• Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.57-74
• /
• 2019

Researchers usually examine the quality of survey data by several conventional measures of reliability and validity. However, those measures are mainly designed to examine the quality of an individual measurement, rather than the quality of a data set as a whole. There is a relative lack of methods for evaluation of the overall data quality. This paper attempts to fill this gap. We propose using interviewers' assessments as one of criteria for evaluating the overall data quality. Interviewers are the ones who literally conduct and thus directly observe interviews. Taiwan's Election and Democratization Studies (TEDS) have required interviewers to assess how trustworthy the responses of each of their interviewees are, and to provide several descriptions about the process and environment of the interviews. We use this information to evaluate the data quality of TEDS surveys and compare it with the results from the conventional test-retest method. The findings are that the interviewer assessment is a fair indicator of the overall reliability of attitudinal questions but not a good indicator when factual questions are examined. Regarding the evaluation of data validity, more data is required to see whether or not interviewers' assessment is informative in terms of data quality.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.76-84
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation criteria for students' portfolios in an annual intramural contest. To accomplish the purpose, evaluation categories and their questions were developed after previous literature, ABEEK's evaluation guidelines, and eight Universities' evaluation forms were analyzed. Furthermore, experts' validity tests were completed by showing that the evaluation criteria form was validated with a mean score of 4.24. Also, the inter-rater reliability was turned out with a high score of .86. The interview results by evaluators of students' portfolios made the final version of evaluation criteria form include five evaluation criteria categories and their allotted score portions: overall organization(40), personal information(15), certificates and awards(5), curriculum(15), and extra-curriculum(15). The importance of overall organization was discussed from the perspectives of teachers as well as students.

• International Journal of Human Ecology
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.65-74
• /
• 2010

Family professionals and family program staff need to consider the importance of program evaluation in Korea since an increasing number of Healthy Family Support Centers are providing diverse intervention and education programs. The purpose of this research paper is to (a) introduce a program evaluation model that includes the program life cycle; (b) help family professionals and family program staff understand the link between program implementation and evaluation processes; and (c) facilitate discussions in terms of program evaluation of Healthy Family Support Centers and evaluation roles of different levels of Healthy Family Support Centers including the headquarters, regional, and local centers. Understanding the program life cycle and relevant evaluation processes will help family professionals and family program staff be more strategic in answering critical questions about a program's effectiveness. The benefits of program evaluation and its implications are discussed.

• 한국의류산업학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.338-350
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to analyze joint angle for a range of swing motion derived through 3D motion analysis in order to design the ergonomic golf wear, use it for evaluation method of apparel fit to improve exercise functionality and provide the basic materials necessary for designing clothes. In order to do this, the subjects for this study were 3 men of age 20s. The data for a range of motion of golf swing were collected by using equipment for 3D motion analysis and then were used for analysis of joint angles and evaluation method of apparel fit. Range of motion was derived through 3D motion analysis of golf swing motion and joint angles for items of joint motion item and of X, Y, and Z-axis were calculated, respectively. In order to set the evaluation questions for evaluation of apparel fit, to find a range of motion at the maximal value and the minimal value of swing motion. As a result, during the swinging motion, neck extension, right shoulder extension, right/left elbow extension, right/left elbow supination did not appear. Items of joint motion showing the maximum at range of each swing motion were applied into 55 questions and consisted. The results of this study were meaningful as a basic study to apply 3D motion analysis to the fashion industry. It's expected to be used to design functional clothing.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.164-174
• /
• 2010

이 연구의 목적은 중학교 과학 생물영역의 총괄 평가 문항의 평가 목표를 블룸의 신 교육목표분류체계에 따라 분류하여 평가 목표의 특성을 파악하는 것이다. 대구지역 중학교 25개교로부터 총 1,711개의 총괄 평가 문항을 수집하여 블룸의 신 교육목표분류체계에 따라 각 문항의 평가 목표를 분석하였다. 총괄 평가 문항을 지식과정 차원의 목표분류틀로 분석한 결과, 사실적 지식에 대한 평가를 목표로 하는 문항이 대부분(67.6%)을 차지하였다. 인지과정 차원에서 표본 문항의 평가 목표는 기억하는가를 평가하는 것이 가장 우세하였다(76.1%). 문항의 주된 평가 목표들이 블룸의 신교육목표 분류체계 중 특정 영역에 치우쳐 있었고, 동일한 분류체계로 수업 목표를 분류했던 이전의 연구 결과와 비교했을 때, 수업목표와 평가 목표의 분포에 차이가 있었다. 학년별 문항의 평가 목표 수준을 분석한 결과, 학년이 올라감에 따라 변하는 인지 수준을 고려하여, 평가 목표를 선정하여야 함에도 불구하고 문항의 평가 목표에서 학년별 차이는 발견할 수 없었다.

