• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.59-71
• /
• 1996

Today, quality management is appearing as a critical issue in the field of health care service, partly because of increasing cost of health care. And qualified health care is also accepted as the right of clients, and the responsibility of health professions. So nursing profession can survive and develop only through the quality management of nursing practice like other health professions. Recently, Consumers of nursing service require the effectiveness and the efficiency of nursing practice. Effectiveness and efficiency of nursing practice can be accomplished by outcome evaluation. The focus of outcome evaluation in nurisng practice is on the change which occures in patient's health status with nurisng intervention. Evaluation of outcome is difficult because of some related problems which should be solved, or managed. These problems could be classified as problems of measurement, and attribution. To solve the problems and to evaluate the outcome in nursing practice more accurately, following tasks were suggested. 1) Outcome indicators, and outcome measurement tools should be developed. For these purpose, outcome variables that nursing interventions can contribute primarily should be found out. Also, outcome variables which are driven from nursing theories should be developed. 2) Outcome researches which can explain the effect of nursing care to patient outcomes should be performed. The outcome researches are the methods which can increase the power of nursing profession. 3) Models which can be used for the systematic and scientific quality management in nursing practice should be developed. The models should include outcome variables, and be able to explain the relationship between structure, process, and outcome aspects of quality management. 4) The method which can make patients participate in the evaluation process of quality of nursing practice should be devised. Because outcome evaluation is client-focused evaluation, the perspectives of patients should be emphasized, and reflected in the process of evaluation.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.155-173
• /
• 2015

Koreatech has adopted a long-term co-op program called IPP (Industry Professional Practice) to address problems in higher education of Korea since 2012, but it was anticipated to face many difficulties in implementing the program due to lack of relevant experiences in Korea. In this regard, a performance evaluation scheme was urgently required to judge the effectiveness of the Co-op program and improve the operational efficiency at the same time. This study aimed to develop comprehensive performance evaluation criteria for the co-op programs on the basis of Kirkpatrick's four-level performance evaluation model for training programs, and apply it to a real Co-op operation to test its feasibility. For this purpose, thorough review on the training program evaluation literature and in-depth analyses of overseas cases of co-op performance evaluation were conducted. Then, a set of Co-op performance evaluation criteria was developed and applied to the Koreatech's Co-op operation in 2013. Two Co-op student questionnaire surveys were administered before and after Co-op terms to measure students' reactions to the Co-op program (Level 1) and changes in participating students' attitudes and competencies (Level 2). In addition, employment rates of Co-op participating and non-participating students were compared (Level 4). The analysis findings showed that participating students were quite satisfied with their jobs and companies, and the Co-op program was effective to a certain degree at enhancing non-major competencies and attitudes to occupation of students. Together, the employment rate of Co-op participants, particularly in small- and medium-sized companies, grew significantly in comparison with that of non-participants. In the last part, several directions for improving the effectiveness of the Co-op programs were discussed.

• 한국실천공학교육학회논문지
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.98-103
• /
• 2012

우리나라에서 최초로 실행되는 한기대 IPP 제도는 실행과정에서 많은 어려움이 예상되며, 그 효과성 또한 아직 불확실하다. 따라서 한국형 IPP 제도의 실효성을 평가하고 프로그램 운영체계 및 과정에 대한 개선방안을 모색하기 위해 체계적인 성과평가모형의 개발이 절실하게 요구된다. 본 연구에서는 IPP 제도의 성과평가 방안을 Kirkpatrick의 4단계 평가모형에 기반하여 제시한다. 이를 위해 외국의 다양한 Co-op 평가사례를 분석하여 평가방법과 평가지표를 찾아내고, 이를 Kirkpatrick의 4단계(반응평가, 학습평가, 행동평가, 그리고 결과평가)에 매핑한다. 이러한 성과평가모형을 통해 IPP 프로그램의 성과와 문제점을 파악함으로써 고용노동부나 대학 내 학부 과 등 관련 이해관계자 집단들을 설득하고 지원을 얻는데 활용할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 IPP 제도의 효과를 극대화시키는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 예상된다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.250-260
• /
• 2022

