• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제49권2호
• /
• pp.27-49
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to suggest an appropriate index for evaluating preferences of Web contents by examining the h-index and its variants. It focuses on how successfully each index represents relative user preference towards topical subjects. Based on data obtained from a popular IT blog (engadget.com), subject values of the h-index and its variants were calculated using 53 subject categories, article counts and the 'Likes' counts aggregated in each category. These values were compared through critical analysis of the indices and Spearman rank correlation analysis. A PFNet (Pathfinder Network) of subjects weighted by $h_T$ values was drawn and cluster analysis was conducted. Based on the four criteria suggested for the evaluation of Web contents, we concluded that the $h_T$-index is a relatively appropriate tool for the Web contents preference evaluation. The $h_T$-index was applied to visually represent the relative weight (topic preference by user 'Likes' count) for each subject category of the real online contents after suggesting the relative appropriateness of the $h_T$-index. Applying scientometric indicators to Web information could provide new insights into, and potential methods for, Web contents evaluation. In addition, information on the focus of users' attention would help online informants to plan more effective content strategies. The study tries to expand the application area of the h-type indices to non-academic online environments. The research procedure enables examination of the appropriateness of the index and highlights considerations for applying the indicators to Web contents.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.491-505
• /
• 2020

연구 목적은 군 교육 프로그램인 그린캠프를 평가할 수 있는 평가지표를 개발하는 것이다. 이러한 목적으로 CIPP 평가모형을 활용하여 평가지표 개발과정을 단계화해서 진행한 연구의 결과를 요약하면 아래와 같다. 첫째, 프로그램 평가 관련 문헌연구, 그린캠프 현장 실태 조사, 전문가 토의를 통해 평가 고려요소를 도출하고 CIPP 평가모형 4개 영역의 예비 평가영역과 항목을 구성하였다. 둘째, 예비 평가항목으로 1차 설문을 수도방위사령부 그린캠프와 장병을 대상으로 조사하여 예비 신뢰도·타당도를 검사하고, 전문가 포커스 그룹 토의로 평가지표를 보완하였다. 셋째, 강원도 지역 4개 대대를 방문하여 2차 설문 조사하고, 12개 군단별 간부와 그린캠프 관련자를 대상으로 3차 조사하여 SPSS 24 통계 프로그램으로 기술통계 분석, 탐색적 요인 분석, 상관관계 분석으로 검증하였다. 넷째, 타당도 검증을 거쳐 16개 평가영역과 36개 평가지표를 결정하였다. 다섯째, 개발한 36개 평가지표를 57개 지표로 세분하고 정책전문가로 델파이 조사하여 43개 지표로 일반화하였다. 이 단계화된 연구의 의의는 정책 시행·추진과정에서 과학적 평가(지표) 개발 및 제도화에 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.83-92
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to develop a publicness evaluation index for indoor privately owned public spaces (POPS). In order to develop the index, 10 cases of indoor POPS in New York City were analyzed using Visibility Graph Analysis by evaluating its accessibility and visual openness. The results are as follows; (1) Accessibility and openness of indoor POPS were higher compared to other public spaces on the first floor. (2) Cases with high accessibility index installed a higher number of entrances. (3) Cases with high openness index were mostly composed of a glass wall. (4) The publicness index was high when the lobby and the indoor POPS are shared. (5) Atrium types were highly utilized and the evaluation index was also high whereas, linear types were less utilized and the evaluation index was lower.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제14권7호
• /
• pp.3528-3537
• /
• 2013

비정형 건축곡면의 패널분할 최적화 정도를 평가하기 위한 여러 가지 최적화 평가기법들이 개발되어 적용되고 있으나 이러한 평가기법과 평가지표들은 독립성, 보편성을 확보하고 있지 못하다. 그러므로 본 연구에서는 비정형곡면 패널분할 최적화 평가기법 및 평가지표에 관한 사례 및 선행연구 고찰을 통한 독립성 및 보편성이 확보되는 비정형 곡면 패널분할 최적화의 정량적 평가를 위한 평가항목 추출과 평가지표의 제안이 이루어진다. 제안된 세 가지 패널분할 최적화 평가항목은 원형 충실도, 생산 용이성, 연속성이며, 원형 충실도를 위한 평가지표로는 곡면 일치, 생산 용이성을 위한 평가지표로는 평면성, 평면 패널 비율, 연속성을 위한 평가지표로는 접선 연속성, 사이 간격이 제안되었으며 그 산출방법이 함께 제안되었다.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 1998년도 가을 학술발표대회 논문집(III)
• /
• pp.755-760
• /
• 1998

This study was performed to improve the evaluation of the longitudinal roughness index for various profilometers at airport runway. Especially, a laser type of profilemeter subjected to the longitudinal roughness index has been focused. The test result show that a new type of profile index, IRI(International roughness index) resulted from a laser type of profilometer was profitable for airport runway etc.. The present study provides useful results for the improvement of evaluation of the conventional profile index.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제6권5호
• /
• pp.325-332
• /
• 2014

