• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.48-60
• /
• 2000

An effort has been made in this paper to measure the project manager's reaction to R&D project evaluation and present the useful information related to rebuilding an R&D evaluation system. Results of this study show that project manager's reaction is related to the selection of reasonable items for evaluation, the rater's expertise, the project manager's participation in evaluation process and so on. Accordingly, managers of the research institute have to set up the evaluation system after deeply considering these results.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.79-89
• /
• 2007

This study suggests the applicability of an AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) to improve the validity and fairness of evaluation index to assess the defense core-technology R&D projects. This study focused on the design of the proposal and performance evaluation index to structure them into a hierarchy using AHP which can be applicable to take the opinion of the defense R&D experts. Using the refined evaluation index, we propose a technique to enhance the reliability of the defense R&D projects evaluation system.

• 한국식품위생안전성학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.125-141
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 비료나 수지의 원료물질로 알려진 멜라민이 최근 수입식품 및 가공식품 등에서 검출되어 국제적으로 문제가 되어 생체시료 중 멜라민의 분석법을 확립하고 벨리데이션을 실시하여 신뢰성을 확보하고자 하였다. 생체시료(뇨 및 혈액) 중 멜라민 및 시아누르산 분석을 위해 단백질 침전법, 액체상 추출법으로 불순물을 제거하였고 LC/MS를 이용한 멜라민 최적분석법의 벨리데이션 결과에서 검출한계는 0.2 ng/mL(멜라민), 2.0 ng/mL(시아누르산)이었으며 각 정량범위내의 직선성은 0.9990이상을 가졌다. 뇨및 혈 중 멜라민의 quality control 시료는 0.5 ng/mL, 0.8 ng/mL, 2.0 ng/mL, 3.0 ng/mL으로서 뇨 중 멜라민 및 시아누르산의 정확성은 91.6%-107.6%범위를 나타내었고 정밀성은 2.0%-11.8%으로 나타났다. 혈 중 멜라민 및 시아누르산의 정확성은 94.9%-119.0%범위를 나타내었고 정밀성은 3.7%-13.5%으로 나타났다. 또한, GC/MS를 이용한 멜라민 분석의 검출한계는 5.0 ng/mL(멜라민), 5.0 ng/mL(시아누르산)이었고, 뇨 및 혈중 멜라민의 quality control 시료는 10.0~40.0 ng/mL이었으며, 뇨 및 혈 중 멜라민 및 시아누르산의 정확성은 83.7%~ 10.7% 범위를 나타내었고, 정밀성은 3.5%-13.8% 으로 나타났다.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.73-82
• /
• 2008

This study has been analyzed to write an ideal training evaluation table after analyzing validity of content organization and assigning score of evaluating elements of clinical practice of Dept. of dental technology. 220 junior students who are studying dental technology in D university in Daegu were questioned to analyze the relationship of content organization and score of clinical practice evaluation table. The corrected material has been inspected by SAS V8 for Windows. The results are as following. 1. The validity of content organization of clinical practice evaluation table has a result which can be reliable over than 70% but the validity of score shows low reliance. c 2. The validity of content organization of detail elements of clinical practice evaluation shows that overuse of material and attentiveness(3.78) and responsibility (3.60) are high response but in score organization, the validity shows that safety measure(2.36) when controling machines, arrangement(2.98) after use and ability (2.98) of solving problems are very low. 3. In the elements without interpersonal relation, it shows that those are related to each other. its grading is p < 0.01 so it appears to be meaningful. 4. In result of analyzing the effect to 'studying amount' mark in clinical practice evaluation mark, it appears the element of attitude for job to affect it. And in result of analyzing the effect to 'training attitude' mark, it appears the element of 'controling machines' to affect it. For these results, to be a better evaluation tool, it should be modified by continuous research with arranging evaluation elements to be marked differently in between elements.

• 한국미생물학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국미생물학회 2001년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.131-137
• /
• 2001

