Development and Application of an Evaluation Model for Biotope Appraisal in terms of Species and Biotope Preservation

종과 비오톱 보전을 위한 가치평가 모형 개발 및 적용

  • Cho, Hyun-Ju (Dept. of Landscape architecture, Graduate School of Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Taek (Dept. of Landscape architecture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • SaGong, Jung-Hee (Environmental and Ecological Reserch Department, Chung-nam Development Institute) ;
  • Ra, Jung-Hwa (Dept. of Landscape architecture, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2010.07.20
  • Accepted : 2010.10.11
  • Published : 2010.10.30

Abstract

This research This research aims at developing systemic evaluation model in terms of biotope preservation through reports, literatures, and expert survey analysis by implementing biotope structure analysis in area level with selecting Hyunpoong and Yuga-myeon, Dalseong county, Daegu metropolitan city as a site. First of all, as a result of biotope type classification of research site, biotope type groups are classified into total 13, and its biotope types are divided into total 61. Also, as a result of literature analysis, total 18 items are drawn such as diversity of biotope typical species as a index item to assess the preservation value of biotope, and the first evaluation index are divided into 10 and the second ones are divided into 8 according to characteristic of index items. As a result of expert survey analysis, All 10 index items, first evaluation index, show high importance average (above 4.7). As a result of implementation of main cause for categorizing evaluation index by characteristic, there are 3 factors such as 'obstructive factor.' Based on above survey analysis result, as a result of estimating the weight of each item, 'restoration factor' showed the highest, 3.4541, but 'factor of habitat stability' showed 3.1468, which is the lowest The systemic value evaluation was set by comprehensively analyzing these results. As a result of biotope preservation value evaluation through applying research site, total 19 types which are abundant in vegetation are classified into I class, 12 types in II class, 5 types in III class, 10 types in IV class, and 15 types in V class respectively. Lastly, as a result of second evaluation, it is analyzed that there are 17 special meaningful space to preserve species and biotope(1a, 1b) and 61 meaningful space to preserve species (2a, 2b, 2c).

Keywords

References

  1. 광양시. 2006. 생태지도(Biotop Map) 및 현황도 제작 연구보고서.
  2. 김정호.한봉호. 2006. 도시생태계 구조를 고려한 비오톱 유형 구분. 한국조경학회지 34(2): 1-17.
  3. 나정화. 1999. 도시비오톱의 유형분류 및 분석에 관한 연구. 한국환경생태학회지 13(2):129-142.
  4. 나정화.도후조. 2003. 도시 중심부 지역의 비오톱 구조분석 및 평가-대구광역시 중구 사례지를 중심으로-. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 6(5):9-11.
  5. 나정화.이석철.사공정희.류연수. 2001. 생물종 및 서식지 보전의 관점에서 본 대도시의 비오톱 구조분석-대구광역시 수성구를 중심으로-. 한국조경학회지 28(6):32-42.
  6. 나정화.조현주.이현택. 2008. 경관생태계획 모형설정을 위한 기초적 연구. 한국조경학회지 34(4):48-64.
  7. 노형진. 2005. SPSS 12.0에 의한 조사방법 및 통계분석. 서울:형설출판사.
  8. 당진군. 2009. 당진군 생태현황조사(비오톱지도작성) 연구용역 보고서.
  9. 대구지역환경기술개발센터. 2008. 비오톱을 활용한 에너지 절약형 지구단위 공간구조 개선 모델링. pp.27-37.
  10. 도후조. 2001. 도시밀집지역 비오톱 구조분석-대구광역시 중구를 중심으로-. 경북대학교 석사학위논문 pp.1-6.
  11. 류연수. 2000. 도시 비오톱의 평가지표 설정. 경북대학교 석사학위논문 pp. 4-8.
  12. 사공정희. 2004. 대도시의 경관생태적 녹지연계망 구축 방안. 경북대학교 박사학위논문 pp.1-3.
  13. 성남시. 2001. 도시생태현황도(Biotop Map)제작 및 GIS 구축사업(1차년도) 연구보고서.
  14. 이석철. 1999. 도시비오톱에 대한 구조분석 및 수치지도화. 경북대학교 석사학위논문.
  15. 최일기.이은희. 2007. 독일의 비오톱 유형분류에 대한 고찰. 한국조경학회지 35(5):73-81.
  16. 최일기.오충현.이은희. 2008. 전국적 적용을 위한 비오톱유형분류 제안. 한국환경생태학회지 22(6):666-678.
  17. 최주영.김경호. 2006. 비오톱분석을 통한 택지 개발지구 보전적지 설정에 관한 연구. 한국지역사회발전학회 논문집 31(3):165-173.
  18. 한국토지공사. 2007. 대구 테크노폴리스 지방산업단지 조성사업 환경영향평가서.
  19. Bauer. G., K., Gerresheim and U. Kisker. 1976. Landschftsrahmenplan Erholungspark Ville. Beitraege zur Landesentwicklung, 35:149-173.
  20. Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land Mosaics. Cambridge University Press. pp.3-40.
  21. Kaerkes, W. 1986. Zur oekologischen Bedeutung urbaner Freiflaechen. Diss. Univ. Bochum. pp.281-284.
  22. Katarina, L., B. Cristina and I. Margareta. 2002. Biotope patterns in urban areas a conceptural model integrating biodiversity issues in spatial planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55: 223-240.
  23. LOELF. 1987. Biotopkartierung NW und Methodik und Arbeitsanleitung-Recklinghausen. pp.40-49.
  24. Marks, R. 1989. Meohoden Oekologischer Planing im Kommunalen Umweltschutz am Beispiel der Stdt Dortmund. VGFO Band 18. Goeltingen. pp.589-592.
  25. Munier, B., B. Nygaard, R. Ejrnas and H. G. Bruun. 2001. A Biotope landscape model for prediction of semi-nature vegetation in Denmark. Ecological Modelling, 139:221-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00244-7
  26. Naveh, Z., and A. Lieberman. 1994. Landscape ecology:Theory and application. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  27. Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York:McGraw Hill.
  28. Riecken, U., U. Ries and A. Ssymank. 1994. Rote Liste der gefaehrdeten Biotoptypen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Kilda-Verlag, 42-73.
  29. Sukopp, H., and S. Weiler. 1988. Biotope mapping and nature conservation strategies in urban area the Federal Republic of Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15:39-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(88)90015-1