• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권11호
• /
• pp.30-38
• /
• 2012

감성 분석은 블로그와 트위터 같은 다양한 소셜 미디어에서 사용자들이 표현하는 감정의 종류를 분석하고 추출하는 연구이다. 현재 감성 분석 연구는 꾸준히 계속되고 있지만, 한국어의 감성 분석 평가 집합은 아직 없다. 본 논문에서는 감성 분석을 평가할 수 있는 평가집합을 구축한다. 평가집합에서는 사용자의 감성에 대한 극성뿐만 아니라 감성의 종류와 강도까지 고려한 평가집합을 구축하였다. 이를 위해 감성의 종류는 긍정에서 7가지의 범주와 부정에서 15가지의 범주를 나누고, 각 범주별로 1~3까지의 강도를 설정하였다. 또한 각 범주에 속하는 어휘에 대해서도 1~3까지의 강도를 설정하였다. 평가집합의 데이터는 다양한 소셜 미디어에서 3,270 문장을 추출하여 구축하였으며, 각 문장에 대해 5 명이 감성의 종류와 강도를 태깅하였다. 구축한 평가집합에서 5명의 일치도는 극성의 경우 93 %, 감성의 종류는 70 %, 강도는 58 % 로 나타났다. 이는 독일어와 스페인어의 평가 집합 보다 일치도가 높게 나타났다. 이 결과는 제안한 평가 집합이 신뢰할 만한 자원으로 다른 감성 분석 시스템의 평가데이터로 사용될 수 있음을 보여준다.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.371-377
• /
• 1992

The purposes of the study were 1) to extend the cognitive categorization theory in an attempt to explain the of garment category, fashionability, and wearer's body types on impression formation, and 2) to find out structures of wearer's impressional dimension and wearer's professional image. The research included a quasi-experiment and survey. The experimental design was a $2^{3}$full factorial design of 3 independent variables. The experimental materials developed for the study were a set of stimuli and a response scale. The stimuli consisted of 8 drawings made by 3 independent variables (garment category, fashion level, wearer's body type). Result were as follows: 1) Garment category, fashionability and wearer's body type had significant effects on impression of the 5 factors-evaluation, potency, appearance, sociability and good-bad, with exception of wearer's body type which was nonsignificant to the potency factor. 2) Garment category was most effective on the evaluation and the potency. However wearer's body type was most effect on the appearance factor and fashionability variable was most effective on the good-bad factor. It was conclued that the results supported the cognitive categorization theory on impression formation and a cognitive categorization hypothesis of clothes.

• International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.191-202
• /
• 2023

This study aims to propose a framework for evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) services, based on the concept of AI service impact. It also suggests a model for evaluating this impact and identifies relevant factors and measurement approaches for each item of the model. The study classifies the impact of AI services into five categories: ethics, safety and reliability, compliance, user rights, and environmental friendliness. It discusses these five categories from a broad perspective and provides 21 detailed factors for evaluating each category. In terms of ethics, the study introduces three additional factors-accessibility, openness, and fairness-to the ten items initially developed by KISDI. In the safety and reliability category, the study excludes factors such as dependability, policy, compliance, and awareness improvement as they can be better addressed from a technical perspective. The compliance category includes factors such as human rights protection, privacy protection, non-infringement, publicness, accountability, safety, transparency, policy compliance, and explainability.For the user rights category, the study excludes factors such as publicness, data management, policy compliance, awareness improvement, recoverability, openness, and accuracy. The environmental friendliness category encompasses diversity, publicness, dependability, transparency, awareness improvement, recoverability, and openness.This study lays the foundation for further related research and contributes to the establishment of relevant policies by establishing a model for evaluating the impact of AI services. Future research is required to assess the validity of the developed indicators and provide specific evaluation items for practical use, based on expert evaluations.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.41-64
• /
• 2007

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to verify the validity of the evaluation indicators on safety and health education programs provided to Korean industrial workers, by developing further. Methods: To develop the early evaluation indicator, the secondary analysis was made on 'Survey on Industrial safety & health trends', the national wide survey data product by Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, as well as the various examinations on literatures. To validate such developed evaluation indicator, 13 safety and health managers in Focus Group discussion to prove the reliability of the contents were composed. To confirm the face validity, the interview with 6 industrial safety and health education experts was held to study the appropriateness of the content. With the cooperation from Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, the structured survey was performed with the safety and health managers from 588 businesses who participated in the education program for the later half of 2006. In this study, the number of responses was randomly divided into 1:1 two groups, in which one group was for the Exploratory Factor Analysis and the other group was for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Results: The results were as follows. First, for the Structure category, 18 evaluation indicators were developed into 4 evaluation categories such as a preliminary examination, education staff and organization, education environment and rules/ regulation. Secondly, the Activity category was comprised of 10 evaluation indicators with respect to 2 areas of curriculum satisfaction and program evaluation. Finally, for the Output category, 9 evaluation indicators were developed into 2 evaluation areas such as documentation and information share and education effects. Conclusions: The evaluation indicators developed through this study will possibly develop and be applied to evaluation tools on safety and health education program, which may further become the standardized indicators to better operate the industrial safety and health education programs.

