected with the results of design projects such as design plan, report, handicrafts, objectives.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.542-550
• /
• 2020

하천은 이·치수 및 환경의 기능을 수행하며 국가의 생활과 문화의 발전에 기여한다. 현재 전국에는 5,937개의 하천이 존재하며, 각 부처 및 지자체에서는 하천유역을 개발 및 복원하기 위한 다양한 사업을 추진 중에 있다. 그러나 각 기관별로 사업의 평가절차 및 평가기법이 통일되지 않고 상이하게 이뤄지고 있음으로 인해 효과성 검증 및 사업 간의 비교와 같은 효율적인 평가가 어려운 실정이다. 이는 동일한 구간에 중복된 사업 수행으로 인한 예산의 과잉투자 문제를 불러일으킬 수 있으며, 추후 하천사업 계획 시 실패한 사업의 요소가 반복적으로 사용될 수 있다는 문제를 야기한다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 문제점을 인식하여 하천 관련 사업들을 표준적으로 평가할 수 있는 하천사업 사후 평가 틀을 개발하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 각 기관별 사업평가 기법과 국가R&D사업, 사회복지사업 등 다방면의 사업들을 비교·분석하여 사업 표준화 추진단계를 우선적으로 제시하였다. 또한 표준화 추진단계를 바탕으로 각 단계별 평가지표를 도출하여 하천 관련 사업을 표준적으로 평가할 수 있는 평가기법을 제시하였다. 최종적으로 시행 완료된 하천사업의 성공요인과 실패요인의 비교·분석을 통해 계획 중인 하천사업에 실패요소가 반복적으로 사용되는 것을 막을 수 있으며 사업의 효율성을 제고할 것으로 본다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.163-175
• /
• 2007

[ $ulcorner$ ]Cost-Effectiveness Analysis$\lrcorner$ has been wifely used to evaluate economic efficiency of R&D projects, but most of cost-effectiveness evaluation systems have some problems such as systematic method for setting and evaluating cost factors, estimation of single effect on each R&D project, and estimation of cross effects among R&D projects. To solve these problems, we have designed a new evaluation indicator called a $ulcorner$Cost-Cross Effect Integration Indicator$lrcorner$ including cross effects developed in this research. The major research findings are summarized as follows : (1) $ulcorner$Coist Estimation Model$lrcorner$, which estimates the cost factors divided into two classes of assembly product and system product and then integrates the total cost values, has been designed. (2) A new method for estimating parameters of cross effects among R&D projects has been developed. (3) $ulcorner$Cross Effects Estimation Model$lrcorner$ to estimate multi-effects and cross effects by completion time among several projects has been designed. (4) $ulcorner$Integration Estimation Indicator$lrcorner$ for setting priority on a project group has been extracted by combination of total cost value and total effect value.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.188-196
• /
• 2021

우리나라는 국가하천 관련 사업들에 많은 투자를 하고 있으나 하천사업이 완료된 후 사업의 실효성을 평가할 수 있는 평가기법이나 하천사업을 관리할 수 있는 시스템은 부재한 실정이다. 평가기법과 시스템의 부재로 하천공사구간 정보, 사업효과 분석, 사업 간 벤치마킹 등의 불가로 이어진다. 이는 동일 구간 유사사업 수행으로 인한 예산의 과잉, 중복투자 문제를 야기할 수 있으며 잘못된 사업요소가 반복적으로 활용될 수 있다. 이러한 평가기법 및 시스템의 부재를 해결하고자 본 연구에서는 하천사업 평가기법 개발 및 하천사업(공사)관리시스템 개발을 진행하였다. 평가기법의 개발은 사업 간의 비교·분석을 가능하게 하며, 유지관리 계획 수립 시 활용될 수 있다. 또한 시스템을 통해 공사정보 조회 및 공사구간의 시각화, 성과품 관리 등을 제공할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 선행연구를 통해 개발한 하천사업 평가기법을 수정·보완하였으며, 낙동강수계 국가하천인 A하천 ◯◯지구, B하천 △△지구 하천환경정비사업에 적용을 통해 실효성을 검증하였다. 또한 하천사업(공사)의 공정관리, 예산관리 등을 위한 시스템 구성(안)을 제시하였다. 본 연구에서 제시한 평가기법 및 시스템 활용방안을 통해 하천사업의 업무효율성 증대와 하천사업의 효율성을 제고할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국BIM학회 논문집
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.10-19
• /
• 2021

In the evaluation for ordering BIM-based projects (Design Build) of Korean National Railway, criteria of BIM-based smart construction technology are assessed. Unlike the existing assessment criteria, performance resources and detailed assessment guidelines have been added by this research. The purpose of this study is to propose qualification assessment standards according to specific guidelines when evaluating on the phase of bidding for BIM-based projects. In the study, an improved evaluation standard (draft) was arranged based on two consultation meetings and surveys of related companies, applied to existing projects with the companies that won the bid, and validated. As more specific and added criteria compared to the existing standards, it could reduce the difficulty of evaluation for BIM capability and lay the foundation for railway BIM-based project management.

• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회:발표자료
• /
• pp.369-385
• /
• 2001

A R&D project evaluation method has been applied for the national nuclear R&D projects in a developing-country setting. In the methodology, Saaty's analytic hierarchy process model is used to evaluate and rank of the selected nuclear R&D project which have a wide range of objectives and characteristics. The criteria used for evaluation related specifically to the Korea's evaluation needs and culture, and they are weighted according to their relative importance as perceived by the evaluator of the R&D project. As a real-world case of evaluation, we elicited and reproduced the evaluation process of the nuclear R&D projects which is going under the research process. As the results of the paper suggests, the methodology can be applied to the evaluation of the R&D projects and has much potential.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.35-44
• /
• 2012

Build-Transfer-Lease (BTL) was introduced to the domestic construction market in 2005. Now, seven years later, the BTL model is most active for educational facilities. In 2011, 93 educational facility projects entered the maintenance stage. Considering the characteristics of today's BTL projects for educational facilities, the main issues are the initial performance and maintenance of educational facilities and the service-providing status for the 20-year operational management period, in relation to providing safety and convenience to students, the facility users. Seeking a solution, local education offices and departments in charge of BTL under the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology have been exploring various methods of evaluating operational maintenance performance from various perspectives. For educational facility BTL projects, however, the appropriateness of initial operation performance evaluation, rather than considering the 20-year operational management period, is controversial in regards to sustainability. On this account, performance evaluation items in four areas-operational maintenance evaluation, facility performance status evaluation, maintenance subject evaluation, and sustainable change response evaluation-should be extracted. An indicator of facility performance evaluation is presented in this study through an AHP survey targeting experts, as part of establishing an operation performance evaluation system for educational facility BTL projects.