• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.25-46
• /
• 2021

이 연구에서는 작은도서관의 활성화 및 내실화 측면에서의 평가를 통해 작은도서관 운영의 질적 수준을 향상하고 자생력을 강화하기 위하여 현행 작은도서관 평가지표 분석, 국내외 작은도서관 관련 평가지표 분석, 국내 타 관종 평가지표 분석, 작은도서관 운영자 및 관련 단체 전문가 등을 대상으로 의견수렴 등을 통해 작은도서관 평가체계 및 지표를 개선하여 제안하였다. 이 연구에서 제안된 작은도서관의 평가체계는 단위 작은도서관을 대상으로 하는 트랙 1과 기초지방자치단체 평가하는 트랙 2로 구분된다. 작은도서관의 평가지표는 트랙 1 작은도서관에 대하여 통계를 통해 확인되는 지표는 생략하고 단순화하였으며, 작은도서관 운영에 따른 도서관 경영, 도서관 인프라, 도서관 서비스의 3개 평가영역, 8개 평가항목, 10개 평가지표 100점으로 구성된 정량평가와 20점 총 120점으로 된 정성평가로 구성하였다. 트랙 2 기초지방자치단체의 평가지표는 정성평가 없이 작은도서관 정책 수립 및 시행과 작은도서관 지원 등에 관하여 도서관 경영, 도서관 인프라의 2개 평가영역, 4개 평가항목, 5개 평가지표 100점으로 구성된 정량평가로 구성되어 있다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.121-130
• /
• 2014

This study aimed at setting up the evaluation indicators system by rural village types to identify systematically the multi-valuedness embedded in rural villages. AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) was used for evaluating the relative importance weight evaluation of each indicator and quantitative analysis of rural village through computer works. The importance weight of evaluation indicators was converted into the score on the basis of maximum 1,000 point to increase the practicality. As a result, characteristics of 5 rural village types(Basic life-supporting, Agricultural promotion, Marketing/processing oriented, Urban-rural communication, Life-style choice types) differed in score of classified indicators. Also, These results are expected to be possible to quantitatively evaluate characteristics by rural village types.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제30권11호
• /
• pp.937-944
• /
• 2021

In this study, water resource topics, infrastructure, water supply, users, and economic indicators based on statistical annual standards for evaluating water welfare were selected by examining domestic and foreign water resource-related indicators. The level of water welfare was evaluated relative to 23 cities and counties in Daegu and Gyeongsangbuk-do using data from the Statistical yearbook, and places with high value of indicators urbanization and large populations were excellent in the infrastructure field, but overall analysis showed that small and medium-sized cities had higher levels. It is judged that it is necessary to develop continuous research and indicators that can evaluate and quantify the level of physical welfare that the people can feel by utilizing the results of this study. In future studies, it is necessary to systematically evaluate the level of water welfare by local governments in Korea through more diverse evaluation items and detailed indicators for each item so that it can be used as basic data for realizing water welfare.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.513-524
• /
• 2009

Urban land consolidation, which is to reform land parcels to remove fragmentation and produce ideal blocks, is an effective means for urban renewal. Successful urban land consolidation brings out great benefits to the city officials as well as general public, such as improved city image, increased land value, and more effective land use. However, urban land consolidation can be detrimental to environment, especially in the ecological aspects, while the execution of land consolidation has been focused solely on development for the sake of human benefits. To remove negative effects of urban land consolidation to the ecological system, this paper is intended to establish a set of criteria for evaluating ecological impacts of an urban land consolidation plan. Firstly, key ecological indicators are identified using a special group decision-making process called "habitual domain analysis" and then individual weighting of each indicator is recorded by analytical hierarchy process. An urban ecological evaluation model with 4 levels and 23 indicators is thus developed.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.52-69
• /
• 2006

Researchers indicates several issues as to performance evaluation methods for public health centers. Firstly, health centers are passively involved in the evaluation process, the performance indicators are activity-oriented, and mostly unrealistic. Balanced Scorecard is one of the methods for evaluating organizational performance, which is utilized at current in many industries including public sector. The purposes of this study is to apply balanced scorecard approach to a public health center and to develop performance indicators as well as their vision and strategies. For developing performance indicators, researchers selected K City Public Health Center and implemented brainstorming with members of health promotion team. Through team process they suggested goals, strategies and several indicators they considered proper to accomplish their shared vision. And then appropriateness of the indicators were evaluated by professional researchers in health promotion field for consensus building by email questionnaire. Based on survey and professional consensus meeting, 11 performance indicators were tailored in four perspectives as well as 6 strategies and 10 strategic goals, which are steps for accomplishing shared vision of health promotion team. For details, refer to the paper. Most members of health promotion team were satisfied with the indicators. However issues such as low level of recognition and familiarity with a new concept of BSC, and cultural resistance to strategic approach in public organizations should be addressed for future application and dissemination of BSC technique to public health organizations.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.85-92
• /
• 2008