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.129-149
• /
• 2018

기술금융은 금융당국이 금융산업 선진화, 중소기업발전을 위해 강력한 정책적 의지를 가지고 도입하여 시행하고 있는 분야이다. 이러한 배경으로 은행의 자체적인 기술평가가 2016년 9월부터 시행되었다. 기술우수기업은 기술평가과정에서 산출된 높은 기술등급으로 기존 신용등급이 상향되게 되며, 결과적으로 높아진 신용등급만큼 금융거래시 혜택을 받게 된다. 분석대상은 KEB하나은행이 2016년 9월부터 2017년 하반기까지 수행한 기술평가 대상 2,719개 업체를 분석하였다. 2016년 하반기 수행된 406개 업체에 대한 기술력평가 예비 연구에서 기존 신용등급과 산출된 기술등급을 결합한 결과, J58'출판업'의 기술신용등급은 신용등급대비 1.05등급 상향되어 상향정도가 가장 높았으며, C10'식료품 제조업'이 두 번째로 상향정도가 높았다. 이로써 기술력평가를 통한 수혜업종을 가려낼 수 있었으며, 업종별 기술 평가의 유용성을 확인할 수 있었다. 이에, 전체 수행기간동안 평가된 2,719개 업체에 대하여 기술력, 업력, 성장유망업종별 분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과 기술력 T-4이상 등급 업체들의 신용등급 상향정도가 가장 높았으며 5년 기준 업력에 따른 기술력평가의 유효성은 미미한 것으로 파악되었다. 정책지원의 효율성차원에서 지정된 성장유망업종에 해당하는 업체들을 대상으로 분석한 결과 일반기업대비 신용등급의 상향정도가 높아 성장유망업종 지원의 유용성을 확인할 수 있었다. 향후, 은행의 업체 발굴 또는 당국의 정책수립시에 T-4이상의 기술력 우수기업, 성장유망 업종에 집중하면 자금지원 효과를 극대화할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.87-113
• /
• 2007

For the realization of the national self-defense, the trend of the defense R&D projects becomes global and diverse with the increase of their budget. Thus, for the effective execution of the budget and the successful performance of the projects, the importance of selection, management and evaluation of the R&D projects is emphasized. This study suggests the applicability of a meta-evaluation model for the realization of the successful defense R&D project evaluation system. This study focused on the development of the meta-evaluation model design which can be applicable to the national defense R&D projects. Using the proposed meta-evaluation model, we propose a technique to enhance the fairness and the reliability of the national defense R&D projects evaluation system.

• 제어로봇시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.112-119
• /
• 2014

A force support system is composed of capital components such as combat equipments, supplies and so on to enable constant fighting power capability. Private technology level evaluation is on the rise as an important spin-on method in force support systems, which requires 92% of total munitions requirements, to obtain superior private technology. The evaluation of the private sector technology level on Korean force support systems has been conducted for the first time as follows: this research chose 38 items to be acquired within 2-3 years and grouped either identical or similar technology among those 38 items. A technology evaluating method was established based on the analysis of domestic and foreign technology level evaluations. Evaluation was performed by a Delphi survey from 180 private and military experts. To obtain an objective index and raise political availability, a technology system map and standard document were developed and applied to all 38 items.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.177-209
• /
• 2007

This work firstly aims to analyse the balance between tangibles and intangibles as well as among human capital, structural capital and relational capital of evaluation indicators for the research institutes in science and technology sector conducted in 2006, by adopting intellectual capital model. The research question of this work comes from that while the R&D activity can produce both tangibles and intangibles, there have no been methodologies to relevantly measure and rationally judge these, in particular, intangible performance. The result shows that the institute evaluation system in 2006 had given more weight on tangibles and structural capital than intangibles and other intellectual capitals such as human capital and relational capital, in comparison to the past evaluation system, even though, in principle, the current evaluation system has to deal with the intangible research performances as well as tangible ones in economic, social and cultural perspective. Finally, based on these analysis, I will try to suggest some policy directions for overcoming the deficits of indicators in institute evaluation system.

• 분석과학
• /
• 제24권5호
• /
• pp.345-351
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 LC-ESI-MS/MS를 이용하여 혈청 중의 피나스테라이드의 분석법을 확립하고, 밸리데이션을 통하여 분석방법의 타당도를 검증하였다. 혈청에 내부표준물질로 베클로메타손을 첨가한 후 methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)을 사용하여 액체상추출법(liquid-liquid extraction, LLE)으로 전처리하였다. LC-MS/MS의 양이온 모드에서 피나스테라이드와 베클로메타손의 MRM (multiple reaction monitoring) mass transition은 각각 m/z 373.2${\rightarrow}$305.2, m/z 409.3${\rightarrow}$391.2 이었으며, 머무름 시간은 각각 5.81분, 5.46분이었다. 피나스테라이드의 정량한계는 0.1 ng/mL로 나타났으며, 0.1~20.0 ng/mL의 농도 범위에서 검량선은 우수한 직선성($R^2$=0.9997)을 확인할 수 있었으며, 회수율은 80~83% 범위이었다. 피나스테라이드의 일내에 대한 정밀도는 6.3~10.6%, 정확도는 97.3~103.6% 범위이었으며, 연속 3일간 수행한 일간 정밀도는 0.8~5.2%, 정확도는 99.8~102.5%로 나타났다.