PURPOSE. The aim of this review was to analyze the evaluation criteria on mandibular implant overdentures through a systematic review and suggest standardized evaluation criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic literature search was conducted by PubMed search strategy and hand-searching of relevant journals from included studies considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) and clinical trial studies comparing attachment systems on mandibular implant overdentures until December, 2011 were selected. Twenty nine studies were finally selected and the data about evaluation methods were collected. RESULTS. Evaluation criteria could be classified into 4 groups (implant survival, peri-implant tissue evaluation, prosthetic evaluation, and patient satisfaction). Among 29 studies, 21 studies presented implant survival rate, while any studies reporting implant failure did not present cumulative implant survival rate. Seventeen studies evaluating peri-implant tissue status presented following items as evaluation criteria; marginal bone level (14), plaque Index (13), probing depth (8), bleeding index (8), attachment gingiva level (8), gingival index (6), amount of keratinized gingiva (1). Eighteen studies evaluating prosthetic maintenance and complication also presented following items as evaluation criteria; loose matrix (17), female detachment (15), denture fracture (15), denture relining (14), abutment fracture (14), abutment screw loosening (11), and occlusal adjustment (9). Atypical questionnaire (9), Visual analog scales (VAS) (4), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) (1) were used as the format of criteria to evaluate patients satisfaction in 14 studies. CONCLUSION. For evaluation of implant overdenture, it is necessary to include cumulative survival rate for implant evaluation. It is suggested that peri-implant tissue evaluation criteria include marginal bone level, plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, and attached gingiva level. It is also suggested that prosthetic evaluation criteria include loose matrix, female detachment, denture fracture, denture relining, abutment fracture, abutment screw loosening, and occlusal adjustment. Finally standardized criteria like OHIP-EDENT or VAS are required for patient satisfaction.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.59-80
• /
• 2010

This research This research aims at developing systemic evaluation model in terms of biotope preservation through reports, literatures, and expert survey analysis by implementing biotope structure analysis in area level with selecting Hyunpoong and Yuga-myeon, Dalseong county, Daegu metropolitan city as a site. First of all, as a result of biotope type classification of research site, biotope type groups are classified into total 13, and its biotope types are divided into total 61. Also, as a result of literature analysis, total 18 items are drawn such as diversity of biotope typical species as a index item to assess the preservation value of biotope, and the first evaluation index are divided into 10 and the second ones are divided into 8 according to characteristic of index items. As a result of expert survey analysis, All 10 index items, first evaluation index, show high importance average (above 4.7). As a result of implementation of main cause for categorizing evaluation index by characteristic, there are 3 factors such as 'obstructive factor.' Based on above survey analysis result, as a result of estimating the weight of each item, 'restoration factor' showed the highest, 3.4541, but 'factor of habitat stability' showed 3.1468, which is the lowest The systemic value evaluation was set by comprehensively analyzing these results. As a result of biotope preservation value evaluation through applying research site, total 19 types which are abundant in vegetation are classified into I class, 12 types in II class, 5 types in III class, 10 types in IV class, and 15 types in V class respectively. Lastly, as a result of second evaluation, it is analyzed that there are 17 special meaningful space to preserve species and biotope(1a, 1b) and 61 meaningful space to preserve species (2a, 2b, 2c).

• 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국소음진동공학회 2007년도 추계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.630-633
• /
• 2007

This paper proposes method to find the subjective satisfaction index of an air-conditioner using consumer's sensory evaluation for an air-conditioner. A satisfaction index of an air-conditioner is presented the annoyance and freshness as ${\alphs}$, ${\beta}$ exponents of 1/f slope and is changed the annoyance and freshness as exponents of 1/f slope are changed. The satisfaction index of an air-conditioner is not improved if SPL is above the proper level although the 1/f slope has optimal ${\alpha}$, ${\beta}$ values. Therefore, this paper proposes the satisfaction index of an air-conditioner considered both SPL and ${\alpha}$, ${\beta}$ exponents of 1/f slope.

• 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국소음진동공학회 2014년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.785-790
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to identify the significant sound quality metric and compose the sound quality index of motor driven roller blind which is part of vehicle sunroof. Before subjective evaluation, sound characteristics of roller blind was analyzed and set the target operating sound for subjective evaluation. Thus, transfer sound of roller blind which has the characteristics of sound modulation was used for subjective evaluation. Linear regression was carried out by chosen Zwicker's metrics which are pointed by comments of jurors. Loudness and sharpness related metrics are prime metrics in sound quality index we composed. Effect of roller blind assay when it is attached to real vehicle was identified to evaluate the validity of index.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제13권8호
• /
• pp.3371-3380
• /
• 2012

본 논문은 기술개발지원사업의 선정 평가지표를 개발하고, 사례에 적용하여 그 타당성을 파악하고 있다. 개발된 선정평가지표의 기업선정순위와 기존 선정평가지표의 기업선정순위를 비교하여 성과를 낸 기업의 순위를 어떤 선정평가지표가 더 정확히 유추해 냈는지를 확인하고 있다. BSC 및 AHP기법을 이용하여 기술개발지원사업 선정평가지표를 개발하였다.