• 전자공학회논문지
• /
• 제52권7호
• /
• pp.169-177
• /
• 2015

본 논문에서는 다층 의사결정을 위한 퍼지 포괄 평가 빙식을 제안하고 평가 시스템을 구축하였다. 제안한 방법은 퍼지 포괄평가 방법과 엔트로피 가중치를 이용하여 주요 평가 항목에 대해서 입찰 전에 평가하는 방식이다. 주요 평가 항목은 중요 스포츠 이벤트 조직위원들의 광범위한 조사에 의해 구성되었다. 본 논문에서는 낮은 단계에서 높은 단계로 순차적으로 단일 인자에 대한 평가와 퍼지 포괄 평가가 수행되었다. 제안한 방식의 유용성을 확인하기 위해서 후보도시의 평가를 위한 스포츠 이벤트 관리 서비스 플랫폼을 구축하였다. 이 방법은 정량적 결과와 전문가의 판단에 근거한 정성적 결과를 통합하여 출력한다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.1159-1163
• /
• 2013

International meetings on various aspects of cancer- its etiology, its diagnosis, its treatment, its palliation, and its prevention and control are held frequently. Many have similar themes, and many seek and receive the same speakers and audiences. A fundamental question arises: what difference does any individual meeting/congress/conference make or add to our understanding of the relevant issues? While many meetings conduct evaluations at the end of the Congress, few use evaluation as a tool to guide design, implementation, and evaluation of both short and long term impacts, and address the question of "what difference did the Congress make". The International Cancer Control Congresses, which are held biennially in different regions of the world, took the opportunity to use evaluation in this way, and ask the relevant questions. This paper describes that evaluation session of the ICCC4, held in Seoul, Korea in November 2011, which was part of the larger evaluation issue.

• 정보처리학회논문지:컴퓨터 및 통신 시스템
• /
• 제12권10호
• /
• pp.291-298
• /
• 2023

본 논문에서는 정보·컴퓨터 표시과목의 임용시험에서 프로그래밍 문항이 프로그래밍 능력을 겸비한 교사 선발에 적합한지 연구하였다. 최근 5년 동안의 문항을 분석한 결과, 프로그래밍 문항의 평균 배점이 교과내용학 총점의 38%(20.8점)로 높게 나타났다. 기출문항에서 프로그래밍 문항의 배점 비중이 높은 과목은 프로그래밍과 자료구조로 확인되었으며, 이들의 평가영역별 배점분포를 분석한 결과 각각 0%~47%, 0%~53%로 영역별 편차가 큰 것으로 나타났다. 본 논문에서는 프로그래밍 문항이 교육 현장에서 요구하는 교사 선발에 적합한지 교사 31명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 임용시험의 프로그래밍 문항에서 평가할 내용에 대한 응답으로 컴퓨팅 사고력이 58%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 문항의 적합도에 대한 응답에서 문제해결력이 5점 척도 기준에서 2.84로 가장 높았으나 전반적으로 적합도가 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 프로그래밍 문항 출제를 위해 적합한 언어로 C언어와 파이썬의 응답이 각각 55%, 45%로 나타났다. 이 결과에서 교사들은 기존의 C언어 외에 파이썬 선호도가 매우 높은 것을 확인하였다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 연구결과를 바탕으로 프로그래밍 문항 출제에 대한 개선방안을 제안하였다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.193-219
• /
• 2015

온톨로지의 평가는 잘 구축된 기존 온톨로지와 비교하는 방법, 활용될 애플리케이션에 적용해보는 방법, 원천데이터와의 적합성 관련성을 판단해보는 방법을 통해 이뤄지고 있다. 이와 같은 방법론은 온톨로지를 통해 얻게 된 결과에 치중되어 온톨로지의 체계, 의미표현, 상호운용성과 같은 내재적인 영역의 평가에 어려움이 있다. 본 연구는 온톨로지 전문가를 통해 온톨로지 품질평가를 위한 항목을 도출하였다. 문헌조사를 통해 온톨로지의 내재적 평가를 위한 범주를 추출하였고, 각 범주에 대한 평가항목을 델파이조사를 통해 전문가들에게 수집한 뒤, 수집된 평가항목을 재검증하였다. 그 결과, 처음 수집된 70개의 평가 항목에서 최종적으로 53개의 평가항목을 선정하였다. 또한 수집된 평가항목을 온톨로지 평가에 활용하여 봄으로써 평가항목의 신뢰도를 측정하였다.

• Journal of Acupuncture Research
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.105-114
• /
• 2022

Background: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is used in the colleges of Korean Medicine, but few studies have validated the OSCE evaluation criteria or post-education questionnaires. Diagnostic ultrasound is used in Korean medicine treatment including acupuncture, acupotomy, and pharmacopuncture to increase the safety and efficacy of treatment. We aimed to develop and validate a OSCE checklist and questionnaire for diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound training. Methods: A OSCE checklist and rubric for diagnostic ultrasound training, and questionnaire was developed using literature research. Eight expert panelists verified each draft item in a single-round survey. Items with a content validity ratio (CVR) < 0.75 were excluded or modified to reflect the experts' opinions. Results: The OSCE checklist and rubric for diagnostic ultrasound training focusing on volar wrist and carpal tunnel syndrome included: 15 items revised according to CVR and expert opinions, the pre-examination procedure, structures to be identified by ultrasound, scans with 2 diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome, an explanation of the exam results, and the post exam procedure. The questionnaire consisted of 15 items, including the overall evaluation of training, the effect of the OSCE, and the perception of the ultrasound. All 6 self-evaluation items were not revised, as they had a CVR of ≥ 0.75. Conclusion: An ultrasound OSCE for scanning the volar wrist and diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome was developed using 15 validated tasks, 15 survey questions about ultrasound training, and 6 questions for self-evaluation. These results may be used in the future for education in diagnostic ultrasound.