• 암석학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.145-152
• /
• 2014

지질유산은 보전가치를 가지는 지질기록들을 총칭하며 지질유산의 보전을 위해서는 지질노두에 대한 조사와 평가가 수행되어야 한다. 각종 개발사업으로부터 지질유산이 훼손되는 것을 방지하기 위한 방안의 하나로서 지질노두에 대해 조사표와 평가표를 작성하여 데이터베이스를 구축함으로써 환경영향평가에 활용하도록 하는 방안을 제안한다. 지질노두 조사표의 내용은 조사지역, 분야, 세부분야, 위치, 규모, 특징, 사진 및 설명, 조사자로 구성되어 있다. 지질노두 평가표는 평가유형, 세부평가, 종합평가, 최종평가등급으로 구성된다. 평가유형은 학술, 교육, 경관으로 구분된다. 학술교육 분야는 대표성, 희소성, 다양성, 전형성을 세부항목으로 평가한다. 지형경관 분야는 특이성, 심미성, 자연성을 세부항목으로 평가한다. 최종평가등급은 5개 등급으로 구분되며 1등급은 보전가치가 가장 높은 등급으로 절대보전을 요한다.

• 동아시아식생활학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.363-371
• /
• 2015

This study investigated the effect and interrelationship of evaluation system in employee's job satisfaction at deluxe hotel kitchen in the Seoul area. The questionnaires developed for this study were distributed to 400 chefs during June to August, 2012. A total of 364 questionnaires were used for analysis (91.0%) and the statistical analysis was completed using PASW (SPSS) 18. The status of operating menu evaluation and menu development was analyzed by dividing the questionnaires into three categories: 'menu idea', 'menu evaluator' and 'menu evaluation system'. The 'menu idea' category showed the highest concern for 'Is the selected idea differentiated from competitors' menu?' (3.10 Likert scale), the 'menu evaluator' category showed the highest concern for 'Do the evaluator's individual factors affect menu evaluation?' ($3.88{\pm}0.96$), and the 'menu evaluation system' showed the highest concern for 'Is the menu commercialized by the menu evaluation system?' (3.32 Likert scale). Overall job satisfaction was studied into three categories: 'human field', 'material field' and 'evaluation field'. Overall satisfaction about one's job was 3.24 Likert scale. For satisfaction in each category, satisfaction for 'human field' was the highest with 3.30 Likert scale compared to 'material field' and 'evaluation field' with 2.76 Likert scale and 3.27 Likert scale, respectively. In conclusion, establishment of a unified evaluation system to improve employee's job satisfaction related to menu development is needed.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.147-159
• /
• 2000

The NIOSH health hazard evaluation program (HHE program) was created in response to the mandate to determine the toxic effect and potential health hazard of workplace exposure, which is found in Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, A primary benefit of HHE program is its ability to provide current health hazard data to employers and employees, which assists them in identifying solutions to occupational health and safety problems in their workplaces, The HHE program also stimulates research in the development and review of sampling methods and diagnostic tests and may prompt additional exposure assesment efforts and toxicological and epidemiological studies. HHE projects also provide human exposure-toxicity data that are used to asses the validity of existing occupational health standards and to support criteria for new standards of recommendation, The HHE request is classified into four categories: 1) category 1: As a administratively invalid, 2) category 2: These are valid requests for which a site visit is not essential to an appropriate response, 3) Category 3 : These are valid requests for which a site visit is necessary for an adequate evaluation, 4) These are valid request which present a complex problem or an opportunity for research, To carry out HHE program one or methods of investigation might be used: 1) direct observation and evaluation of production processes and employee work practices 2) employees exposure level and air contamination level 3) medical test or physical examinations of employees 4) private, confidential interviews with employees 5) review of employer's record of injuries and illness, employee exposure data, medical tests and job histories. After investigation and analysing the data, NIOSH issues a final report, giving finding and recommendation.

• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.74-83
• /
• 2006

The purposes of this study were to (1) identify the evaluation categories, areas, attributes, and criteria of the school food service program using both a qualitative and a quantitative analyses, (2) define the relative importance of the evaluation categories, areas, attributes, and criteria of the school food service program using analytic hierarchy process, (3) organize the evaluation system to improve quality of the school food service in Korea. A survey was conducted from August to October 2004 to collect data from 172 dietitians, 15 school food service officials at the educational board, 10 professionals of school food service. Statistical analyses were performed on the data utilizing the SPSS 12.0 for Windows and Excel, such as Descriptive statistics and analytic hierarchy process was performed. The result of the analytic hierarchy process indicated that relative importance of evaluation category was 0.4319 (food service manage ment), 0.2369 (nutrition education), 0.1455 (satisfaction) and 0.0912 (parent involvement program). 'Sanitation, safety and facility (0.1739)' was the most important area among the subcategories of food service management, followed by nutrition management (0.1581), procurement (0.1375), production (0.1345), organization and personnel management (0.0662), planning (0.0644), food service evaluation (0.0585), financial accountability (0.0555), and information management (0.0554). There existed a relative importance on the three areas of the nutrition program and satisfaction evaluation category: students (0.5281, 0.6221), parents (0.1812, 0.1491), and teachers (0.1838, 0.1618). In the parent involvement program evaluation category, relative importance of committee and monitoring management was 0.4658 and information communication was 0.3724. The quality of food and service to school children can be improved by the appropriate application of the developed evaluation tool for the school food service program.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.61-67
• /
• 2016

Purpose: Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (APCT) is frequently used as a diagnostic tool in trauma patients. However, trauma unrelated, incidental findings are frequently encountered. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalences of incidental findings on APCT scans in trauma patients. Methods: The archived records of 801 trauma patients treated from January 2013 to December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Six hundred and forty of these patients underwent contrast enhanced APCT in an emergency department and were included in this study, and 205 (32.1%) of these patients had incidental findings. These findings were divided into two categories: category I, meaning a radiological benign finding not requiring further evaluation or follow-up, and category II, requiring further evaluation and follow-up. Results: One hundred and sixty (24.8%) patients were allocated to category I and 45 (7.2%) to category II. The most frequent incidental findings were discovered in kidneys (34.6%), followed by liver (28.8%), and gallbladder (15.6%). The most frequent finding in category I was a benign cyst (60.1%), followed by a simple stone (15.6%), and hemangioma (11.9%). Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder (17.8%) was the most common lesion in category II, followed by atypical mass (15.6%), complicated stone (15.6%) and cystic neoplasm (15.6%). Conclusion: The prevalence of an incidental finding on APCT scans was 32.1%. Although category II lesions were not common in trauma patients, these findings should be communicated to patients, and when necessary referred to a primary care physician. Systems are required for producing appropriate discharge summaries and informing patients about the implications of incidental findings.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.382-390
• /
• 2018

본 연구에서는 국제기준 및 산업환경 변화에 따른 의료기기 품질경영 평가모델, 즉 의료기기 제조기업의 품질경영시스템의 인허가와 상시점검에 필요한 평가기준의 구성요소를 도출하고, 이를 평가도구로 의료기기 제조기업에 적용하여 실행수준의 평가 및 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 본 연구에서는 선행연구 검토, 전문가 면담조사에 따라 예비항목을 마련하고, 기획, 실시, 점검, 조치 등 4개 영역의 요인으로 대분류 항목을 정의한 후, 각각의 평가계층과 평가항목을 구성하였으며, AHP에 의한 가중치와 중요도를 산출하였다. 그 결과, 기획 요인에서는 책임의 명확화와 품질관리 목표설정의 항목, 실시 요인에서는 개별제품을 중심으로 한 요구사항의 관리 및 설계 개발 프로세스의 관리에 관한 평가항목, 점검 요인에서는 정보의 측정 분석에 대한 관리항목, 조치 요인에서는 인증기준 및 법규, 규제에 대한 검토항목이 상대적으로 중요하게 나타났다. 이에 도출된 평가모델을 평가도구로 삼아 의료기기 제조기업에 적용함으로써, 품질경영 실행수준의 평가와 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 조사 분석하였다. 연구대상 의료기기 제조기업들은 비교적 양호한 수준의 품질경영 실행수준을 보이고 있고, 이를 통해 일정수준의 경영성과를 얻고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 각 요인과 평가계층들이 대부분 경영성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 특히 의료기기 품질경영시스템은 인허가 취득이 주목적이지만, 인허가와 직접적인 관련이 없는 경영환경적 요소들이 중요하며, 기업 내 외부에서 이러한 요소들이 연계성을 갖고 통합적으로 운영되는 것이 효과적이라는 점을 알 수 있었다.