Evaluating the effectiveness of educational programs involves measuring learning processes as well as outcomes. It is essential to study cohorts of students and graduates to evaluate the long-term effects of educational programs with data generated both during education and after graduation. The purpose of this study was to establish cohorts of students and graduates to evaluate their performance, thereby providing a basis for evaluating the social accountability of medical education. In this study, student and graduate cohorts were built for both students currently enrolled and graduates at Inje University College of Medicine (IUCM). A model involving the process of cohort establishment and an evaluation indicator framework was developed. In the process of cohort establishment, the following steps were conducted: defining the goals and objectives of the student and graduate cohorts, organizing a cohort committee, developing regulations, registering cohorts, acquiring consent, and building a database. A framework of evaluation indicators according to the graduate roles of IUCM was developed by adapting Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. Next, items to be collected in student and graduate cohorts were selected, and the current status of existing data was analyzed. Moreover, a preliminary analysis was conducted, including analyses of the evaluation indicators and graduates' performance. This study suggests that it is necessary to include additional evaluation indicators considering students' learning environment and well-being in student cohorts and to develop strategies or methods for graduates to continue participating in data collection for a long-term study.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.75-83
• /
• 2008

Purpose: Currently lung cancer ranks second in cancer for incidence rate and is a disease that ranks first for a death rate by cancerous growth because it is already advanced at the time of diagnosis. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the factors that affect the effectiveness of and rash occurrence by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (EGFR TKI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 100 patients, who took EGFR TKI (erlotinib, gefitinib) among patients who were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer in a Hospital in Korea between May 2005 and February 2008, was conducted. The drug effectiveness was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumor. Results: EGFR mutation was the only factor associated with drug response (complete response and partial response). When stable disease was added to drug response as the evaluation parameter, ECOG and rash as well as EGFR mutation were found to be important factors. Survival, however, was not affected by EGFR mutation. The factors influenced on survival were older age (${\geq}65$), low ECOG ($1{\sim}2$), adenocarcinoma and rash. In the case of rash, group with EGFR mutation or low ECOG showed significantly higher chance of occurrence. There was no significant difference in rash occurrence between gefitinib and erlotinib groups. Conclusions: Based on the results, EGFR mutation positive and low ECOG ($1{\sim}2$) were significantly important factors for both effectiveness of EGFR TKI and rash occurrence. Also, rash itself was found to be an independently significant factor for the disease control and survival. Therefore, while administering EGFR TKI, patients who have the factors associated with rash occurrence should be closely monitored for effective and safe drug therapy.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.65-89
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 파리선언(2005)의 개발효과를 평가하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 구체적으로 말하면, OECD/DAC가 78개의 개도국으로부터 수집한 2005~10년 기간의 자료를 이용하여, 파리선언의 여러 원칙이 독자적으로 또는 원조와의 상호작용을 통하여 1인당 국민소득의 성장에 기여한 정도를 평가한다. 본 연구의 결과에 의하면, 원조가 독자적으로 국민소득의 증가에 기여한 효과는 부정적이다. 그러나 건전한 정책과 제도가 있는 개도국 또는 파리선언의 몇 가지 원칙이 실시된 국가에서는 원조의 효과가 긍정적이었다. 파리선언의 다섯 가지 원칙 중에서 오직 원조가 개도국의 개발전략과 계획에 연계되어야 한다는 원칙이 적용된 경우와 원조공여국-수원국 상호 간에 상호책임의 원칙이 적용된 경우에는 원조가 경제성장에 긍정적이며 유효한 영향을 미쳤다는 것을 보여 준다. 따라서 파리선언의 원칙들이 원조의 효과성을 제고한다는 OECD의 주장은 오직 부분적으로만 실증된 셈이다. 원조와 파리선언의 개발효과에 관한 이러한 실증적 분석 결과는 건전한 제도나 정책이 경제성장에 중요하다는 경제학 문헌의 주장과 앞으로의 국제개발협력의 논의과제에 주는 의미가 크다.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.1137-1144
• /
• 2012

