• 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.107-121
• /
• 1995

The goal of this study was to establish the evaluation method, which consist of the principle, factor, procedure and checklist, on environmental camp program and then to support staffs of environmental camp for decision-making to improve pre-program and develop new one. The main principles of the evaluation method established in this study were Hierarchical holism and Open inter-communication. First, hierarchical holism focused at the interaction among six factors, which were divided by 3 steps : 1) goal(and objectives) 2) learners and sites 3) activities, staffs and media. Second, open inter-communication could be defined a feedback process among all program participants : manager, staff, teacher, volunteer, learner and so on. The evaluation checklist had been developed of 10 comprehensive items and 30 factor-items at the preliminary step but some items were assessed some complex or duplicate in the result of 3 case studies. The suggested checklist was diminished to 5 comprehensive items and 25 factor-items. Several alternatives, which included specifing learners and objectives, developing site-oriented program and establishing the evaluation sheet were suggested for improving environmental camp program.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.135-143
• /
• 2010

VJ 제작 방송프로그램의 편성이 늘고 있는 시점에서 각 방송사의 프로그램 평가가 객관적 결과를 도출할 수 있느냐에 의문을 갖고, 제작시스템의 변화를 고려한 새로운 맞춤형 프로그램 평가방법을 제안하였다. 제안한 품질평가의 항목들은 VJ 방송프로그램의 제작완성도 평가차원의 새로운 모델을 제시하며, 현재의각 방송사의 프로그램 평가방법을 개선하는 데 활용될 수 있다. VJ 방송프로그램의 문제점을 파악해낼 수 있는 항목의 도출을 위해 1차 실험으로 방송현장의 PD, VJ, 학계 교수 등 각 10명씩 총 30명으로 전문가그룹을 선정하여, VJ 방송프로그램의 평가항목을 선정하기 위한 실험을 실시하였다. 그 결과 평가항목 중요도 분석결과를 근거로 총 9항목으로 VJ 프로그램 품질평가 항목을 설계하였다. 또한, 제안한 평가척도를 검증하기 위한 2차 실험을 실시하였다. 실험결과, 제안한 품질평가방법의 신뢰도가 .939로 나타나 의미를 부여할 수 있으며, 품질평가 항목의 선정에 있어서 VJ 방송프로그램만을 고려하여 평가한 새로운 품질평가척도로서 유의미한 결과를 갖는다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.219-230
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 해양치유단지의 조성을 위한 입지평가에 대한 연구로서 평가항목 및 평가지표를 도출하고 평가방법을 제안하였다. 입지평가를 위한 평가항목과 평가지표를 정하기 위해 해양치유단지 해외사례를 조사하고 선행 유사사업의 입지평가사례를 분석하였다. 정부의 해양치유산업 관련 정책 및 지자체 사업계획 등을 고려하여 3개 대분류 평가항목, 8개 중분류 평가항목, 5개 소분류 평가항목, 26개 평가지표를 정하였으며 각 평가지표별 평가기준을 정하였다. 평가방법은 먼저 전문가로 구성된 평가위원회에서 평가항목별 가중치를 부여하고 다음으로 각 평가위원이 개별 평가지표에 대해 가중치와 점수를 부여하여 평가점수를 산정한다. 이 평가점수에 평가항목별 가중치를 곱하여 평가지표별 최종점수를 정하고 모든 평가지표의 최종점수들을 합하면 각 평가위원의 평가점수가 되며 평가위원들 평가점수를 산술평균하면 대상지 입지평가결과가 된다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.47-57
• /
• 2015

In this research, an attempt was made to approach social sustainability of residential environments that have been studied thus far in community-oriented research in a broader perspective, with the aim to induce evaluation indicators for social sustainability of a residential environment that is oriented for enhancement of the residents' life quality. First, evaluation system of social sustainability of residential environments is divided into 6 areas that include regionality, diversity, fairness, satisfaction of diverse needs, social exchange, and participation and decision making. A subdivision was also introduced to account for evaluation properties by area. Second, regarding measurement of life quality in a residential environment, the scope of evaluation was divided into residential environment dimension, resident dimension, and management dimension which can incorporate both objective evaluation and subjective evaluation in consideration of the fact that it involves both physical environment and socio-psychological elements. Third, evaluation indicators by area were collected based on an analysis of preceding studies. For the purpose, a total of 193 indicators were extracted, including 28 items of regionality area, 26 items of diversity area, 28 items of fairness area, 58 items of satisfaction of diverse needs, 34 items of social exchange area, and 19 items of participation and decision making area. The kind of evaluation indicators have meaning in that it can be used as an evaluation tool of social sustainability that can be applied universally from the planning stage. It can be utilized as a basic data for enhancement of life quality and promotion of social values in a residential environment.