The aim of this research is to develop the sentiment indicators of housing welfare for evaluating housing welfare policies conducted by the Korean government. The methods of this research are used by analysis of related documents, FGI (Focus Group Interview), and survey. The survey was made by experts and consumers. To analyze the survey, this research also uses confirmatory factor analysis by SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science) program, AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) by Expert Choice program, frequency, average, percentages, Factor analysis etc. As a result of this research, selected housing welfare indicators are settled as follows: In the housing welfare aspect, 11 indicators in the department of 'Housing Satisfaction' and 11 indicators in the department of 'Community Satisfaction' (22 in total) are suggested. The indicators are 1) Water Supply and Distribution Equipment 2) Heating equipment 3) the size of the exclusive residential area 4) the number of rooms 5) Ventilation and Lighting 6) Sound Insulation (Indoor Noise) 7) Air Pollution/Odor 8) House Deposit 9) Rent Paid 10) Maintenance (Dwelling) Cost 11) The length of Occupation 12) Proximity to Welfare Facilities 13) Educational Environment 14) Convenience of Facilities (shops, hospitals etc.) 15) Convenience of Transportation and Commuting 16) Distance from Workplace 17) Landscape and Green Space (Tree, Flowers, Grass etc.) 18) Vandalism (Destruction Behavior, graffiti etc.) 19) Privacy 20) Noise in Public Places (Drinking, Loudly Talking etc.) 21) Safety from Crime 22) Safety from a Disaster. As of 2007, the housing welfare sentiment index is measured by the survey of 1,000 inhabitants in the public housing, which shows 3.51.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.97-120
• /
• 2008

경쟁력 향상과 생산성 제고의 도구로서 디지털 환경에 적합한 새로운 전문도서관 평가지표 개발의 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 특히, 전문도서관의 경우 다른 도서관과 달리 다양한 주제적 배경을 가지고 있고, 1인 운영 소규모 도서관도 많다는 특성을 충분히 고려하여 평가지표가 개발되어야 한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 2007년에 작성된 전문도서관 평가지표를 기초로 하여 이해하기 쉽고 적용 가능성이 높은 새로운 평가지표를 개발하였다. 개발된 전문도서관 평가지표는 선행연구와 타관종의 평가지표를 충분히 검토하였으며, 다양한 주제 분야 전문도서관 소속 전문가들의 의견이 반영될 수 있도록 수차례의 회의를 거쳐 완성되었다. 새 평가지표의 개발 후 타당성과 실효성을 검증하기 위해 평가지표 타당성 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 아울러 일부 전문도서관을 대상으로 모의평가도 실시하였다. 개발된 평가지표로 전문도서관 운영평가를 정착시킨다면, 새 평가지표는 전문도서관의 현재 수준을 파악하고 개선하여 미래 지향적 전문도서관 육성에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제51권4호
• /
• pp.5-34
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 도서관의 교육적 가치를 평가할 수 있는 평가지표를 개발하고자 하였으며, 이를 위해 1차적으로 도서관의 가치에 대해 연구한 60여 개의 국내 외 논문들을 총체적으로 분석하여 예비 평가지표를 도출하였다. 도출한 예비 평가지표를 토대로 10명의 전문가를 선정하여 3차에 걸친 델파이조사를 실시하여 최종평가지표를 개발하였다. 도서관의 교육적 가치의 최종평가지표는 크게 리터러시 개선, 학습 및 교육지원, 연구지원 및 정보자원제공, 교육환경 및 교육의 질 개선, 역량강화 등의 5가지 평가영역과, 13개 평가항목, 62개 평가지표로 구성된다. 향후에는 이를 기반으로 실제로 도서관의 교육적 가치를 측정하는 연구가 수행되어야 할 것으로 보인다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.181-214
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 도서관의 사회적 가치를 평가할 수 있는 평가지표를 개발하고자 하였으며, 이를 위해 1차적으로 도서관의 가치에 대해 연구한 60여 개의 국내 외 논문들을 총체적으로 분석하여 예비 평가지표를 도출하였다. 도출한 예비 평가지표를 토대로 11명의 전문가를 선정하여 3차에 걸친 델파이조사를 실시하여 최종평가지표를 개발하였다. 최종평가지표는 공공도서관의 사회적 가치를 크게 지역 사회개발, 지역 사회의 연계, 지역 주민의 삶의 질 향상, 지역 주민의 평등화, 지역 사회에 필요한 정보제공서비스 등의 5가지 평가영역과, 13개 평가항목, 64개 평가지표로 구성된다. 향후에는 이를 기반으로 공공도서관의 사회적 가치를 측정하는 연구가 수행되어야 할 것으로 보인다.

• 보건의료산업학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.219-229
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to introduce the web database for healthy city Wonju that contains healthy city indicators and materials. It has provided diverse information to public officers who are working on healthy city projects and citizens for monitoring and evaluating the projects, effectively. The web database was made on 2006 and was updated on 2009. The new Web database system was designed for supporting that the staffs of healthy city can manage all data update by themselves. The new Web database encompasses more recent information about health city projects. After identifying users' needs and reasons for modifying the fields of data, we added new indicators to the Web database. Some redundant indicators were deleted based on users' requests. The Web database quality evaluations were performed by using 13 quality evaluations constructs. Through all 13 constructs, less than 20% of study subjects felt that it did not satisfy their needs or expectations. Well developed and verified contents of the Web database for healthy city are very essential and important. The database makes healthy city projects alive by managing and sharing healthy city related data and indicators effectively.