요즘 대부분의 대학들이 국제화를 목표로 재학생들의 어학능력 및 국제적 경쟁력 강화와 함께 영어강의의 중요성이 증대되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 강의평가점수를 이용해서 과목특성 변수들과 개인특성 변수들 별로 영어강의와 한국어강의의 효과성을 비교하였다. 또한 로지스틱회귀분석과 의사결정나무분석을 이용하여 어떤 요인들이 영어강의가 한국어강의에 비해서 효과적인지를 주효과와 상호작용효과 측면에서 분석하였다. 분석결과에 따르면 영어강의의 효과성에 영향을 미치는 변수로는 학년, 계열, 강좌규모, 평균평점, 계열, 전형방법 등으로 나타났다. 또한 영어강의 효과성이 특히 높은 그룹은 1학년이면서 인문계열인 경우, 그리고 1학년이면서 자연 및 예체능계열이고 평균평점이 높은 그룹이 높게 나타났다. 그리고 영어강의의 효과성 비율이 특히 낮은 그룹은 2-3학년 학생이면서 강좌규모가 크고 인문계열인 경우로 나타났다.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제11권6호
• /
• pp.562-568
• /
• 2008

현대의 물류는 파렛트를 활용한 일관운송체계로 변화하고 있다. 더불어 포장용기의 적재율과 타 수송수단과의 정합성을 높이려는 노력도 병행되고 있다. 이와 같은 일련의 추세는 물류의 효율화를 통한 물류비 절감이라는 명제에 기반을 둔다. 파렛트를 이용한 일관수송에서 기본이 되는 것은 포장의 단위이다. 개별 포장의 크기와 형태가 포장용기의 적재율을 최대화시키도록 하는 것이 관건이기 때문이다. 또한 포장용기는 이차적으로 수송수단의 적재함이나 보관시설 등 연관된 물류활용에 영향을 미치기 때문에 포장의 단위가 미치는 파급의 범위는 넓다. 본 연구의 목적은 포장모듈 표준화 사업의 효과를 평가하는 척도(MOE)를 선정하고 이를 반영한 평가모형을 개발하는데 있다. 선행연구의 사례와 타 학문분야의 계량화 방법 등을 토대로 포장모듈의 표준화가 물류산업에 미치는 영향을 파악하고 이를 계량화하는 방안을 제시한다. 연구의 방법론적 측면에서 볼 때 물류활동 부문별로 나타나는 포장모듈 표준화의 효과를 어떠한 방법으로 계량화하고 가중치를 두어 하나의 대표값으로 추출하느냐가 관건이 된다.

• International Journal of Human Ecology
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.65-74
• /
• 2010

Family professionals and family program staff need to consider the importance of program evaluation in Korea since an increasing number of Healthy Family Support Centers are providing diverse intervention and education programs. The purpose of this research paper is to (a) introduce a program evaluation model that includes the program life cycle; (b) help family professionals and family program staff understand the link between program implementation and evaluation processes; and (c) facilitate discussions in terms of program evaluation of Healthy Family Support Centers and evaluation roles of different levels of Healthy Family Support Centers including the headquarters, regional, and local centers. Understanding the program life cycle and relevant evaluation processes will help family professionals and family program staff be more strategic in answering critical questions about a program's effectiveness. The benefits of program evaluation and its implications are discussed.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.78-88
• /
• 2010

In this paper we develop a model for the performance evaluation of defense R&D test development projects based on analytic hierarchy process. First, evaluation indicators are collected through the related literature survey and a delphi inquiry method. Second, stepwise multiple linear regression is used for developing a hierarchical structure for analytic hierarchy process in the evaluation model, which can make the selected evaluation indicators of the hierarchical structure independent. Also we verify the effectiveness of proposed indicators of the performance evaluation by comparing with the existing evaluation indicators. The developed indicators for the performance evaluation is more reasonable and practical than the previous indicators on defense R&D test development projects.