• 의료ㆍ복지 건축 : 한국의료복지건축학회 논문집
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.25-37
• /
• 2011

As International considerations about the Barrier-Free environment increase, Korean Barrier-Free Environment Certification System has operated since 2008 in Korea. The purpose of this study is to find way to improve evaluation items, so this study analyzed the result of examination certified facilities and investigated the importance of the evaluation item for conducted a questionair survey with the BF experts. As a result, a lower scored and high important item should assign a higher score or lower the difficulty level, so induces applicants to be certified. Second, a higher scored and lower important item should assign a lower score or increase the difficulty of evaluating. The results suggested are expected the use in the improvement direction of BF certification evaluation items.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.177-203
• /
• 1997

This study concerns performance evaluation of the research-funding agencies focused on Korea Science and Engineering Foundation(KOSEF). On the basis of the constituents approach and the systems approach of organizational effectiveness theory, the evaluation items are derived reflecting generic characteristics of the research-funding agencies, and their priorities are determined using analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Three groups of constituents with differing interest and expections are identified, and their perceptions on the importance of the evaluation items are measured through questionnaire survey. Analyses show that the evaluation items perceived important by each constituency are significant different from one another. The implications of the result to the Government and KOSEF are discussed.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.177-177
• /
• 1989

This study concerns performance evaluation of the research-funding agencies focused on Korea Science and Engineering Foundation(KOSEF). On the basis of the constituents approach and the systems approach of organizational effectiveness theory, the evaluation items are derived reflecting generic characteristics of the research-funding agencies, and their priorities are determined using analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Three groups of constituents with differing interest and expections are identified, and their perceptions on the importance of the evaluation items are measured through questionnaire survey. Analyses show that the evaluation items perceived important by each constituency are significant different from one another. The implications of the result to the Government and KOSEF are discussed.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.65-84
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to develop Meta Evaluation Indicators for Defense R&D Programs in Korea. At first, the four components of this meta evaluation model were designed, which are evaluation context, evaluation input, evaluation process and evaluation outcome. And fifty two indicators for this meta evaluation were developed by experts who performed evaluations for Defense R&D Programs. The reliability of components and items was verified by Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ coefficient. It was over 0.6 in all areas. The validity of components and items was verified by Factor Analysis. Analytic Hierarchy Process method was used in assigning the evaluation weight. The survey of twenty two evaluators participated in Defense R&D Programs showed that the Consistency Ratio was under 0.1 in evaluation components and items. In this study, an objective and reasonable set of Defense R&D Meta Evaluation Indicators was developed to increase the responsibility of Defense R&D Programs and improve the quality of evaluation results.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.171-189
• /
• 2011

KAs information and knowledge are increasingly becoming more important in the knowledge-driven society, knowledge management, as a very important management paradigm, is securing firm position in private and public sectors. Complying with this paradigm, government-funded research institutes in science-technology sector are actively utilizing knowledge management by employing knowledge management system and evaluating its applications' performance. The purpose of this study is to develop evaluation items and measurement indices to rationally measure knowledge management performance of the government-funded research institutes and to verify the feasibility of applying these evaluation items and indices. To achieve this research goal, the evaluation model of knowledge management performance was constructed by reviewing and integrating the existing studies, and subsequently, evaluation areas, evaluation items, measurement indices were derived from this evaluation model. Also, the feasibility analysis on the evaluation items and measurement indices was performed by means of FGI(Focus Group Interview) with the knowledge management experts belonging to Korean government-funded institutions in science-technology sector. The implications of this study are as follows : in theoretical perspective, this study has proposed a criterion frame to evaluate knowledge management performance, and has rationally drawn evaluation items and measurement indices from the criterion frame. And in practical perspective, this study has improved the validity and practicality of the measurement indices, which can lead to more reasonable and easier evaluation of knowledge management performance of the government-funded research institutes.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제20호
• /
• pp.40-47
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this study was to identify design evaluation items for assisted living facilities for the elderly. To achieve this purpose, the 23 design issues in assisted living facilities were examined through literature analysis. Then, the field studies were carried out by using these items and by asking open questions, or any other suggestions for unexpected, but important design issues in their facilities. The field studies were conducted through interviews with several residents and surveys with staff in six selected assisted living facilities in Cincinnati, Ohio. Finally, the 23 design evaluation items for assisted living facilities were identified. These items can be used as evaluation criteria or design guidelines for assisted living facilities.