• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.203-224
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation perspectives of IT business value and empirically analyze the differences of evaluation perspectives between ex ante evaluation and post implementation evaluation, and among various information system types. 4 evaluation perspectives which have been used in the previous studies and in the field of industry practices are financial, customer, internal process, and growth, which are based on the BSC model. Data of 98 information systems have been collected from 89 companies including manufacturers, banks, insurances, and stock trading companies. As results of multi-way MANOVA test, 3 out of 8 hypothesis have been accepted statistically. While the order of importance of 4 perspectives in ex ante evaluation is customer, financial, internal process, and growth, the order of post implementation evaluation appears to be much different : that is, internal process, customer, financial, and growth. These findings provide insights for both IT practitioners and researchers.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.117-154
• /
• 2006

This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the current institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRIs). Under the current evaluation systems, twenty GRIs are grouped into three Research Groups and each Group has its own evaluation systems. One problem of the current institutional evaluation systems is that the systems cannot reflect individual GRIs' characteristics. The following methods are used. First, based on four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton(1992)'s Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model, six perspectives appropriate to GRUs' characteristics are derived. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI Research Groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRIs' evaluatees are asked to allocate appropriate weights on the performance measures. Evaluatees' weights of a GRI are compared with average weights of the related Group. Finally in every BSC's perspective, GRIs that have extraordinarily over-scored or under-scored weights are analyzed in terms of GRIs' missions, customers, capability of human resources, etc. In the Basic Research Group, the Korea Basic Science Institute is deviated in the financial perspective and the strategic direction perspectives. In the Public Research Group, Korea Institute of Construction Technology is significantly different from other GRIs in three perspectives. Five out of eight GRIs in the Industrial Research Group, GRIs are significantly different each other in several perspectives. It could be concluded that the current institutional evaluation systems are least appropriate in measuring performance of the GRIs of the Industrial Research Group.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.1087-1116
• /
• 2005

This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRI). Research methodology is as follows: first, four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton (1992) Balanced Scorecard Model are revised into six perspectives suitable to GRI's characteristics. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI evaluation groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRI's evaluatees are asked to allocate ideal weights on the performance measures. The evaluatees' weights are compared with the weights of current performance measures, and the characteristics of evaluatees' opinions about current performance evaluation systems are analyzed. Results are as follows; first, six perspectives for Korean GRIs are financial, long-term outcome, short-term outcome, strategic direction, project management, human resources perspectives. second, GRI evaluation systems put the most weights on the long- and short-term outcome perspectives and the least weights on the financial perspective. This result complies with theoretical model: in performance evaluation of GRIs, the customer perspective is the most important one while the financial perspective is the least important one. Third, evaluatees think that the long-term outcome perspective of the Basic-technology GRI group and the short-term outcome perspective of the Applied-technology GRI Group needs more weight. Fourth, it is found that the current systems have more weights on the project management and strategic direction perspectives than evaluatees think. The possible explanation of this result would be that since the measures of these perspectives are relatively easier to set up than those of other perspectives, the current systems contains larger number of measures and, accordingly more weights.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.61-77
• /
• 2013

본 연구의 목적은 교과서 평가기준에 반영된 교과 관점의 중요성을 탐색하고, 현재 실과(기술 가정) 교육과정에 제시된 관점과 교과서 평가기준과의 관련성과 더불어 향후 교과서 평가기준을 방향을 설정하는 것이었다. 따라서 본 연구의 내용은 실과(기술 가정) 교과서 평가기준을 분석하고, 교과서 평가기준에서의 교과 관점의 의미를 탐색하며, 2007 개정 교육과정 및 2011 개정 교육과정에 지속적으로 제시된 교과 관점을 도출하고, 교육과정과 교과서 평가기준에서 강조하고 있는 관점의 관련성을 분석하며, 마지막으로 향후 교과서 평가기준 개발 방향을 제시하는 것을 포함하고 있다. 교과서 평가기준은 교과서 개발을 위한 교과관점을 제공하고, 교과의 주요 개념과 가치를 전달하며, 교사교육의 방향을 제시해 줄 수 있다는 점에서 중요한 의미를 가진다. 본 연구에서 교육과정 분석을 통해 도출된 교과 관점들은 관리역량, 생활역량, 실천적 경험, 개인과 가족을 이해하기 위한 통합역량, 생활문제해결, 그리고 진로 및 생애설계이다. 향후 국가 수준의 교육과정에서 제시된 교과 관점들에 터하여 교과서 평가기준의 항목들을 개발할 필요가 있으며, 학습 자료 평가기준뿐만 아니라, 교수 학습 방법, 교사 활동 평가 등 다양한 평가 틀에 교과 관점들이 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.265-293
• /
• 2005

This research examines the relationship between the characteristics of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRI) and their institutional performance evaluation system. First, based on Kaplan & Norton (1992) Balanced Scorecard Model, six perspectives suitable to Korean GRI are derived. Second, personnel who works on evaluation job classified current performance measures into the six perspectives. Analyzing comparative weights of individual perspectives, the characteristics of performance evaluation systems among institutes are derived and compared with their missions. The results are as follows: First, GRI evaluation systems put most weight on the customer perspective and least weight on the financial perspective. This result complies with Korean GRI's missions and strategies as well as findings of foreign cases. Second, Basic-technology GRI group relatively more priotizes long-term customer perspective, while Applied-technology GRI Group relatively more priotizes short-term customer perspective. Public-technology GRI Group is located in the middle in terms of priority of customer perspectives. Third, for three yews (2000-2002), performance measure weights of Basic-technology Group are changed much less than those of the other two groups. Further research are needed for reasons of drastic changes for Applied-technology and Public-technology groups and some abnormally high and low measure weights.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.83-95
• /
• 2018

본 논문은 민간투자사업의 특수성을 반영한 성과평가 모델 개발을 목적으로 한다. 성과평가 모델 개발을 위해 첫째, 문헌연구를 통하여 민간투자사업 주요 관점과 관점별 성공항목을 정의하고, AHP 설문조사를 통하여 가중치를 산정하였다. 둘째, 민간투자사업 성과에 영향을 미치는 핵심 성과요인을 도출하고, 이를 평가할 수 있는 평가항목을 제안하였다. 셋째, 관점별 성공항목과 평가항목을 매칭함으로써 민간투자사업 성과평가 모델을 구축하였다. 성과평가 모델 개발과 적용을 통해 민간투자사업 이해관계자 사이의 첨예한 관점의 차이가 존재함을 파악할 수 있었다. 이는 다양한 이해관계자의 관점을 균형있게 반영한 민간투자사업의 종합적인 평가의 필요성을 보여준다. 본 연구에서 제시한 성과평가 모델의 평가 결과와 기존의 건설공사 사후평가 결과를 비교해보면, 본 연구의 평가 점수가 이용자 만족도 조사 결과와 유사하다. 건설공사 사후평가에 비해 본 연구의 평가모델은 다양한 이해관계자의 만족도 및 관점을 반영하였기 때문으로 판단된다. 본 연구에서 개발한 성과지표의 결과를 통해 다양한 관점을 고려한 민간투자사업의 성과를 측정할 수 있으며, 어떠한 성공요인 및 평가항목이 프로젝트 성공에 영향을 미치는지 파악할 수 있다. 또한, 본 모델의 프로세스를 기반으로 주요관점 및 성공항목의 가중치 변화와 평가항목의 가감을 통해 도로 시설물을 제외한 민간투자사업 프로젝트에도 적용이 가능할 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.97-115
• /
• 2009

This study proposes a framework for an evaluation and selection of a venture firm with promising new technology in optical electronics industry to nurture that firm. The framework is intended to help practitioners to evaluate accurately and objectively new technologies. In addition, this study tests the usability and effectiveness of this framework with an actual certain case. More specifically, this study, first proposes that the framework for new technology evaluation is composed of financial perspective, market perspective, internal business perspective, and R&D and growing perspective. They are on the four perspectives of BSC(Balanced Score Card). Each perspective contains specific items. In addition, this study uses AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) to assess the comparative importance among the four perspectives and their specific items. Secondly, based on the results of AHP, the usability and effectiveness of the framework suggested in this study have been tested with a real case evaluating and selecting a promising venture firm. The results of the study have the following implications: this study has developed the framework for new technology evaluation which assists practitioners. Our framework offers the four perspectives and their specific items with their respective comparative importance. Furthermore, this study has verified that the proposed framework can be applicable in real situation with more accurate results.

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2004년도 Proceedings of the Convention of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea Vol.2
• /
• pp.127-127
• /
• 2004

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한예방의학회 1994년도 교수 연수회(역학)
• /
• pp.332-335
• /
• 1994

Compared to other variables being considered in therapeutics, patient compliance has long been given minor attention although it affects every aspect of medical care; Limited methodology of compliance measurement, in particular, has hampered major progress in research, and pre-conceptions have been reiterated. However, there is a recent surge in interest derived from new data revealed by reliable methods, i.g. continuous medication (compliance) monitoring. The visualization of dynamics in drug regimen compliance over time offers unique opportunities, both to scientific drug evaluation and therapeutics in medical practice. New perspectives related to the descriptive and explanatory side of the problem are outlined by giving examples from various therapeutic fields.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.81-87
• /
• 2017

Performance evaluation has been done using financial indices which are generally regarded as inappropriate for the organizations which are innovative and progressive. Thus, the Balanced Scorecard(BSC) was developed considering long term performance and invisible performance. This BSC has four perspectives of finance, customer, internal operation, and learning. Based on the BSC, a new BSC has been derived with a fifth view of environmental and social perspective, which is now called as a Sustainability BSC. In this study, we evaluated Green IT initiatives using the Sustainability BSC. The initiatives are categorized as RFID, telepresence, paperless office, logistics management etc. The initiatives were evaluated from the view of five perspectives, resulting in high cor relationships among finance, internal operation, and environmental and social perspectives. Namely, good initiatives from the view of environmental/social perspective are also evaluated as good from the view of finance and internal operation perspectives. In this study, we recommend organizations to introduce Green IT initiatives by showing how Green IT initiatives have contributed to the organizations.